bandeira thesis
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
1/115
i
The posit ioning of Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) in
the European short haul business t ravel market.
Joo Pedro Bandeira
M. A. European Tourism Management (ETM)
Bournemouth University
August 2004
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
2/115
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
3/115
iii
Acknowledgements
First of all, I would like to express my appreciation to my supervisor Prof.
Francisco Serra and my co-supervisor Prof. Paula Martins for their help and
advice in the organization and writing of this dissertation.
This is an important step in my life which finally came true. The fulfilment of this
dissertation has a very significant meaning for me since it symbolises the
overcome of a difficult but very challenging hurdle in this pleasant and
rewarding voyage, which is life.
I want to dedicate this moment to my family which always supported and
incited me during the good and bad times. I love you all.
Personal gratitude to my mother, for giving attention and courage to everything I
do. To my father for being there every time I needed. To my super grandmother
Teresa for giving continuous support and care.
To my sister thanks for being always caring about me.
Special thanks to my uncle Antnio Bandeira for the precious and priceless
support for the writing of this dissertation. Technologies are making distances
shorter, and shorter
My reference to all the wonderful colleagues I had the opportunity to meet andshare unforgettable moments, during the master period in Bournemouth and
Heilbronn.
Finally but not least my thanks for all my friends in Portugal, that gave all the
attention and support during this long period.
Faro, 27.08.2004
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
4/115
iv
Declaration
I hereby declare that the dissertation submitted is wholly the work
of Joo Pedro Bandeira. Any other contributors or sources have
either been referenced in the prescribed manner or are listed in the
acknowledgements together with the nature and scope of their
contribution.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
5/115
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
6/115
vi
3.2. EASYJET THE RUNNER FOR THE EUROPEAN LCC THRONE .........................................................62
3.3. THE ATTACKOF LCCS TO THE BUSINESS AIR TRAVEL MARKET...............................................68
3.4. CASE STUDY CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................79
4. DISSERTATION CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................81
BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................................................................................84
ANNEXES (AND APPENDICES) ....................................................................................................................103
Annex 1- Timetables and frequencies of BA, KLM and easyJet, in Route Amsterdam-London .............103
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
7/115
vii
List of Tables
Table 1-The dist inction bet w een custom er and consum er in business t ravel ________________ 15
Table 2: Scheduled passenger movement in London airports, 1999-2001 ___________________ 28
Table 3: Evolut ion of som e European Short Haul routes air fares, January 1999 and_________ 29
Jan ua ry 2003 ____________________________________________________________________ 29
Table 4- Airlines product__________________________________________________________ 45
Table 5: Passengers Stat ist ics com parison betw een Ry anair and BA - July 2004 ____________ 54
Table 6: Flight frequencies of easy Jet, BA an d KLM from Lon don t o A mst erdam ____________ 72
Table 7: Flight frequencies of Ry anair, BA and Al it alia from Lo ndon t o Mil an _____________ 72
Table 8: Fares difference betw een Ry anair and BA /Iberia on it s new routes ________________ 74
Table 9: Punctua lit y performance of Ry anair and easy Jet compared wit h other M ajor airlines inEurope in January 2004.___________________________________________________________ 75
Table 10: Ai rlines wit h few est lost bags _____________________________________________ 76
Table 11: Airlines w ith few est flight cancellat ions _____________________________________ 77
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
8/115
viii
List of Figures
Figure 1: The m etho dolo gical approach _______________________________________________ 6
Figure 2: St ructu re of t he Dissertat ion ________________________________________________ 8
Figure 3: Ry anair Traffic num bers (in m illion s) _______________________________________ 55
Figure 4: Ryanair current destinations _______________________________________________ 57
Figure 5: Pass engers grow t h (in percenta ge): __________________________________________ 58
Figure 6: Ryanair Fleet: ___________________________________________________________ 59
Figure 7: Comparison of passenger traffic betw een easyJet and Ry anair___________________ 63
Figure 8: easy Jets current net w ork _________________________________________________ 64
Figure 9: easy Jets Fleet comp osit ion pla n ___________________________________________ 65
Figure 10: R yanai r publicity in it s w eb-sit e against BA fuel surcharges ___________________ 78
Figure 11: R ya nair seat sale Promot ion in its w eb sit e _________________________________ 78
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
9/115
ix
List of abbreviat ions
AMEX American Express
ATW Air Transport World
BA British Airways
BAA British Airports Authority
BTI Business Travel International
CEO Chief Executive Officer
CWT Carlson Wagonlit Travel
IATA International Air Transport Association
ITM Institute of Travel Management
LCC Low Cost Carrier
LFA Low Fare Airline
MICE Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Events
TNC Traditional Network Carrier
SARS Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
SIA Singapore Airlines
T&TI Travel & Tourism Intelligence
VFR Visiting Friends and Relatives
UK United Kingdom
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
10/115
1
1Introduction
1.1.Introduction to the Area of Study
In recent years a lot has been written and said about the emergence of the Low
Cost Airlines. This new breed of Airlines have revolutionised deeply and
decisively the status-quo of the aviation in general and specifically of the so
called Traditional Network Airlines, by introducing a revolutionary low cost
business model which enable these airlines to offer very low fares to their
customers.
