beam design
DESCRIPTION
Beam DesignTRANSCRIPT
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
1/84
BEAM DESIGN
ERT352FARM STRUCTURES
It doesnt matter what the subject is; once youvelearnt how to study, you can do anything you want.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
2/84
INTRODUCTION Steel beams of various cross-sectional shapes are
commercially available. Sections of steel beams are indicated ith a
combination of letters and a number. !"# $%& ' (%) U* ) $%& mm by (%) mm
universal beam ei"hin" )& +",m.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
3/84
N /SIS 0 O DDISTRI*UTION
oads from slab are normally de1ned in 234+N,m ) . These loads are transferred to supportin" beams
in either 2 4+N,m or 254 +N. oads from reinforced concrete solid slab#
o oads may be distributed to the supportin" beamsdependin" on the ratio of lon" side,short side of the slab6 y, 78
o Type of distribution loads from slab# One- ay spannin" slab9 hen y, 7 : ).% T o- ay spannin" slab9 hen y, 7 ; ).%
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
4/84
N /SIS 0 O D DISTRI*UTION6cont.8
oad from precastconcrete slab
o oads may bedistributed to the
supportin" beams inone direction only andnot dependin" on theratio of y, 7.
o This is becauseprecast concrete slabare one- ay spannin"as they are supportedby beams at the endsof the slab only.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
5/84
N /SIS 0 O DDISTRI*UTION 6cont.8
(. One- ay spannin" slab 6 y, 7 : ).%8o
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
6/84
N /SIS 0 O DDISTRI*UTION 6cont.8
). T o- ay spannin" slab 6 y, 7 ; ).%8o
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
7/84
!7ample (# oad distributionand beam analysis
The follo in" 1"ure sho s s =oor plan of a steel buildin". The =oor consists of precast concrete hollo core slabs.
oad carried by the slab are follo s#o Unfactored dead load from self ei"ht of precast slabs9
self ei"ht of steel beams and 1nishin" > &.% +N,m)
o Unfactored imposed load > ?.% +N,m ) Determine the ma7imum shear force and moment in beam
(, -*.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
8/84
Solution# oad distribution#
o for precast slab9 considered as one- ay spannin" and it issupported by beam * and CD.
Desi"n load9 nn > (.$&@+ A (.&B+ > (.$& 6& +N,m ) 8 A(.& 6?.% +N,m ) 8 > (). & +N,m )
Total desi"n load9 > n 7 idth of load transferred to beam (, -*
> (). & +N,m ) 7 6) m8 > )&.& +N,m
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
9/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Since beam * is simply supported and loads are
symmetry9 then#o a7imum shear force9 E !d > 6 8,)
> 6)&.& +N,m86& m8,)> 63.75 kN
o a7imum moment9 !d > 6 ) 8,F> 6)&.& +N,m86& m8 ) ,F> 79.7kNm
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
10/84
!7ample )# oad distributionand beam analysis
The follo in" 1"ure sho s the plan of a buildin". The slab is cast in-situ reinforced concrete.Unfactored dead and imposed loads are sho n onthe dra in". In addition9 beam ), -* alo carries
?m hi"h bric+ all of $ +N,m). determine thema7imum shear force and moment of beam ), -*.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
11/84
Solution# oad distribution on reinforced concrete solid slab
o Slab (# y, 7 > m,?m > (. & G ).%9 t o ay spannin"slab
o Slab )# y, 7 > m,$m > ).$ : ).%9 one ay spannin"slab
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
12/84
Solution#6cont.8 oad from slab (# beam ), -*
o Desi"n load9 n ( > (.$&@+ A (.&B+> (.$& 6& +N,m ) 8 A (.&6).%+N,m ) 8> H. &+N,m )
o Total desi"n load9 5( > n( 7 trape odial area of loadfrom slab (
> H. &+N,m) 7 J6$m A m8,) 7 )mK
> H .&+N
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
13/84
Solution#6cont.8 Since beam is simply supported and loads are
symmetry9 then#o a7imum shear force9 E !d( > 6 8,)
> 6H .& +N,m86& m8,)> 48.75 kN
o )ma > )m , m > %.)FM
o a7imum moment9 !d( > J6$ 0 ? a ) 8 ,)? 6( - a8K 5 > J6$ 0 ? 6%.)FM ) 8 ,)? 6( - %.)FM8K H .&+N
6 m8 > 106.5 kNm
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
14/84
Solution#6cont.8 oad from slab )# beam ), -*
o Desi"n load9 n ) > (.$&@+ A (.&B+> (.$& 6& +N,m ) 8 A (.&6$.%+N,m ) 8> ((.)& +N,m )
o Total desi"n load9 5) > n) 7 idth of slab )> ((.)& +N,m ) 7 (.& m> (M.H +N,m
