barrett-ctt national values assessment headlines

CTT National Values Assessment HeadlinesOctober 2013

www.valuescentre.com 2

CTT National Assessments – Status Oct. 2013

Denmark 2008

Latvia2007

Sweden2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013

Iceland2008, 2010

Belgium2010

UK2012

Finland2010, 2011

Switzerland2011

France2012, 2013

USA2009, 2010, 2011

Australia2009

Canada2009

South Africa2011

Bhutan2007

Brazil2010

Nigeria2012

Argentina2001**

Singapore2012

United Arab Emirates 2012

South America

North America

Africa

Asia

Oceania

Europe

Venezuela2010 **

Trinidad & Tobago2012

** Not statistically valid

Italy2012


Why National Assessment?

The purpose of this presentation is to show that it is possible to measure the values and culture of communities and nations.


National Assessments

The CTT National Values Assessment Provides politicians, government and community leaders with a

way of measuring and monitoring the degree to which the needs and values of the citizens of their nation or their community are being met, and hence the level of happiness/well-being that people perceive.

Highlights the most important national and community issues, and can be used to generate deep meaningful conversations among different societal groupings about national and community priorities.

Provides a road-map for achieving long-term sustainability. Identifies emergent issues in different population subgroups—

gender, age, ethnicity, etc. Uses internet technology to give citizens a voice and enable them

to participate in the process of day to day democracy.

Fundamentally this work highlights the values that unite groups & communities rather than the beliefs that divide.


Seven Levels of Consciousness©

Survival

Relationship

Self-esteem

Transformation

Internal Cohesion

Making adifference

Service

Personal Organisational Community/Society

Sel

f in

tere

stC

om

mo

n G

oo

d

Selfless serviceBeing your purpose. Compassion, humility, forgiveness. Caring for humanity and the planet.

Service to humanity and societal contributionSocial responsibility, long-term perspective, ethics, compassion and humility.

Global sustainabilityHuman rights, long-term perspective, ecological resilience, peace, focus on future generations. Global perspective.

Making a positive difference in the worldLiving your purpose. Empathy, alliances, intuition, mentoring, and focus on wellbeing (physical, emotional, mental, spiritual).

Internal/External collaboration, community involvementEnvironmental awareness, employee fulfilment, coaching/mentoring and caring for the local community.

Strategic alliances and regional partnershipsRegional collaboration, environmental awareness, quality of life, community involvement and sustainability. Caring for nature.

Finding meaning in existenceFinding your purpose. Integrity, honesty, authenticity, passion, enthusiasm, creativity, and humour & fun.

Sense of purpose and strong internal communityShared vision and values. Commitment, creativity, enthusiasm, integrity, honesty, generosity, fairness, openness, transparency and trust.

Strong cohesive cultureShared vision and values. Fairness, transparency, trust, honesty and social cohesion. Positive collective spirit.

Letting go of fearsFinding the courage to grow and develop. Adaptability, life long learning, continuous renewal and personal growth.

On-going improvement and employee participationAdaptability, accountability, empowerment, teamwork, goals orientation and continuous improvement.

Democratic processes and continuous renewalFreedom, equality, empowerment, accountability, adaptability, entrepreneurship and consensus.

Feeling a sense of self-worthConfidence, competence, self-reliance.Fear: I am not enough.Leads to need for power, authority or status seeking.

High performance systems and processesReliability, quality, efficiency, productivity and excellence. Bureaucracy, hierarchy, confusion, and complacency.

Institutional effectivenessLaw abiding, community/national pride, governmental efficiency and high quality public services. Bureaucracy, central control, elitism, complacency and apathy.

Feeling protected and lovedFamily, friendship, loyalty, respect.Fear: I am not loved enough. Leads to jealousy, blame and discrimination.

Positive relationships that support organisation needsLoyalty, open communication, customer satisfaction. Manipulation, blame, favouritism and internal competition.

Sense of belonging and social stabilityNeighbourliness, conflict resolution, racial harmony and a focus on family and friendships. Inequality, discrimination, intolerance, hatred, loneliness/isolation.

Satisfying physiological and survival needsHealth, security, financial stability.Fear: I do not have enough.Leads to control, domination and caution.

