bases of countable boolean algebras

4

Click here to load reader

Upload: r-s-pierce

Post on 15-Jan-2017

219 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bases of Countable Boolean Algebras

Bases of Countable Boolean AlgebrasAuthor(s): R. S. PierceSource: The Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol. 38, No. 2 (Jun., 1973), pp. 212-214Published by: Association for Symbolic LogicStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2272057 .

Accessed: 16/06/2014 00:41

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

Association for Symbolic Logic is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to TheJournal of Symbolic Logic.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 185.44.77.38 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:41:00 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: Bases of Countable Boolean Algebras

THE JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC

Volume 38, Number 2, June 1973

BASES OF COUNTABLE BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS

R. S. PIERCE1

The purpose of this note is to give a short proof of a conjecture of Feiner that every countable Boolean algebra has an ordered basis that is a lexicographic sum of well-ordered sets over the ordered set -y of all rational numbers. Actually, we prove a slightly more precise fact, which is formulated below as Theorem 3. An earlier proof of Feiner's conjecture was obtained by David Cossack (unpublished), using a different method.

Our proof will use the following property2 of Cantor's dyadic discontinuum D. LEMMA 1. Let B be a dense subset of D, and suppose that X is a countable set of

points in D. Then there is a homeomorphism of D onto itself that maps X into B. PROOF. Let X = {X1, X2, X3, * *}. Being homeomorphic to a countable product

of two point spaces, D is a complete metric space with the property that each of its points has arbitrarily small, metrically homogeneous, compact, open neighbor- hoods. Thus, it is possible to construct a sequence (po (P, T2, . . * of isometrics of D such that 9p is the identity mapping on D; for every x E D, the distance from x to Tk(X) is at most 2 k; if j < k, then Tk(Tk-1 *. TOX) = (k- I x oxj; and (Pk((Pk 1 .PoXk) e B. These properties, together with the completeness of D, guarantee that limk. Tk(pk -I... po exists, and it is easy to check that this limit is an isometry of D that carries X into B.

Our proof of Feiner's conjecture is based on a lemma that is a variant of Theorem 1.2 in [2]. The proof of this lemma employs a construction given by Reichbach in [3], and it is considerably shorter than the original proof of 1.2 in [2].

Let I denote the unit interval [0, 1]. The Cantor set will be written in the form D = I - Un<(JJnf where Jn = (an, bn), and these intervals are disjoint. Denote Y = {bn: n < w}. The definition of D is such that Y is dense in D.

If T is any Hausdorff space, and e is any ordinal number, then the expression T(? stands for the transfinite topological derivative of order e.

LEMMA 2. Let V be a space that is homeomorphic to D, and suppose that V- V0 D V1 D * * * D V, D * * *, e < i, where each V! is closed and nonempty, and it is a countable ordinal. Then there is a closed subset Z of I with D c Z, and a homeomor- phism cp of V onto D such that

(a) Z(Ut) = D and Z - D is homeomorphic to wa;

Received October 12, 1971. 1 This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant GP-29248.

The author is grateful to Professor W. P. Hanf for pointing out Feiner's conjecture, and later mentioning Cossack's proof of it.

2 According to Professor R. D. Anderson, this lemma is well-known folklore of point set topology. However, the author was not able to find it stated explicitly in the literature. For this reason, a brief proof of the result is included in the paper.

212 ( 1973, Association for Symbolic Logic

This content downloaded from 185.44.77.38 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:41:00 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: Bases of Countable Boolean Algebras

BASES OF COUNTABLE BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS 213

(b) (Z'' - D)- n D = p(V~) for all t < Mt;

(c) K& = Z rn [a,, bJ) is order isomorphic to W@(n, for some countable ordinal ae(n);

(d) the points of Z that are covered (in the ordering of Z inherited from the usual ordering of I) are exactly the elements of Un<coK

PROOF. Since tk is countable, there is a countable, dense subset W of V such that W: = W n V: is dense in V: for each e < tk. For convenience, define WA = 0. By Lemma 1, there is a homeomorphism p of V onto D such that T(W) c Y. For n < w, define ae(n) = min{f < ,t: bn 0 T(W,)}. Note that bn e T(WO) if and only if f < a(n). Define sets Kn C [an, bn) satisfying

(1) Kn is relatively closed in [an, bn); (2) Kn is order isomorphic to W,(n'; (3) an Kn; (4) bn is a limit point of Kn. Such sets exist because ae(n) is countable. By Lemma 4.5 in [2], we have (5) Kn(? = 0 if e > a(n); (6) bn is a limit point of Kn?( if e < ae(n).