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
15/84
Solution#6cont.8 oad from beam self ei"ht and bric+ all
o Self ei"ht of beam > ( +N,mo 5ei"ht of bric+ all per meter len"th > ei"ht of bric+ all 7 hei"ht
of all
> $ +N,m)
7 ? m > () +N,mo Total dead load9 @+ > self ei"ht of beam A ei"ht of bric+ all
> ( +N,m A () +N,m> ($ +N,m
o Desi"n load9 $ > (.$&@+ > (.$&6($+N,m8 > ( .&& +N,m
o Total desi"n load for slab )9 bric+ all and self ei"ht of beam9? > ) A $ > (M.H +N,m A ( .&& +N,m
> $?.& +N,m
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
16/84
Solution#6cont.8 Since beam * is simply supported and loads are
symmetry9 then#o a7imum shear force9 E !d) > 6 8,)
> 6$?.& +N,m86 m8,)> 120.75 kN
o a7imum moment9 !d) > 6 ) 8,F> 6$?.& +N,m86 m8 ) ,F> 211.3 kNm
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
17/84
Solution#6cont.8 oad combination from slab ( and slab )
o The ma7imum shear force and moment from beam ), -*is obtained by combinin" the loads from slab ( and slab) to"ether as follo #
o a7imum shear force9 E !d > E !d( A E !d)> ?F. & A ()%. &> 169.5 kN
o a7imum moment9 !d > !d( A !d)> (%M.& A )((.$> 317.8 kNm
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
18/84
*eam Desi"n Section Classi1cation
o ny steel beam sections that are sub ect to compression due tobendin" or an a7ial force should be classi1ed.
o
The purpose of the classi1cation is to determine hether localbuc+lin" in=uences the capacity of the beam.
o The occurrence of local buc+lin" of compressed elements of across-section prevents the development of full section capacity.
o The classi1cation of a section is carried out by comparin" theidth-to-thic+ness ration of the elements9 i.e. c/t ! t"# $%&'#
#(#m#&t and c/t ! t"# )#* #(#m#&t a"ainst the limit of c,t ofthe =an"e and c,t of the eb respectively "iven by T%*(# 5.2EC3
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
19/84
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
20/84
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
21/84
l
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
22/84
!7ample# Sectionclassi1cation
Determine the classi1cation of a ?%M 7 (?% 7 ?MU* in "rade S) &.
Solution:o Refer Table $.( pa"e )M#
Steel "rade9 S) & t G ?% mm fy > ) & N,mm )
o Refer Table &.) pa"e ?)# > P 6)$&,fy8 > P 6)$&,) &8 >%.H)
o &$.% G ) > )6%.H)8 > MM.) eb is Class(
R i d d
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
23/84
Restrained andUnrestrained *eams
Steel beams may be desi"n as either restrainedor unrestrained.
If a beam full lateral restraint to its compression=an"e alon" the span9 the beam is consideredfully restrained.
Cases here beams can be desi"ned as fullyrestrained alon" the spans are#
o *eams carryin" in-situ reinforced concrete slabo *eams ith steel dec+in" =oorin" systems9 ith orithout shear studs. Shear studs function as a simple
concrete anchor.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
24/84
Restrained and Unrestrained *eams6cont.8
De=ection of restrained beamo The restrained beam is fully prevented from movin"
side ays.o The de=ection ill only ta+e place vertically about the
ma or a7is ithout any lateral de=ection.
Types of restrainto There are t o conditions of restraint#
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
25/84
Desi"n of Restrained*eam
The desi"n process for fully restrained beam isfollo s#
o naly e the beam and determine the reaction 6R8 Lma7imum shear force 6E !d 8L ma7imum moment 6 !d 8 and
ma7imum de=ection.o Select suitable steel U* section.o Classify the sectiono Chec+ the bendin" moment resistanceo Chec+ shear resistanceo Chec+ shear buc+lin" resistance of ebo Chec+ combination of shear and momento Chec+ de=ection
* di " 9
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
26/84
*endin" oment9Clause M.).& !C$
The desi"n resistance for bendin" for classes (and ) cros sections
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
27/84
Shear9 Clause M.).M!C$
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
28/84
Shear area for secondary beam9 v
o
5here > "ross sectional area of the section
Shear *uc+lin" Resistance of 5eb9 Clause M.).M 6M8!C$
o If 9 shear buc+lin" resistance no need tobe carried out.