The liberalisation of the airline industry in Europe in 1997 was the key moment
for the rise of these very competitive airlines since it allowed any airline
established on a European country to fly between any two EU airports and
determined the end of flag carriers monopoly in European skies. The so-called
democratisation of air travelling was just beginning.
Initially low fare airlines were clearly only focusing on the leisure segment which
was thought to be more price-oriented. However, and contrarily to what most
people would suppose, there is evidence that these airlines have been also
attracting a large number of business travellers (Koumeli, 2002b). In fact
depressed European economies have made Business Travellers more and more
price conscious augmenting the price factor in the choice for their flights (Pels
and Rietveld, 2004).
Having these introductory ideas in consideration the next chapter will discuss
the dissertation aim and objectives.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
11/115
2
1.2. Research Aims & Objectives
This dissertation has the main aim of analysing the positioning of LCCs in the
short haul Business air Travel Market, which has been for many years, the
cornerstone for the revenues and financial health of the Traditional Airlines.
In order to achieve this aim the following objectives have been set:
a) To find out the changes brought in with the emergence of the Low CostCarriers to the Air travel Business in Europe, and specially the effects to
the Business Air Travel Market.
b) To analyse what are the main purchase factors in the European Short-haulBusiness Air Travel Market, and to determine the disposition of business
travellers to fly with low cost carriers in the short haul.
c) To examine how well Low Cost Carriers are doing in attracting BusinessTravellers, analysing their competitive advantages in relation with the
TNCs, in this important market.
d) To investigate the viability of business class on the European short-haul,trying to forecast what is the future of the Business Class in the European
short haul air business.
e) As a conclusion, to assess whether TNCs can retain their short haulBusiness Travel markets by continuing to pamper their business
passengers, or whether to progress into the low cost arena themselves.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
12/115
3
1.3. Methodology
1.3.1. Introduction
The following chapter presents the research methods, which will be used to
achieve the aim and objectives of this dissertation.
The research is carried out on the basis of secondary data sources. This form of
data collection will be explained in the following chapter.
1.3.2. Secondary Research
This study which aims to examine the positioning of LCCs in relation to the
Business air Travel Market will be based exclusively on secondary data.
Secondary data are already existing information which was collected for a
specific primary purpose and can be used a second time in a different project.
The most important advantage of using secondary data is the enormous saving
in time and money. The use of existing sources not only helps the researcher to
formulate and understand the research problem better, but also broadens the
base for which scientific conclusions are highly enhanced (Ghauri et al., 1995).
The secondary data gathered will be used for the literature review and the case
study in order to meet the objectives of this dissertation.
The review of existing literature will focus on analysing the Air Travel Business
Market, the situation of the European aviation industry, LCCs and TNCs.
Moreover, it will supply the theoretical base of this dissertation, and the support
for the analysis of the leaders of LCCs sector, Ryanair and easyJet and their
positioning in relation to the Business Travel Market in the case study.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
13/115
4
A case study can be defined as a detailed investigation with data collected over
time of one or more organizations within organisations (Hartley, 1994).
In this dissertation the case study will help the author to verify in a more
practical way the current positioning of the two most successful LCCs in the
Business Travel Market. Both the literature review and the case study will be
organized and oriented to meet the 5 objectives purposed in the previous
chapter.
Secondary sources used for the research includes aviation specialized magazines,
newspaper articles, industry reports (such as Mintel aviation and Business Travel
reports), Internet articles, aviation conference presentations papers and
textbooks.
Mr Antonio Bandeira, Varig Brazilian airlines manager in USA and authors
uncle, provided many important aviation reports, conference presentations and
various aviation articles which were very useful for the purpose of the
dissertation. Furthermore, its insights and knowledge over the themes covered
were important to understand and clarify various current aviation issues.
