batch to batch
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
1/37
Batch to BatchReproducibility
and how to achieve it
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
2/37
Batch-to-Batch Reproducibility
Only possible to achieve high levels of shade
reproduction by using the same raw materialsand the same dyeing process
Check that fabric or yarn to be dyed has same
dye affinity as previous batch
Standard of preparation must be identical
Maintain same liquor ratio Ensure same number of contacts
Make sure operators add right chemicals at the
same time and temperature
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
3/37
Batch-to-Batch Reproducibility
Use the same standard program procedures foreach batch. May vary with the dyes and
chemicals used, and depth, pale/medium/dark,but for reproduction of the same colour theprocedure should be identical each time
Check water supply daily, especially hardness,pH and bicarbonate content
Oils, waxes and spin finish must be removed toobtain level dyeing and consistent batch-to-batch shade
Avoid standing times during process. Havedyes and chemicals prepared ready for addition
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
4/37
Number of contacts
This is the number of times the fabric comes into contact with the dyeliquor during the dyeing process, and will depend on fabric rope
speed and the number of jet nozzle passages.Fabr ic R ope c yc le tim e(mins)
S p e e d w o v e nfabr ic
Spee d kn itfabr ic
P E Sunf ixed
1 400 250
P E Sheat -set 2 400 200
P A u n f ix e d 2-3 400 300
P Aheat -set
3 350 300
C OReact ive
4 350 300
Example - cotton knit - fabric speed maximum 300 m/min
Number of nozzle passages = Process time(480 mins) = 120Rope cycle time( 4 mins)
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
5/37
Rope length
020406080
100120140160180200
220240260280300
320340360
20
0
40
0
60
0
80
0
100
0
120
0
rope length (m)
Kg
600 g
500 g400 g
300 g
275 g
250 g225 g
200 g
175 g
150 g125 g
100 g
Weight perlinear metre
Rope length
Weight of the rope 105 kgweight per linear metre 0.200 kg/m
= 525 m
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
6/37
Cycle time = rope length
fabric speed
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
rope length (m)
m/m
in
1
2
3
4
5
6
Rope of 900 metres at 225 metres/min - cycle time 4 minutes
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
7/37
Maximum rope length
Calculate the maximum rope length with a fabric of a particularweight per sq. m., having determined the rope speed and cycletime. Keep the same rope length in each jet chamber.
For example - 100% cotton reactive dyeing
cycle time = 4 minutes
knit fabric speed = 300 m / minute
rope length = 4 min X 300 m = 1200 metres
If the rope is shorter, the winch speed should be reduced, so
that the same rope circulation time and nozzle contacts aremaintained
Rope length = 800 m = 200 m.minute
cycle time = 4 minutes
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
8/37
Creasing
Abrasion and chafing marks may be caused by:
machine speed too highstationary fabric in a running machine, perhaps
caused by poor wetting, knots and tangles
overloading, leading to mechanical friction
rough patches in machineSuch abrasion may exaggerate creasing by
damaged fibres dyeing to a different shadeoften useful to turn tube of knitted fabric inside to
outside, particularly single jersey.
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
9/37
Creasing
Creasing may result from:
incorrect loading - twisted rope, poor sewing inadequate preparation, incomplete or too rapid
relaxation
quality of goods (tight construction, high twist yarns,dense weight per square metre)
poor suitability of dyeing machine - folds not moved
batch of fabric too heavy
incorrect dyeing process - heating/cooling too fast
lustre - stationary fabric on hot metal under pressure
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
10/37
Creasing
Load into
jet machineFabric should bedelivered to dyeing
machine already
folded and each piece
sewn straight, with
sewing machine, to
next piece. Rope is
loaded into dyeing
machine without twist
Only pieces of
equal diametershould be sewn
together
Leave small opening to allowballooning of air to escape
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
11/37
Creasing, crack marks, rope marks
Cockling, or dimpling - eliminate by using larger diameter jetnozzle, increasing liquor ratio, reducing fabric speed
Rope marks caused by poor opening of rope. Avoid bypre-setting or pre-relaxation of fabric before dyeing
Rope and crack marks also from incorrect process proceduresHigher speed + slower rates of rinse and cooling often solve
Reduce machine load, run at slightly higher nozzle pressure,or use next largest nozzle size.
Check that bath draining temperatures are not too high,especially with viscose
Shock cooling of stationary fabric will cause crack marks
Crows feet or Wrinkling - avoid by presetting or prerelaxation,higher rope speed and increasing liquor ratio help
Orange peel effect - fabric stopped running during coolingstage - machine is overloaded - not enough liquor - drainingbath at too high a temperature and refilling with cold water
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
12/37
Preparation
Batch-to-Batch Reproducibility - Fabric or yarn to be dyed
must have same dye
affinity as previous batch
Standard of preparation
must be identical
Oils, waxes and spin finish
must be removed to obtain
level dyeing and consistent
batch-to-batch shade
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
13/37
Adding salt to dyebath causes aggregation ofthe dye. More aggregation = more attraction
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
14/37
Aggregation depends on the cation
NH4 < Na < K < Mg < Ni < Mn < Zn < Ca < Ba
Therefore, wherever concentration of calcium is higher in the
fabric, the dye will be more attracted
Ammonium salt aggregates less than sodium, calcium and
barium salts cause much higher aggregation.
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
15/37
Analysis of samples of cotton fibre
of different provenanceProvenance Ca ppm Mg ppm Fe ppm Al ppm Mn ppmSendhwa India 1000 600 125 45 5.9Bailhongal India 1030 845 115 64 5.6Jetpur India 580 585 84 65 3.9Pandurna India 980 790 475 220 9.9Izmir Turkey 905 890 22 15 3Hatay Turkey 725 640 24 17 3Urfa Turkey 6290 1190 63 48 31Tarsus Turkey 985 620 29 23 3Paranah Brazil 2711 1119 313 not tested not testedSao Paulo Brazil 944 863 72 not tested not testedPeru 700 440 13 not tested not testedTexas USA 810 365 75 not tested not testedCalifornia USA 600 540 40 not tested not tested
Russia 1320 567 112 not tested not tested
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
16/37
Analysis of the metal content of
vegetable impurities in cotton
Ca Mg Fe Al MnSeeds 25000 5500 600 1100 85Stem particles 17500 7000 350 600 90
Bark particles 6500 550 500 1200 250
pure cotton fibre 540 490 27 8
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
17/37
Disadvantages of calcium and
magnesium in textile processing Insoluble white powder deposits of carbonates, hydroxides,
phosphates formed in alkaline scouring/bleaching
Insoluble silicate deposits in bleaching
Lime soap stains
Build-up of deposits on machines
Peroxide stabilisers blocked by excess calcium - poor stability
Insoluble yellowish green salts formed with optical brighteners
Emulsions of oils and greases are broken by Ca and Mg
Solubility of dyes impaired Form spots and stains with dyes
Cause change of shade and reduced fastness.