Finally, define (7) Z = D U Un<wKn

Since I - Z = Un<,(Jn - Kn), and each Jn - Kn is a nonempty union of open intervals by (1)-(4), it follows that Z is closed in I. The assertion (c) of the lemma is clear from the definition of Z, and (d) follows easily from (2) and (3). Since Kn - {an} is open in Z, and Z4 =-D(4) = D for all e, we have Z(4) 0 Kn = Kn? U {an}, and Z(4 = Z(4) (D U Un<wKn) = D u Un<(oKnM. Thus, by (5),

(8) Za = D U U{Kn(4: ae(n) > e}. In particular, Z(e) = D. If bn e Tp( Wi), then t < ae(n) so that, by (6), bn (Z( - D) .

Therefore, T(V,) = (W:)- c (Z4 - D)r n D. To reverse this inclusion, sup- pose that x E D - i(V,). Then there is a neighborhood N of x such that N n

q((W4) = 0. We can assume that N = (br, as) for suitable r and s. It follows that if n < w is such that Jn n N =# 0, then bn e N, and, consequently, bn 0 p((W4). Therefore, ae(n) < e so that, by (8), N n (Z)- D) = 0. Thus, x 0 (Z a - D) -, which establishes (b). To prove the last part of (a), note that (Z - D)4 = Z4'- D is not compact if e < tk, and (Z - D)(") = 0. By Proposition 3.2 in [2], Z - D is homeomorphic to wt.

We can now prove Feiner's conjecture. THEOREM 3. Let A be a countable Boolean algebra. Then A has an ordered basis

of one of the forms wA n + 1, with A a countable ordinal and n < w; , 6,War + 1, with -q the countable dense order type and each ac. a countable ordinal; or a sum of these two types.

PROOF. Let X be the Boolean space associated with A. By the discussion in ?3 of [2], X can be written as a disjoint union X = U1 U U2, with U1 and U2 closed in X, and

(1) U1 = 0, or U1 is homeomorphic to wA n + 1, A countable, n < w;

(2) U2 = 0, or U2 ) is homeomorphic to D and U2 - U) is homeomorphic to wi, tk countable.

This topological decomposition corresponds to a direct product A = B1 x B2,

This content downloaded from 185.44.77.38 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:41:00 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 4: Bases of Countable Boolean Algebras

214 R. S. PIERCE

where U1 is the Boolean space of B1 and U2 is the Boolean space of B2. By Theorem 2.5 of [1], B1 has an ordered basis of type wA .n + 1. So consider U2, which we may assume to be nonempty. Let V = U(,) and, for 6 < /i, let V: = (U24'- V)- n V. By Lemma 2, we can construct Z c I, and a homeomorphism 9 of V onto D such that Z(u) = D, Z - Z(#) is homeomorphic to co, and T(V~) = (Z(4)-D)- n D for all e < [t. By Theorem 1.1 in [2], p extends to a homeomorphism of U2 onto Z. Our proof is completed by the observation that {an: ni < w} has order type -y, so that, by (c) and (d) of Lemma 2 and Theorem 2.5 of [1], B2 has an ordered basis of type 2;r w`ar + 1, where each a, is countable.

REFERENCES

[1] R. D. MAYER and R. S. PIERCE, Boolean algebras with ordered bases, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10 (1960), pp. 925-942.

[2] R. S. PIERCE, Existence and uniqueness theorenis for extensions of zero-dimensional compact metric spaces, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 148 (1970), pp. 1-21.

[3] M. REICHBACH, A note on O-dimensional compact sets, Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel, Section F (Mathematics and Physics), vol. 7F (1958), pp. 117-122.

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII

HONOLULU, HAWAII 96822

This content downloaded from 185.44.77.38 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:41:00 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions