basel - iii, pillar 3 disclosures for the quarter ended 30.09 · basel iii pillar 3 disclosures for...
TRANSCRIPT
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 1
Updated as on 17.11.2017
Head Office: Manipal – 576104, Corporate Office: Gandhinagar, Bangalore – 56009, Karnataka
Basel - III, Pillar 3 Disclosures for the quarter ended 30.09.2017
Syndicate Bank was established in 1925 in Udupi in Karnataka State as Canara Industrial and Banking Syndicate Ltd., mainly to provide financial assistance to local weavers. In 1963, the Bank changed its name from Canara Industrial and Banking Syndicate Ltd. to Syndicate Bank Ltd. In 1969, the Bank was nationalised and became a Public Sector Bank.
As of 30th September 2017, the Government of India has held 72.92% stake in the Bank. The Bank‟s shares are listed with Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE: 532276) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE: SYNDIBANK).
RBI has prescribed implementation of the Basel III capital regulations in India with effect from April 1, 2013. Banks have to comply with the regulatory capital limits and minimum CRAR as prescribed under Basel III capital regulations, on an ongoing basis. To ensure smooth transition to Basel III, appropriate transitional arrangements have been provided for meeting the minimum Basel III capital ratios, full regulatory adjustments to the components of capital etc. Basel III capital regulations would be fully implemented by March 31, 2019.
Scope of Application and Capital Adequacy
Pillar 3 disclosures apply to SyndicateBank and Bank, being a consolidated entity, has to comply with the capital adequacy ratio requirements at two levels:
a) Consolidated (“Group”) level capital adequacy ratio requirements, which measure the capital adequacy of a bank based on its capital strength and risk profile after consolidating the assets and liabilities of its subsidiaries / joint ventures / associates etc. except those engaged in insurance & any non-financial activities; and
b) Standalone (“Solo”) level capital adequacy ratio requirements, which measure the capital adequacy of a Bank based on its standalone capital strength and risk profile.
Overseas operations of SyndicateBank through its branch in London are covered in both the above scenarios.
Table DF-1: Scope of Application
i. Qualitative Disclosures
Basis of consolidation for capital adequacy
The entities considered for consolidation for capital adequacy include subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures of the Bank, which carry on activities of banking or
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 2
financial nature as stated in the scope for preparing consolidated prudential reports as prescribed by RBI.
List of group entities considered for consolidation (Accounting/Regulatory)
Name of the Entity / Country of incorporation
Whether the entity
is Included under
Accounting scope of consolidation (Yes /
No)
Explain the method of
consolidation (Accounting
scope)
Explain the reasons for
difference in the method
of Consolidation
Explain the reasons if
consolidated under only one of the scope of
Consolidation
Syndbank Services Limited (India)
Yes AS 21 line – by
– line basis
Non Financial subsidiary
(100% owned)
Deducted from Regulatory
Capital
Prathama Bank (India)
Yes AS 23 Equity
Method Associate
Risk Weighted for Capital adequacy purposes
Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank (India)
Yes AS 23 Equity
Method Associate
Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank (India)
Yes AS 23 Equity
Method Associate
a) List of group entities not considered for consolidation both under the accounting and regulatory scope of consolidation There are no group entities of SyndicateBank that are not considered for consolidation under both the accounting scope of consolidation and regulatory scope of consolidation.
ii. Quantitative Disclosures:
a) List of group entities considered for consolidation (Regulatory scope): Nil
b) The aggregate amount of capital deficiencies in all subsidiaries which are not included in the regulatory scope of consolidation i.e. that are deducted: There is no capital deficiency in subsidiary of the bank
c) The aggregate amounts (e.g. current book value) of the bank’s total interests in insurance entities, which are risk-weighted: Bank does not have any investment in insurance entities.
d) Any restrictions or impediments on transfer of funds or regulatory capital within the banking group: Nil
Table DF-2: Capital Adequacy
i. Qualitative Disclosures
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 3
Assessment of capital: The Bank has a process for assessing its overall capital adequacy in relation to the Bank's risk profile and a strategy for maintaining its capital levels. The process provides an assurance that the Bank has adequate capital to support all risks inherent to its present business and to support the planned business growth and an appropriate capital buffer based on its business profile. The Bank identifies, assesses and manages comprehensively all risks that it is exposed to, through sound governance and control practices, robust risk management framework and an elaborate process for capital calculation and planning. Bank has, Board approved comprehensive Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and Stress test policy which was adopted in 2008. Bank has been modifying/revising the ICAAP policy on an annual basis based on the experience gained, sophistication achieved and also as per the suggestions/observations made by RBI during its AFI/Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process.
The Bank has a structured management framework in the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process for the identification and evaluation of the significance of all risks that the Bank faces, which may have an adverse material impact on its financial position. The Bank considers the following as material risks; it is exposed to, in the normal course of its business and therefore, factors these in ICAAP
(a) Credit Risk
(b) Credit Concentration Risk
Name concentration
Group Concentration
Sector concentration
Zone concentration
Asset Type concentration
External & Internal rating grade concentration
(c) Market Risk (not covered under Pillar I)
(d) Operational Risk (not covered under Pillar I)
(e) Liquidity Risk
(f) Interest Rate Risk in Banking Book
Other Risks covered as part of Pillar 2, in ICAAP: - In addition to the above mentioned risks, Bank also assesses the following risks as part of Pillar 2 in qualitative manner.
(a) Reputational Risk
(b) Strategic Risk
(c) Group Risk
(d) Settlement Risk
(e) Pension Obligation Risk
(f) Loss of Key Personnel
(g) Model Risk
The Bank has implemented a Board approved Stress Testing Framework taking into consideration RBI guidelines which forms an integral part of the Bank's ICAAP and provides an assessment of the capital requirement and impact on Profits of the Bank under stressed conditions envisaged by the Bank.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 4
The purpose of stress testing is to assess the impact of various „shocks‟ on the quality of the bank‟s portfolio and an assessment of the bank‟s ability to withstand such shocks if such an event/s materializes. When such events actually take place, the quality of assets held by a bank will deteriorate and may lead to reduced profits or constrain the bank to keep more capital.
In order to assess the impact on CRAR and income of the bank, the Stress Test will be conducted on quarterly basis. The Bank assesses the impact on the following risks, as part of Stress Test:
(a) Credit Risk
Non-performing assets
Restructured assets
Collateral
Concentration Risk
(b) Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
Interest rate Risk
- Trading Book
- Banking Book
Equity Price Risk
(c) Liquidity Risk
The two broad categories of stress tests used are sensitivity tests and scenario analysis.
ii. Quantitative Disclosures:
a) Capital requirement for Credit Risk:
Particulars Amount
(` in Millions)
Portfolios subject to Standardised Approach
155,954.81
Securitisation exposures* -
Total 155,954.81
* Bank does not have any exposure to securitisation transactions
b) Capital requirements for Market risk:
Standardized Duration Approach Amount (` in Millions)
Interest rate risk 10,451.03
Foreign exchange risk(including gold) 138.38
Equity risk 3,457.33
Total 14,046.73
c) Capital requirements for Operational risk:
Particulars Amount
(` in Millions)
Basic indicator approach 16,389.42
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 5
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 6
d) Common Equity Tier1, Tier1 and Total Capital ratios (Basel III):
Particulars %
Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio 7.23%
Tier 1 Ratio 9.20%
Total Capital Ratio 12.17%
iii. Risk Exposure and Assessment
Credit Risk
a) Definition: Credit Risk is defined as the possibility of losses associated with diminution in the credit quality of counterparties. In a Bank‟s portfolio, losses stem from outright default due to inability or unwillingness of a customer or counterparty to meet commitments in relation to lending, trading, settlement and other financial transactions. Alternatively, losses result from reduction in portfolio value arising from actual or perceived deterioration in credit quality of the assets.
b) Credit Risk Strategy: One of the key components of credit risk management framework is credit risk strategy. Bank has sound credit risk strategy to meet the objectives of credit risk management. Bank's Credit Risk Strategy is in consonance with credit philosophy of the Bank, which emphasizes quality assets, profitable relationships and prudent growth.
Accordingly, Bank's Credit Risk Strategy is guided by the following principles:
Credit granting process of the Bank would be marked by careful assessment in selecting borrowers and prudence in approving loans.
Credit quality shall not be compromised for the sake of earnings or volumes. The business development would aim to diffuse credit risks through broadening of the client base, sectoral diversification and geographical distribution.
Credit Risk strategy of the Bank would also seek to mitigate the cyclical economic trends and ensure that, the shifts in the composition of credit do not have an adverse effect on overall quality of the credit portfolio.
Bank employs the following processes to accomplish its credit risk strategies.
Establishment of pro-active risk management practices
Separation of credit risk management functions from credit sanction
Risk based appraisal and sanction
Multi-tiered credit approval system
Discriminatory sanction levels based on amount, transaction risks and rating
Independent loan review mechanism
Focused attention on problem/ weak credit exposures
Review / exit in case of low quality assets.
Risk driven management of credit ceilings or limits
Capture, Analysis and Measurement of Credit Risk
Risk based pricing
Focused approach to specialized lending. This is being done through establishment of Large / Corporate Finance/ Mid-corporate branches, and retail loan centers.
Identify Low Priority Industries based on the current exposure and NPA levels
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 7
Thus the strategy would determine the Bank‟s willingness to grant loans based on the type of economic activity, geographical location, currency, market, maturity and anticipated profitability. This would necessarily translate into the identification of target markets and business sectors, preferred levels of diversification and concentration, cost of capital in granting credit and cost of bad debts.
Credit Risk Management System
The credit risk management system encompasses the following:
i. Identification of Risk: Bank has methods and procedures to identify or locate the credit risk. Timely identification of risk will enable the Bank to initiate timely corrective action.
ii. Assessment of Risk: Assessment is done by rating the borrower and classifying the borrower under a particular risk grade. Each risk grade indicates the relative riskiness of the borrower vis-à-vis others in the portfolio. Risk assessment is quantified for the purpose of grading and comparison.
iii. Monitoring of Risk: Once the risk is identified and assessed, Bank continuously monitors and ensure that the risk remains within manageable limits. Risk monitoring is an important tool of the Bank to protect the quality of the asset and avoid slippage to NPA.
iv. Control and Mitigation of Risk: Controlling of risk is ensured by the Continuous monitoring undertaken in respect of „Special Mention Accounts‟ by the bank under a separate vertical called Credit Monitoring and Review department showing signs of slippage in asset quality and monitoring of exposure to sensitive sectors are undertaken on a monthly basis. Efforts are made to mitigate the risk. Risk is mitigated by way of obtaining collaterals or guarantees.
c) Credit Risk Governance:
The Bank has an independent Risk Management Department, which is headed by General Manager and is responsible for managing credit risk, market risk, operational risk and integration of all risks. The department functions independent of Credit Department and other operations and decision making processes. The Risk Management Department focuses on identification, assessment, monitoring and controlling and mitigating of risks across various segments.
i) Organisation Structure:
The Bank has implemented a robust and comprehensive Credit Risk Management framework. The Board of Directors assumes the overall responsibility for credit risk management and decides the credit risk management policy, strategies and sets prudential & other limits. The set-up of Risk Management Department is hereunder:
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 8
1. Risk Management Committee (RMC) of the Board: The Risk Management Committee, a sub-committee of the Board headed by Managing Director & CEO, devises the policy and strategies for integrated risk management containing various risk exposures of the Bank, including the credit risk.
The responsibilities of RMC include:
a) Setting risk strategies, risk policies, risk appetite and risk tolerance of the Bank. b) Setting policies and guidelines for measurement/ management/
monitoring/reporting of Credit Risk, Market Risk and Operational Risk. Approving all related policies i.e., Credit policy, Credit Risk Policy, Forex Treasury Policy and Operational guidelines, Domestic Treasury Policy and Operational Guidelines, ALM policy, Operational risk policy, etc.
c) Approving procedures for analysing, measuring and monitoring various risks, which should be sufficiently comprehensive to capture all material risk inherent in the Bank‟s business.
Board of Directors
Risk Management Committee
CommitteCOmmitte
CRMC (Credit
Risk
Management
Committee)
RMC at ROs
Market
Risk &
Liquidity
Risk
Credit
Policy
Formula
tion
BASEL
II/III
Impleme
ntation
ORMC
(Operational Risk
Management
Committee)
ALCO (Asset
Liability
Management
Committee)
Risk Management Department
ISMC (Information
Security Management
Committee)
SOC (Security Operations
Centre)
CIS (Centre for Information Security)
ISWG (Information
Security Working
Group)
CISO (Chief
Information Security
Officer)
Credit
Risk
Operation
al Risk
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 9
d) Setting up efficient internal control system to promote effective operations, reliable reporting, safeguarding assets and ensuring compliance with risk limits, laws, regulations and approved policies.
e) Approving and Reviewing risk limits under credit risks, market risks and operational risks
f) Undertaking on an ongoing basis an assessment of credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, equity price risk, foreign exchange risk, operational risk, legal risk, etc.
g) Ensuring robustness of financial models and effectiveness of all systems used to calculate Credit/Market/Operational risks.
h) Monitoring compliance with risk parameters by various operating departments and ensure the appropriateness of risk control process, keeping in view the level of risks posed by the bank‟s activities.
i) Paying prompt attention to identify material weaknesses and take remedial action.
j) Ensuring that risk management processes (related to people, systems, operations, limits and controls) satisfy Bank‟s policy.
k) Co-ordinate and supervise Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC), Asset-Liability Management Committee (ALCO) and Operational Risk Management Committee (ORMC) through review of minutes of these committees.
l) Report to the Board of Directors by placing the minutes of RMC meetings. m) Place any note to the Board for approval / discussion depending upon the
importance of the matter.
Separate sub-committees, are set up to manage and control various risks:
Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC)
Operational Risk Management Committee (ORMC)
Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO)
2. Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC): The Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC) chaired by Managing Director & CEO, is responsible for the implementation of the Credit Risk Policy and strategies approved by the Board. The committee monitors credit risk, clears policies and ensures compliance of policies.
3. Risk Management Cells at ROs: The Risk Management Cell at RO is responsible for overall credit and operational risk management functions including Basel II related work. The functions of Risk Management cell include review of reporting register, review of sanctions, confirmation of ratings, Basel II implementation, operational risk management, review of concurrent audit reports, monitoring of SM accounts, Mitra committee reports, monitoring issuance of Legal Compliance and Due Diligence certificate.
The scope and Nature of Credit Risk reporting and/ or measurement system
1) The credit risk of a borrower or that of a credit facility sanctioned to a borrower is assessed through a credit rating system. The rating of the borrower is done prior to sanction of the loan and review of the rating is to be done on regular basis. The confirmation of the rating is independent of sanction. Hurdle rates are prescribed by the Board for considering or rejecting a proposal for various portfolios. Credit Rating is also linked to decide Sanctioning Authority, Margin, Pricing and monitoring purposes.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 10
2) Portfolio credit risk is assessed by studying the exposures under the following
categories and appraised to Top Management, Risk Management Committee of the Board, Audit Committee of the Board and Board of Directors on a regular basis.
Prudential limits for individual and group borrowers – Ceiling on maximum credit that can be considered for an individual borrower / group of borrowers
Exposure ceiling for Top 20 Group and Top 20 Individual Borrowers
Industry-wise/sector-wise exposure ceilings
Exposure to Sensitive Sector
Exposure to Capital Market
Rating-wise distribution of all the advances
Migration of ratings – Movement of credit ratings in the credit portfolio as a whole over different time periods
3) Bank is having Loan Review Mechanism (LRM), which involves independent assessment of the quality of an advance, effectiveness of loan administration, compliance with internal policies of bank and regulatory framework and portfolio quality. It also helps in tracking weaknesses developing in the account for initiating corrective measures in time.
Policies for hedging and/or mitigating risk and strategies and processes for monitoring the continuing effectiveness of hedges/mitigants:
Bank has evolved several strategies/systems/procedures to mitigate and monitor credit risk. The operational guidelines pertaining to the Risk Monitoring and control systems put in place by the bank are as under.
The Bank has an independent Credit Monitoring & Review Department for identifying all problem accounts which places the same before Top Management and coordinates with functional departments at CO/HO, for effective monitoring of Special Mention accounts/Restructured accounts and takes feedback for any changes in the system/policy. Timely remedial action is taken to improve the quality of the assets and arrest slippage to NPA category. Similar structure exists in each RO.
Bank is having the system of Monthly Monitoring Report for borrowal accounts with balance outstanding of ` 1 crore and above for monitoring and follow up of advances and preventing from slipping to NPA.