Financial viability and people safetyFinancial performance, organisational growth, and employee health and safety. Control, greed, exploitation and micro-management.

Economic stability and citizen securityProsperity, health care, employment, emergency services/defence and social safety nets. Corruption, violence, poverty, environmental pollution and greed.

Positive Focus/ Excessive Focus

National Assessment Sweden: (1001 people)

unemployment (L) 599 1(O)

bureaucracy (L) 457 3(O)

uncertainty about the future (L)

438 1(I)

freedom of speech 395 4(O)

wasted resources (L) 354 3(O)

materialistic (L) 338 1(I)

blame (L) 334 2(R)

peace 332 7(S)

short-term focus (L) 319 1(O)

educational opportunities 279 3(O)

employment opportunities 612 1(O)

financial stability 490 1(I)

concern for future generations

405 7(S)

effective healthcare 335 1(O)

nature conservancy 330 6(S)

democratic process 277 4(R)

environmental awareness 262 6(S)

long-term perspective 256 7(S)

caring for the elderly 253 4(S)

equality 239 4(R)

Values Plot March 12, 2013Copyright 2013 Barrett Values Centre

I = IndividualR = Relationship

Black Underline = PV & CCOrange = PV, CC & DC

Orange = CC & DCBlue = PV & DC

P = PositiveL = Potentially Limiting (white circle)

O = OrganisationalS = Societal

Matches

PV - CC 0CC - DC 0PV - DC 0

Cultural Entropy:Current Culture

47%

humour/ fun 470 5(I)

family 422 2(R)

responsibility 383 4(I)

honesty 357 5(I)

accountability 315 4(R)

compassion 290 7(R)

positive attitude 284 5(I)

fairness 279 5(R)

adaptability 257 4(I)

independence 228 4(I)

Level Personal Values (PV) Current Culture Values (CC) Desired Culture Values (DC)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

IRS (P)=6-4-0 IRS (L)=0-0-0 IROS (P)=0-0-2-1 IROS (L)=2-1-4-0 IROS (P)=1-2-2-5 IROS (L)=0-0-0-0

The values that are important to people

in their personal lives.How the people experience their society-- What is

working well? What is undermining the sustainability nation and quality of life of the citizens

What the people believe is necessary for them to improve their lives and help the nation

achieve its full potential?

What do these plots tell you?


Cultural Entropy

Cultural Entropy in Nations

Cultural entropy is the degree of dysfunction that occurs in a community or nation due to the felt presence of unmet needs and fear-based behaviours that impact the general population.

We measure cultural entropy by determining the proportion of votes in a cultural values assessment for potentially limiting values/behaviours such as corruption, bureaucracy, unemployment, discrimination, etc.


Cultural Entropy: Risk Bands

0-10% Healthy Culture: This a low level of entropy which is a good indication for the future.

11-20% Minor Issues: Some degree of dissatisfaction with the current culture that requires discussion and dialogue

21-30% Significant Issues: Potential unease among the population and/or conflicts that require immediate attention and/or resolution.

31-40% Serious Issues: Unresolved issues among the population that, if left unaddressed, could create social unrest.

41%+ Critical Issues: Leadership issues that could lead to social unrest, demonstrations, and civil disobedience, indicating a need for change in policy and/or a change in government


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


Argentina (110)

Values PlotCopyright Barrett Values Centre

Matches



60%







life-long learning 40 4(I)

creativity 35 5(I)

family 33 2(R)

values awareness 32 5(I)

love 27 4(R)

solidarity 26 5(I)

friendship 26 2(R)

approachable 25 2(R)

commitment 25 5(I)

perseverance 25 4(I)

corruption (L) 93 1(O)


inequality (L) 80 2(R)


crime/ violence (L) 75 1(R)

poverty (L) 67 1(I)

conflict/ aggression (L) 58 2(R)

environmental pollution (L) 45 1(O)

loneliness/ isolation (L) 43 2(R)


quality of life 62 6(I)

governmental efficiency 50 3(O)

values awareness 47 5(O)

law abiding 46 3(I)

economic growth 43 1(O)

community involvement 40 6(S)

full employment 36 3(O)

social justice 30 4(S)

decency 29 2(I)


