bat foraging distance and duration · personal communication brigham, rm, hdjn aldridge, and rl...

1
References Anthony, ELP and TH Kunz. 1977. Feeding strategies of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus, in southern New Hampshire. Ecology. 58:775-786. Barbour, RW, and WH Davis. 1969 . Bats of America. The University Press of Kentucky. Barclay, RMR 2003. Personal communication Brigham, RM, HDJN Aldridge, and RL Mackey.1992. Variation in habitat use and prey selection by Yuma bats, Myotis yumanensis. Chruszcz BJ,and RMR Barclay. Prolonged foraging bouts of a solitary gleaning/hawking bat, Myotis evotis. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 81: 823–826 Gaspari, M. 1994. Report on bat Study at the Woodard Bay Natural Resource Conservation Area. Unpublished report to Wash. Dept. of Natural Resources Harris, AH. 1974. Myotis yumanensis in interior southwestern North America, with comments on Myotis lucifugus. Journal of Mammalogy 55:512-513. Henry, M, DW Thomas, R Vaudry, and M Carrier. 2002. Foraging distances and home range of pregnant and lactating Little Brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Journal of Mammalogy. 83:767-774 Johnston, D. 2002. Data collection protocol - Yuma bat (Myotis yumanensis). San Francisco Estuary Wetlands Regional Monitoring Program Nagorsen, DW. 1993. Bats of British Columbia. Royal British Columbia Museum Handbook Ormsbee, P. 2003. USFS, Eugene, Oregon. personal communication. Schirato, G, 2003 personal communication Do Large Colonies Create Long Commutes? Examining Myotis Bat Foraging Distance and Duration Greg Falxa, Cascadia Research Collective, Olympia, Wa. [email protected] Introduction Each spring and summer the largest known bat colony in Washington state, a mixed-species maternity colony of Little brown and Yuma bats (Myotis lucifugus and M. yumanensis, or "MYYU/LU") roost in an abandoned railroad pier near Olympia, Washington (Figs. 1 & 4). The bats begin arriving in April, have their young in early June. After the young become volant in early July the colony peaks at over 3,000 individuals, then begins a steady decline as the bats disperse only a few remain by September. Based on examination of bats in the the hand, it appears that nearly all of the bats roosting in the pier are Yuma bats or Little brown bats (Gaspari 1994) by examining the skulls of specimens (Schirato 2003, pers. comm) and in 2004 by the author collecting time- expansion calls with a Pettersson D240x ultrasonic detector and analyzing the calls with SonoBat software (Pettersson Elecktronik, Sweden & SonoBat, Arcadia, CA.). In the coastal Pacific Northwest these 2 species are extremely difficult to distinguish by morphological features (Harris 1974) and identification between these two in the hand is unreliable without the aid of genetic analysis or time expansion call analysis (Pat Ormsbee, pers. comm.). Both Yuma bats and Little Brown bats forage in or near riparian areas when they are available, feeding heavily on aquatic emergent insects (Brigham et al. 1992); and this study supports earlier reports that these two species will use similar resources for maternity roosts (Nagorsen & Brigham 1993). The roost area is bordered by saltwater inlets of Puget Sound to the north and east, semi-rural open and wooded land to the south and west which then transitions into urban areas 8-10 km from the maternity roost. We expected these bats to forage at a series of ponds and wetlands located 2 and 6 km to the south of the roost and for their nightly activity alternate between bouts of foraging and periods of night roosting. This nightly pattern is widely reported for insectivorous bats. Both of these assumptions generally proved to be wrong for this group. Methods We monitored the maternity colony population with flyout (emergence) counts from late March to early October, 2003 and 2004. We captured bats leaving the pier with mist nets on 16 nights between mid-April and late August both years. We used SkinBond adhesive to attach radio-tags with a 12-day battery life (.36 gram LB-2N, Holohil Systems) to 4 pregnant and 6 post-lactating bats. We gathered an average of over 8 nights of foraging and night roosting behavior per radio-tagged bat. To permit intensive monitoring of the subjects’ activities on a fine scale, only one bat was radio-tagged at a time. Tracking was accomplished by first establishing vicinity locations using a vehicle outfitted with a Yaesu FT-817 ham radio (Vertex-Standard, Cypress, CA) , omni- directional gain antenna, low-noise preamplifier, and digital audio processor (to reduce ignition noise) . The observer then switched to a portable telemetry receiver and used a either a 3 or 4-element handheld Yagi antenna to obtain directional information and "walk-in" locations on the bat. When a tagged bat's signal was lost or could not be heard, a search pattern was initiated from its last known location. Re-acquiring a lost signal could sometimes take hours, or not accomplished until he following day. Large movements such as switching day roosts separated by 19 km were successfully tracked, and a single bat crossing 2 Puget Sound inlets (in succession) were successfully tracked. Figure 5. Capitol Lake, Olympia, Washington. One of the distant feeding areas for the bats from the Woodard Bay colony, where some foraged continuously for nearly 6 hours before returning to a day roost, with no rest breaks or night roosting. Results Three of the 10 radio-tagged bats foraged for long periods with no night roosting observed, 3 others night roosted only when it started raining while they were involved in feeding, emerging shortly after the rain abated to continue foraging. The remaining 4 routinely roosted 2 or 3 times nightly, close to the foraging area (in all cases a lake, large pond or open wetland) for between 5 and 40 minutes, then