Bank has also system of conducting periodic credit audits and stock audit for exposure beyond a threshold limit.
Security management is instrumental in mitigating credit risk. It involves creation of enforceable charge over the borrower/third party assets in favour of the Bank, proper valuation/storage/maintenance and insurance of the securities so charged at regular intervals, in order that the Bank‟s advances/loans remain fully covered by the realizable value of the securities charged to it. Further, the charged securities are valued at periodic intervals and stipulated margins are maintained at all times.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 11
Table DF-3: Credit Risk: General Disclosures
i. Qualitative Disclosures
A sound and efficient banking system is a sine qua non for maintaining financial
stability. Loans and advances constitute major portion of the assets of the Bank and
also a vital source of income. Asset quality is one of the major soundness indicators
of a bank. Therefore considerable emphasis has been placed on improving asset
quality. Prompt recovery of loans and advances not only increases the liquidity and
profitability position of the Bank, but also enables the Bank to recycle the funds for
alternate productive activities and to improve the bottom line.
The Bank classifies its advances (loans and credit substitutes in the nature of an advance) into performing and non-performing loans in accordance with the extant RBI guidelines on Asset classification, Income Recognition and Provisioning to Advances portfolio. An NPA is defined as a loan or an advance where:
An asset, including a leased asset, becomes non-performing when it ceases to
generate Income for the bank.
A non performing asset (NPA) is a loan or an advance where;
Interest and / or installment of principal remains overdue for a period of more than 90 days in respect of a term loan,
The account remains 'out of order', in respect of an Overdraft / Cash Credit (OD/ CC),
The bill remains overdue for a period of more than 90 days in the case of bills purchased and discounted,
The installment of principal or interest thereon remains overdue for two crop seasons for short duration crops,
The installment of principal or interest thereon remains overdue for one crop season for long duration crops,
The amount of liquidity facility remains outstanding for more than 90 days, in respect of a securitization transaction undertaken in terms of RBI guidelines on Securitization dated February 1, 2006.
in respect of derivative transactions, the overdue receivables representing positive mark-to-market value of a derivative contract, if remain unpaid for a period of 90 days from the specified due date for payment.
A Credit card account will be treated as non-performing asset if the minimum amount due, as mentioned in the statement is not paid fully within 90 days from the payment due date mentioned in the statement.
In case of interest payments, the account shall be classified as NPA only if the
interest due and charged during any quarter is not serviced fully within 90
days from the end of the quarter.
Out of Order status: An account should be treated as 'out of order' if the
outstanding balance remains continuously in excess of the sanctioned limit / drawing
power for 90 days. In case where the outstanding balance in the principal operating
account is less than the sanctioned limit / drawing power, but there are no credits
continuously for 90 days as on the date of Balance Sheet or credits are not enough
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 12
to cover the interest debited during the same period, these accounts also should be
treated as 'out of order'.
Overdue: Any amount due to the bank under any credit facility is 'overdue' if it is not
paid on the due date fixed by the bank.
Quantitative Disclosures:
Total Gross Credit Risk Exposures – Gross Outstanding Advances (Fund Based and Non - Fund Based) Geographical Distribution-Wise:
(Amount ` in Millions)
Category As on September 30, 2017
Fund Based Non fund Based Total
Domestic 1,715,172.74 234,900.67 1,950,073.41
Overseas 433,699.73 0.70 433,700.43
Total 2,148,872.47 234,901.37 2,383,773.84
Industry-Wise Distribution of Exposures (Gross Fund Based and Non-Fund Based Advances)
(Amount ` in Millions)
Industries Fund Based Balance O/S
Non Fund Based Balance
O/S Total
Agriculture 336,524.00 - 336,524.00
Mining & Quarrying (incl. Coal) 7,487.44 1,880.74 9,368.18
Food Processing 31,797.77 2,965.61 34,763.38
Sugar 5,735.95 31.80 5,767.75
Edible Oils & Vanaspati 5,200.97 1,145.04 6,346.01
Tea 389.49 2.10 391.59
Others 20,471.36 1,786.67 22,258.03
Beverage & Tobacco 1,391.95 165.64 1,557.59
Textiles 27,462.14 739.88 28,202.02
Cotton Textiles 9,891.43 324.69 10,216.12
Jute Textiles 111.69 19.01 130.70
Man-Made Textiles 1,366.70 0.17 1,366.87
Other Textiles 16,092.32 396.01 16,488.33
Leather & Leather Products 1,423.32 75.71 1,499.03
Wood & Wood Products 2,146.86 598.29 2,745.15
Paper & Paper Products 7,757.12 576.12 8,333.24
Petroleum, Coal Products & Nuclear Fuels
20,473.63 36,613.07 57,086.70
Of which: - - -
Petroleum 18,549.07 36,604.55 55,153.62
Chemicals & Chemical Products 29,855.78 6,021.56 35,877.34
Fertilizer 4,856.16 3,895.30 8,751.46
Drugs & Pharmaceuticals 9,094.84 360.14 9,454.98
Petro Chemicals 12,255.79 551.57 12,807.36
Others 3,648.99 1,214.55 4,863.54
Rubber, Plastic & their Products 8,662.23 958.83 9,621.06
Glass & Glassware 2,007.86 185.49 2,193.35
Cement & Cement Products 8,601.81 1,349.62 9,951.43
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 13
(Amount ` in Millions)
Industries Fund Based Balance O/S
Non Fund Based Balance
O/S Total
Basic Metal & Metal Product 97,508.52 2,069.63 99,578.15
Iron & Steel 85,206.02 1,752.25 86,958.27
Other Metal & Metal Product 12,302.50 317.38 12,619.88
All Engineering 22,311.74 43,314.96 65,626.70
Electronics 2,509.58 4,577.17 7,086.75
Others 19,802.16 38,737.79 58,539.95
Vehicles, Vehicle Parts & Transport Equipment
10,368.66 786.20 11,154.86
Gems & Jewellery 18,231.46 1,667.33 19,898.79
Construction (other than Infrastructure) 29,997.36 34,526.31 64,523.67
Infrastructure 249,079.15 37,484.59 286,563.74
Power 131,437.96 7,011.37 138,449.33
Of which: - - -
State-owned Power Utilities 73,197.90 671.60 73,869.50
Telecommunication 25,217.16 23,685.58 48,902.74
Roads 26,677.20 4,447.50 31,124.70
Airports - - -
Ports 3,247.41 - 3,247.41
Railways (other than Indian Railways) 12,205.36 - 12,205.36
Other Infrastructure 50,294.06 2,340.14 52,634.20
Other Industries (Excluding NBFC) 40,497.99 6,922.64 47,420.63
NBFC 204,582.87 265.00 204,847.87
Total of Industries (Including NBFC) 1,158,169.66 179,167.22 1,337,336.88
Residual Advances 990,702.81 55,734.15 1,046,436.96
Total Advances 2,148,872.47 234,901.37 2,383,773.84
Exposure to Industries in excess of 5% of total exposure:
(Amount ` in Millions)
Industries Fund Based Non Fund
Based Total
% of Total Exposure
Agriculture 3,36,524.00 - 3,36,524.00 14.12%
Infrastructure 2,49,079.15 37,484.59 2,86,563.74 12.02%
of which Power 1,31,437.96 7,011.37 1,38,449.33 5.81%
NBFC 2,04,582.87 265.00 2,04,847.87 8.59%
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 14
Residual contractual maturity breakdown of assets as on 30.09.2017:
(Amount ` in Millions)
Maturity Buckets
Cash Bal. with
RBI
Bal. with other banks
Invest- ments
Net Advances
Fixed Assets
Other Assets
Total
Next Day 10,368 1,440 1,238 1,96,164 48,481 - 412 2,58,103
2 to 7 days - 1,539 1,82,341 2,648 47,453 - 362 2,34,343
8 to 14 days - 1,187 15,000 904 39,097 - 345 56,533
15 to 30 days - 1,742 - - 63,526 - 639 65,907
31 days & upto 2 m
- 2,872 - 1,539 1,15,268 - 1,813 1,21,491
>2 mths & upto 3 mths
- 6,540 - 600 1,15,009 - 2,704 1,24,853
>3 mths and upto 6 mths
- 10,792 9,416 8,629 1,93,864 - 7,145 2,29,846
>6 mths and upto 1 y
- 16,080 1,595 12,742 1,58,953 - 516 1,89,886
>1 year and upto 3 years
- 40,968 - 1,74,106 6,34,381 - 32,204 8,81,659
>3 years and upto 5 years
- 7,117 26,318 1,12,855 2,90,204 - 3,010 4,39,504
>5 years and upto 7 years
- 3,465 - 1,57,879 1,18,546 - 4,542 2,84,431
>7 years and up to 10 years
- 2,286 - 46,704 1,10,181 - 2,369 1,61,540
>10 years and up to 15 years
- 1,511 1,198 6,631 19,757 - 699 29,796
>15 years - 3,243 - 4,384 1,09,294 24,306 16,837 1,58,065
Total 10,368 1,00,782 2,37,107 7,25,785 20,64,012 24,306 73,598 32,35,958
Amount of NPAs (Gross)
Category of Assets
Amount (` in Millions)
Substandard 60,182.20
Doubtful 1 66,497.10
Doubtful 2 59,223.60
Doubtful 3 14,326.80
Loss 1,536.70
Total NPA 201,766.40
Net NPAs 118,942.97
NPA Ratios
(i) Gross NPAs to Gross Advances 9.39%
(ii) Net NPAs to Net advances 5.76%
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 15
Movement in NPA
Particulars Amount (` in Millions)
NPA (Opening balance 30.06.2017) 2,01,838.50
Increase in NPA
Fresh NPA 14,792.90
Increase due operations 822.30
Increase due to Diff in FX exchange 144.60
Any other (Pl specify) -
Total (A) 15,759.80
Reduction in NPAs
Recovery towards Principal 5,852.00
Write off 188.90
PWO 4,389.00
Up gradation 5,402.00
Decrease due to operations -
Decrease due FX Exchange -
Any other (Pl specify) -
Total (B) 15,831.90
NPA (Closing balance 30.09.2017) 201,766.40
Movement of Provisions for NPAs
Particulars Amount (` in Millions)
Opening balance (31.12.2016) 78,455.70
Add : Provisions made during the period 7,595.80
Less :
Write Off 4,389.00
Write back of excess provisions 399.30
Closing Balance (31.03.2017) 81,263.20
Non-Performing Investments
Particulars Amount (` in Millions)
Amount of Non-Performing Investments 4,961.24
- Amount of provisions held for non-performing investments
4,233.20
- Amount of provisions for Depreciation on investments 2,498.41
Total: Provision for non-performing investments & Depreciation on investments
6,731.61
Provision movement of Non-Performing Investments & Depreciation on Investments (Valuation)
Particulars Amount (` in Millions)
Opening balance (31.12.2016) 6,270.61
Provisions made during the period 461.00
Write Off / Reduction in Provisions 0.00
Write back of excess Provisions 0.00
Closing Balance (31.03.2017) 6,731.61
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 16
Table DF - 4 - Credit Risk: Disclosures for Portfolios Subject to the Standardised Approach
i. Qualitative Disclosures:
1. Names of the credit Rating Agencies used, plus reasons for any changes :-
In line with the provisions of the Revised Framework under Basel II, where the facility provided by the Bank possesses rating assigned by an eligible credit rating agency, the risk weight of the claim will be based on this rating. Bank uses the ratings of the following domestic credit rating agencies for the purposes of risk weighting their claims for capital adequacy purposes:
• Credit Rating Information Services of India Limited (CRISIL) • Credit Analysis and Research Limited (CARE) • India Ratings and Research Private Limited (India Ratings) • Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency of India (ICRA) • Brickwork Ratings India Pvt. Limited (Brickwork) • SMERA Ratings Ltd. • Infomerics Valuation and Rating Pvt Ltd.
Bank use, the ratings of the following international credit rating agencies for the purposes of risk weighting their claims for capital adequacy purposes:
• Fitch • Moody's • Standard & Poor‟s
2. Types of exposures for which ratings are used:-
• The Bank has used the solicited ratings assigned by the above approved credit rating agencies for all eligible exposures, both on balance sheet and off balance sheet, whether short term or long term. The Bank has not made any discrimination among ratings assigned by these agencies nor has restricted their usage to any particular type of exposure.
• If there are two ratings accorded by credit rating agencies that map into different risk weights, the higher risk weight corresponding to lowest rating applied.
• If multiple ratings accorded by credit rating agencies with different ratings, then the ratings corresponding to the two lowest risk weights referred to and the higher of those two risk weights applied. i.e., the second lowest risk weight.
3. Description of the process used to transfer public issue ratings on to comparable assets in the banking book.
• Bank invests in a particular issue that has an issue specific rating by a chosen credit rating agency; the risk weight of the claim will be based on this assessment.
• Issue Specific Ratings (Bank‟s own exposures or other issuance of debt by the same borrower constituent/counterparty) or Issuer Ratings (borrower constituent/ counterparty) are applied to unrated exposures of the same borrower constituent/ counterparty subject to the following:
• Issue specific ratings are used where the unrated claim of the Bank ranks pari-passu or senior to the rated issue / debt.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 17
• Wherever issuer rating or issue specific ratings are used to risk weight unrated claims, such ratings are extended to entire amount of claim on the same counterparty.
ii. Quantitative Disclosures:
Amount of the Bank‟s Exposures – Outstanding Gross Advances (including Rated & Unrated) in Major Risk Buckets after factoring Risk Mitigants under Standardized Approach.
(Amount ` in Millions)
Risk Weight Category Amount
Advances
Fund Based
Risk weight Below 100 % 1,233,843.08
Risk weight of 100 % 497,414.38
Risk weight more than 100 % 185,554.61
Deducted-CRM 232,060.40
Total 2,148,872.47
Non-Fund Based
Risk weight Below 100 % 115,978.11
Risk weight of 100 % 47,698.32
Risk weight more than 100 % 36,049.22
Deducted-CRM 35,175.72
Total 234,901.37
Investments (Banking Book)
Risk weight Below 100 % 504,883.13
Risk weight of 100 % 0.00
Risk weight more than 100 % 753.75
Deducted from capital 3.00
Total 505,639.88
Table DF – 5: Credit Risk Mitigation: Disclosures for Standardized Approaches
i. Qualitative Disclosures:
Disclosures on credit risk mitigation methodology are being adopted by the Bank which are recognized under the Standardized Approach for reducing capital requirements for credit risk and this will also be applicable for calculation of the counterparty risk charges for OTC derivatives and repo-style transactions booked in the trading book.
1. Policies and processes for collateral valuation and management
Basic procedures and descriptions of controls as well as types of standard/acceptable collaterals, guarantees necessary in granting credit, evaluation methods for different types of credit and collateral, frequency of revaluation and release of collateral are stipulated in the Credit policy & Credit Risk Policy framed by the Bank.
2. A description of the main collaterals taken by the Bank
Collaterals eligible as risk mitigants for capital computation under Standardized Approach comprise namely:
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 18
• Cash or Cash equivalent (including fixed deposit receipts, issued by the lending bank).
• Gold (include both bullion and jewellery) • Securities issued by Central and State Governments • Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP) and National Savings Certificates (NSC) • Life insurance policies with a declared surrender value of an insurance
company which is regulated by IRDA. • Debt Securities rated BBB- or better/ PR3/P3/F3/A3 for Short-Term Debt
Instruments
3. Main types of guarantor counterparty and their creditworthiness:
The Bank considers credit protection in terms of the guarantees which are direct, explicit, irrevocable and unconditional. The bank takes into account such credit protection in calculating capital requirements
The types of guarantees recognized for credit risk mitigation are guarantees by Central Government, State Governments, ECGC (Risk Weight at 20% for guaranteed portion of State Govt. & ECGC), CGTMSE, CRGFTLIH (Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Low income housing).
As the guaranteed portion of the counterparty exposure is assigned the risk weight of the applicable to guarantor and the uncovered portion retains the risk weight of the underlying counterparty. Hence Guarantees issued by entities with attracting lower risk weight than the counterparty will lead to reduced capital charges.
ii. Quantitative Disclosures
Exposures (Fund Based and Non Fund Based) covered by Eligible CRMs:
Particulars Amount (` in Millions)
Eligible Collaterals 188,285.89
Eligible Guarantees (having 0% RW) [Central Govt., CGMSE, CRGFTLIH]
78,950.23
Total 267,236.12
Table DF-6: Securitisation Exposures: Disclosure for Standardised Approach
As on date, SyndicateBank has not entered into any kind securitization transaction
Table DF-7: Market Risk in Trading Book
Market risk refers to the uncertainty of future earnings resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, market prices and volatilities. The Board approved Investment and Market Risk policies and operational guidelines thereon are in place, reviewed annually to ensure that operations in securities, foreign exchange and derivatives are conducted in accordance with sound and acceptable business practices and are as per the extant regulatory guidelines.
