basel iii and its implications

33
Dr.Nabil Zaki Basel III And Its Implications

Upload: informa-middle-east

Post on 28-Jul-2015

84 views

Category:

Business


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Basel III And Its Implications

Dr.Nabil Zaki

Basel III And Its Implications

Page 3: Basel III And Its Implications

Agenda

• Welcome

• Housekeeping notes

• Session starts

• Q&A

• End of webinar

Page 4: Basel III And Its Implications

House Keeping• Slides will be available on our SlideShare page, link will be

emailed to you

• Recording of the webinar will be available to download, link will be emailed

• Take the time to complete post-webinar survey that will pop up at the end

• You can type your questions throughout the session

• Time will be allocated in the end for the speaker to address your questions

Page 5: Basel III And Its Implications

About Your SpeakerDr. Nabil Zaki.

Dr. Nabil W. Zaki has been in the investment and banking industry for more than 30 years. During that period, he assumed senior positions in both corporate finance and treasury with major Wall Street firms and international financial institutions in New York, Canada and the Middle East. He has held high profile management positions with Chase Manhattan Bank, Merrill Lynch, Prudential Securities and Tradition. Currently, Nabil Zaki is an adjunct Professor of Corporate Finance and Derivatives at New York University. He taught at New York Institute of Finance (currently known as FT Knowledge) from 1995 until 2004. He lectures extensively on portfolio management, risk management, derivatives, and international capital markets for major Wall Street firms and financial institutions. Nabil worked as senior vice presidents at both Chase Manhattan bank as well as Merrill Lynch in a variety of senior posts in credit and treasury.  

Page 6: Basel III And Its Implications

6

Sheila Blair of FDIC to put 829 of the nation’s 7,800 banks on its “problemList” at the end of June 2010; up from 775 at the end of 1Q10.

Already 118 banks failed until Sept 1st, 2010; well ahead of the pace set in2009, when 140 were seized by regulators.

Lending by US banks is still stunted; loan balances across all major loan Categories fell; leading to a decline of total assets for the industry by 1% to$13.2 trillion during 1Q10, and a massive liquidity squeeze.

US banks’ 2Q10 profits totaled $21.6 billion, reversing a combined loss of $4.4 billion in 2Q09. Banks set aside more than $40.3 billion for

future loan losses.

Page 7: Basel III And Its Implications

7

From 2007 until September 2011A total of 396 bank failures in USA

With total assets of

US$674.7 billion&

Cost to U.S. government of

US$80.7 billion

Page 8: Basel III And Its Implications

8

BIS is recognizing that a key characteristic of the 2007

onwards financial crisis is the inaccurate and

ineffective management of liquidity risk

Page 9: Basel III And Its Implications

9

Basel IIIA new set of rules on banking supervision, published in

response to the recent financial crisis.

The Basel Committee is an international organization, set up by the governors of the G10 central banks at the end of 1974, operating under the patronage of BIS.

After the crisis broke out in 2007, the Committee was extendedto G20 countries (including China, India & Brazil). The Committee coordinates the allocation of supervisory dutiesamong the national authorities for the supervision of banking

activities worldwide.

Page 10: Basel III And Its Implications

10

Basel III

Basel III Capital

Proposals

Basel IIILiquidity Proposals

Page 11: Basel III And Its Implications

11

Introduction of a Leverage Ratio

Increased Capital Requirements on Certain counterparty Credit Risks

Improving Quality & Consistency of Regulatory Capital

Components of Basel III Capital Proposals

Addressing Procyclicality

Page 12: Basel III And Its Implications

12

Increased Capital Requirements “Tighter definitions” of Common Equity

Banks must hold 4.5% by Jan. 2015,then a further 2.5%, totaling 7%

Measures to limit Counterparty Credit Risk Introduction of a Leverage Ratio A framework for counter-cyclical capital buffers Short & Medium-term quantitative

Liquidity Ratios

The Basel III Regulations

Page 13: Basel III And Its Implications

13

New Elements of Basel III(1) Increasing & improving the quality of bank capital by:

(a) Increasing the minimum regulatory ratios

(b) Introducing capital buffers to be added to the minima

(c) Reviewing the treatment of certain regulatory capital components (particularly deferred tax assets, minority interest capital and significant equity investments in banks, finance and insurance companies, and hybrid equity instruments) to improve their quality.

(2) The introduction of anti-cyclical capital buffers to avoid excessive increases in bank’s risk position in the expansive phases of the cycle; therefore, avoiding the negative consequences that emerge in recession phases.

(3) The introduction of additional capital requirements for counterparty risk, in relation to banks’ off-balance sheet activities (derivatives, guarantees & commitments).

(4) The introduction of a leverage ratio (the ratio between capital and non-risk weighted total assets).

(5) The introduction of liquidity risk measurement/monitoring provisions in the short-term (liquidity coverage ratio) and in the mid-term (net stable funding ratio- NSFR)

Page 14: Basel III And Its Implications

14

Basel III

Capital Requirements

CapitalRatios

CapitalBuffers

DefinitionOf Capital

Page 15: Basel III And Its Implications

15

Basel IIIRisk-based

Capital Ratios

Core Tier 1Total Tier 1Total

Capital

Basel 3 requires banks to hold4.5% of common equity, up

from 2%. 6% of capital must be Tier 1. Tier 2 no more than 2%.

Total Tier 1 increased from 4% to 6%. Other types of Tier 1 canaccount for 1.5%. Combined with buffers,

Total Tier 1 = 8.5% RWAs

Total minimum capital requirement remains at 8%, subject to new capitalBuffers. Combined with buffers,

Total Risk-based capital =10.5% of RWAs

Page 16: Basel III And Its Implications

16

Basel IIICapital Buffers

Conservation BufferTo be used by banks

in times of stress(2.5% of core Tier 1;

to be met with Common equity only)

Countercyclical BufferA range of up to 2.5%

of common equity.Left to the discretion

of national regulators

Page 17: Basel III And Its Implications

17

Capital Buffers• In addition to the rise in Tier 1 capital ratios, a new

series of capital buffers will be introduced to further increase the minimum requirements

(1) Capital Conservation Buffer: which will require banks to hold (above the minimum 8% total capital) a further 2.5% of core Tier 1 capital over and above the new 4.5% level; which brings the total common equity requirement to the level of 7% of RWAs. This buffer must consist solely of common equity, after deductions.

(2) Capital Countercyclical Buffer: Banks may at certain times be required to hold another buffer; ranging from 0% to 2.5% of capital in the form of common equity or other fully loss-absorbing capital; to be implemented according to national circumstances. This buffer will only be in effect where there is an excess credit growth that results in a “system wide build up of risk” in any given country & will operate as an extension of the capital conservation buffer.

Page 18: Basel III And Its Implications

18

Timing of Capital Buffers• Both the capital conservation &

countercyclical buffers will be phased in from January 1st, 2016 to January 1st, 2019 at yearly increments of 0.625% of RWAs.

• The capital conservation buffer will be phased in at 0.625% on Jan 1st, 2016 & increasing each subsequent year by an additional 0.625%; to reach 2.5% on Jan 1st, 2019.