emerging to continue foraging in the adjacent areas. All radio-tagged bats were tracked to locations greater than 8 km from their day roost, 7 bats traveled greater than 12 km. Five of the 7 bats tagged at the large Woodard Bay colony commuted to a 250 acre urban lake (Fig. 5) a distance over 13 km from the capture location. Two of these bats were tracked to this distant lake on 6 consecutive nights each (one in July and one in August), and one of these traveled directly to the lake from the day roost, foraged non-stop for 5.75 hours, then traveled back to the roost for a total of 6.75 continuous hours "on the wing." Discussion These one-way commute distances ranging between 10 and 15 km are considerably greater than previously reported; studies and surveys for these 2 species indicate distances of <1 km to 8 km between day roosts and foraging areas (Barbour and Davis 1969; Barclay, pers. comm.; Henry et al 2002; Johnston 2002). The non-stop flying for up to 6.75 hours was also unusual. Chruszcz & Barclay (2003) first reported insectivorous bats (Long-eared myotis, Myotis evotis) spending 90% of their out-of-roost time foraging. They felt this might be related to the species being near the edge of its range, exercising a flexible feeding strategy as they glean insects from surfaces as well as taking prey aerially. This would allow them to take advantage of the period between midnight and shortly before dawn when aerial insect counts are lower (Anthony et al. 1977), but insects on surfaces are still available for gleaning. However, since Little brown and Yuma bats are thought to be exclusively hawking (aerial) feeders, we expect that emergent aquatic insects are available all night at Capitol Lake during the summer months. Additionally, Little brown and Yuma bats are common in this region and not near the extent of their range. These long uninterrupted foraging times entirely over this one lake may indicate that resources at the site are not all that abundant, as 4.5 - 5.5 hours should be enough time for a Little brown bat to fill its stomach several times (Barclay, pers. comm). The three bats in our study that did night-roost regularly (including non-rainy nights) did so for only 10 to 40 minutes at a time, and rarely more than twice a night. Three bats were never observed night roosting when away from the day roost. It is unknown why these bats were regularly foraging at greater distances than previously reported for Little brown or Yuma myotis. Possible explanations offered have included: greater competition for resources by a larger colony; because the distant lake offers a superior forage opportunities; that the fine scale monitoring of individual bats reveals behavior that might be been missed by less intensive methods. 13 km from Capitol Lake Acknowledgements: Many thanks to Lori Salzer, Lisa Hallock, Michael Baker, Mary Linders, Joanna & JD Miller, John Fleckenstein, John Konovsky, Don Martin, Nancy Laich, Kelly McAllister, Scott Pearson, Michael Lacki, Michele Zuckerberg, Margaret Gaspari, Lanny Carpenter, John Calambokidis, Michelle Stevie, Stephen and Dakota Pasqual, Roberta Davenport, Tyra Lindquist, Gretchen Blatz, Jeff Foisy, Lee Templeman, Aimee Hart, Pat Ormsbee, and to the board of Cascadia Research. Radio tagging was made possible because of support from Bats Northwest, Cascadia Research , and WDF&W Region 6. Figure 1. Female and juvenile bats roost in large clusters under the supporting beams of the abandoned railroad pier. 22 km Conclusion Our results suggest that aspects of the reported foraging behavior for small myotis bats is not applicable this landscape, and that these small bats have the metabolic capacity and endurance to regularly make long commutes to feeding areas. Many forage long hours interrupted by little of no night roosting, then commute back to a distant day roost. The hypothesis made in 2003 that the large colony size at Woodard Bay forced these long distances in order to disperse over a larger feeding area was not supported by the 2004 data obtained from “MYLU/YU” bats tagged at Capitol Lake which commuted just as far (up to 15km) to small maternity roosts in entirely different areas (Figure 4). Whether the behavior of these bats is exceptional or if the methods employed facilitated more remote observations that might have been otherwise missed cannot be inferred from this small study, but tracking bats using methods that allow continuous observation of the subject’s behavior may help us develop methods for studies with larger sampling effort. Certainly the observation that the “signal was lost” should flag the need to reevaluate the assumptions regarding the range. Tracking radio-tagged bats in an urban landscape offers some unique obstacles such as limited public access within the study area, and decreased signal detection range due to increased electrical interference (from power lines, computers, and strong radio signals) and in flat areas like our study area, from the lack of elevated vantage points to increase the line- of-sight distance. And because of our experience with a defective tag, we recommend performing distance tests on all radio tags prior to deployment on study subjects. We continue to investigate bat utilization at Capitol Lake using time expansion acoustic sampling methods to better identify the species and spatial distribution at this large foraging aggregation. Figure 2. Myotis lucifugus with .37 gram radio tag, ready for release at capture site (in this case the foraging area). 17 km 19 km from WB Roost 5 km 14 km 13 km Large Maternity Roost Small/Med. Roost Night Roost Non-Woodard Bay Myotis Foraging Area Woodard Bay Myotis Foraging Area BAT KEY Figure 4. Map of the area used by the bats under study, encompassing urban Olympia, Washington and the area north and east of Olympia bordered on the north by Puget Sound.

Upload: others

Post on 01-Nov-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bat Foraging Distance and Duration · Personal communication Brigham, RM, HDJN Aldridge, and RL Mackey.1992. Variation in habitat use and prey selection by Yuma bats, Myotis yumanensis

Refe

renc

esAn

thony

, ELP

and T

H Ku

nz.

1977

. Fee

ding s

trateg

ies of

the l

ittle b

rown

bat,

Myo

tis lu

cifug

us, in

south

ern N

ew H

amps

hire.

Eco

logy.

58:77

5-78

6.Ba

rbou

r, RW

, and

WH

Davis

. 196

9 . B

ats of

Ame

rica.

The

Univ

ersit

y Pre

ss of

Ken

tucky

.Ba

rclay

, RMR

2003

. Per

sona

l com

munic

ation

Brigh

am, R

M, H

DJN

Aldr

idge,

and R

L Mac

key.1

992.

Varia

tion

in ha

bitat

use a

nd pr

ey se

lectio

n by Y

uma b

ats, M

yotis

yum

anen

sis.

Chru

szcz

BJ,a

nd R

MR B

arcla

y. P

rolon

ged f

orag

ing bo

uts of

a so

litary

glean

ing/ha

wking

bat,

Myo

tis e

votis

.Can

adian

Jour

nal o

f Zoo

logy.

81: 8

23–8

26Ga

spar

i, M.

1994

. Rep

ort o

n bat

Stud

y at th

e W

ooda

rd B

ay N

atura

l Res

ource

Con

serva

tion

Area

. Unp

ublis

hed r

epor

t to W

ash.

Dept.

of N

atura

l Res

ource

sHa

rris,

AH. 1

974.

Myot

is yu

mane

nsis

in int

erior

south

weste

rn N

orth

Amer

ica, w

ith co

mmen

ts on

Myo

tis lu

cifug

us. J

ourn

al of

Mamm

alogy

55:51

2-51

3.He

nry,

M, D

W T

homa

s, R

Vaud

ry, an

d M C

arrie

r. 20

02. F

orag

ing di

stanc

es an

d hom

e ran

ge of

preg

nant

and l

actat

ing Li

ttle B

rown

bats

(Myo

tis lu

cifug

us).

Jo

urna

l of

Mamm

alogy

. 83:7

67-7

74Jo

hnsto

n, D.

2002

. Data

colle

ction

proto

col -

Yuma

bat

(Myo

tis yu

man

ensis

). Sa

n Fra

ncisc

o Estu

ary W

etlan

ds R

egion

al Mo

nitor

ing P

rogr

amNa

gorse

n, DW

. 199

3. Ba

ts of

Brit

ish C

olumb

ia. R

oyal

Britis

h Colu

mbia

Muse

um H

andb

ook

Orms

bee,

P. 20

03. U

SFS,

Eug

ene,

Oreg

on. p

erso

nal c

ommu

nicat

ion.

Schir

ato, G

, 200

3 pe

rsona

l com

munic

ation

Do

Larg

e C

olon

ies

Cre

ate

Lon

g C

omm

ute

s? E

xam

inin

g M

yoti

sB

at F

orag

ing

Dis

tan

ce a

nd

Du

rati

onG

reg

Falx

a, C

asca

dia

Res

earc

h C

olle

ctiv

e, O

lym

pia,

Wa.

g

regf

@ef

n.o

rg

Intr

oduc

tion

Eac

h sp

ring

and

sum

mer

the

larg

est k

now

n ba

t co

lony

in W

ashi

ngto

n st

ate,

a m

ixed

-spe

cies

mat

erni

ty

colo

ny o

f Litt

le b

row

n an

d Yu

ma

bats

(Myo

tis lu

cifu

gus

and

M. y

uman

ensi

s, o

r "M

YY

U/L

U")

roos

t in

an

aban

done

d ra

ilroa

d pi

er n

ear O

lym

pia,

Was

hing

ton

(Fig

s.

1 &

4).

The

bat

s be

gin

arriv

ing

in A

pril,

hav

e th

eir y

oung

in

ear

ly J

une.

Afte

r the

you

ng b

ecom

e vo

lant

in e

arly

Jul

y th

e co

lony

pea

ks a

t ove

r 3,0

00 in

divi

dual

s, th

en b

egin

s a

stea

dy d

eclin

e as

the

bats

dis

pers

e on

ly a

few

rem

ain

by

Sep

tem

ber.

Bas

ed o

n ex

amin

atio

n of

bat

s in

the

the

hand

, it

appe

ars

that

nea

rly a

ll of

the

bats

roos

ting

in th

e pi

er a

re

Yum

a ba

ts o

r Litt

le b

row

n ba

ts (G

aspa

ri 19

94) b

y ex

amin

ing

the

skul

ls o

f spe

cim

ens

(Sch

irato

200

3, p

ers.

co

mm

) and

in 2

004

by th

e au

thor

col

lect

ing

time-

expa

nsio

n ca

lls w

ith a

Pet

ters

son

D24

0x u

ltras

onic

de

tect

or a

nd a

naly

zing

the

calls

with

Son

oBat

sof

twar

e (P

ette

rsso

n E

leck

troni

k, S

wed

en &

Son

oBat

, Arc

adia

, C

A.).

In

the

coas

tal P

acifi

c N

orth

wes

t the

se 2

spe

cies

are

ex

trem

ely

diffi

cult

to d

istin

guis

h by

mor

phol

ogic

al fe

atur

es

(Har

ris 1

974)

and

iden

tific

atio

n be

twee

n th

ese

two

in th

e ha

nd is

unr

elia

ble

with

out t

he a

id o

f gen

etic

ana

lysi

s or

tim

e ex

pans

ion

call

anal

ysis

(Pat

Orm

sbee

, per

s. c

omm

.).

Bot

h Yu

ma

bats

and

Litt

le B

row

n ba

ts fo

rage

in o

r nea

r rip

aria

n ar

eas

whe

n th

ey a

re a

vaila

ble,

feed

ing

heav

ily o

n aq

uatic

em

erge

nt in

sect

s (B

righa

m e

t al.

1992

); an

d th

is

stud

y su

ppor

ts e

arlie

r rep

orts

that

the

se tw

o sp

ecie

s w

ill

use

sim

ilar r

esou

rces

for m

ater

nity

roos

ts (N

agor

sen

&

Brig

ham

199

3).

