bed load extraction with vortex tubes

1
Bed load extraction with vortex tubes Bed load aggradations in the headrace channels upstream of a hydropower plant at the Limmat River had required intensive maintenance work. As the bedload transported to the powerhouse can cause both damages to turbines and operational disturbances those aggradations are undesired effects of flood events. Therefore, an alternative solution with vortex tubes was investigated in order to obtain an efficient and permanent supply of sediment to the residual flow reach. A vortex tube is a horizontal element below a channel with an intake slot along its longitudinal axis. As vortex tubes are currently not part of a standard design to extract bedload upstream of power plants, a physical model (scale 1:35) was used to test three different tube configurations in terms of their extracting efficiency, hydraulic behavior and operational criteria. Bed load extraction with vortex tubes Keywords: Bed load extraction, vortex tubes Commissioned by: Limmatkraftwerke AG, Baden 1 of 1 Vortex tube type "Omega" in the physical model (Q=500m3/s). A point bar adapted upstream of the structure, that reaches the upper slot edge. A prototype of the vortex tube realized at the power plant “Schiffmühle” at the river Limmat, Switzerland. The hydraulic tests showed that the principle of vortex tubes is suited for the extraction of transported sediment. The results demonstrated extracting rates over 95 % under appropriate hydraulic conditions. The extracting efficiency was particularly affected by tube discharge, vortex intensity, channel Froude number and sediment load. In addition, the tube geometry is dependent on sediment size, channel width and economical aspects. The best results in terms of efficiency were obtained by the tube-type “Omega”. As exposition of the tubes leads to narrowing of the cross-section and flow separation, it is recommended to place the tube’s top edge in the same height as the bed level. For a bended open chan- nel reach a deflection angle of 60° against the main flow direction gave the best results. Q e Section A-A Plan view Section B-B D Θ α L T t A A B B Θ α L T length of vortex tube D inner tube diameter t slot width e difference in height between upper and lower slot edge inclination of tube axis angle between tube axis and main flow direction

Upload: others

Post on 04-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bed load extraction with vortex tubes

Bed load extraction with vortex tubes

Bed load aggradations in the headrace channels upstream of a hydropower plant at the Limmat River had required intensive maintenance work. As the bedload transported to the powerhouse can cause both damages to turbines and operational disturbances those aggradations are undesired effects of flood events. Therefore, an alternative solution with vortex tubes was investigated in order to obtain an efficient and permanent supply of sediment to the residual flow reach. A vortex tube is a horizontal element below a channel with an intake slot along its longitudinal axis.

As vortex tubes are currently not part of a standard design to extract bedload upstream of power plants, a physical model (scale 1:35) was used to test three different tube configurations in terms of their extracting efficiency, hydraulic behavior and operational criteria.

Bed load extraction with vortex tubes

Keywords: Bed load extraction, vortex tubesCommissioned by: Limmatkraftwerke AG, Baden

1 of 1

Vortex tube type "Omega" in the physical model (Q=500m3/s). A point bar adapted upstream of the structure, that reaches the upper slot edge.

A prototype of the vortex tube realized at the power plant “Schiffmühle” at the river Limmat, Switzerland.

The hydraulic tests showed that the principle of vortex tubes is suited for the extraction of transported sediment. The results demonstrated extracting rates over 95 % under appropriate hydraulic conditions. The extracting efficiency was particularly affected by tube discharge, vortex intensity, channel Froude number and sediment load. In addition, the tube geometry is dependent on sediment size, channel width and economical aspects.

The best results in terms of efficiency were obtained by the tube-type “Omega”. As exposition of the tubes leads to narrowing of the cross-section and flow separation, it is recommended to place the tube’s top edge in the same height as the bed level. For a bended open chan-nel reach a deflection angle of 60° against the main flow direction gave the best results.

Qe

Section A-A

Plan view

Section B-B

D

Θ

α

L T

t

A

A

B

α

LT length of vortex tubeD inner tube diametert slot widthe difference in height between

upper and lower slot edge

inclination of tube axis

angle between tube axis andmain flow direction