bayesian networks

55
Bayesian Networks Tamara Berg CS 590-133 Artificial Intelligence Many slides throughout the course adapted from Svetlana Lazebnik, Dan Klein, Stuart Russell, Andrew Moore, Percy Liang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Rob Pless, Killian Weinberger, Deva Ramanan 1

Upload: gabriel-bernard

Post on 31-Dec-2015

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Bayesian Networks. Tamara Berg CS 590-133 Artificial Intelligence. Many slides throughout the course adapted from Svetlana Lazebnik , Dan Klein, Stuart Russell, Andrew Moore, Percy Liang, Luke Zettlemoyer , Rob Pless , Killian Weinberger, Deva Ramanan. Announcements. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

1

Bayesian Networks

Tamara Berg

CS 590-133 Artificial Intelligence

Many slides throughout the course adapted from Svetlana Lazebnik, Dan Klein, Stuart Russell, Andrew Moore, Percy Liang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Rob Pless, Killian Weinberger, Deva Ramanan

Announcements

• HW3 will be released tonight– Written questions only (no programming)– Due Tuesday, March 18, 11:59pm

Review: Probability

• Random variables, events• Axioms of probability• Atomic events• Joint and marginal probability distributions• Conditional probability distributions• Product rule• Independence and conditional independence• Inference

Bayesian decision making

• Suppose the agent has to make decisions about the value of an unobserved query variable X based on the values of an observed evidence variable E

• Inference problem: given some evidence E = e, what is P(X | e)?

• Learning problem: estimate the parameters of the probabilistic model P(X | E) given training samples {(x1,e1), …, (xn,en)}

Bayesian networks (BNs)

A type of graphical model A BN states conditional independence

relationships between random variables Compact specification of full joint distributions

Juan F. Mancilla-Caceres
Changed: More commonly called

Random Variables

Random variables

be a realization of Let

Random Variables

Random variables

be a realization of Let

A random variable is some aspect of the world about which we (may) have uncertainty.

Random variables can be:Binary (e.g. {true,false}, {spam/ham}), Take on a discrete set of values

(e.g. {Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter}), Or be continuous (e.g. [0 1]).

Joint Probability Distribution

Random variables

Joint Probability Distribution:

be a realization of Let

Also written

Gives a real value for all possible assignments.

Queries

Joint Probability Distribution:

Also written

Given a joint distribution, we can reason about unobserved variables given observations (evidence):

Stuff you care about Stuff you already know

Representation

One way to represent the joint probability distribution for discrete is as an n-dimensional table, each cell containing the probability for a setting of X. This would have entries if each ranges over values.

Joint Probability Distribution:

Also written

Graphical Models!

Representation

Graphical models represent joint probability distributions more economically, using a set of “local” relationships among variables.

Joint Probability Distribution:

Also written

Graphical Models

Graphical models offer several useful properties:

1. They provide a simple way to visualize the structure of a probabilistic model and can be used to design and motivate new models.

2. Insights into the properties of the model, including conditional independence properties, can be obtained by inspection of the graph.

3. Complex computations, required to perform inference and learning in sophisticated models, can be expressed in terms of graphical manipulations.

from Chris Bishop

Main kinds of models

• Undirected (also called Markov Random Fields) - links express constraints between variables.

• Directed (also called Bayesian Networks) - have a notion of causality -- one can regard an arc from A to B as indicating that A "causes" B.

Syntax Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) Nodes: random variables

Can be assigned (observed)or unassigned (unobserved)

Arcs: interactions An arrow from one variable to another indicates

direct influence Encode conditional independence

Weather is independent of the other variables Toothache and Catch are conditionally independent

given Cavity Must form a directed, acyclic graph

Weather Cavity

Toothache Catch

Juan F. Mancilla-Caceres
Changed title from Structure to Syntax

Example: N independent coin flips

Complete independence: no interactions

X1 X2 Xn…

Example: Naïve Bayes document model

Random variables: X: document class W1, …, Wn: words in the document

W1 W2 Wn…

X

Example: Burglar Alarm

I have a burglar alarm that is sometimes set off by minor earthquakes. My two neighbors, John and Mary, promise to call me at work if they hear the alarm

Example inference task: suppose Mary calls and John doesn’t call. What is the probability of a burglary?

What are the random variables? Burglary, Earthquake, Alarm, JohnCalls, MaryCalls

What are the direct influence relationships? A burglar can set the alarm off An earthquake can set the alarm off The alarm can cause Mary to call The alarm can cause John to call

Example: Burglar Alarm

What are the model parameters?

What does this mean?

Bayes Nets

Directed Graph, G = (X,E)

Nodes

Edges

Each node is associated with a random variable

Example

Joint Distribution

By Chain Rule (using the usual arithmetic ordering)

Directed Graphical Models

Directed Graph, G = (X,E)

Nodes

Edges

Each node is associated with a random variable

Definition of joint probability in a graphical model:

where are the parents of

Example

Joint Probability:

Conditional Independence

Independence:

Conditional Independence:

Or,

Conditional Independence

By Chain Rule (using the usual arithmetic ordering)

Missing variables in the local conditional probability functions correspond to missing edges in the underlying graph.

Removing an edge into node i eliminates an argument from the conditional probability factor

Joint distribution from the example graph:

Semantics A BN represents a full joint distribution in a compact way.

We only need to specify a conditional probability distribution for each node given its parents: P (X | Parents(X))

Z1 Z2 Zn

X

P (X | Z1, …, Zn)

Example

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

10

0

1

0 10

1

Example: Alarm Network

Burglary Earthqk

Alarm

John calls

Mary calls

B P(B)

+b 0.001

b 0.999

E P(E)

+e 0.002

e 0.998

B E A P(A|B,E)

+b +e +a 0.95

+b +e a 0.05

+b e +a 0.94

+b e a 0.06

b +e +a 0.29

b +e a 0.71

b e +a 0.001

b e a 0.999

A J P(J|A)

+a +j 0.9

+a j 0.1

a +j 0.05

a j 0.95

A M P(M|A)

+a +m 0.7

+a m 0.3

a +m 0.01

a m 0.99

Size of a Bayes’ Net

• How big is a joint distribution over N Boolean variables?

2N

• How big is an N-node net if nodes have up to k parents?

O(N * 2k+1)

• Both give you the power to calculate• BNs: Huge space savings!• Also easier to elicit local CPTs• Also turns out to be faster to answer queries (coming)

30

The joint probability distribution

For example, P(j, m, a, ¬b, ¬e)

= P(¬b) P(¬e) P(a | ¬b, ¬e) P(j | a) P(m | a)

Independence in a BN

• Important question about a BN:– Are two nodes independent given certain evidence?– If yes, can prove using algebra (tedious in general)– If no, can prove with a counter example– Example:

– Question: are X and Z necessarily independent?• Answer: no. Example: low pressure causes rain, which

causes traffic.• X can influence Z, Z can influence X (via Y)• Addendum: they could be independent: how?

X Y Z

Independence

Key properties:a) Each node is conditionally independent of its non-descendants given its parentsb) A node is conditionally independent of all other nodes in the graph given it’s Markov blanket (it’s parents, children, and children’s other parents)

Moral Graphs

Equivalent undirected form of a directed acyclic graph

Independence in a BN

• Important question about a BN:– Are two nodes independent given certain evidence?– If yes, can prove using algebra (tedious in general)– If no, can prove with a counter example– Example:

– Question: are X and Z necessarily independent?• Answer: no. Example: low pressure causes rain, which

causes traffic.• X can influence Z, Z can influence X (via Y)• Addendum: they could be independent: how?

X Y Z

Causal Chains

• This configuration is a “causal chain”

– Is Z independent of X given Y?

– Evidence along the chain “blocks” the influence

X Y Z

Yes!

X: Project due

Y: No office hours

Z: Students panic

37

Common Cause

• Another basic configuration: two effects of the same cause– Are X and Z independent?

– Are X and Z independent given Y?

– Observing the cause blocks influence between effects.

X

Y

Z

Yes!

Y: Homework due

X: Full attendance

Z: Students sleepy

38

Common Effect

• Last configuration: two causes of one effect (v-structures)– Are X and Z independent?

• Yes: the ballgame and the rain cause traffic, but they are not correlated

• Still need to prove they must be (try it!)

– Are X and Z independent given Y?• No: seeing traffic puts the rain and the

ballgame in competition as explanation

– This is backwards from the other cases• Observing an effect activates influence

between possible causes.

X

Y

Z

X: Raining

Z: Ballgame

Y: Traffic

39

The General Case

• Any complex example can be analyzed using these three canonical cases

• General question: in a given BN, are two variables independent (given evidence)?

• Solution: analyze the graph40

Causal Chain

Common Cause

(Unobserved)Common Effect

Reachability (D-Separation)• Question: Are X and Y

conditionally independent given evidence vars {Z}?– Yes, if X and Y “separated” by Z– Look for active paths from X to Y– No active paths = independence!

• A path is active if each triple is active:– Causal chain A B C where B is

unobserved (either direction)– Common cause A B C where B

is unobserved– Common effect (aka v-structure)

A B C where B or one of its descendants is observed

All it takes to block a path is a single inactive segment

Active Triples Inactive Triples

Bayes Ball

• Shade all observed nodes. Place balls at the starting node, let them bounce around according to some rules, and ask if any of the balls reach any of the goal node.

• We need to know what happens when a ball arrives at a node on its way to the goal node.

42

43

Example

Yes

44

R

T

B

T’

Example

R

T

B

D

L

T’

Yes

Yes

Yes

45

Constructing Bayesian networks

1. Choose an ordering of variables X1, … , Xn

2. For i = 1 to n add Xi to the network select parents from X1, … ,Xi-1 such that

P(Xi | Parents(Xi)) = P(Xi | X1, ... Xi-1)

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)?

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A)?

P(A | J, M) = P(A | J)?

P(A | J, M) = P(A | M)?

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | M)? No

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | M)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B)?

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B | A)?

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | M)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B | A)? Yes

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | M)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B | A)? Yes

P(E | B, A ,J, M) = P(E)?

P(E | B, A, J, M) = P(E | A, B)?

Example

Suppose we choose the ordering M, J, A, B, E

P(J | M) = P(J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | J)? No

P(A | J, M) = P(A | M)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B)? No

P(B | A, J, M) = P(B | A)? Yes

P(E | B, A ,J, M) = P(E)? No

P(E | B, A, J, M) = P(E | A, B)? Yes

Example

Example contd.

Deciding conditional independence is hard in noncausal directions

The causal direction seems much more natural, but is not mandatory

Network is less compact

Summary

Bayesian networks provide a natural representation for (causally induced) conditional independence

Topology + conditional probability tables Generally easy for domain experts to

construct