The

roos

t are

a is

bor

dere

d by

sal

twat

er in

lets

of

Pug

et S

ound

to th

e no

rth a

nd e

ast,

sem

i-rur

al o

pen

and

woo

ded

land

to th

e so

uth

and

wes

t whi

ch th

en tr

ansi

tions

in

to u

rban

are

as 8

-10

km fr

om th

e m

ater

nity

roos

t. W

e ex

pect

ed th

ese

bats

to fo

rage

at a

ser

ies

of p

onds

and

w

etla

nds

loca

ted

2 an

d 6

km to

the

sout

h of

the

roos

t and

fo

r the

ir ni

ghtly

act

ivity

alte

rnat

e be

twee

n bo

uts

of fo

ragi

ng

and

perio

ds o

f nig

ht ro

ostin

g. T

his

nigh

tly p

atte

rn is

wid

ely

repo

rted

for i

nsec

tivor

ous

bats

. Bot

h of

thes

e as

sum

ptio

ns

gene

rally

pro

ved

to b

e w

rong

for t

his

grou

p.

Met

hods

We

mon

itore

d th

e m

ater

nity

col

ony

popu

latio

n w

ith fl

yout

(em

erge

nce)

cou

nts

from

late

Mar

ch to

ear

ly O

ctob

er, 2

003

and

2004

. We

capt

ured

bat

s le

avin

g th

e pi

er w

ith m

ist n

ets

on 1

6 ni

ghts

bet

wee

n m

id-A

pril

and

late

Aug

ust b

oth

year

s.

We

used

Ski

nBon

d ad

hesi

ve to

atta

ch ra

dio-

tags

with

a 1

2-da

y ba

ttery

life

(.36

gr

am L

B-2

N, H

oloh

il S

yste

ms)

to 4

pre

gnan

t and

6 p

ost-l

acta

ting

bats

. We

gath

ered

an

aver

age

of o

ver 8

nig

hts

of fo

ragi

ng a

nd n

ight

roos

ting

beha

vior

pe

r rad

io-ta

gged

bat

. To

per

mit

inte

nsiv

e m

onito

ring

of th

e su

bjec

ts’ a

ctiv

ities

on

a fi

ne s

cale

, onl

y on

e ba

t was

radi

o-ta

gged

at a

tim

e. T

rack

ing

was

ac

com

plis

hed

by fi

rst e

stab

lishi

ng v

icin

ity lo

catio

ns u

sing

a v

ehic

le o

utfit

ted

with

a Y

aesu

FT-

817

ham

radi

o (V

erte

x-S

tand

ard,

Cyp

ress

, CA

) , o

mni

-di

rect

iona

l gai

n an

tenn

a, lo

w-n

oise

pre

ampl

ifier

, and

dig

ital a

udio

pro

cess

or (t

o re

duce

igni

tion

nois

e) .

The

obse

rver

then

sw

itche

d to

a p

orta

ble

tele

met

ry

rece

iver

and

use

d a

eith

er a

3 o

r 4-e

lem

ent h

andh

eld

Yagi

ant

enna

to o

btai

n di

rect

iona

l inf

orm

atio

n an

d "w

alk-

in" l

ocat

ions

on

the

bat.

Whe

n a

tagg

ed b

at's

si

gnal

was

lost

or c

ould

not

be

hear

d, a

sea

rch

patte

rn w

as in

itiat

ed fr

om it

s la

st k

now

n lo

catio

n. R

e-ac

quiri

ng a

lost

sig

nal c

ould

som

etim

es ta

ke h

ours

, or

not a

ccom

plis

hed

unt

il he

follo

win

g da

y. L

arge

mov

emen

ts s

uch

as s

witc

hing

da

y ro

osts

sep

arat

ed b

y 19

km

wer

e su

cces

sful

ly tr

acke

d, a

nd a

sin

gle

bat

cros

sing

2 P

uget

Sou

nd in

lets

(in

succ

essi

on) w

ere

succ

essf

ully

trac

ked.

Figu

re 5

. C

apito

l Lak

e, O

lym

pia,

Was

hing

ton.