o 5here9 depth of eb9
)2(9.0 f v bt A A =
72
0,
)1(
m
y pl Rd c
f W M
=2
,
12 =
Rd pl
Ed
V V
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
30/84
!7ample# *eam * ith span &.% m is simply supported at
and *. )?%
+Nm. Usin" "rade S) &9 Desi"n beam *.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
31/84
Solution# Trial section si e based on moment resistance9 5pl
So9 try section ?%M 7 (?% 7 ?M U* in "rade S) & 65pl >FFFcm $8
3
33
2
6
2
7.872
102.872/275
10240/275
240
cm
mm xmm N Nmm x
mm N kNm
f M
W y
Ed pl
=
=
==
=
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
32/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Section properties ?%M 7 (?% 7 ?M U*
h > ?%$.) mm d > $M%.?mmb > (?).) mm > &F.M cm )
t > M.F mm t f > ((.) mmIy > (& %% cm ? I > &$F cm ?
5 pl9y > FFF cm $ 5 el9 y > F cm $
d,t > &$ c,t f > &9($! > )(%%%% N,mm ) @ > F(%%% N,mm )
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
33/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Desi"n stren"th
o Table $.(# Steel "rade S) &o TG ?% mm f y > ) & N,mm ) 9 f u > ?$% N,mm )
Section classi1cationo Refer Table &.) pa"e ?)# > P 6)$&,fy8 > P 6)$&,) &8 >
%.H)o &$.% G ) > )6%.H)8 > MM.) eb is Class
(
o Since =an"e and eb are class (9 the section is classi1edas Class (.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
34/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Shear Resistance of Section 6Clause M.).M8
o a7imum e7ternal desi"n shear force9 E!d > (H) +No Shear resistance of section9 E c9 Rd > E pl9 Rd
o
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
35/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Shear area for main beam9 v
Therefore9 use the bi""est v > )H H.$ mm )
2,
2 4.25893.2979
6.3043.31855860
2.11)]2.10(28.6[)2.11)(2.142(25860
)2(2
mm Amm
t r t bt A A
webv
f w f v
=>=+=
++=
++=
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
36/84
Solution# 6cont.8
Desi"n chec+
section is satisfactory.
kN x
f AV V
m
yv Rd pl Rd c
473101
)]3/275(3.2979[
)3/(
3
0,,
=
=
==
0.141.0473192
,
== Rd c
Ed
V V
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
37/84
Solution# 6cont.8 *endin" oment Resistance of Section 6Clause
M.).&8o a7imum e7ternal desi"n moment9 !d > )?% +No oment resistance for class ( cross-section#
kNm
x x
f W M
m
y pl Rd c
2.244
101)275)(10888(
6
3
0,
=
=
=
kNm M M Rd pl Rd c 2.244,, ==
0.198.02.244
240
,
== Rd c
Ed
M M
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
38/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Shear *uc+lin" Resistance of 5eb 6Clause
M.).M6M88o If 9 shear buc+lin" resistance no need to be
carried out.
o 5eb depth 9
o So9
local eb buc+lin" is li+ely to occur and hence shearbuc+lin" chec+ no need to be carried out.
72 )?% +NL
Shear force at ma7imum moment is E > % +N. %.& Ec9Rd > %.& 7 ? $ > )$M.& +N
Since E > % +N G %.& Ec9Rd9 it does not a ect the momentresistance9 c9Rd.
o This beam section is able to carry the most criticalcombination of bendin" and shear.
0.198.02.244
240
,
== Rd c
Ed
M M
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
40/84
Unrestrained *eam The possibility of lateral-torsional buc+lin" must
be ta+en into consideration hen thecompression =an"e of the beam is not fullyrestrained alon" the span.
The buc+lin" capacity of unrestrained beamdepends on the
o Section type.o
Unrestrained len"tho Restraint conditiono Type of load applied
D i" f U t i d
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
41/84
Desi"n of Unrestrained*eam
The follo in" are the steps for desi"nin"unrestrained beams#
o Divide the beam into se"ments bet een lateralrestraints
o Chec+ the moment buc+lin" resistance for each se"menthere is "iven asL
o Section modulus9 5yL 5y > 5pl9yL lastic modulus for Class ( and Class )
sections 5y > 5el9y9 !lastic modulus for Class $ section
1,
m
y y LT Rd b
f W M
=
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
42/84
The reduction factor T9 is "iven by
5here9o Non dimensional slenderness9
o *uc+lin" parameter9
22
1
LT LT LT
LT
+=
cr
y y LT M
f W =
])2.0(1[5.02 LT LT LT LT ++=
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
43/84
The critical elastic buc+lin" moment9
5here#o !9 @ are material propertieso I 9 It9 I are section propertieso cr is the buc+lin" len"th of the membero C( is the factor that depends on the shape of bendin" moment
dia"ram
5.0
2
2
2
2
1 += z
t cr
z
w
cr
z cr
EI
GI L
I
I
L
EI C M
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
44/84
If the moment alon" the beam is not uniform9then cr is modi1ed by the C ( factor
The modi1cation factor9 C ( is "overned by theratio V hich is the ration of the smaller to lar"ermoments of restrained ends.
The ratio of smaller moment to lar"er moment is"iven as
V > small , lar"e for restrained ends
The C ( factor can be obtained from the follo in"table refer *S&H&% .
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
45/84
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
46/84
The C ( factor is never less than (.%.
If C( > (.%9 its means the moment alon" the
beam is uniform.
C( > (.FF 0 (.?% V A %.&) V )
9f d i" i "
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
47/84
9cr for desi"nin"unrestrained
beams Typical e7ampleof beams ithoutintermediatelateral restraintsand theircorrespondin"buc+lin" len"ths.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
48/84
intermediate lateral
restraints Simple supported beams ith intermediate lateralrestraints are described as beams hereo ateral restraints are provided at beam supports and at
intermediate of beams
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
49/84
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
50/84
The C ( factor#o V > small , lar"e for restrained endso C( > (.FF 0 (.?% V A %.&) V )
!7ample# Desi"n of
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
51/84
!7ample# Desi n ofUnrestrained *eam
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
52/84
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
53/84
Solution# Desi"n load9 3 > (.$&@+ A (.&B+
> (.$&6$.%+N,m ) 8 A (.&6&.%+N,m ) 8> ((.&&+N,m )
Reaction of beam CD at support C> point load at point C of beam !> 63 7 idth 7 len"th8,)> 6((.&&+N,m) 7 ).& m 7 M m8,)> FM.M +N
Self- ei"ht beam !9 > &$+",m 7 H.F( 7 (%-$> %.&) +N,m
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
54/84
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
55/84
Section properties ?%M 7 (?% 7 &$ UW*h > ?%M.M mm d > $M%.?mmb > (?$.$ mm > M .H cm )
t > .H mm t f > ().H mmIy > (F$9%% cm ? I > M$& cm ?
I > %.)?M dm ? It > )H cm ?
5 pl9y > (%$% cm$
5 el9 y > FHH cm$
d,t > ?&.M c,t f > ?.?M
! > )(%%%% N,mm ) @ > F(%%% N,mm )
cr > ).& m r > (%.) mm
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
56/84
Desi"n stren"tho Table $.(# Steel "rade S) &o TG ?% mm f y > ) & N,mm ) 9 f u > ?$% N,mm )
Section classi1cationo Refer Table &.) pa"e ?)# > P 6)$&,fy8 > P 6)$&,) &8 >
%.H)o ?&.M G ) > )6%.H)8 > MM.) eb is
Class (
o Since =an"e and eb are class (9 the section is classi1edas Class (.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
57/84
Solution# 6cont.8
Shear Resistance of Section 6Clause M.).M8o a7imum e7ternal desi"n shear force9 E!d > ??.M +No Shear resistance of section9 E c9 Rd > E pl9 Rd
o 5eb shear area
o So9 shear are of eb only
0,,
)3/(
m
yv Rd pl Rd c
f AV V
==
wwwebv t h A =,
mmmmmm
t hh f w8.380)2.11(22.403
2
===
2
3.3008
)9.7)(8.380(0.1
,
mm
mmmm
t h A wwwebv
=
==
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
58/84
Solution# 6cont.8 ore accurate calculation of shear area
considerin" the 1llet area
Therefore9 use the bi""est v > $?&F mm )
2,
2 3.30083458
1.3651.369767909.12)]2.10(29.7[)9.12)(3.143(26790
)2(2
mm Amm
t r t bt A A
webv
f w f v
=>=+= ++=
++=
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
59/84
Solution# 6cont.8
Desi"n chec+
section is satisfactory.
kN x
f AV V
m
yv Rd pl Rd c
549101
)]3/275(3458[
)3/(
3
0,,
=
=
==
0.108.0549
6.44
,
== Rd c
Ed
V V
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
60/84
Solution# 6cont.8 *endin" oment Resistance of Section 6Clause
M.).&8o a7imum e7ternal desi"n moment9 !d > (%H.H +No oment resistance for class ( cross-section#
kNm x
x
f W M
m
y pl Rd c
3.283101
)275)(101030(6
3
0,
=
=
=
kNm M M Rd pl Rd c 3.283,, ==
0.139.03.2839.109
,
== Rd c
Ed
M M
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
61/84
Solution# 6cont.8 ateral torsional buc+lin" 6 T*8
o a7imum e7ternal desi"n moment9 !d > (%H.H +Nmo oment buc+lin" resistance
o
If the moment alon" the beam is not uniform9 then cris modi1ed by the C( factor.
1,
m
y y LT Rd b
f W M =
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
62/84
o Determine the modi1cation factor9 C(small > % +Nm9 lar"e > (%H.H +Nm
V > small , lar"e > %,(%H.H > % for restrained ends >
%
C( > (.FF 0 (.?% V A %.&) V )
> (.FF 0 (.?%6%8 A %.&)6%8 )
> (.FFo !lastic critical buc+lin" moment
5.0
2
2
2
2
1 += z
t cr
z
w
cr
z cr EI
GI L I I
L
EI C M
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
63/84
( dm > (%% mm9 hence ( dm M > (% () mm M
Non-dimensional slenderness for T*
kNm
Nmm x
mm x xmm N
mm x xmm N
xmmmm x
mm xmm
mm x xmm
N
EI GI L
I I
L EI
C M z
t cr
z
w
cr
z cr
3.884
1030.884
)10635()21000(
)1029()81000()2500(1063510246.0
)2500(
)10635()21000(88.1
6
5.0
442
2
44
2
2
44
612
2
44
2
2
5.0
2
2
2
2
1
==
+
=
+=
566.0103.884
)/275(1010306
233
=== Nmm x
mm N mm x M
f W
cr
y y LT
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
64/84
o Determine the buc+lin" parameter9 X TImperfection factor9 Y T for T* curves
h,b > ?%M.M mm,(?$.$ mm > ).F? :)curve Zb[ \ hence9 Y T > %.$?
o Reduction factor9 ] T for T*
722.0
]566.0)2.0566.0(34.01[5.0])2.0(1[5.0
2
2
=++=
++= LT LT LT LT
855.0566.0722.0722.0
112222
=+
=+
= LT LT LT
LT
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
65/84
oment buc+lin" resistance
Desi"n chec+ section is satisfactory
kNm x
mm N mm x
f W M
m
y y LT Rd b
18.242100.1
)/275()101030(855.0 62
33
1,
=
=
=
0.145.018.2429.109
,
== Rd c
Ed
M M
!7ample# Desi"n of
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
66/84
!7ample# Desi n ofrestrained beam
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
67/84
l
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
68/84
Solution#
l
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
69/84
Solution# Section properties &$$ 7 )(% 7()) UW*
h > &??.& mm d > ? M.&mmb > )((.H mm > (&& cm )
t > (). mm t f > )(.$ mmIy > M9%%% cm? I > $$H% cm ?
I > ).$) dm ? It > ( F cm ?
5 pl9y > $)%% cm $ 5 el9 y > ) H% cm $
d,t > $ .& c,t f > ?.%F! > )(%%%% N,mm ) @ > F(%%% N,mm )
cr > ?.% mr > (). mm
S l i 6 8
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
70/84
Solution# 6cont.8 Desi"n stren"th
o Table $.(# Steel "rade S) &o TG ?% mm f y > ) & N,mm ) 9 f u > ?$% N,mm )
Section classi1cationo Refer Table &.) pa"e ?)# > P 6)$&,fy8 > P 6)$&,) &8 >
%.H)o $ .& G ) > )6%.H)8 > MM.) eb is
Class (
o Since =an"e and eb are class (9 the section is classi1edas Class (.
S l i # 6 8
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
71/84
Solution# 6cont.8 *endin" oment Resistance of Section 6Clause
M.).&8o a7imum e7ternal desi"n moment9 !d > F)( +Nmo oment resistance for class ( cross-section#
kNm x
x
f W M m
y pl
Rd c
880101
)275)(103200(6
3
0,
=
=
=
kNm M M Rd pl Rd c 880,, ==
0.193.0880821
,
== Rd c
Ed
M M
S l i # 6 8
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
72/84
Solution# 6cont.8 ateral torsional buc+lin" 6 T*8
o a7imum e7ternal desi"n moment9 !d > F)( +Nmo oment buc+lin" resistance
o
If the moment alon" the beam is not uniform9 then cris modi1ed by the C( factor.