2001

Australia (13.626m)

bureaucracy (L) 5.900m 3(O)

crime/violence (L) 5.294m 1(R)

blame (L) 4.915m 2(R)

wasted resources (L) 4.664m 3(O)

materialistic (L) 3.617m 1(I)

corruption (L) 3.465m 1(O)


3.384m 1(I)

short-term focus (L) 3.002m 1(O)

freedom of speech 2.953m 4(O)

economic growth 2.841m 1(O)

caring for the elderly 4.957m 4(S)

affordable housing 4.877m 1(O)

accountability 4.457m 4(R)

caring for the disadvantaged

4.247m 4(S)


4.136m 7(S)

effective healthcare 4.100m 1(O)

employment opportunities

3.617m 1(O)

community pride 3.261m 3(I)

governmental effectiveness

3.065m 3(O)

dependable public services

2.922m 3(O)

Values Plot Copyright Barrett Values Centre






Matches


family 6.764m 2(R)

honesty 6.366m 5(I)

caring 6.337m 2(R)

humour/fun 5.428m 5(I)

friendship 3.936m 2(R)

respect 3.768m 2(R)

compassion 3.472m 7(R)

independence 3.460m 4(I)

responsibility 3.430m 4(I)

trust 3.253m 5(R)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1



42%

NB. The assessment participant sample was 1052 and has been statistically adjusted to reflect the Australian population.

2009

Belgium (7650)



3777 1(I)


conflict/aggression (L) 3061 2(R)




poverty (L) 2523 1(I)

crime/violence (L) 2512 1(R)


honesty 3032 5(I)


2952 7(S)


respect 2548 2(R)



poverty reduction 2399 1(O)

affordable housing 2270 1(O)

peace 2183 7(S)








Matches


honesty 4248 5(I)

respect 3525 2(R)

friendship 3276 2(R)

family 2976 2(R)

caring 2917 2(R)

listening 2725 2(R)

health 2656 1(I)


trust 2212 5(R)



7

6

5

4

3

2

1



53%

2010

Bhutan (403)

continuous improvement 195 4(O)

environmental protection

104 1(O)

strict moral/religious codes

104 3(O)

political rights 102 3(O)

education 100 4(O)


shared vision 90 5(O)

information availability 88 3(O)

shared values 88 5(O)

contentment 87 5(I)


education 115 4(O)

continuous improvement 113 4(O)




contentment 93 5(I)

environmental protection 89 1(O)

compassion 83 7(R)

full employment 82 3(O)

strict moral/religious codes

82 3(O)







Matches



4%

friendship 180 2(R)

continuous learning 160 4(I)

compassion 128 7(R)

caution (L) 122 1(I)

sincerity 121 5(I)


self-discipline 102 1(I)

optimism 95 5(I)

helpfulness 94 2(R)

caring 92 2(R)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2007

Brazil (2544)





illiteracy (L) 963 3(I)





683 1(I)


peace 1031 7(S)

fairness 718 5(O)






respect 623 2(R)









Matches



51%


family 1132 2(R)

honesty 1005 5(I)

respect 951 2(R)

humility 885 7(I)


health 741 1(I)

fairness 678 5(R)

hope 677 4(I)

patience 659 5(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2010

Canada (1250)


human rights 444 7(S)





law enforcement 284 3(O)



272 1(I)







377 4(S)


356 7(S)




governmental effectiveness 317 3(O)







Matches



32%

honesty 577 5(I)

family 481 2(R)

caring 436 2(R)

humor/fun 427 5(I)

respect 371 2(R)

friendship 360 2(R)



trust 322 5(R)

patience 313 5(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2009


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


Denmark (923)


Matches


Cultural Entropy: Current Culture

21%






family 450 2(R)

honesty 431 5(I)




friendship 291 2(R)

caring 284 2(R)

fairness 243 5(R)

listening 233 2(R)

cooperation 230 5(R)


educational opportunities

437 3(O)

prosperity 356 1(I)



personal freedom 293 4(I)


tradition (L) 256 2(O)




social responsibility 345 4(S)


341 3(O)



peace 289 7(S)



personal freedom 249 4(I)


2008

Finland (1165)



594 1(I)





peace 355 7(S)


envy (L) 346 2(I)








authenticity 320 5(I)

dependable public services 312 3(O)



peace 297 7(S)







Matches



49%

caring 488 2(R)

honesty 457 5(I)



family 406 2(R)

friendship 312 2(R)


authenticity 301 5(I)

valuing of nature 285 6(S)

practicality 271 3(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2011


uncertainty about the future (L) 594 1(I)





peace 355 7(S)


envy (L) 346 2(I)


Finland National Assessments

Matches10

Cultural Entropy

2010 48%

2011 49%









peace 324 7(S)

envy (L) 298 2(I)


Level 2010 (1008) 2011 (1165)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

IROS (P)=0-1-2-1 | IROS (L)=2-0-4-0 IROS (P)=0-1-2-1 | IROS (L)=2-0-4-0

Orange=Values MatchP=PositiveL=Potentially Limiting (white circle)

I=IndividualR=RelationshipO=OrganisationalS=Societal

France (1020)



414 1(I)







protesting (L) 274 2(I)



justice 261 4(O)

honesty 257 5(I)


equality 235 4(R)












Matches


honesty 382 5(I)

family 381 2(R)

friendship 343 2(R)

autonomy 309 4(I)

respect 302 2(R)



listening 231 2(R)

generosity 229 5(R)

politeness 214 2(R)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1



65%

2013









protesting (L) 274 2(I)


French National Assessments

Matches10

Cultural Entropy

2012 57%

2013 65%











contempt (L) 240 2(R)

Level 2012 (1005) 2013 (1020)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1





7

6

5

4

3

2

1


Iceland (1094)


Matches



63%






family 598 2(R)

honesty 497 5(I)

friendship 357 2(R)

optimism 335 5(I)

trust 298 5(R)

fairness 292 5(R)

health 273 1(I)





530 1(I)



blame (L) 442 2(R)


347 7(S)



elitism (L) 296 3(R)



honesty 295 5(I)



family 235 2(R)

respect 230 2(R)

dependable public services

228 3(O)





2010


530 1(I)



blame (L) 442 2(R)

concern for future generations 347 7(S)






Iceland National Assessments

Matches6

Cultural Entropy

2008 54%

2010 63%






275 1(I)



material needs 224 1(I)


gender discrimination (L) 196 2(R)

blame (L) 177 2(R)

Level 2008 (635) 2010 (1094)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1




Italy (1549)


political patronage (L) 902 1(O)


794 1(I)



nepotism (L) 717 2(R)


lack of transparency (L) 659 2(O)

distrust (L) 613 2(R)





honesty 493 5(I)

legal justice 484 4(O)

collaboration 472 6(R)


451 4(S)


economic development 402 1(O)

giving/ volunteering 378 6(S)







Matches


Cultural Entropy Current Culture:

73%

friendship 765 2(R)

honesty 659 5(I)

family 630 2(R)



giving/ volunteering 408 6(S)

patience 378 5(I)

respect 364 2(R)

creativity 349 5(I)



7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2012


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


Latvia (1041)


Matches



54%






family 471 2(R)

children 369 2(R)

health 309 1(I)

honesty 275 5(I)


caring 267 2(R)


friendship 241 2(R)


compassion 215 7(R)



inequality (L) 522 2(R)





emphasis on materiality (L) 298 1(I)

self-interest (L) 251 3(I)

drug addiction(L) 246 1(I)


financial stability 493 1(O)


377 7(S)

job security 336 1(O)


caring for the disadvantaged 295 4(S)



children 232 2(R)

material wealth 231 1(I)

2007

Nigeria (5010)




terrorism (L) 1977 1(R)


hatred (L) 1890 2(R)


illiteracy (L) 1731 3(I)

blame (L) 1501 2(R)

low value for life (L) 1237 1(R)


peace 1795 7(S)


honesty 1283 5(I)

unity 1215 5(R)



transparency 1006 5(O)


commitment 959 5(I)







Matches


Cultural Entropy Current Culture:

57%


caring 1769 2(R)

honesty 1588 5(I)

achievement 1367 3(I)

ambition 1360 3(I)

self-discipline 1335 1(I)

commitment 1171 5(I)

control (L) 1152 1(R)

courage 1133 4(I)

being the best 1100 3(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2012

Sweden (1001)




