belle upgrade r&d: recent developments @ uhidlab/presentations/bgm_mar03.pdf · belle upgrade...
TRANSCRIPT
Belle Upgrade R&D: Recent Developments @ UH
Gary S. VarnerUniversity of Hawai
,i
Belle General MeetingMarch 2003
1Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
What’s New?
• MTS1 Fabrication – Arrived beginning of year– TOP/precision timing readout candidate
• STRAW2 Fabrication– Another precision timing option– Built in TWC/Pile-up handling
• COPPER Eval board– High speed FE electronics emulator
• What next
2Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Time-to-Time – Clocked and MTDC
2ns
e- e-
Sample edges with 500ps resolution
3Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
TS + MTDC Performance
• ~20ps jitter
σ = 22.5ps+50ps
-50ps
4Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Works Well, Why Change?
• LRS Demise– Unobtainium– Use new generation of
precision, low deadtime multi-hit TDCs
– Form-factor• Lower card costs, many channels• FINESSE/COPPER (PMC)
– For TOP want multi-hit truly deadtimeless
• Min. δT >= 10ns (HPTDC) [5ns typ.]
– Reference to RF bunch and self-calibration
32 LVDS inFINESSE
COPPER interface
5Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Electronics – scenarios
Bar TOP
~5mm pos. resolution: 40 Ch/counter
Butterfly TOP
*200 counters = 1440 channelsMulti-hit (hidden cost) >1440 channels
Focusing DIRC
~few mm x few mm: few kCh/counter
*~100 counters: few 100k channels
~1mm pos. resolution: 200 Ch/counter
*180 counters = 36,000 channels
6Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Time Stretcher Module
• Designed
with LRS
– R&D 100 Award
VIPA StandardModule
16 Channels/1 per DC
Stretch factor20x
RF clockReference
7Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
MTS1 Layout
•Presented at 3rd Belle Upgrades Meeting
• Sent for Fab. Sept 16, back mid-Dec.
•Agilent 0.5µm process
8Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
MTS1 Silicon (1)
LVDS Rx
LVDS Tx
9Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
MTS1 Silicon (2)
Completely differential
signal routing
10Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Evaluation Board
CPLD (programmable
logic)MTS1 chip
Bottom view
Top view TTL-LVDS translator
• Quick and simple test board – avoid complexity unless MTS1 shown to work – found bias changes!
11Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Test Station
Bottom view
GPIB -Ethernet
• Software readout works – but very slow (1/4 Hz)
12Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
TS SPICE Output
Ramp
Output to TDC
Ref
Input:4:1 Stretch
Ratio
25ps 100ps lsb
13Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Output Signal
• Measured with a 5GSa/s scope (500MHz ABW) ……200ps/sample
14Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
TS SPICE Simulation
• Simple fit:
Time Stretcher SPICE Simulation
y = 3.7503x + 4.9388R2 = 1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33
Input Time difference [ns]
Str
etch
ed T
ime
[ns]
15Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
MTS1 Timing Residuals
SF~15 for this test
(scope optimization)
40MHz RF clock
• After trying many things, still getting clock feedthrough – however can be simply calibrated
16Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
MTS1 Timing Residuals
σ ~ 49ps
RMS ~ 51ps
• However, this value includes the (large) system jitter
17Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
System Jitter
σ ~ 49.5ps
22meas JitterMTS1
σσσ −=
22 )5.49()3.51( −=
Use RMS value
σ ~ 13.5ps
• Don’t believe it, but promising and impetus to put together a better test system
18Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Direct Residuals Comparison
• Comparable: MTS1 Time Stretcher residuals2002/07/26 14.06
σ = 22.5ps
Residual Timing (ns)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
IDEntriesMeanRMS
101 16
0.4500E-02 0.2199E-01
0.3788 / 1Constant 6.085Mean 0.6607E-02Sigma 0.2633E-01
tsref3.ntp
σ = 26.3ps
RMS = 22.0ps
LRS module test
MTS1 Simulation
19Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Time Walk Correction
• Reasonable functional form– But as background increases…
tFixed threshold
V
T0
Twc
ADCGate
Q
Sensitive to “3 Effects”
• Many ideas: e.g. direct digitization at high speed?
20Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
STRAW2 Chip Self-Triggered Recorder Analog Waveform (STRAW)
16 Channels of256 deep SCA buckets
Optimized for RF inputMicrostrip 50Ω
Follow-on to the ATWDChip (LBL)
Target input Bandwidth:>700MHz
-LL and HL (adj.) for each channel
Sampling Rate:1-2GSa/s (adj.)
-Multiplicity triggerfor LL hits
On-chip ADC:12-bit, >2MSPS
Primary application:Askaryan-effect RFUHE cosmic detectors External option:
MUXed Analog out
Sampling Rates>~8GSa/s possiblew/ 0.25µm process
8192 analog storage cells
Die:~2.5mm2 Possible to get rid of TDC: muegamma
Self-Triggering:
21Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA)
M. R
osen, Univ. of H
awaii
ANITAGondola &
Payload
Antenna array
Cover (partially cut away)
Solar Panels
• ANITA Goal: Pathfinding mission for GZK neutrinos
• NASA SR&T funded Nov. 2002, launch in 2006
22Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
STRAW2 Evaluation
• RF signal input
• Adjustable: 0.6 –3.4 GSa/s
• 256 samples (70 –300ns)
23Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
RF Response
• Sub-ns transient ping: <= 100ps leading edge
Scope ET sampling:100 Gsa/s equiv.
24Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
πβ Domino Chip (thanks to S. Ritt)
C. Brönnimann et al., NIM A420 (1999) 264
Existing:• 0.5 – 1.2 GHz sampling
speed• 128 sampling cells• Readout at 5 MHz, 12 bit• ~ 60 $/channel
Needed:• 2.5 GHz sampling speed• Circular domino wave• 1024 sampling cells• 40 MHz readout
Existing:• 0.5 – 1.2 GHz sampling
speed• 128 sampling cells• Readout at 5 MHz, 12 bit• ~ 60 $/channel
Needed:• 2.5 GHz sampling speed• Circular domino wave• 1024 sampling cells• 40 MHz readout
Pile up handling
25Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
TOF Counter Test
STRAW2 (uncal.) vs. TDS scope
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time [ns]
STR
AW
[V],
scop
e[sc
aled
V]
scope (4GSa/s)STRAW2
TOF Counter, FM-PMT
STRAW2 chip sampling @ 3.3 Gsa/s
@ 3.3 Gsa/s, 15 samples on 5ns
risetime leading edge
26Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Precision Timing Estimate
• Time base stability– Jitter tiny (<= 10ps?)– Can phase lock to KEK-B RF clock
• Leading edge fitting– A la g-2 (NIM …)– Completely immune to backsplash– Significant robustness for pile-up– True multi-hit extraction– New way to get at systematics limitation
• Crude estimate:– For 300ps steps, 100mV min sensitivity in threshold region:
– 5mV quantization extrapolation 15ps resolution– Needs real evaluation – can test with good DSO
27Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
FIFOFIFO
FIFOFIFO
FIFOFIFO
FIFOFIFO
MemoryMemory
CPUCPU
Bridge
Local Bus PCI Bus
VME-9U Module
Det
ecto
r Si
gnal
s
User I/OUser I/O
User I/OUser I/O
User I/OUser I/O
User I/OUser I/O
Trigger inputTrigger interrupt
BridgeBridge
Mezzanine Cards
PCI Mezzanine Cards
ControlControl BridgeBridge
USB 2.0
Rear B
oard
FINESSE
SPIGOT
COPPER
Performance Evaluation
•Develop “evaluation” FINESSE (to exercise COPPER), as well as “test data” FINESSE for Sub-detector software tests
28Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
CuEval FINESSE
• Front-end INstrumentation Entity for Sub-detector Specific Electronics
Dual 128kB RAM480 Mbps USB2.0
COPPER Interface
Hardware “ready” – Yangheng working on USB drivers
29Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Summary
• MTS1 Future– Some work on linearity needed, multi-hit functioning– Proper test board, CAMAC readout (<<50ps intrinsic noise)– Unfortunately Agilent 0.5µm no longer supported by MOSIS– Enough for prototyping (~20 chips), but may want to migrate to
TSMC 0.35µm process [MTS2]– CFD ASIC upstream [BCFD1]
• STRAW2 Future– STRAW3 (fix known bugs)– COW (Completely Oversampled Waveform) chip– Experiment with achievable time resolution for TOF counter (&
TOP prototype eventually…)
• CuEval prototype– TOP readout, APV25 readout, …
And…
30Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Thoughts on the Future (1)
• Monolithic Pixel Detector– STAR prototype under test at UH:
8 cm
l 20 µm square pixels
λ5 chips per slat
λ90 million pixels
λ40 µm thick chips
Fang working on, Plan pixel proto(TSMC process)This fiscal year
(if get Nichi-bei funds) 20µm2 pixel proto
Many thanks to S. Kleinfelder (UC Irvine),& F. Bieser, H. Matis & H. Wieman (LBNL)
31Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Thoughts on the Future (2)
• Composite Pixel Detector– XTEST2 architecture a winner for high-speed readout
50µm
• Essentially XTEST2 architecture – 8-bits, 37 transistors ~10µm2
– 1G pixels/s P=50mW
Fab. Detector on top
32Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Back-up Slides
• Stuff for further rumination, if queried
33Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
TOP Counter
• Looks good, though Time-of-Propagation depends on photon wavelength
34Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Single Point Measurement
• Maximize R for better pointing… trigger latency
+
= δυυυ
υε)/(4.01
11 00
0
TeVW
RKAE T
r
Empirically determined
Material, aperture DecoherenceFreq.
R
• Squeeze all possible info.
35Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
COPPER Hardware
COPPER Board
FINESSE
FINESSE
FINESSE
FINESSE
VME-9U size board
PMC
PMC
PMC for CPU
Front
Rear
SPIGOT
• VME and PCI interfaces
36Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
FINESSE Hardware• Dimensions
- Depth × Width = 168.0(d) × 71.0(w) mm2.
• Layout example
COPPER side
component side
• “PMC” form factor -- compact
37Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Test Control (w/o Trig/DAQ)
Control to FIFOs
(Max. 480 Mbit/s)
USER IO card for COPPER testing
DATA to FIFOs
Trigger
Interrupt to CPU
USB 2.0
Rear Board
registers
RAM
registers
FINESSE
SPIGOT
• Use memory mapping for control + CPLD/FPGA
38Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Trex Enterprises HDTV
Located in Maui
HNEI doing prototypeDeposition work
Designing a 500M pixel array
• micro/nano crystalline Si deposit on HDTV
39Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Interesting Possibility
Top electrode
Combine both!
Would allow redundancy at higher noise rates
Some compatibility issues in choice of
circuits
40Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
Current thoughts
• Parallel efforts
Exploration/DesignEvaluation
• High Speed readout
• Pipelined readout
• Better SNR:
•improve detector
•lower noise
• TSMC submission possible (Nichi-bei request)
• Gain experience
• Understand practical limits on performance
• Feedback to design process
• Give grad students/ post-Docs some experience with pixels
41Gary S. Varner, Belle General Meeting: March 25, 2003
template
• Simple fit: