behavioral finance fnce 455 class session #8 lloyd kurtz santa clara university 1

41
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Upload: sharon-flowers

Post on 16-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

BEHAVIORAL FINANCE

FNCE 455Class Session #8Lloyd KurtzSanta Clara University

1

Page 2: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Topics

• What is Behavioral Finance?

• People Make Mistakes• Processing - The Monty Hall Problem• Decisions - The Disposition Effect

• Markets Make Mistakes• Shiller Study #1• Shiller Study #2• Shiller Study #3

• The Graham View

2

Page 3: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

What Is Behavioral Finance?

3

Page 4: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

What is behavioral finance?

“The application of psychology to financial behavior – the behavior of practitioners.”

- Shefrin

“The study of how cognitive biases and other psychological factors impact human behavior in markets.”

- Bodie, Kane, and Marcus

"The study of the influence of psychology on the behavior of financial practitioners and the subsequent effect on markets."

-Sewell

Page 5: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Even professors are human

“When we started our work together, we didn’t say we wanted to deviate from neoclassical finance. [But] we always found it really ridiculous that finance academics kept two selves: a rational self they presented in their research and teaching, and a personal self where they did what they described as irrational in their classes... No one was asking about the disconnect.” - Statman

Meir Statman and Hersh Shefrin

Page 6: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

The optimal car

Page 7: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Suboptimal cars

7

Page 8: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Utilitarian sales pitch

• I am well-educated, have had extensive professional training, and hold all appropriate professional certifications.

• I have specialized diagnostic tools and software that will help me match your portfolio’s risk to your needs and objectives.

• I monitor your portfolios and rebalance them so that you can spend your time on other things.

• I have particular expertise in _____.

• Empirical studies suggest you’ll almost certainly do better hiring me than you would on your own.

Page 9: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Value-expressive sales pitch

Because you’re

not the kind of

person who

thinks ‘good’ is

good enough.

Page 10: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Predictably irrational

“These irrationalities fall into two broad categories:

first, that investors do not always process

information correctly and therefore infer incorrect

probability distributions about future rates of return;

and second…they often make inconsistent or

systematically sub-optimal decisions...”

- Bodie, Kane, and Marcus

Page 11: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

People Make Mistakes

11

Page 12: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Processing

Page 13: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

The Monty Hall Problem

13

A thoroughly honest game-show host has placed a car behind one of three doors. There is a goat behind each of the other doors. You have no prior knowledge that allows you to distinguish among the doors. "First you point toward a door," he says. "Then I'll open one of the other doors to reveal a goat. After I've shown you the goat, you make your final choice whether to stick with your initial choice of doors, or to switch to the remaining door. You win whatever is behind the door." You begin by pointing to door number 1. The host shows you that door number 3 has a goat.

Source: Wikipedia

Page 14: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

OK, now...

14

Should you stay with Door #1 or SWITCH to Door #2?

Source: Wikipedia

Page 15: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Counterintuitive

15

“A restated version of [the Monty Hall problem] appeared in Marilyn vos Savant's Ask Marilyn question-and-answer column of Parade in September 1990. Though vos Savant gave the correct answer, … [she] estimates 10,000 readers including several hundred mathematics professors wrote in to declare that her solution was wrong. ”

Source: Wikipedia

Page 16: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

How Monty Gets Your Goat

16

Source: Wikipedia

Page 17: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Decision Tree

17

Source: Wikipedia

Page 18: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

DECISIONS

Page 19: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Disposition Effect: prediction

19

“The disposition effect is a behavioral finance theory that predicts individuals will hold their losing investments too long and sell their winning investments too soon to optimize profits.”

- Garvey and Murphy

Page 20: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Disposition Effect: evidence

Studies finding evidence of the disposition effect:

• Shefrin and Statman (1985)• Makhija (1988)• Heisler (1994)• Odean (1998)• Locke and Mann (2000)• Coval and Shumway (2001)

20

Page 21: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Why would people do that?

• The purchase price is a reference point.

• People like gains, but they hate losses.

• People don’t like to admit they’ve made a bad decision. A sale ‘ratifies’ the loss.

21

Page 22: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Garvey and Murphy

• 15 professional equity traders

• “Generated $1.4 mm in intraday trading profits” over 68 trading days, in a “downward-trending market” (3/8/2000-6/13/2000).

• 96,323 trades

• Median duration of a winning roundtrip: 64 seconds

• Median duration of a losing roundtrip: 102 seconds

22

Page 23: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Disposition effect in Taiwan

• Individual Investors: Very Strong• Dealers: Strong• Corporate: Strong• Foreigners: No disposition effect• Mutual funds: No disposition effect• All Investors: Very Strong

23

Source: Bard Barber, Yi-Tsung Lee, Yu-Jane Liu and Terrance Odean. “Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realize Losses? Evidence from Taiwan.”

Page 24: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Markets Make Mistakes

24

Page 25: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Robert Shiller

• Yale economist• Pioneer in behavioral finance

• Recent research has focused on valuations in the equity and housing markets.

25

Source: Newsweek, 1/27/2005

Page 26: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Shiller on volatility

26

“There will always be bubbles.”

Source: Newsweek, 1/27/2005

Page 27: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Shiller’s three shots

#1 – S&P 500 Dividends and Prices

#2 – S&P 500 Cyclically-Adjusted P/E Ratio

#3 – Home Prices

27

Page 28: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

#1 – The market is too volatile

• Shiller (1981) argues the market is too volatile when compared with economic fundamentals.

• With 20-20 hindsight, Shiller was able to compute ‘rational’ prices for stocks using a dividend discount model for the 1871-1979 time period.

• Real prices were more than 5x times as volatile as ‘rational’ prices.

• BD&K: “If true, this finding would be an outright refutation of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and must result from irrational investment behavior.”

28

Page 29: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

#1 – The market is too volatile

29

Page 30: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

BK&M on Shiller (1981)

“Since earnings are far more volatile than dividends, the volatility of rational prices will be much larger in [an earnings-based model]...[and therefore] will indicate that actual prices do not exhibit excess volatility.”

30

Page 31: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

#2 – Stock market bubbles

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Year

Pri

ce-E

arni

ngs

Rat

io (

CA

PE

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Lon

g-T

erm

Int

eres

t Rat

es

19011966

2000

Price-Earnings Ratio

Long-Term Interest Rates

1981

1921

1929

23.29

31

Originally created for the 2000 book Irrational Exuberance

Page 32: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

#3 – Home prices (1880 – 2010)

0

50

100

150

200

250

1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Year

Inde

x or

Int

eres

t Rat

e

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Pop

ulat

ion

in M

illi

ons

Home Prices

Building CostsPopulation

Interest Rates

32

Source: Robert Shiller

Page 33: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

The Graham View

33

Page 34: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Graham’s critique

• Prices are more volatile than intrinsic valuations [e.g., dividends and book values are relatively stable].

• Much of this volatility is the product of irrational behavior on the part of other investors.

• An unjustified fall in price increases expected return.

34

Page 35: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Buffett explains Mr. Market

35

“Ben Graham, my friend and teacher, long ago described the mental attitude toward market fluctuations that I believe to be most conducive to investment success. He said that you should imagine market quotations as coming from a remarkably accommodating fellow named Mr. Market who is your partner in a private business. Without fail, Mr. Market appears daily and names a price at which he will either buy your interest or sell you his...”

Warren Buffett, 1987 Chairman’s Letter

Page 36: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Mr. Market: happy

“...at times he feels euphoric and can see only the favorable factors affecting the business. When in that mood, he names a very high buy-sell price because he fears that you will snap up his interest and rob him of imminent gains...”

36

Page 37: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Mr. Market: sad

“...at other times he is depressed and can see nothing but trouble ahead for both the business and the world. On these occasions he will name a very low price, since he is terrified that you will unload your interest on him...”

37

Page 38: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

The best thing about Mr. Market

38

“He doesn't mind being ignored. If his quotation is uninteresting to you today, he will be back with a new one tomorrow. Transactions are strictly at your option. Under these conditions, the more manic-depressive his behavior, the better for you.”

Page 39: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Therefore...

“The investor who permits himself to be stampeded or unduly worried by unjustified market declines in his holdings is perversely turning his basic advantage into a basic disadvantage. That man would be better off if his stocks had no market quotation at all, for he would then be spared the mental anguish caused him by other persons’ mistakes of judgment.” -Graham

39

Page 40: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

Graham and theorists agreeMarkets are pretty efficient

• EMH Theorists: yes• Graham: yes

Most people would be better off in an index fund• EMH Theorists: yes• Graham: yes

Markets may move because of human emotions • EMH Theorists: yes, appetite for risk can change over time• Graham: yes, fear creates undervalued securities

Short-term market-timing is likely to be fruitless• EMH Theorists: yes, because markets are so efficient• Graham: yes, because it encourages a speculative mindset

A sucessful investor needs discipline and willpower• EMH Theorists: yes – to pursue an indexing strategy• Graham: yes – to purchase undervalued securities when others are afraid

40

Page 41: BEHAVIORAL FINANCE FNCE 455 Class Session #8 Lloyd Kurtz Santa Clara University 1

DisagreementsThere is such a thing as an ‘unjustified’ move in the price of a stock

• EMH Theorists: no• Graham: yes

Buying stocks that appear inexpensive is a lower-risk activity than buying stocks that appear expensive

• EMH Theorists: no• Graham: yes

There are reasonably simple techniques that could offer superior investment results over time:

• EMH Theorists: no• Graham: yes

Adjusting stock market exposure based on an awareness of valuations could be the basis for good investment decisions over time.

• EMH Theorists: no• Graham: yes

41