before the hon’ble...
TRANSCRIPT
PRESENTATION ON
NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY AUTHORITY
BEFORE THE
HON’BLE MINISTER 14 JULY, 2016. MOEFCC, NEW DELHI.
Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Objectives:
1. Conservation of biological diversity;
2. Sustainable use of its components;
3. Fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of
genetic resources.
Functions of NBA (Sec. 18)
• Grant approval for access of bioresoources
• Advise Central/State Government on above three objectives
• Issue guidelines
• To oppose grant of IPR outside India on any bioresource obtained from India.
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change
National Biodiversity Authority
(Established by the Central Government)
State Biodiversity Boards
(Established by the State Governments)
Biodiversity Management Committees
(Established by the Local Bodies)
Sl.No. States SBSAPs State
specific
Rules
Threatened
Species
notifications
(Sec.38)
No. of
BMCs
No. of
PBRs
1. Andhra Pradesh 928 28
2. Arunachal Pradesh 43 -
3. Assam 171 6
4. Bihar - -
5. Chhattisgarh 27 7
6. Goa 54 -
7. Gujarat 3,405 133
8. Haryana - -
9. Himachal Pradesh 155 -
10. Jammu & Kashmir - -
11. Jharkhand 66 11
12. Karnataka 4,636 468
13. Kerala 1,043 758
14. Madhya Pradesh 23,743 704
15. Maharashtra 890 37
SBBs- BMCs- PBRs: CURRENT SCENARIO
Sl.No. States SBSAPs State
specific
Rules
Threatened
Species
notifications
(Sec.38)
No. of
BMCs
No. of
PBRs
16. Manipur 52 10
17. Meghalaya 94 -
18. Mizoram 221 3
19. Nagaland 10 -
20. Odisha 230 76
21. Punjab 55 -
22. Rajasthan 31 -
23. Sikkim 13 -
24. Tamil Nadu 16 -
25. Telangana 710 9
26. Tripura 217 126
27 Uttar Pradesh 32 11
28. Uttarakhand 751 22
29. West Bengal 176 76
TOTAL 24
States
22
States
16
States
37,769
(26 States)
2,485
(17 States)
Cont……
Sl.No Union Territories SBSAPs Threatened
Species
Notifications
(Sec.38)
No. of
BMCs
No. of
PBRs
1. Andaman And Nicobar
2. Chandigarh
3. Dadra And Nagar Haveli
4. Daman And Diu
5. Lakshadweep
6. NCT of Delhi
7. Puducherry
TOTAL 4 UTs 2 UTs
UNION TERRITORIES
I. CONSERVATION
The State Government may declare areas of biodiversity importance as Biodiversity Heritage Sites.
(Sec. 37). NBA has issued guidelines for the identification of BHS.
- 7 BHS notified in three States
The Central Government, in consultation with the concerned State Government, to notify certain specie
s of plants and animals, as a threatened species (Sec. 38). NBA developed a methodology through an
expert committee for notification of threatened species.
- notified in 16 States and 2 Union Territories
As per Section 41 of the Act read with Rule 22 (6) of the Rules, 2004, the main function of the
BMCs is to prepare People’s Biodiversity Registers (PBRs) in consultation with local people. NBA
has issued a guidelines on this in 2009 and updated in 2013.
- 2485 PBRs have been documented in 17 states
The Central Government designate institutions/ organizations from time to time as repositories for safe
custody of representative samples as voucher specimens of the biological resources accessed in
accordance with the provisions contained under section 39. A guidelines to keep Safe custody of
voucher specimen has been issued in March 2016.
- 15 Institutions designated
ACHIEVEMENTS
II. SUSTAINABLE USE
• Regulating access to BR for commercial utilization u/s 3 &19
Source (cultivated or wild)
Rare/endemic/ endangered/ threatened
Species in CITES appendices
• Notification of Bioresources Normally Traded as Commodities (u/s 40).
- A revised list of 385 species notified.
- Parts of the plants, source & common name.
- Items traded as a matter of common practice are also NTC
ACHIEVEMENTS
• Guidelines on Access to Biological Resources and Associated Knowledge and Benefits
Sharing Regulations, 2014 have been notified on 21st November, 2014.