Yellowish deposits on inside and tops of yarn bobbins Unlevel dyeing
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
18/37
Chemical Formula Systematic name Trivial Name Melting Point deg C
C15H31COOH hexadecanoic acid Palmitic acid 64C17H35COOH octadecanoic acid Stearic acid 69
C19H39COOH eicosanoic acid Arachinic acid 76
C21H43COOH docosanoic acid Behenic acid 81C23H47COOH tetracosanoic acid Lignoceric acid 81C25H51COOH hexacosanoic acid Cerotic acid 88
C27H55COOH octacosanoic acid Montanic acid 91 - 93
C29H59COOH triacontanoic acid Mellisic acid 92
C31H63COOH dotriacontanoic acid Locca acidC33H67COOH tetratriacontanoic acid Ghedda acidC17H33COOH octadecanoic-9-acid Oleic acid 13
C19H37COOH eicosanoic-9-acid Gadoleic acid
C24H49OH tetracosanol Lignoceryl alcohol 75 - 77C26H53O hexacosanol Ceryl alcohol 79 - 81
C28H57O octacosanol Montanyl alcohol 83
C30H61OH triacontanol Gossypyl alcoholC32H65OH dotriacontanol
C34H69OH tetratriacontanol 92C30H60(OH)2 tricontandiol Coceryl alcoholC3H5(OH)3 propantriol Glycerol 18
Detectable wax acids and alcohols in cotton
This
means
we need
boiling
water
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
19/37
Component Content ( % )
Wax ester 22Phytosterols 12 - 14
Polyterpenes 1 - 4Hydrocarbons 7 - 8Free wax alcohols 42 - 46
Saponifiable 36 - 50Non-saponifiable 50 - 63Inert 0 - 3
Composition and removal properties ofcotton wax
This means weneed caustic soda
This means we needdetergent / emulsifier
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
20/37
Added Impurities
Knitting oils
0.5 - 2 %
Soil to be removed in preparation
of Knitted Cotton
Natural Impurities
Fats
Waxes
Hemicellulose
Pectins
Proteins Mineral matter
10-15 %
Total Impurities
10 - 17 %
Paraffin Wax Spinning oils
High soil content - need good detergent to remove and prevent17 kg of soil from redepositing onto 100 kg fabric
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
21/37
Oils and waxes
Residual oils and waxes in yarn and fabric will make
penetration more difficult.Oils and waxes will tend to form a tide mark at the water
level on the walls of the dyeing machine, and then wipe off
to make a dirty mark on fabric.
If disperse dyes are also present in the bath, they will dye the
oil/wax, so any spot or stain will be a coloured spot, very
difficult to remove.
Many reactive dyes, especially blues, navies and blacks, are
lipophilic, and will dye fabric containing more oil to a
different shade, or accentuate a spot.
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
22/37
What happens if .?
We have a dyehouse equipped with 10 atmospheric jet dyeing
machines, operating at a liquor ratio of 6:1, each machine
producing 15 batches of 500 kg per week of 100% cotton weft
knit fabric.
The production is 100% Right-First-Time. But 5% of theproduction is Damaged and Kept. This means 5% cannot be
sold because it is unlevel, or has poor fibre strength etc.
What is the effect on profit if we reduce process time by 6% ?
What is the effect on profit if we reduce chemical cost by 10%
What is the effect on profit if we reduce Damaged & Kept to2.5%
I d
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
23/37
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
WHAT IF ?
ExtraValue 387 220 469
% Gain 18% 10% 22%
Reduce Process Time by 6% Reduce Chemical Cost by 10% Reduce D & K to 2.5%
The biggest effect on profit is by reducing damaged fabric by half.
The smallest effect is reducing chemical cost by 10%.
Increasedprofit
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
24/37
What happens if .?
We have a dyehouse equipped with 10 atmospheric jet dyeing
machines, operating at a liquor ratio of 6:1, each machine
producing 15 batches of 500 kg per week of 100% cotton weft
knit fabric.
The production is 100% Right-First-Time, there is 0% secondquality production and 0% Damaged and Kept.
If the average profit margin is 20%, the dyehouse will make a
profit of 40,800 per week.
What happens if production is only
80% Right-First-Time ?
LOST PROFIT
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
25/37
100%RFT
0%Seconds
0%D&
K
20%Rework
CUM
ULATIVE
-50,000
-45,000
-40,000
-35,000
-30,000
-25,000
-20,000
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
LOST PROFIT
per week
10 Jet Factory
LOST PROFIT 0 0 0 -48,960 -48,960
% Loss 0% 0% 0% -120% -120%
100% RFT 0%Seconds 0 %D&K 20%Rework CUMULATIVE
If production is 100% RF
PROFIT=
40,800
Margin = 20 %
If only 80% of
production is
Right-First-Time
Lost profit =
48.960 per week
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
26/37
Dyeing cotton with reactive dyes
Lab to bulk reproducibility - lab procedure should reflect closelythe bulk process, including auxiliaries
Dyeing should follow thorough preparation, in bath free from
impurities ( especially NaOH and H2O2) Accurate weighing of dyes and auxiliaries with a checkweigh
system, preferably with barcode reader.