Market Risk in Trading Book is assessed as per the Standardised Duration approach. The capital charge for Market Risk in Trading Book, i.e, Held for Trading (HFT) and Available for Sale (AFS) portfolios is computed as per Reserve Bank of India prudential guidelines.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 19
Capital requirements for market risk
Standardized Duration Approach Amount
(` in Millions)
Interest rate risk 10,451.03
Foreign exchange risk (including gold) 138.38
Equity risk 3,457.33
Total 14,046.73
Table DF 8 - Operational Risk Disclosures
Operational Risk
Operational Risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. Operational Risk includes legal risk but excludes strategic risk and reputation risk.
Bank has well laid down manual of instructions covering the entire gamut of its business. These manuals are periodically supplemented with circulars to update the information with the developments internal and external to the bank. Bank has a well developed Operational risk management framework, which includes operational management policy, as parent policy and other policies on
1. Risk and Control Self Assessment(RCSA) 2. Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) and 3. Loss Data Management (LDM).
In addition to this, Bank has policy on Business Line Mapping, Fraud Risk Management Policy, KYC and AML policies to prevent KYC and AML violations. Bank had created off-site monitoring cells at HO and ROs to monitor sensitive transactions on a daily basis which serves as an early warning system. Bank has also framed a Policy on Conflicts of Interest to ensure that Personal interests are not coming in the way of discharging the Professional duties towards the Organization.
Bank has revised the Business Continuity Plan Policy on the basis of experience gained and also on the basis of the recommendations made by the Gopala Krishna Committee formed by RBI. A detailed disaster recovery plan has been put in place and to address the IT related disruptions & to ensure Business Continuity. Information security is managed through information security policy.
Approach for Computation of Capital Charge for Operational Risk
In accordance with Reserve Bank of India guidelines, the Bank is presently adopting the Basic Indicator Approach (BIA) for measurement of Operational Risk Capital Charge.
For facilitating migration towards The Standardized Approach (TSA), Bank has undertaken the process of Business Line Mapping. Bank has completed mapping of income for 24 quarters as on 31.03.2017. The mapping of Gross Income to various Business Lines as defined by RBI is undertaken on a quarterly basis and the same is being placed before the Operational Risk Management Committee (ORMC) meeting for approval.
For enabling migration to the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA), Bank has implemented Operational Risk Management Solution (ORMS) to enable system driven flow of the inputs required for Capital Calculation like the Internal loss data, Key Risk Indicators (KRIs), Risk and Control Self Assessment (RCSA), Scenarios
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 20
and also for the computation of Value at Risk (VaR) for Operational Risk. The Bank is also undertaking analysis for migration to Advanced Approaches for computation of Capital Charge for Operational Risk.
Bank is one of the founder members of CORDEX (Consortium of Banks for Credit & Operational Risk Data Exchange), a company formed by Indian Banks‟ Association (IBA). This will enable the Bank in collecting External Loss Data and subsequent developing of Scenarios which is also one of the inputs for Capital Calculation under the Advanced Measurement Approach. Presently, Bank has established connectivity to CORDEX through a dedicated line through our data center Mumbai which will facilitate the capture of External loss data.
Table DF-9: Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB)
i. Qualitative Disclosures:
Organizational set-up
ALCO (Asset-Liability Management Committee) is responsible for management of the balance sheet of the Bank with a view to managing the market risk exposure assumed by the Bank within the risk parameters laid down by the Risk Management Committee of the Board or the Board of Directors. The Asset Liability Management Group at the Bank monitors and manages the risk under the supervision of ALCO. At overseas branch, London, ALM group monitors interest rate risk along with liquidity risk.
The ALM Policy of the Bank contains the prudential limits on liquidity and interest rate risk, as prescribed by the Board of Directors/Risk Committee/ALCO. The prudential limits are monitored on regular basis. Any breach in the limits will be reported to ALCO/ RMC/ Board.
Interest Rate Risk in Banking Book is derived under following two approaches
• Traditional Gap Analysis – Earnings perspective • Duration Gap Analysis – Economic value perspective
Gap analysis: The interest rate gap or mismatch risk is measured by calculating gaps over different time intervals at a given date for domestic and overseas operations. Gap analysis measures mismatches between Rate Sensitive Liabilities (RSL) and Rate Sensitive Assets (RSA) (including off-balance sheet positions). The report is prepared by grouping rate sensitive liabilities, assets and off-balance sheet positions into time buckets according to residual maturity or next re-pricing period, whichever is earlier. For non-maturity assets/liabilities (for instance, working capital facilities on the assets side and current and savings account deposits on the liabilities side) grouping into time buckets is done based on behavioral studies or by making certain assumptions in line with RBI guidelines. The difference between RSA and RSL for each time bucket signifies the gap in that time bucket. The direction of the gap indicates whether net interest income is positively or negatively impacted by a change in the direction of interest rates and the extent of the gap approximates the change in net interest income for that given interest rate shift. The ALM Policy of the Bank stipulates bucket-wise limits for mismatches.
Earnings at Risk (EaR): The gap reports indicate whether the Bank is in a position to benefit from rising interest rates by having a positive gap (RSA > RSL) or whether it is in a position to benefit from declining interest rates by a negative gap (RSL > RSA). The Bank monitors the EaR with respect to net interest income (NII) based on
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 21
a 200 basis points adverse change in the level of interest rates. The magnitude of the impact over a one year period, as a percentage of the NII of the previous year gives a fair measure of the earnings risk that the Bank is exposed to. The EaR computations include the banking book as well as the trading book.
Economic Value of Equity (EvE): Change in the interest rates also have a long-term impact on the market value of equity of the Bank, as the economic value of the Bank‟s assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet positions is impacted. Duration is a measure of interest rate sensitivity of assets, liabilities and also equity. It may be defined as the percentage change in the market value of an asset or liability (or equity) for a given change in interest rates. Thus EvE is a measure of change in the market value of equity of a firm due to the identified change in the interest rates. The Bank uses EvE as a part of framework to manage IRRBB for its domestic and overseas operations. The ALM Policy stipulates a limit on the overall EvE of the Bank.
ii. Quantitative disclosures
Impact of interest rate risk
Earnings perspective (Traditional Gap Analysis) - Impact on Bank earning
(Amount ` in Millions)
Interest rate rise by Interest rate fall by
100 bps 200 bps 100 bps 200 bps
INR 469 939 (469) (939)
USD (110) (219) 110 219
Others 112 225 (112) (225)
Total 472 945 (472) (945)
Economic perspective (Duration Gap Analysis) – Impact on Net worth
S. No. Particulars Value
1 Weighted Average Modified Duration of Rate Sensitive Liabilities
0.89
2 Weighted Average Modified Duration of Rate Sensitive Assets 1.09
3 For 1% change in interest rate – Impact on Net Worth 9,120.82
4 For 2% change in interest rate – Impact on Net Worth 18,241.63
Frequency of Measurement of interest rate risk
Measurement and Computation of Interest rate risk in Banking Book is carried out by the Bank on a monthly basis. Bank also calculates on a monthly basis, the likely drop in Market Value of Equity with change in interest rates. Earnings-at-Risk is measured on a monthly basis using Traditional Gap Analysis.
Table DF-10: General Disclosure for Exposures Related to Counterparty Credit Risk
i. Qualitative Disclosures
• The Bank has a well laid-down policy for undertaking derivative transactions approved by its Board.
• The Bank is undertaking derivative transactions for hedging risks on its Balance Sheet as well as for trading / market-making purposes. Bank is undertaking derivative transactions like FRAs, Interest rate swaps, Currency swaps and Currency Options, with bank and Non-bank Counter parties. The Bank is only undertaking proprietary trading position in Currency Futures on two Exchanges.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 22
• Forward contracts under past performance category are booked for clients with Rating SYND 01 - SYND 04 only and on complying with RBI guidelines.
• During the year Bank undertook Interest Rate Swaps and FRA for hedging Purpose to Mitigate Interest Rate Risk in Banking Book for Liabilities at London Branch.