The Regulations provide for:
legal certainty
clarity and transparency
simplified procedure to the Indian researchers / Govt. institutes to carry out basic
research outside India
options of benefit sharing for different users
graded benefit sharing
establishing supply chain from source to manufacturer
upfront payment on high economic valued bio-resources
(Red sanders, Sandal etc.)
apportioning accrued benefits to the community/ BMC.
III. FAIR AND EQUITABLE SHARING OF BENEFITS
ACHIEVEMENTS
What are all the Activities Covered
under the Act?
Biological Resource and/or associated knowledge
Activities Persons u/s 3 (2) Persons u/s 7
Research NBA -NA-
Bio-survey and Bio-utilization
NBA SBB
Commercial utilization
NBA SBB
Intellectual Property Rights
NBA NBA
Transfer of research results NBA NBA
Third party transfer of BR & AK NBA -NA-
1. Commercial Utilization:
2. Transfer of results of research , the benefit sharing obligation is 3.0 to 5.0% of the monetary
consideration.
3. Intellectual Property Rights :
Benefit sharing component
Annual Gross ex-factory sale of product Benefit sharing component
Up to Rupees 1,00,00,000 0.1 %
Rupees 1,00,00,001 up to 3,00,00,000 0.2 %
Above Rupees 3,00,00,000 0.5 %
If applicant himself commercialize the process/product/innovation
0.2 – 1.0% of Annual Ex-factory gross sale (minus govt. taxes)
If applicant assigns / licenses the process / product / innovation to a third party for commercialization
3.0 – 5.0 % of the fee received in any form. And 2.0 – 5.0 % of Royalty
4. Transfer of accessed boresources and AK, the benefit sharing obligation is 2.0 to 5.0% (following
sectoral approach) of any amount and / or royalty received from the transferee.
Form Category Applications
received
Agreements
signed
Form I Access to Biological resources and
associated traditional knowledge
252
71
Form II Transferring the results of research to
foreign nationals, companies, NRI’s for
commercial purposes.
43
13
Form III Seeking Intellectual Property Right
821
147
Form IV Third Party transfer of the accessed
biological resources and associated
traditional knowledge.
80
28
Total 1196 259*
Form-B Conducting of non-commercial
research or research for emergency
purposes outside India by Indian
researchers/ Government institutions
12
7
Status of Applications on ABS
* Out of 814 applications cleared by NBA, so far 259 agreements have been executed.
Benefit Sharing (royalty, upfront payment, etc) earned
1.Benefit sharing received - 34.26 Crores
a. Export of Red sanders - 32.00 crores
b. Others - 1.84 crores
2. Application fee received - 43.28 Lakhs
Access and Benefit Sharing Chair- Shri Ramesh G. Kalaghatgi, I.F.S,
Biodiversity Management Committees
Chair- Smt. Gayatri Ramachandran, I.A.S.(Retd.)
Red Sanders Chair- Shri B.Vijayan, I.A.S.(Retd.)
Expert Committees (sec 13(2) of the Act & r/w Rule 11 of the BD Rules)
Revise the existing Agreement Formats Chair- Dr R.S.Rana
Normally Traded Commodities Chair – Shri D.K. Ved, I.F.S (Retd.)
Medicinal Plants Chair – Dr. Amarjeet Ahuja IAS., (Retd.)
Agro-Biodiversity Chair- Dr R.S.Rana
Financial Year Grant – in – Aid Released (Rs. in cr.) Actual Expenditure
(Rs. in cr.)
2003 - 04 0.80 0.09
2004 - 05 0.71 0.59
2005 - 06 1.36 1.36
2006 - 07 2.08 1.40
2007 - 08 2.14 1.90
2008 - 09 2.87 2.78
2009 - 10 2.97 2.97
2010 - 11 5.33 3. 99
2011 - 12 9.37 7.22
2012 - 13 10.49 8.07
2013 - 14 38.85 24.67
2014 - 15 33.89 24.77
2015 - 16 18.06 16.96
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
02468
10121416182022242628303234363840
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
0.8 0.71 1.36 2.08 2.14 2.87 2.97 5.33
9.37 10.49
38.85
33.89
18.06
0.99 0.59 1.36 1.4 1.9 2.78 2.97 3.99
7.22 8.07
24.67 24.77
16.96
Grant in Aid released (Rs. in Cr.) Actual Expenditure (Rs. In cr.)
COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS
UNDP Project: ‘Institutional Strengthening
for Implementation of Biological Diversity
Act’
MP, JH Completed
GEF direct access project NR5 and NBAP Addendum Completed
UNEP GEF MoEFCC - ABS Project WB, AP, TS, TR, KA, Goa,
HP, Sikkim, OR, GJ
Ongoing
Indo - Norwegian Centre for Biodiversity
Policy and Law (CEBPOL)
Ongoing
GoI - UNDP Biodiversity Finance Initiative
(BIOFIN) - India
Ongoing
ASEAN Capacity Building programme Approved, to
commence
Indo- German GIZ project on ABS TN, MH, UK Approved, to
commence
KFW project in North-East Nagaland, Assam Under
discussion
Development of PIF for GEF-6 on
mainstreaming of biodiversity
Under
preparation
Review Meetings of State Biodiversity Boards conducted on 10th May 2016 at
Chennai for Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Kerala, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil
Nadu, Telengana
Review Meetings of State Biodiversity Boards conducted on 6th June 2016
at New Delhi for Chathisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh,
Uttara Pradesh, Punjab, Rajastan, Jharkhand and Uttarakhand
Review Meetings of State Biodiversity Boards will be conducted during 3rd
week of July 2016 for the North East States of India
Organised and Participated Media Workshop to engage the media on
discoursed on “National Biodiversity Targets and Biodiversity Act” in
collaboration with Centre for Environmental Communication on 7th June at
New Delhi and 14th June at Chennai
In collaboration with DBT and BCIL Awareness workshops on Guidelines for
Access to Biological resources under Biodiversity Act 2002 being conducted at
6 different cites (New Delhi, Pune, Kolkata, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Bangaluru)
13th June 2016
Year
Medium Term Long Term
2016 – 17 2017 - 18 2018 - 19 2019 - 20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Capital - 25.00 25.00 - - - - - -
Revenue - - - - - - - - -
Recurring 13.00 28.00 32.00 31.00 28.00 31.00 35.00 39.00 43.00
Non-
Recurring
5.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00
Total 18.00 63.00 68.00 43.00 42.00 47.00 53.00 59.00 65.00
PROJECTION OF FINANCIAL RESOURCES REQUIREMENT ** (MEDIUM/LONG TERM)
(Rs. in crores)
** Includes proposed network programme on Invasive Alien species and
endangered species
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths
BD Act’s Institutional framework
Decentralized implementation
and grassroots linkages
Mainstream objective
Weakness
Inadequate capacity of
stakeholders at SBB and BMC
level
Inadequate awareness among
stakeholders
Lack of enforcement mechanism
Opportunities
Capacity building
Stakeholder engagements
Bilateral & Multilateral Projects
Threats
Complexity of issues
Lack of case laws
Lack overall precedence
Challenges
• Pan India coverage
• Slow formation of BMCs & PBRs
• Inadequate awareness among stakeholders
• Inadequate capacity of stakeholders, especially SBBs and BMCs
• Building trust among stakeholders
• Mainstreaming of biodiversity
• Receipt of incomplete applications
• Complexity of issues and no precedence elsewhere, no case laws
• Notification u/s 37, 38 – link to action
• State Rules not in consonance with the BD Act
• Constitution of BMCs at local level in different states and union territories
• Monitoring the post approval compliance by the user of BR/AK
• Utilization of Benefit sharing with the benefit claimers
Way ahead
• Continual engagement with stakeholders (CSOs, Business, Academia, Research institutions and Government Departments)
• Sector-specific training programmes and awareness initiatives
UNDP global project (Scientific and R&D sector)
Awareness to researchers / scientists / institutions with the collaboration of DBT through CEBPOL project
• Development of online application
• Preparation of SBSAPs and SBTs
• Building capacity different stakeholders
• Pursuing formations of BMCs & PBRs
• Approved posts of 58 still pending
• Outreach through NBA quarterly news letter