Dissolve dye in sufficient water and sieve before addition to
tank, then dilute further, dosing over time. Check specific gravity after adding salt
Check pH at start and after adding alkali
Have all dyes and chemicals ready and add at appropriate timeevery time
Some dyes sensitive to reduction - use Antioxidol SBR
Sequestering agent needed in dyebath and soaping
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
27/37
cotton containing
1500 ppm Ca & Mg
Into dyeing machineat 10:1 liquor ratio
water will contain
150 ppm Ca & Mg
Ca & Mg contamination
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
28/37
Effect of calcium and magnesium onISO Cold Water fastness of reactive dye
Contaminant added
to dyebath
Contaminant added
to rinse bath
EFFECT COTTON POLYAMIDE EFFECT COTTON POLYAMIDE
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
29/37
Typical problem
Softened dyehouse water contains sodium bicarbonate.
As temperature rises bicarbonate is converted to carbonate.
More dye is hydrolysed in the bath before it has a chance to
exhaust onto the cotton and be available to react with the
cotton.
This means more hydrolysed dye to remove in wash-off, and
lower dye yield.
Bicarbonate will also act as a pH buffer with other alkalis
making it difficult to achieve the pH needed for optimum
fixation ( monochlortriazine dyes - pH 10.6 - 11.2)
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
30/37
Bicarbonate
Suggest buffering dyebath with 0.3 to 2.0 g/l monosodium
phosphate to avoid problems with bicarbonate in water
initiating fixation.
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
31/37
Low foam
Do we appreciate the full value of a low foam product ?
Lets say a dyehouse was using a cheap detergent, but after
following a prescribed process recipe, it was common practice
for the machine operator to give an extra cold rinse because he
saw foam in the machine after the preparation scour/bleach.
If this extra cold rinse was not necessary with the Nearchimica
detergent Nearpon LF-JET- what would be the value ?
Process using Detergent X
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
32/37
with final cold rinse to remove foam
CUSTOMER'S Process
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 31 60 91 121 152 182 213 244 274 305 335 366 397 425
Time in Minutes
0C
Detergent X
BLEACHISOTHERMAL reactive dye WASHOFF
Costs using Detergent X
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
33/37
0
20
40
60
80100
120
140
160
CUSTOMER'S Costs
Sum of Labour 27.68
Sum of Effluent 2.35
Sum of Water 6.14
Sum of Steam 6.96
Sum of Dyes 76.80
Sum of Chemicals 31.43
Sum of Electricity 6.10
CUSTOMER'S
Process time,mins =
Batches per week =
443
14
1%
4%
4%
49%
20%
4%
18%
Thies_Eco_soft_103_1_1600_DS
DetXBLEACH
ShorterWASHOFF
ISOTHERMAL
Costs using Detergent X
Cost of Detergent X
= zero
Process using Nearpon LF-JET
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
34/37
-no additional cold rinse needed
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112 126 140 154 168 182 196 210 224 238 252 266 280 294 308 322 336 350 364 378 392 406
Time in Minutes
0C
STANDARD
BLEACHISOTHERMAL Reactive Dye WASHOFF
Cost comparison with process usingNearpon LF JET no cold rinse necessary
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
35/37
0
20
40
60
80
100
120140
160
Comparison of Processes
Sum of Labour 27.68 ,26.19Sum of Effluent 2.35 ,2.02
Sum of Water 6.14 ,4.89
Sum of Steam 6.96 ,6.88
Sum of Dyes 76.80 76.80
Sum of Chemicals 31.43 34.57Sum of Electricity 6.10 5.79
CUSTOMER'S NEARCHIMICA SAVINGS
5%
-10%
0%
1%
20%
14%
5%
TIME(mins)
BATCHES/week 14 16443 419 5%
Nearpon LF-JET - no cold rinse necessaryto remove foam
Extra margin - even if Detergent X costs
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
36/37
nothing
MARGIN generated per Machine week
14
16
2,842
3,253
CUSTOMER'S
NEARCHIMICA
Batches/week
Batches/week
411
-
8/8/2019 Batch to Batch
37/37
The road toreproducibility
Well prepared is half dyed