Page 19: Basel III And Its Implications

19

Regulators’ Response to LR• The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

(BCBS) and some national regulatory authorities are going to introduce the following:

Limiting the amount of

leverage

RegulatoryCapitalBuffer

Page 20: Basel III And Its Implications

20

Phase-in Arrangements (all dates as of Jan)

l

20120111

20122012 20120133

20142014 20120155

20162016 20172017 20182018 20120199

Min. C. Equity Min. C. Equity Capital RatioCapital Ratio

3.5%3.5% 4%4% 4.54.5%%

4.5%4.5% 4.5%4.5% 4.5%4.5% 4.5%4.5%

Capital Conserv. Capital Conserv. RatioRatio

0.6250.625%%

1.251.25%%

1.8751.875%%

2.5%2.5%

Min C. Equity +Min C. Equity +

Conservation Conservation RatioRatio

3.5%3.5% 4%4% 4.54.5%%

5.1255.125%%

5.755.75%%

6.3756.375%%

7%7%

Phase-in Phase-in deductionsdeductions

20%20% 40%40% 60%60% 80%80% 100%100% 100100%%

Min Tier 1 Min Tier 1 CapitalCapital

4.5%4.5% 5.5%5.5% 6%6% 6%6% 6%6% 6%6% 6%6%

Min. Total Min. Total CapitalCapital

8%8% 8%8% 8%8% 8%8% 8%8% 8%8% 8%8%

Min Total Capital Min Total Capital + Cons. Buffer+ Cons. Buffer

8%8% 8%8% 8%8% 8.6258.625%%

9.1259.125%%

9.8759.875%%

10.510.5%%

Capital Capital Instruments (no Instruments (no longer qualify as longer qualify as non-core Tier1 non-core Tier1 &2)&2)

Phased-out over 10 year horizon beginning 2013

Leverage Ratio SupervisoryMonitoring

Parallel Run Jan 2013-2015Disclosure starts 2015

MigrationTo Pillar 1

Page 21: Basel III And Its Implications

21

Basel IIIGlobal Liquidity

Standards

Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Net Stable Funding Ratio

Short-term liquidity metric Structural funding metric

It requires banks to maintain high-quality,unencumbered assets in excess of their stressed cash outflows over 30-day time.

To promote more medium & long-termfunding of the assets & activities of the bank over a 1-year horizon

2015 2018

Page 22: Basel III And Its Implications

22

Objectives of Basel III Liquidity Standards• Basel III set out 2 liquidity ratios; (A)short-term ratio as well as (B)A longer-term funding ratio by reference

to the amount of “longer-term-stable sources of funding” relative to the “liquidity profiles” of the assets funded and the off-balance sheet exposures.

• The aim is to ensure banks maintain 30 days’ liquidity coverage for extreme stress conditions

Page 23: Basel III And Its Implications

23

Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)• Various changes to the detailed

calculation of “liquid assets” and other elements of the ratio are made

• These changes include treating commitments of sovereigns and central banks in a manner similar to non-financial corporates and requiring that all assets in the liquidity pool for the definition of liquid assets be managed as part of the pool and be subject to operational requirement and introducing a “level 2” of liquid assets which can comprise up to 40% of the pool.

Page 24: Basel III And Its Implications

24

Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)• It effectively assesses the behavioral

maturity of each side of the balance sheet over a one-year horizon.

• More particularly, haircuts are applied to each category of assets and liabilities according to their expected stability through a stress scenario, and the available stable funding must exceed the required stable funding.

Page 25: Basel III And Its Implications

25

NSFR ….in a nutshell• NSFR, as a metric, highlights the level of

long-term funding compared with short-term liabilities.

• At this stage, no limit for the NSFR has been set, and such a limit is unlikely.

• However, regulators are expected to compare each bank’s figure against its peer group average and range.

• By end of 2011, the exact calculation of the metric has not been specified

The main objective of NSFR is to encourage more medium-term funding

Page 26: Basel III And Its Implications

26

Objectives of NSFRThe main objective of

NSFR is to encourage more medium-term funding

Control the level of maturity transformation that an institution undertakes

Page 27: Basel III And Its Implications

27

Quantitatives of NSFR British Bankers Association (BBA) suggested either of

the following definitions for calculating NSFR:(1) Capital + term funding with residual maturity of 1-year

+ non-wholesale funding divided by assets not marketable within 1 year

Capital + Term funding ( > 1 year) + Retail funding

Assets > 1 year

(2) Given that the problem during the 2008 crisis was one of over-reliance on ST wholesale funding, an alternative calculation of the metric could be by the following formula:

Unsecured wholesale funding > 1 year Total deposits + Debt securities in issue + Capital

Page 28: Basel III And Its Implications

28

Timing of Basel III Liquidity Standards

TestedTested(Observation (Observation

Period)Period)

MandatoryMandatory

Liquidity Coverage Liquidity Coverage RatioRatio

(LCR)(LCR)

20112011 Jan 1Jan 1stst, , 20152015

Net Stable Funding Net Stable Funding RatioRatio

(NSFR)(NSFR)

20122012 Jan 1Jan 1stst, , 20182018

Page 29: Basel III And Its Implications

29

Basel III

Capital Standards

125% increase of Tier 1 Capital from 2% to 4.5% of RWAs.

50% increase in Total Tier 1 Capital from 4% to 6% of RWAs.

Redefining Common Equity and its Structure & Content

Simplifying Tier 2 & Abolishing Tier 3Capital Ratios

Capital Buffers

2.5% Conservation

Buffer

0%-2.5% Countercyclical

Buffer

New 3% Leverage Ratio of Tier 1 Capital; as part of Pillar 2.

Total Tier 1 Capital+

Capital Buffer= 7% of RWAs

up from 2%Increase of 250%

Page 30: Basel III And Its Implications

30

Key dates: Capital Requirements

DatDatee

Milestone: Capital RequirementsMilestone: Capital Requirements

20120133

Minimum capital requirementMinimum capital requirement: : Start of the Start of the gradual phasing-in of the higher minimum gradual phasing-in of the higher minimum capital requirementscapital requirements

20120155

Minimum capital requirementMinimum capital requirement: Higher minimum : Higher minimum capital requirements are fully implementedcapital requirements are fully implemented

20120166

Conversion Buffer:Conversion Buffer: Start of the gradual phasing-in Start of the gradual phasing-in of the conversion bufferof the conversion buffer

20120199

Conversion BufferConversion Buffer: The conversion buffer is fully : The conversion buffer is fully implementedimplemented

Page 31: Basel III And Its Implications

31

Key dates: Leverage RatioDatDatee

Milestone: Leverage RatioMilestone: Leverage Ratio

20112011 Supervisory monitoringSupervisory monitoring: : Developing templates Developing templates to track the leverage ratio and the underlying to track the leverage ratio and the underlying componentscomponents

20132013 Parallel run I:Parallel run I: The leverage ratio and its components The leverage ratio and its components will be tracked by supervisors, but not disclosed and not will be tracked by supervisors, but not disclosed and not mandatorymandatory

20152015 Parallel run II:Parallel run II: The leverage ratio and its components The leverage ratio and its components will be tracked and disclosed, but mandatorywill be tracked and disclosed, but mandatory

20172017 Final adjustmentsFinal adjustments: : Based on the results of the parallel Based on the results of the parallel run period, any final adjustments to the leverage ratiorun period, any final adjustments to the leverage ratio

20182018 Mandatory requirementsMandatory requirements: : The leverage ratio will The leverage ratio will become a mandatory part of Basel III requirementsbecome a mandatory part of Basel III requirements

Page 32: Basel III And Its Implications

32

Key dates: Liquidity Requirements

DatDatee

Milestone: Liquidity RequirementsMilestone: Liquidity Requirements

20120111

Observation PeriodObservation Period: Developing templates & : Developing templates & supervisory monitoring of the liquidity ratios supervisory monitoring of the liquidity ratios

20120133

Introduction of the LCRIntroduction of the LCR: Introducing Leverage : Introducing Leverage Coverage RatioCoverage Ratio

20120188

Introduction of NSFRIntroduction of NSFR: Introducing Net Stable : Introducing Net Stable Funding RatioFunding Ratio

Page 33: Basel III And Its Implications

Any Questions?

Thank you for your time.