banning unified school district prop 39 integrated solar ... info... · • led lighting upgrades...
TRANSCRIPT
Banning Unified School District
Prop 39 IntegratedSolar and Energy Efficiency Program
December 8, 2016
Crista Curtis, Business Development ManagerJonathan Brown, Operations Director
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Prop 39 Program Overview
Nov. 6, 2012: California Clean Energy Jobs Act approved by voters.
Banning USD was allocated $1,098,765 (estimated) for a 5-year program
• Year 1 – $219,507
• Year 2 – $193,315
• Year 3 – $185,347
• Year 4 – $280,843
• Year 5 – $219,753 (estimated)
November 2016 – Banning USD went out for a public bid to select qualified energy services company and selected OpTerra Energy Services.
April 28, 2016: Banning USD School Board Approved a Program Development Agreement with OpTerra Energy Services to develop energy program for the District.
September – completed energy audits, worked with District staff to develop highest priority projects and now share results with the Board.
3
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Prop 39 Process
Work with District staff to identify critical facility needs energy saving opportunities. Develop Prop. 39 funding application and manage the
State approval process for the District Create a facility upgrade plan that maximizes energy
savings and Prop 39 dollars over the 5-year allocation –meeting 1.01 SIR as required by Prop 39. Manage subcontractors & bidding process, for turn-key
solution. Provide reports required for Prop 39 M&V.
4
Project Development
Engineering/Design
Construction Measurement & Verification
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Building A Sustainable Future for Banning USDOption 1
Energy Efficiency• LED Lighting Upgrades – interior and exterior at all campuses• Building Envelope Improvements – at all campuses• Transformers – Banning High School• HVAC – added to gym at Nicolet (not energy savings, but paid for by energy
savings, and to address equity and comfort issue
Solar PV • Program Capacity: 1.4 MW, producing 2,297,600 million kWh annually• Locations:
o Banning Higho Cabazon Elementary o Central Elementary/District Officeo Coombs Alternative Edo Florida Discovery Center/Nicolet Elementaryo Hemmerling Elementaryo Hoffer Elementary
5
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Building A Sustainable Future for Banning USDOption 2
Energy Efficiency• LED Lighting Upgrades – interior and exterior at all campuses• Building Envelope Improvements – at all campuses• Transformers – Banning High School• HVAC – added to gym at Nicolet (not energy savings, but paid for by energy
savings, and to address equity and comfort issue
Option 3: Battery Storage
• Not economically feasible at this time – will be a future consideration.
6
Energy Savings By Measure(Option 2)
7
Solar66.3%
Lighting
28.7%
Building Envelope 2.8%
Transformers 2.2%
Solar
Benefits: Provide shaded parking Makes use of vacant/unusable land Provides shade/shelter in
playground areas Solar panels warrantied for 25
years Provides energy to District facilities
for 25+ years, for less than what District is paying to the utility
Reduces District carbon footprint
8
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Banning High
9
66.6 % of demand
Parking Lot and pool shade structure
Future:Roofmountsolar and battery storage
EV Charging
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Central Elementary/District Office
11
Central: 48.6% of demand Roof-mount system
DO: 66.3% of demand Ground-mount system
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Florida Street Discovery Center/Nicolet Middle
13
72.5% of demand Ground-mount system
66.3% of demand Ground-mount system
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Hemmerling Elementary
14
77.6% of demand Parking Lot Shade Structure and Playground Shade Structure
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Hoffer Elementary
15
53.9% of demand Playground Shade Structure and Roof-mount
Leverages Prop 39 Funds. Maximizes all applicable
rebates, incentives, and grants.
Balance of program is paid from energy savings.
Capital/Bond contribution is a District option.
Savings are guaranteed by OpTerra and verified by the CEC.
Funding Sources
Paid from Utility Bill Savings
Grants
19
Option 1: Economics
Estimated Program Cost:$11.8 million
Year 1 Net Savings = $156k * $30k Utility Incentives $1.1M Prop 39 Funds $1.2M Optional Bond Contribution
(Banning HS) Energy Savings over $17.9 M for
30-year program** No Risk to District – OpTerra is
sole responsible party:• Construction, guarantee, savings,
& management of subcontractors**depends on final interest rates, assumes 17-year term
20
Paid by Savings Financing$ 9.47M
Prop 39 $1.1M
Utility Incentives$30k
Bond$1.2M
Option 2: Economics
Estimated Program Cost: $4.1M Year 1 Net Savings = $154k $30k Utility Incentives $1.1M Prop 39 Funds $1.2M Optional Bond Contribution (Banning HS) Energy Savings over $4.0 M for 30-year program No Risk to District – OpTerra is sole responsible party:
• Construction, guarantee, savings, & management of subcontractors
21
How Paid from Savings Programs Work
Each program is designed to generate savings by reducing utility and maintenance costs.
A portion of the savings is used to repay the lender and remaining savings can be used by the District to fund other immediate mission-critical priorities.
The capital to build the program is provided by third-party financing.
22
Energy Savings Guarantee
Guarantee Establish an energy baseline of existing equipment and conditions (Baseline).
Subtract new equipment energy consumption from historical energy baseline consumption to identify project energy savings.
Use International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocols to report program savings on a quarterly basis.
California Energy Commission has established their own energy savings procedures for Prop.39 funds.
Savings Reconciliation Process In the event of a savings short fall, OpTerra will pay the difference to the District in accordance with contract terms.
In the event of an increased savings, over the contracted guarantee, the District retains the savings in accordance with contracted terms.
Note: OpTerra currently has over 50 clients with ongoing guarantees that total over $750 million.
23
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Anticipated Project Schedule
Board Approves Energy Services Contract: January 2017 Notice to Proceed: February 2017 Design & Engineering: Feb-March 2017 Division of State Architect Approval: May 2017 On-Site Construction: Summer 2017-Feb 2018
**Construction scheduling coordinated with District and individual sites.
PV System on-line and generating: Spring Break 2018
24
© 2016 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Economic & Environmental Benefits
District-wide Energy Program will reduce energy used by approximately 66.5%
Saves District over $17.9 million for next 30 years Offsets 1,615 metric tons of carbon dioxide every year.
• Equivalent to removing over 500 cars off the roads every year• Equivalent to providing power to over 171 homes every year• Equivalent to preserving 1,528 acres of forest every year.
Over 20 years, this program will offset over 1,615 metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
25
© 2015 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES
Our Prop 39 Partnersto develop, submit, and implement
Perris Union HSD Completed $2M (5 Year Prop 39 - $2M) Desert Sands USD Completed $12M (5 Year Prop 39 - $6.2M) Fountain Valley SD Completed $8.2M (5 Year Prop 39 -$1.3M) Nuview Union SD Completed $9.4M (5 Year Prop 39 - $620k) Manhattan Beach USD Completed $ 9.5M (5 Year Prop 39 - $1.3M) Huntington Beach City SD Completed $8.1M (5 Year Prop 39 - $1.3M) Jurupa USD Completed $35M (2 Year Prop 39 - $1.9M) La Mesa Spring Valley SD In Construction $15.5M (5 Year Prop 39 - $2.5M) Burbank USD In Construction $ 26M (5 Year Prop 39 - $3M) Westminster SD In Construction $ 22.1M (5 Year Prop 39 - $2.2M) Los Angeles USD In Construction $ 10.2M (Partial Prop 39 Allocation)
UNDER CONTRACT
*Selected by San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools & 17 participating districts
Inglewood USD Walnut Valley USD Coalinga-Huron USD East Side Union HSD Mount Pleasant USD
Mountain View SD Patterson Joint UHSD San Bernardino County Superintendent of
Schools* South San Francisco USD
26