One

of t

he d

ista

nt fe

edin

gar

eas

for t

he b

ats

from

th

e W

ooda

rd B

ay c

olon

y, w

here

som

e fo

rage

d co

ntin

uous

ly fo

r nea

rly 6

hou

rs b

efor

e re

turn

ing

to

a da

y ro

ost,

with

no

rest

bre

aks

or n

ight

roos

ting.

Res

ults

Thre

e of

the

10 ra

dio-

tagg

ed b

ats

fora

ged

for l

ong

perio

ds w

ith n

o ni

ght r

oost

ing

obse

rved

, 3 o

ther

s ni

ght r

oost

ed o

nly

whe

n it

star

ted

rain

ing

whi

le th

ey w

ere

invo

lved

in fe

edin

g, e

mer

ging

shor

tly a

fter t

he ra

in a

bate

d to

con

tinue

fora

ging

. The

rem

aini

ng 4

ro

utin

ely

roos

ted

2 o

r 3 ti

mes

nig

htly

, clo

se to

the

fora

ging

are

a (in

all

case

s a

lake

, lar

ge p

ond

or o

pen

wet

land

) for

bet

wee

n 5

and

40 m

inut

es, t

hen

emer

ging

to c

ontin

ue fo

ragi

ng in

the

adja

cent

are

as. A

ll ra

dio-

tagg

ed b

ats

wer

e tra

cked

to lo

catio

ns g

reat

er

than

8 k

m fr

om th

eir d

ay ro

ost,

7 ba

ts tr

avel

ed g

reat

er th

an 1

2 km

. Fi

ve o

f the

7 b

ats

tagg

ed a

t the

larg

e W

ooda

rd B

ay c

olon

y co

mm

uted

to a

250

acr

e ur

ban

lake

(Fig

. 5) a

dis

tanc

e ov

er 1

3 km

from

the

capt

ure

loca

tion.

Tw

o of

thes

e ba

ts w

ere

track

ed to

th

is d

ista

nt la

ke o

n 6

cons

ecut

ive

nigh

ts e

ach

(one

in J

uly

and

one

in A

ugus

t), a

nd o

ne o

f the

se tr

avel

ed d

irect

ly to

the

lake

from

th

e da

y ro

ost,

fora

ged

non-

stop

for 5

.75

hou

rs, t

hen

trave

led

back

to th

e ro

ost f

or a

tota

l of 6

.75

cont

inuo

us h

ours

"on

the

win

g."

Dis

cuss

ion

Thes

e on

e-w

ay c

omm

ute

dist

ance

s ra

ngin

g be

twee

n 10

and

15

km a

re c

onsi

dera

bly

grea

ter t

han

prev

ious

ly re

porte

d;

stud

ies

and

surv

eys

for t

hese

2 s

peci

es in

dica

te d

ista

nces

of <

1km

to 8

km

bet

wee

n da

y ro

osts

and

fora

ging

are

as (B

arbo

ur a

nd

Dav

is 1

969;

Bar

clay

, per

s. c

omm

.; H

enry

et a

l 200

2; J

ohns

ton

2002

). T

he n

on-s

top

flyin

g fo

r up

to 6

.75

hour

s w

as a

lso

unus

ual.

Chr

uszc

z &

Bar

clay

(200

3) fi

rst r

epor

ted

inse

ctiv

orou

s ba

ts (L

ong-

eare

d m

yotis

, Myo

tis e

votis

) spe

ndin

g 90

% o

f the

ir ou

t-of-r

oost

tim

e fo

ragi

ng. T

hey

felt

this

mig

ht b

e re

late

d to

the

spec

ies

bein

g ne

ar th

e ed

ge o

f its

rang

e, e

xerc

isin

g a

flexi

ble

feed

ing

stra

tegy

as

they

gle

an in

sect

s fro

m s

urfa

ces

as w

ell a

s ta

king

pre

y ae

rially

. Thi

s w

ould

allo

w th

em to

take

adv

anta

ge o

f the

per

iod

betw

een

mid

nigh

t and

sho

rtly

befo

re d

awn

whe

n ae

rial i

nsec

t cou

nts

are

low

er (A

ntho

ny e

t al.