• Cross Currency swaps are undertaken for both principal and interest, back-to-back, thus hedging both exchange rate risk and interest rate risk without involvement of any outlays.
• Cross-currency swaps are undertaken upto a period of 10 years, covering the same back-to-back without any open position.
• Currency swaps are undertaken for non-bank counter party with ratings SYND 01 to 04 only.
• The bank has set in place appropriate control system to assess the risks associated with Derivatives and MIS in place to monitor the same.
• The Bank has a system of continuous monitoring and appraisal of Credit Risk limits of counter-parties.
• Credit exposures for derivative transactions are monitored on the basis of Current Exposure Method (CEM).
• Credit Risk is monitored by setting up counterparty exposure limits setting country risk exposure limits and mitigating settlement risk through CCIL / CLS.
• The transactions with our Counterparty Banks and non-bank counterparty are undertaken within the limits approved by the Board. The transactions with non-bank counterparties are done on a back-to-back covered basis without assuming any market risk.
• The Bank is not having any exposure in complex derivatives nor has it any direct exposure to the sub-prime assets.
• The Bank has not crystallized and written off any account nor incurred any loss on account of undertaking derivative transactions.
• The segregation of Front Office, Mid Office and Back Office is ensured to avoid conflict of interests and to mitigate the degree of risk. The Mid Office is directly reporting to Risk Management Department at Corporate Office, Bangalore.
• ISDA agreements are executed / exchanged with every counterparty banks and non-bank clients as per RBI guidelines.
• Mid Office measures and monitors the risk arising out of trading deals independently.
• The transactions are undertaken within the overall Aggregate Gap Limits and Net Overnight Open position limits sanctioned by the Board / RBI.
• Any transaction undertaken for hedging purpose, if it becomes naked, is treated as a trading transaction and allowed to run till maturity.
• The transactions are separately classified as hedge or non-hedge transactions and measured at fair value.
• The transactions covered on back-to-back basis and the transactions undertaken to hedge the risks on Bank assets and liabilities are valued as per the valuation prescribed and Interest is accounted on accrual basis.
• For Investment: Premium at the time of purchase, if any, is amortized over the residual period of the transaction. Profit is recognized on maturity. Discount is held in Income Received in Advance account and appropriated to Profit and Loss account on maturity.
• Adequate provision is made for transactions undertaken for hedging purpose, which became naked resulting in mark-to market losses. However during the period no Hedge Transaction turns naked.
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 23
• Transactions for market making purposes are marked-to-market at monthly intervals and those for hedging purposes are accounted for, on accrual basis.
• Collaterals are also obtained depending on the terms of sanction. • 89.55% of Derivatives fall under the short tenure of less than one year of
remaining Maturity.
ii. Quantitative Disclosures
A. Forward Rate Agreements//Interest Rate Swaps at London Branch. The FRAs/IRS’ are contracted in USD.
S. No
Items Amount
(in ` Millions)
i) The notional principal of the swap agreements 58,756.50
ii) Losses which would be incurred if the counterparties fail to fulfill their obligations under the agreements (1) (value of CCE
748.89
iii) Collateral required by the bank upon entering the swap 0.00
iv) Concentration of credit risk arising from the swaps 0.00
v) The fair value of the swap book (2) (Net of Positive and Negative MTM)
293.33
Note: All FRA and IRS undertaken are against Banks to hedge Balance sheet gaps. The fixed interest rate liability was converted in to Floating rates by entering in to Interest Rate Swaps of matching maturity.
B. Currency swaps at International Division, Mumbai in USD/INR :
S. No Items Amount
(in ` Millions)
i) The notional principal of the swap agreements 6,542.50
ii) Losses which would be incurred if the counterparties fail to fulfill their obligations under the agreements(1)
365.70
iii) Collateral required by the bank upon entering the swap
0.00
iv) Concentration of credit risk arising from the swaps 0.00
v) The fair value of the swap book(2) 19.38
Losses have been defined as the Total Credit Exposure inclusive of Credit and Replacement Risk
Fair Value of Swaps book is the Net MTM receivable or Payable on the above Swaps
Forward Rate Agreement (FRA‟s) and Interest Rate Swaps (IRS‟s) were undertaken by the Bank to hedge its own books and for managing assets and Liability mismatches. Currency Swaps has been undertaken with customer for hedging their exposures and covered back-to-back with identical terms.
These Derivatives transactions are entered with counter parties satisfying the criteria as prescribed by the Credit and Treasury Policies. These Board approved policies prescribes various parameters/limits to manage and monitor Credit and Market Risks.
The accounting Policy for Derivatives has been drawn up in accordance with the RBI guidelines.
C. Exchange Traded Derivatives
Currency Futures:
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 24
The Bank undertakes proprietary trading in Currency Futures in USD/INR on two recognized Exchanges. There is no Outstanding Contracts under Currency future as on 30.09.2017.
Interest Rate Futures:
Exchange Traded Interest Rate Derivative is NIL as on 30.09.2017. The Bank is not dealing in Exchange Traded Interest Rate Derivatives.
Table DF-11: Composition of Capital
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
Common Equity Tier 1 capital: instruments and reserves
1 Directly issued qualifying common share capital plus related stock surplus (share premium)
40,751.03 a1+a2+a3
2 Revenue and Other Reserves / Retained earnings
24,721.60 b1
3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves)
66,050.47
c1+c2+c3+ c7+45% of c4+75% of
c6
4 Directly issued capital subject to phase out from CET1 (only applicable to non-joint stock companies)
Public sector capital injections grandfathered until January 1, 2018
5 Common share capital issued by subsidiaries and held by third parties (amount allowed in group CET1)
6 Common Equity Tier 1 capital before regulatory adjustments
1,31,523.10
Common Equity Tier 1 capital: regulatory adjustments
7 Prudential valuation adjustments
8 Goodwill (net of related tax liability)
9 Intangibles other than mortgage-servicing rights (net of related tax liability)
10 Deferred tax assets
11 Cash-flow hedge reserve
12 Shortfall of provisions to expected losses
13 Securitisation gain on sale
14 Gains and losses due to changes in own credit risk on fair valued liabilities
15 Defined-benefit pension fund net assets
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 25
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
16 Investments in own shares (if not already netted off paid-in capital on reported balance sheet)
17 Reciprocal cross-holdings in common equity
2.50
f1
18
Investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities that are outside the scope of regulatory consolidation, net of eligible short positions, where the bank does not own more than 10% of the issued share capital (amount above 10% threshold)
19
Significant investments in the common stock of banking, financial and insurance entities that are outside the scope of regulatory consolidation, net of eligible short positions (amount above 10% threshold)
20 Mortgage servicing rights (amount above 10% threshold)
21 Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences (amount above 10% threshold, net of related tax liability)
22 Amount exceeding the 15% threshold
23 of which: significant investments in the common stock of financial entities
24 of which: mortgage servicing rights
25 of which: deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences
26 National specific regulatory adjustments (26a+26b+26c+26d)
26a of which: Investments in the equity capital of the unconsolidated insurance subsidiaries
26b of which: Investments in the equity capital of unconsolidated non-financial subsidiaries
2.50
26c of which: Shortfall in the equity capital of majority owned financial entities which have not been consolidated with the bank
26d of which: Unamortised pension funds expenditures
Regulatory Adjustments Applied to Common Equity Tier 1 in respect of Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel III
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 26
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
Treatment
of which: [insert type of adjustment]
For example: filtering out of unrealised losses on AFS debt securities (not relevant in Indian context)
27
Regulatory adjustments applied to Common Equity Tier 1 due to insufficient Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 to cover deductions
28 Total regulatory adjustments to Common equity Tier 1
5.00
29 Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET1) 1,31,518.10
Additional Tier 1 capital: instruments
30 Directly issued qualifying Additional Tier 1 instruments plus related stock surplus (31+32)
32,500.00
31
of which: classified as equity under applicable accounting standards (Perpetual Non-Cumulative Preference Shares)
32 of which: classified as liabilities under applicable accounting standards (Perpetual debt Instruments)
32,500.00
33
Directly issued capital instruments subject to phase out from Additional Tier 1
3,865.00
34
Additional Tier 1 instruments (and CET1 instruments not included in row 5) issued by subsidiaries and held by third parties (amount allowed in group AT1)
35 of which: instruments issued by subsidiaries subject to phase out
36 Additional Tier 1 capital before regulatory adjustments
36,365.00
d1 after phasing out (32,500 +
7,730*50%)
Additional Tier 1 capital: regulatory adjustments
37 Investments in own Additional Tier 1 instruments
38 Reciprocal cross-holdings in Additional Tier 1 instruments
550.00
f2
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 27
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
39
Investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities that are outside the scope of regulatory consolidation, net of eligible short positions, where the bank does not own more than 10% of the issued common share capital of the entity (amount above 10% threshold)
40
Significant investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities that are outside the scope of regulatory consolidation (net of eligible short positions)
41 National specific regulatory adjustments (41a+41b)
41a Investments in the Additional Tier 1 capital of unconsolidated insurance subsidiaries
41b Shortfall in the Additional Tier 1 capital of majority owned financial entities which have not been consolidated with the bank
Regulatory Adjustments Applied to Additional Tier 1 in respect of Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel III Treatment
Of which: Deferred Tax Asset (20%)
Of which: Investment in Associate (at 50%)
42 Regulatory adjustments applied to Additional Tier 1 due to insufficient Tier 2 to cover deductions
43 Total regulatory adjustments to Additional Tier 1 capital
550.00
44 Additional Tier 1 capital (AT1) 35,815.00
44a Additional Tier 1 capital reckoned for capital adequacy
35,815.00
45 Tier 1 capital (T1 = CET1 + AT1) (29 + 44a)
1,67,333.10
Tier 2 Capital: Instruments and Provisions
46 Directly issued qualifying Tier 2 instruments plus related stock surplus
34,000.00
47 Directly issued capital instruments subject to phase out from Tier 2
7,500.00 d2 after
phasing out
48 Tier 2 instruments (and CET1 and AT1 instruments not included in rows 5 or 34) issued by subsidiaries and held by third
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 28
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
parties (amount allowed in group Tier 2)
49 of which: instruments issued by subsidiaries subject to phase out
50 Provisions 12,744.27
51 Tier 2 capital before regulatory
adjustments 54,244.27
Tier 2 capital: regulatory adjustments
52 Investments in own Tier 2 instruments
53 Reciprocal cross-holdings in Tier 2 instruments
300.00
f3
54
Investments in the capital of banking, financial and insurance entities that are outside the scope of regulatory consolidation, net of eligible short positions, where the bank does not own more than 10% of the issued common share capital of the entity (amount above the 10% threshold)
55
Significant investments in the capital banking, financial and insurance entities that are outside the scope of regulatory consolidation (net of eligible short positions)
56 National specific regulatory adjustments (56a+56b)
56a of which: Investments in the Tier 2 capital of unconsolidated subsidiaries
56b of which: Shortfall in the Tier 2 capital of majority owned financial entities which have not been consolidated with the bank
Regulatory Adjustments Applied To Tier 2 in respect of Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel III Treatment
Of which: Investment in Associate (At 50%)
57 Total regulatory adjustments to Tier 2 Capital
300.00
58 Tier 2 capital (T2) 53,944.27
58a Tier 2 capital reckoned for capital adequacy
53,944.27
58b Excess Additional Tier 1 capital reckoned as Tier 2 capital
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 29
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
58c Total Tier 2 capital admissible for capital adequacy (58a + 58b)
53,944.27
59 Total capital (TC = T1 + T2) (45 + 58c) 2,21,277.36
Risk Weighted Assets in respect of Amounts Subject to Pre- Basel III Treatment
60 Total risk weighted assets (60a + 60b + 60c)
1,818,448.00
60a of which: total credit risk weighted assets 1,521,510.30
60b of which: total market risk weighted assets 137,040.90
60c of which: total operational risk weighted assets
159,896.80
Capital ratios
61 Common Equity Tier 1 (as a percentage of risk weighted assets)
7.23%
62 Tier 1 (as a percentage of risk weighted assets)
9.20%
63 Total capital (as a percentage of risk weighted assets)
12.17%
64
Institution specific buffer requirement (minimum CET1 requirement plus capital conservation and countercyclical buffer requirements, expressed as a percentage of risk weighted assets)
6.75%
65 of which: capital conservation buffer requirement
1.25%
66 of which: bank specific countercyclical buffer requirement
67 of which: G-SIB buffer requirement
68 Common Equity Tier 1 available to meet buffers (as a percentage of risk weighted assets)
1.73% 7.23%-5.50%
National minima (if different from Basel III)
69 National Common Equity Tier 1 minimum ratio (if different from Basel III minimum)
6.75%
70 National Tier 1 minimum ratio (if different from Basel III minimum)
8.25%
71 National total capital minimum ratio (if different from Basel III minimum)
10.25%
Amounts below the thresholds for deduction (before risk weighting)
72 Non-significant investments in the capital of other financial entities
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 30
Amount (in ` Millions)
Basel III common disclosure template to be used during the transition of regulatory adjustments (i.e. from April 1, 2013 to
December 31, 2019)
Amounts Subject to Pre-Basel
III Treatment
Ref No
73 Significant investments in the common stock of financial entities
74 Mortgage servicing rights (net of related tax liability)
75 Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences (net of related tax liability)
Applicable caps on the inclusion of provisions in Tier 2
76
Provisions eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 in respect of exposures subject to standardised approach (prior to application of cap) [other than Revaluation reserve]
12,744.27
of which: Provision on Standard Assets 11,567.25 e1
of which: Other Provisions 1,177.02
77 Cap on inclusion of provisions in Tier 2 under standardised approach
19,018.88 1.25% of
credit RWA
78
Provisions eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 in respect of exposures subject to internal ratings-based approach (prior to application of cap)
79 Cap for inclusion of provisions in Tier 2 under internal ratings-based approach
Capital instruments subject to phase-out arrangements (only applicable between March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2022)
80 Current cap on CET1 instruments subject to phase out arrangements
Not
App
lica
ble
81 Amount excluded from CET1 due to cap (excess over cap after redemptions and maturities)
82 Current cap on AT1 instruments subject to phase out arrangements
83 Amount excluded from AT1 due to cap (excess over cap after redemptions and maturities)
84 Current cap on T2 instruments subject to phase out arrangements
85 Amount excluded from T2 due to cap (excess over cap after redemptions and maturities)
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 31
Table DF-12: Composition of Capital - Reconciliation Requirements
Step 1: Amount (in ` Millions)
S No.