1,
m
y y LT Rd b
f W M =
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
73/84
o Determine the modi1cation factor9 C(small > H? +Nm9 lar"e > H? +Nm
V > small , lar"e > H?, H? > ( for restrained ends
C( > (.FF 0 (.?% V A %.&) V )
> (.FF 0 (.?%6(8 A %.&)6(8 )
> (.%o !lastic critical buc+lin" moment
5.0
2
2
2
2
1 += z
t cr
z
w
cr
z cr EI
GI L I I
L
EI C M
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
74/84
( dm > (%% mm9 hence ( dm M > (% () mm M
Non-dimensional slenderness for T*
kNm
Nmm x
mm x xmm N
mm x xmm
N
xmmmm xmm x
mm
mm x xmm
N
EI GI L
I I
L EI
C M z
t cr
z
w
cr
z cr
46.1397
1046.1397
)103390()21000(
)10178()81000()4000(103390
10232)4000(
)103390()21000(0.1
6
5.0
442
2
44
2
2
44
612
2
44
2
2
5.0
2
2
2
2
1
==
+
=
+=
794.01046.1397
)/275(1032006
233
=== Nmm x
mm N mm x M
f W
cr
y y LT
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
75/84
o Determine the buc+lin" parameter9 X TImperfection factor9 Y T for T* curves
h,b > &??.& mm,)((.H mm > ).M :)curve Zb[ \ hence9 Y T > %.$?
o Reduction factor9 ] T for T*
916.0
]794.0)2.0794.0(34.01[5.0
])2.0(1[5.02
2
=++=
++= LT LT LT LT
728.0794.0916.0916.0
112222
=+
=+
= LT LT LT
LT
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
76/84
oment buc+lin" resistance
Desi"n chec+ section is not satisfactory9
hence9 lar"er section should be used.
kNm x mm N mm x
f W M
m
y y LT Rd b
4.640100.1 )/275()103200(728.0 6
2
33
1,
=
=
=
0.128.14.640
821
,
>== Rd c
Ed
M M
D i
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
77/84
De=ection beam may not fail due to e7cessive de=ection9
ho ever9 it is necessary to ensure that de=ections arenot e7cessive under unfactored imposed loadin" toprevent#
o Dama"e to various architectural features such as interior alls9
partitions9 ceilin"s and e7terior claddin"o Severe crac+in" in brittle 1nishes such as bric+ all ith plaster
1nishedo Dama"e to non-structural element such as "lass fa^ade9 ceilin"s9
partitions and other fra"ile elements.
Eertical de=ection limito The follo in" table "ives su""ested limits for calculated vertical
de=ections of certain members under the characteristic loadcombination due to variable loads and should not includepermanent loads.
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
78/84
Desi"nsituation
Eertical De=ectionlimit
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
79/84
a7imum Eertical De=ection due to e7ternal loado The follo in" table sho s the formula to calculate
vertical de=ection at mid-span of a simply supportedbeam ith di erent loadin" types.
o The formula can be used to calculate de=ection of arestrained or unrestrained beam
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
80/84
!7 l #
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
81/84
!7ample# Chec+ de=ection of beam sho n in 1"ure belo
S l ti #
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
82/84
Solution# De=ection is chec+ed under serviceability. Therfore9 only unfactored imposed load 6(.%B+8
are considered in calculatin" the de=ection. Deadloads are not included
*eam ?%M 7 ( F 7 M% U* Clause $.).M !C$#
o odulus of !lasticity9 ! > )(% %%% N,mm )
)( M%% cm ?
S l ti #6 t8
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
83/84
Solution#6con.t8 a7imum de=ection due to unfactored imposed loads
If the beam is carryin" all ith plaster 1nish or anyother brittle 1nish9 de=ection limit9
choose lar"er beam section
mm
mmmmmm xmm N
x
mm xmm N
mmmm N EI
wL EI
wLc
2.28
8.134.14)1021600)(/210000(48
)10000(1030
)1021600)(/210000(384
)10000)(/5(548384
5
442
33
442
4
34
=+=
+=
+=
mmmm L
8.27360
10000360lim
===
mmmmc 8.272.28 lim =>=
-
7/17/2019 Beam Design
84/84
To acquire knowledge, one must study; but to acquire wisdom, onemust observe .
TQ NW /OU