1977

), bu

t ins

ects

on

surfa

ces

are

still

avai

labl

e fo

r gle

anin

g. H

owev

er, s

ince

Litt

le b

row

n an

d Yu

ma

bats

are

thou

ght t

o be

exc

lusi

vely

haw

king

(aer

ial)

feed

ers,

we

expe

ct th

at e

mer

gent

aqu

atic

inse

cts

are

avai

labl

e al

l nig

ht a

t Cap

itol L

ake

durin

g th

e su

mm

er m

onth

s. A

dditi

onal

ly, L

ittle

bro

wn

and

Yum

a ba

ts a

re c

omm

on in

this

regi

on a

nd n

ot n

ear t

he e

xten

t of t

heir

rang

e. T

hese

long

uni

nter

rupt

ed fo

ragi

ng ti

mes

ent

irely

over

this

one

lake

may

indi

cate

that

reso

urce

s at

the

site

are

not

all

that

abu

ndan

t, as

4.5

-5.

5 ho

urs

shou

ld b

e en

ough

tim

e fo

r a

Littl

e br

own

bat t

o fil

l its

sto

mac

h se

vera

l tim

es (B

arcl

ay, p

ers.

com

m).

The

thre

e ba

ts in

our

stu

dy th

at d

id n

ight

-roos

t reg

ular

ly

(incl

udin

g no

n-ra

iny

nigh

ts) d

id s

o fo

r onl

y 10

to 4

0 m

inut

es a

t a ti

me,

and

rare

ly m

ore

than

twic

e a

nigh

t. Th

ree

bats

wer

e ne

ver

obse

rved

nig

ht ro

ostin

g w

hen

away

from

the

day

roos

t. It

is u

nkno

wn

why

thes

e ba

ts w

ere

regu

larly

fora

ging

at g

reat

er d

ista

nces

than

pre

viou

sly

repo

rted

for L

ittle

bro

wn

or Y

uma

myo

tis. P

ossi

ble

expl

anat

ions

offe

red

have

incl

uded

: gre

ater

com

petit

ion

for

reso

urce

s by

a la

rger

col

ony;

bec

ause

the

dist

ant l

ake

offe

rs a

sup

erio

r for

age

oppo

rtuni

ties;

that

the

fine

scal

e m

onito

ring

ofin

divi

dual

bat

s re

veal

s be

havi

or th

at m

ight

be

been

mis

sed

by le

ss in

tens

ive

met

hods

.

13 k

m fr

om

Cap

itol L

ake

Ackn

owled

gem

ents

: Man

y tha

nks t

o Lor

i Salz

er, L

isa H

alloc

k, Mi

chae

l Bak

er, M

ary L

inder

s, Jo

anna

& JD

Mille

r, Jo

hn F

lecke

nstei

n, Jo

hn K

onov

sky,

Don M

artin

, Nan

cy La

ich, K

elly M

cAllis

ter, S

cott P

earso

n, Mi

chae

l Lac

ki, M

ichele

Zuc

kerb

erg,

Marg

aret

Gasp

ari, L

anny

Car

pente

r, Jo

hn C

alamb

okidi

s, Mi

chell

e Stev

ie, S

tephe

n and

Dak

ota P

asqu

al, R

ober

ta Da

venp

ort, T

yra Li

ndqu

ist, G

retch

en B

latz,

Jeff F

oisy,

Lee

Temp

leman

, Aim

ee H

art, P

at Or

msbe

e, an

d to t

he bo

ard o

f Cas

cadia

Rese

arch

. Rad

io tag

ging w

as m

ade p

ossib

le be

caus

e of s

uppo

rt fro

m Ba

ts No

rthwe

st, C

asca

dia R

esea

rch ,

and W

DF&W

Reg

ion 6.

Figu

re 1

. Fem

ale

and

juve

nile

bat

s ro

ost i

n la

rge

clus

ters

und

er th

e su

ppor

ting

beam

s of

the

aban

done

d ra

ilroa

d pi

er.

22 k

m

Conclusion

Our

resu

lts su

gges

t tha

t asp

ects

of th

e re

porte

d fo

ragi

ng b

ehav

ior f

or sm

all m

yotis

bats

is

not

app

licab

le th

is la

ndsc

ape,

and

that

thes

e sm

all b

ats h

ave

the

met

abol

ic c

apac

ity a

nd

endu

ranc

e to

regu

larly

mak

e lo

ng c

omm

utes

to fe

edin

g ar

eas.

Man

yfo

rage

long

hou

rs

inte

rrup

ted

by li

ttle

of n

o ni

ght r

oost

ing,

then

com

mut

e ba

ck to

a di

stan

t day

roos

t. T

he

hypo

thes

is m

ade

in 2

003

that

the

larg

e co

lony

size

at W

ooda

rd B

ay fo

rced

thes

e lo

ng

dist

ance

s in

orde

r to

disp

erse

ove

r a la

rger

feed

ing

area

was

not

supp

orte

d by

the

2004

dat

a ob

tain

ed fr

om “

MY

LU/Y

U”

bats

tagg

ed a

t Cap

itol L

ake

whi

ch c

omm

uted

just

as f

ar (u

p to

15

km) t

o sm

all m

ater

nity

roos

ts in

ent

irely

diff

eren

t are

as (F

igur

e 4)

. Whe

ther

the

beha

vior

of

thes

e ba

ts is

exc

eptio

nal o

r if t

he m

etho

ds e

mpl

oyed

faci

litat

edm

ore

rem

ote

obse

rvat

ions

that

m

ight

hav

e be

en o

ther

wis

e m

isse

d ca

nnot

be

infe

rred

from

this

smal

l stu

dy, b

ut tr

acki

ng b

ats

usin

g m

etho

ds th

at a

llow

con

tinuo

us o

bser

vatio

n of

the

subj

ect’s

beha

vior

may

hel

p us

de

velo

p m

etho

ds fo

r stu

dies

with

larg

er sa

mpl

ing

effo

rt. C

erta

inly

the

obse

rvat

ion

that

the

“sig

nal w

as lo

st”

shou

ld fl

ag th

e ne

ed to

reev

alua

te th

e as

sum

ptio

ns re

gard

ing

the

rang

e.

Trac

king

radi

o-ta

gged

bat

s in

an u

rban

land

scap

e of

fers

som

e un

ique

obs

tacl

es su

ch a

s lim

ited

publ

ic a

cces

s with

in th

e st

udy

area

, and

dec

reas

ed si

gnal

det

ectio

n ra

nge

due

to

incr

ease

d el

ectri

cal i

nter

fere

nce

(fro

m p

ower

line

s, co

mpu

ters

, and

stro

ng ra

dio

sign

als)

and

in

flat

are

as li

ke o

ur st

udy

area

, fro

m th

e la

ck o

f ele

vate

d va

ntag

e po

ints

to in

crea

se th

e lin

e-of

-sig

ht d

ista

nce.

And

bec

ause

of o

ur e

xper

ienc

e w

ith a

def

ectiv

e ta

g, w

e re

com

men

d pe

rfor

min

g di

stan

ce te

sts o

n al

l rad

io ta

gs p

rior t

o de

ploy

men

t on

stud

y su

bjec

ts. W

e co

ntin

ue

to in

vest

igat

e ba

t util

izat

ion

at C

apito

l Lak

e us

ing

tim

e ex

pans

ion

acou

stic

sam

plin

g m

etho

ds

to b

ette

r ide

ntify

the

spec

ies a

nd sp

atia

l dist

ribut

ion

at th

is la

rge

fora

ging

agg

rega

tion.

Figu

re 2

. Myo

tis lu

cifu

gus

with

.37

gram

radi

o ta

g, re

ady

for r

elea

se a

t ca

ptur

e si

te (i

n th

is c

ase

the

fora

ging

are

a).

17 k

m

19 k

m fr

om W

B R

oost

5 km

14 k

m

13 k

m

Larg

e M

ater

nity

Roo

stSm

all/M

ed. R

oost

Nig

ht R

oost

Non

-Woo

dard

Bay

M

yotis

For

agin

g Ar

eaW

ooda

rd B

ay M

yotis

Fo

ragi

ng A

rea

BA

T

KE

Y

Figu

re 4

. Map

of t

he a

rea

used

by

the

bats

und

er s

tudy

, enc

ompa

ssin

g ur

ban

Oly

mpi

a,

Was

hing

ton

and

the

area

nor

th a

nd e

ast o

f Oly

mpi

a bo

rder

ed o

n th

e no

rth b

y Pu

get S

ound

.