Particulars
Balance Sheet as in
financial statements
(Standalone)
Balance Sheet under
regulatory scope of
Consolidation
A Capital & Liabilities
I Paid-up Capital 9,045.39 9,045.39
Share Application Money Pending Allotment 0.00 0.00
Reserves & Surplus 131,213.11 131,213.11
Minority Interest 0.00 0.00
Total Capital 1,40,258.50 1,40,258.50
ii Deposits 28,26,004.64 28,26,004.64
of which: Deposits from banks 3,25,343.35 3,25,343.35
of which: Customer deposits 25,00,661.28 25,00,661.28
of which: Other deposits (pl. specify) 0.00 0.00
iii Borrowings 1,93,253.28 1,93,253.28
of which: From RBI 0.00 0.00
of which: From banks 38,502.84 38,502.84
of which: From other institutions & agencies 6,851.44 6,851.44
of which: Borrowings Outside India, 58,669.00 58,669.00
of which: Capital instruments 89,230.00 89,230.00
iv Other liabilities & provisions 76,441.29 76,441.29
TOTAL 32,35,957.71 32,35,957.71
B Asset
i Cash and balances with Reserve Bank of India 1,11,150.26 1,11,150.26
Balance with banks and money at call & short notice
2,37,106.53 2,37,106.53
ii Investments 7,25,784.99 7,25,784.99
of which: Government securities 6,49,081.82 6,49,081.82
of which: Other approved securities 9.05 9.05
of which: Shares 3,045.83 3,045.83
of which: Debentures & Bonds 40,014.33 40,014.33
of which: Subsidiaries /Joint Ventures /Asso. 265.22 265.22
of which: Others 12,399.75 12,399.75
iii Loans and advances 20,64,011.86 20,64,011.86
of which: Loans and advances to banks 3,25,040.14 3,25,040.14
of which: Loans and advances to customers 17,38,971.72 17,38,971.72
iv Fixed assets 24,306.32 24,306.32
v Other Assets 73,597.75 73,597.75
Of which: Goodwill and intangible assets 0.00 0.00
Out of which: Eligible Deferred tax Assets 0.00 0.00
vi Goodwill on consolidation 0.00 0.00
vii Debit balance in Profit & Loss account 0.00 0.00
Total Assets 32,35,957.71 32,35,957.71
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 32
Step 2:
Amount (in ` Millions)
S.No Particulars
Balance Sheet as in financial
statements
Balance Sheet under regulatory
scope of Consolidation
Ref No
As on 30.09.2017
A Capital & Liabilities
i Paid-up Capital 9,045.39 9,045.39 a1
Total 9,045.39 9,045.39
of which: Amount eligible for CET1
9,045.39 9,045.39
of which: Amount eligible for AT1
0.00 0.00
Reserves & Surplus 131,213.11 131,213.11
of which: Share Premium 31,705.63 31,705.63 a3
of which: Revenue & Other Reserves
26,301.16 26,301.16 b1
of which: Balance in Profit and Loss Account
(1,579.53) (1,579.53) b2
of which: Capital Reserve
2,860.79 2,860.79 c1
of which: Statutory Reserves
34,727.56 34,727.56 c2
of which: General Reserves
5,811.64 5,811.64 c3
of which: Revaluation Reserves
15,766.95 15,766.95 c4
of which: Investment Reserve Account
0.00 0.00 c5
of which: Foreign Currency Translation Reserve
254.22 254.22 c6
of which: Special Reserve
15,364.69 15,364.69 c7
Total Capital 140,258.50 140,258.50
ii
Deposits 2,826,004.64 2,826,004.64
of which: Deposits from banks
325,343.35 325,343.35
of which: Customer deposits
2,500,661.28 2,500,661.28
of which: Other deposits (pl. specify)
0.00 0.00
iii
Borrowings 193,253.28 193,253.28
of which: From RBI 0 0
of which: From banks 38,502.84 38,502.84
of which: From other institutions & agencies
6,851.44 6,851.44
of which: Others (Outside India)
58,669.00 58,669.00
of which: Capital 89,230.00 89,230.00
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 33
Step 2:
Amount (in ` Millions)
S.No Particulars Balance Sheet as in financial
statements
Balance Sheet under regulatory
scope of Consolidation
Ref No
instruments
of which: Eligible for AT 1 Capital
40,230.00 40,230.00 d1
of which: considered under regulatory scope of consolidation
36,365.00 36,365.00
Regulatory adjustments subject to Pre-Basel-III (AT1)
3865.00 3865.00
of which: Eligible for Tier 2 Capital
49,000.00 49,000.00 d2
of which: considered under regulatory scope of consolidation
41,500.00 41,500.00
Regulatory adjustments subject to Pre-Basel-III (Tier II)
7,500.00 7,500.00
iv
Other liabilities & provisions
76,441.29 76,441.29
of which: Provision on Standard Assets
11,567.25 11,567.25 e1
Total Capital & Liabilities
3,235,957.71 3,235,957.71
B
i Cash and balances with Reserve Bank of India
111,150.26 111,150.26
Balance with banks and money at call and short notice
237,106.53 237,106.53
ii Investments 725,784.99 725,784.99
of which: Government securities
649,081.82 649,081.82
of which: Other approved securities
9.05 9.05
of which: Shares 3,045.83 3,045.83
of which: Reciprocal Investments in Common Equity of banks/ financial institutions
2.50 2.50 f1
of which: Debentures & Bonds
40,014.33 40,014.33
of which: Reciprocal investments in Capital instruments of banks/
550.00 550.00 f2
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 34
Step 2:
Amount (in ` Millions)
S.No Particulars Balance Sheet as in financial
statements
Balance Sheet under regulatory
scope of Consolidation
Ref No
Financial institutions (AT 1 instruments)
of which: Reciprocal investments in Capital instruments of banks/ Financial institutions (Tier 2 instruments)
300.00 300.00 f3
of which: Financial Subsidiaries / Joint Ventures / Associates
262.72 262.72
of which : Investment in Non Financial Subsidiaries
2.5 2.5
of which: Others (Commercial Papers, Mutual Funds etc.)
33,368.74 33,368.74
iii Loans and advances 2,064,011.86 2,064,011.86
of which: Loans and advances to banks
325,040.14 325,040.14
of which: Loans and advances to customers
1,738,971.72 1,738,971.72
iv Fixed assets 24,306.32 24,306.32
v Other assets 73,597.75 73,597.75
Of which: Deferred Tax Asset
3,562.56 3,562.56
Total Assets 3,235,957.71 3,235,957.71
Step 3: Amount (in ` Millions)
S No.
Particulars
Component of
Regulatory Capital
reported by Bank
Source based reference
numbers/letters of the Balance
Sheet under regulatory
scope of Consolidation
1
Directly issued qualifying common
40,751.03 a1+a2+a3 share (and equivalent for non-joint
stock companies) capital plus related
stock surplus (Share premium)
2 Revenue and Other Reserves 24,721.60 b1
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 35
Step 3: Amount (in ` Millions)
S No.
Particulars
Component of
Regulatory Capital
reported by Bank
Source based reference
numbers/letters of the Balance
Sheet under regulatory
scope of Consolidation
3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves)
66,050.47 c1+c2+c3+ c7+45% of
c4+75% of c6
4 Directly issued capital subject to phase out from CET 1 (only applicable to non- joint stock companies)
0.00
5
Common share capital issued by subsidiaries and held by third parties 0.00
(amount allowed in group CETI)
6 Common Equity Tier 1 capital before
1,31,523.10 regulatory adjustments
7 Prudential valuation adjustments 0.00
8 Goodwill (net of related tax liability) 0.00
DF-17- Summary comparison of Accounting Assets vs Leverage Ratio Exposure measure:
S No
Item Amount (in ` Millions)
1 Total consolidated assets as per published financial statements 3,235,957.71
2 Adjustment for investments in banking, financial, insurance or commercial entities that are consolidated for accounting purposes but outside the scope of regulatory consolidation
-
3 Adjustment for fiduciary assets recognised on the balance sheet pursuant to the operative accounting framework but excluded from the leverage ratio exposure measure
-
4 Adjustments for derivative financial instruments 26,716.95
5 Adjustment for securities financing transactions (i.e. repos and similar secured lending)
988.73
6 Adjustment for off-balance sheet items (i.e. conversion to credit equivalent amounts of off- balance sheet exposures)
168,589.70
7 Other adjustments (550.00)
8 Leverage ratio exposure 3,431,703.09
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter ended September 2017 Page 36
Table DF-18: Leverage ratio common disclosure template:
Item
Amount (in ` Millions)
On-balance sheet exposures
1 On-balance sheet items (excluding derivatives and SFTs, but including collateral)
3,235,957.71
2 (Asset amounts deducted in determining Basel III Tier 1 capital) (550.00)
3 Total on-balance sheet exposures (excluding derivatives and SFTs) (sum of lines 1 and 2)
3,235,407.71
Derivative exposures
4 Replacement cost associated with all derivatives transactions (i.e. net of eligible cash variation margin)
8,405.98
5 Add-on amounts for PFE associated with all derivatives transactions 18,310.96
6 Gross-up for derivatives collateral provided where deducted from the balance sheet assets pursuant to the operative accounting framework
0
7 (Deductions of receivables assets for cash variation margin provided in derivatives transactions)
0
8 (Exempted CCP leg of client-cleared trade exposures) 0
9 Adjusted effective notional amount of written credit derivatives 0
10 (Adjusted effective notional offsets and add-on deductions for written credit derivatives)
0
11 Total derivative exposures (sum of lines 4 to 10) 26,716.95
Securities financing transaction exposures
12 Gross SFT assets (with no recognition of netting), after adjusting for sale accounting transactions
988.73
13 (Netted amounts of cash payables and cash receivables of gross SFT assets)
14 CCR exposure for SFT assets
15 Agent transaction exposures
16 Total securities financing transaction exposures (sum of lines 12 to 15)
988.73
Other off-balance sheet exposures
17 Off-balance sheet exposure at gross notional amount 392,965.88
18 (Adjustments for conversion to credit equivalent amounts) (224,376.19)
19 Off-balance sheet items (sum of lines 17 and 18) 168,589.70
Capital and Total Exposures
20 Tier 1 capital 167,333.10
21 Total exposures (sum of lines 3, 11, 16 and 19) 3,434,374.78
Leverage ratio
22 Basel III leverage ratio 4.88%