438 1(I)




blame (L) 334 2(R)

peace 332 7(S)






405 7(S)







equality 239 4(R)







Matches



47%


family 422 2(R)


honesty 357 5(I)


compassion 290 7(R)


fairness 279 5(R)




7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2013

Sweden National Assessments


Matches

6


2009: 31%

2010: 34%

2011: 42%

2012: 43%


Orange = Values Match P = PositiveL = Potentially Limiting (white circle)


Level 2009 (1016) 2010 (1002) 2011 (1030) 2012 (1000)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

IROS (P)=0-1-1-4 IROS (L)=1-0-3-0 IROS (P)=0-1-1-3 IROS (L)=1-1-3-0 IROS (P)=1-0-1-2 IROS (L)=2-1-3-0 IROS (P)=0-0-2-1 IROS (L)=2-2-3-0

freedom of speech

539 4(O)

peace 522 7(S)


unemployment (L)

409 1(O)


democratic process

317 4(R)

environmental awareness

311 6(S)


301 1(I)

wasted resources (L)

284 3(O)

nature conservancy

276 6(S)

freedom of speech

458 4(O)


unemployment (L)

424 1(O)

peace 398 7(S)


314 3(O)


303 6(S)

democratic process

298 4(R)

blame (L) 297 2(R)



280 1(I)

unemployment (L)

535 1(O)


freedom of speech

408 4(O)


369 1(I)


blame (L) 331 2(R)


326 3(O)

peace 298 7(S)



286 6(S)





393 1(I)



326 3(O)

blame (L) 315 2(R)

peace 306 7(S)



280 3(O)

Singapore (2000)

kiasu (L) 1154 1(I)

competitive (L) 823 3(O)

self-centred (L) 653 3(R)

material needs 628 1(I)

kiasi (L) 600 1(I)

deteriorating values (L) 591 3(I)


blame (L) 494 2(R)


470 1(I)

security 440 1(O)





624 4(S)

compassion 590 7(R)


579 7(S)


equal opportunities 538 4(O)









Matches


family 936 2(R)

friendship 708 2(R)

health 648 1(I)

happiness 603 5(I)

caring 546 2(R)

honesty 510 5(I)


well-being (physical/ emotional/ mental/ spiritual)

474 6(I)

respect 468 2(R)

balance (home/work) 444 4(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1



41%

2012

South Africa (8582)



blame (L) 4189 2(R)






3039 1(I)


ethnic discrimination (L) 2246 2(R)




honesty 2520 5(I)






2244 7(S)








Matches



62%


honesty 4225 5(I)

respect 3320 2(R)

integrity 3225 5(I)

family 3203 2(R)


commitment 2271 5(I)

balance (home/work) 2259 4(I)

caring 2241 2(R)

ethics 2047 7(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2011

Switzerland (370)



secrecy of the banks (L) 129 2(O)

decentralisation 122 4(O)


economic stability 110 1(I)

prosperity 103 1(I)


tradition (L) 92 2(O)

neutrality 91 4(S)

sustainable development/renewable energies

139 6(S)


134 7(S)






global thinking 87 7(S)



integration of foreigners 69 4(O)







Matches



26%


honesty 131 5(I)

ethics 121 7(I)


102 6(I)

humour/ fun 96 5(I)



creativity 92 5(I)

global awareness 91 7(S)

enthusiasm 90 5(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2011

Trinidad & Tobago (612)



blame (L) 359 2(R)

ad-hoc governance (L) 295 1(O)

nepotism (L) 282 2(R)



liming (L) 250 3(I)

discrimination (L) 247 2(O)




246 7(S)



223 4(S)




community pride 174 3(I)









Matches


honesty 260 5(I)

caring 224 2(R)

family 192 2(R)

ambition 185 3(I)

commitment 149 5(I)


144 6(I)


138 7(S)


integrity 132 5(I)



7

6

5

4

3

2

1



75%

2012

UAE (4096)


1160 7(S)

respect 1041 2(R)


creativity 912 5(I)

family 899 2(R)

peace 897 7(S)


aesthetics 818 6(I)

loyalty 788 2(R)




1051 7(S)



creativity 895 5(I)

family 869 2(R)

respect 857 2(R)

honesty 770 5(I)

innovation 765 4(O)








