bed capacity planning and smoothing using computer ... · pdf filebed capacity planning and...
TRANSCRIPT
CRHE
Bed Capacity Planning and Smoothing Using Computer
Simulation on the OR Master Schedule
Michael W. CarterCentre for Healthcare Operations
Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Toronto
Brief introduction Hospital bed capacity planning Operating room Master Surgery Scheduling
2
Outline
The Importance of Health Care
Health care is North Americas largest single industry.
Estimated total spending in Canada was $219 billion (CN) in 2015. ($2.9 trillion in the US)
In Canada, in 2013, $4,569 US per person was spent on health care compared to $9,086 in US
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0
50
100
150
200
250
$ pe
r per
son
$ Bi
llion
sTotal $ $/Person
Chart1
22.3910
26.31059
30.81225
341342
36.71435
39.81542
43.31660
46.81769
511902
56.12056
612203
66.32365
69.82461
71.62495
73.12520
74.12528
74.72522
78.42623
83.72778
89.92957
97.93207.0433581092
106.33451.2043776781
1143663.9613717129
1233899.7872285683
130.34114.4419250561
1414355
1514630
1604866
1725162
1825398
1935659
1995803
2055902
Total $
$/Person
$ Billions
$ per person
Sheet1
Total $$/Person
8022.3910
8126.31059
8230.81225
83341342
8436.71435
8539.81542
8643.31660
8746.81769
88511902
8956.12056
90612203
9166.32365
9269.82461
9371.62495
9473.12520
9574.12528
9674.72522
9778.42623
9883.72778
9989.92957
0097.93207.0433581092
01106.33451.2043776781
021143663.9613717129
031233899.7872285683
04130.34114.4419250561
051414355
061514630
071604866
081725162
091825398
101935659
111995803
122055902
132095988
142166000
152196105
Sheet2
International Trends
OECD web site: www.oecd.org Dec. 2015
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 '00 '02 '04 '06 08 10 12 14
Health Spending as a % GDP
US
Canada
France
Germany
UK
Netherlands
Japan
Mexico
Belgium
CRHE Canadian Medicare (very brief)
Providers are private. Govt pays for services (like US Medicare) Covered if:
Medically necessary Done in a hospital Done by a doctor
1990 Internationally recognized leader 2000 We had slipped significantly 2008 Major funding increases improving 2012 Major funding challenges!
4 10 9 5 5 7 7 3 2 1 11 Quality Care
Effective Care Safe
Care Coordinated
Care
Patient-Centered Care
2 9 8 7 5 4 11 10 3 1 5
4 7 9 6 5 2 11 10 8 1 3
3 10 2 6 7 9 11 5 4 1 7
4 8 9 10 5 2 7 11 3 1 6
5 8 10 7 3 6 11 9 2 1 4
Access
Cost-Related Problem
Timeliness of Care
8 9 11 2 4 7 6 4 2 1 9
9 5 10 4 8 6 3 1 7 1 11
6 11 10 4 2 7 8 9 1 3 5
Efficiency 4 10 8 9 7 3 4 2 6 1 11
Equity 5 9 7 4 8 10 6 1 2 2 11
Healthy Lives 4 8 1 7 5 9 6 2 3 10 11 Health Expenditures/Capita, 2011**
$3,800
$4,522
$4,118
$4,495
$5,099
$3,182
$5,669
$3,925
$5,643
$3,405
$8,508
COUNTRY RANKINGS
Top 2*
Middle
Bottom 2*
OVERALL RANKING (2013)
AUS CAN FRA GER NETH NZ NOR SWE SWIZ UK US
Notes: * Includes ties. ** Expenditures shown in $US PPP (purchasing power parity); Australian $ data are from 2010. Source: Calculated by The Commonwealth Fund based on 2011 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults; 2012 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians; 2013 International Health Policy Survey; Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard 2011; World Health Organization; and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Health Data, 2013 (Paris: OECD, Nov. 2013).
Commonwealth Report 2014
COUNTRY RANKINGS
(4109557732111Quality CareEffective Care Safe Care Coordinated CarePatient-Centered Care29875411103154796521110813310267911541748910527113165810736119214AccessCost-Related ProblemTimeliness of Care89112476421995104863171116111042789135Efficiency4108973426111Equity5974810612211Healthy Lives4817596231011Health Expenditures/Capita, 2011**$3,800$4,522$4,118$4,495$5,099$3,182$5,669$3,925$5,643$3,405$8,508)Top 2* Middle Bottom 2*
OVERALL RANKING (2013)
AUSCANFRAGERNETHNZ NORSWESWIZ UK US
Notes: * Includes ties. ** Expenditures shown in $US PPP (purchasing power parity); Australian $ data are from 2010.
Source: Calculated by The Commonwealth Fund based on 2011 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults; 2012 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians; 2013 International Health
Policy Survey; Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard 2011; World Health Organization; and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Health Data, 2013 (Paris: OECD, Nov. 2013).
Background
Master Surgical Schedule Revised every 6-12 months Block booking OR time Major driver of resource utilization downstream
(PACU, ICU, beds) and upstream (wait lists). How can you manage the volumes? I will discuss two applications.
7
CRHE
Tian Mu Liu and Michael Carter
Hospital Bed Capacity Planning
CRHEDevelopment of Bed Allocation Model
9
Model Objective To estimate the number of beds a hospital needs during a typical week in order to provide a given level of service
We constructed a prototype: In-patient groups are categorized by: admission category,
provider service, bed group A typical week includes 21 shifts (seven days a week and
three shifts a day)
CRHEModel Overview
Use one year of historical data Model surgical patients based on a typical full week
OR schedule Model medical/emergent/urgent patients based on
random historical arrivals We do not consider ward capacity; we tell you how
many beds you need in each service We simulate several weeks, and find a range
(confidence intervals) Separate LOS: ED (admitted), ICU, ward, ALC
CRHEED Bed Demand (Regina General)
11
Admitted patients Bed Blockers: 10-17 Bed demand peaks on weekday evenings (3-4 more)
11 11 13 10 1216
12 1317
13 1316
12 1316
12 1216
12 12 14
0
5
10
15
20N
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Aver
age
Bed
s R
equi
red
CRHEICU Bed Demand
12
Number of required SCU beds range: 55-63 Bed demand is relatively consistent throughout a week
58 56 56 55 56 58 58 59 61 61 61 62 62 6263 63 63 63 61 59 59
010203040506070
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ng
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Aver
age
Bed
s R
equi
red
CRHEWard Bed Demand
13
Ward beds range: 344-370 Bed demand peaks on Thursday evening
353 347 345 344 348 351354 359 361
363 363 365 367 367 370 370 370 370 366 360 357
310320330340350360370380390
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ng
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Aver
age
Bed
s R
equi
red
CRHEAverage Demand by Service
14
2735
15
51
115
130
108
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngN
ight
Day
Eve
ning
Nig
htD
ayE
veni
ngSun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Aver
age
Num
ber o
f Bed
s R
equi
red
1 Infants2 Pregnancy & Childbirth3 Pediatrics4 Mental Health5 Surgical6 Medical
CRHE
Balancing Demand
By swapping blocks for a few surgeons, we can dramatically reduce the peaks in bed demand
Tian has created an automated procedure Surgeons can be fixed in place
15
CRHESurgical Ward and ICU beds
16
CRHERevised OR schedule
17
Revised Shift Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
OR 1 MorningPooler, Stephen Duane Meiers, Suzanne Tse, Edward T W Kaban, Gordie K Akinbiyi, Amos A
AfternoonCuddington, Gordon W