Matches


family 1315 2(R)

respect 1301 2(R)


ambition 1095 3(I)

honesty 1078 5(I)

ethics 1070 7(I)

commitment 973 5(I)

caring 947 2(R)

being liked (L) 942 2(R)



7

6

5

4

3

2

1



12%

2012

UK (4000)




1728 1(I)


blame (L) 1506 2(R)


media influence (L) 1272 3(O)


drugs/ alcohol (L) 1219 1(I)

apathy (L) 1209 3(I)





1438 4(S)




1149 7(S)


honesty 1043 5(I)








Matches


caring 1967 2(R)

family 1837 2(R)

honesty 1594 5(I)



fairness 1065 5(R)

compassion 1049 7(R)


respect 969 2(R)

trust 942 5(R)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1



59%

2012

USA (1505)

blame (L) 820 2(R)






651 1(I)








551 7(S)





379 4(S)


peace 355 7(S)







O = OrganizationalS = Societal

Matches



56%

family 672 2(R)

caring 648 2(R)

humor/ fun 584 5(I)

honesty 563 5(I)



compassion 442 7(R)

friendship 433 2(R)


respect 402 2(R)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1


2011

USA National Assessments



blame (L) 680 2(R)


651 1(I)






military strength 402 3(O)

blame (L) 820 2(R)






651 1(I)







Orange = Values Match P = PositiveL = Potentially Limiting (white circle)

Matches9


2009: 52%

2010: 58%

2011: 56%



blame (L) 681 2(R)



567 1(I)






O= OrganisationalS = Societal

Level 2009 (1503) 2010 (1504) 2011 (1505)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

IROS (P)=0-0-0-0 IROS (L)=3-3-4-0 IROS (P)=0-0-1-0 IRS (L)=2-3-4-0 IROS (P)=0-0-0-0 IRS (L)=2-3-5-0

Venezuela (320)


conflict/aggression (L) 212 2(R)




blame (L) 177 2(R)


174 1(I)

centralized government (L)

143 3(O)









honesty 97 5(I)

commitment 94 5(I)









Matches


honesty 179 5(I)

family 161 2(R)


commitment 134 5(I)




respect 100 2(R)

dialogue 99 6(R)

ethics 95 7(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1



72%

2010


Entropy Percentages by Nation

7573 72

6563 62

60 5957 56

54 5351

4947

42 41

32

26

21

12

4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Cultural entropy is a measure of dysfunctional, toxic or destructive energy in a system


For more information and resources

• National Values Assessment section of Values Centre website

• “Love Fear and the Destiny of Nations” by Richard Barrett (paperback and ebook)

• Example: UK National & Community Values Assessment with all results and shared resources

http://www.valuescentre.com/sectors/?sec=nations

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Love-Destiny-Nations-Richard-Barrett/dp/1105639428/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1384342260&sr=8-1&keywords=love+fear+and+the+destiny+of+nations

http://www.valuescentre.com/ukvalues/


OTHER TRIAL SURVEY RESULTS

Hungary & Slovakia

Hungary (457)


373 1(I)





blame (L) 253 2(R)



hatred (L) 200 2(R)

ethnic discrimination (L) 198 2(R)

peace 172 7(S)


trust 155 5(R)

collaboration 153 6(R)




transparency 132 5(O)



Values Plot October 15, 2012Copyright 2012 Barrett Values Centre






Matches


family 241 2(R)

friendship 203 2(R)

compassion 174 7(R)




honesty 136 5(I)

trust 116 5(R)


creativity 115 5(I)


7

6

5

4

3

2

1



82%

National Survey: Slovakia (125)





78 1(I)


elitism (L) 62 3(R)

poverty (L) 62 1(I)


blame (L) 53 2(R)


honesty 59 5(I)










Values Plot October 15, 2012Copyright 2012 Barrett Values Centre






Matches


family 71 2(R)

friendship 62 2(R)

humour/ fun 51 5(I)

honesty 47 5(I)

fairness 39 5(R)

trust 37 5(R)



creativity 35 5(I)



7

6

5

4

3

2

1



76%

barrett-ctt national values assessment headlines

Health & Medicine