Additionally Mr Joao Bandeira, authors father and supervisor of the handling
department of TAP air Portugal which serves various TNCs and LCCs in Faro
airport, supplied valuable information over the differences in ground handling
operational procedures between the two types of airline.
Today is easy to find much information about Low Cost Carriers. The subject is a
very popular theme and it is not difficult to find useful information about LCCs
in magazines, newspapers and Internet articles. Also there is available a fair
number of academic studies or textbooks related with the subject.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
14/115
5
In order to develop the case study about the leading European LCCs much of the
data were drawn up directly from both airlines websites and last years final
reports. These reliable sources gave very important and useful information about
the companies performance in the past as well as their perspectives and plans
for the future.
1.3.3. Analysis of secondary data
When carrying out secondary research, you are not just collecting and
reproducing it in a similar or identical form. (Finn et al 2000). By contraries, the
data needs to be arranged to address the authors objectives.
Secondary data analysis represents interpretations, conclusions, or additional
knowledge about the information collected (Veal, 1992).
The secondary data analysis carried out within this dissertation involves data,
quantitative data, as well as mixed data sets of both types. The approaches used
to analyse the available secondary data are very varied, including the reading
of texts, the examination of theories, the interpretation of statistics and previous
research on the subjects.
To conclude, the methodological sequence used to achieve the aim and objectives
of this dissertation is explained next in a clear way with Figure 1.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
15/115
6
1.3.4. Methodological approach
Figure 1: The m ethodological approach
Source: Authors own.
Secondary
Research
Internet articles
Aviation specialised
magazines
Textbooks
Newspapers
articles
Reports
Literature
Review
Analysis
Conference
Presentations
Case Study: Ryanair and
easyJet
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
16/115
7
1.4. Structure of the Dissertation
This dissertation is structured into six main chapters. Below it will be presented
an outline of each chapter:
Chapter 1- Introduction
It includes an introduction about the topic of this dissertation, its aim and
objectives, an explanation over the methodology to be used and the structure of
the dissertation.
Chapter 2- Literature review
The Literature review chapter is divided in 4 sub chapters: Business Air Travel
Market, Background of Aviation Industry in Europe and LCCs. At the end of
each sub chapter will be summarised the chapter key findings.
Chapter 3- Case Study: Ryanair and easyJet
The case study will be the practical part of the dissertation. Has the goal of
examining how the leaders of the European LCC sector have been so successful
and evaluate their positioning in the Business Travel Market.
Chapter 4- Conclusion
Taking into consideration the aim and objectives of the dissertation, this chapter
summarises and evaluates the findings and conclusion of the study.
Following, is supplied a whole view of the dissertation structure in Figure 2.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
17/115
8
Figure 2: St ructure of the Dissertat ion
Source: Authors own.
DissertationIntroduction
Business
Market
Low cost
carriers TraditionalNetwork Carriers
Case Study:
Ryanair and easyJet
Conclusion
Background of Airline
Industry in Europe
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
18/115
9
2Literature Review
Introduction
This chapter is one of the main parts of the dissertation. It will offer a thorough
literature review over the three cornerstones of the dissertation: the Business
Travel Market, the Low Cost Carriers and the Traditional Network Carriers. To
achieve the aim of this dissertation is absolutely necessary to understandcomprehensively these three topics and their current situation.
The Literature Review will also give a very important theoretical support for the
practical part of the case study which will examine the two leading European
LCCs and how they are doing in the Business Travel Market.
The Literature Review will begin to examine the main requirements of Business
travellers when flying on short haul and the current situation of the short haul
Business Travel Market and the Business Class in Europe. Next follows an
overview over the Background of the airline industry in Europe and the
liberalisation process which meant new opportunities for LCCs to grow. After
this, will be investigated the emergence, development and LCCs success
formulas in relation to TNCs and also the propensity for business travellers to
use budget carriers. Finally, the last sub chapter will focus on TNCs current
situation and their actions facing the threat of LCCs in the Business Travel
Market.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
19/115
10
2 .1. European Business Air Travel
2.1.1. The demand for Air Travel: The Business market
Broadly in the Tourism sector, and specifically in the airline business, two main
segments are generally identified; business travel market and the leisure market
(Doganis 2002). According to the objectives of this dissertation, the focus will be
made at the Business Air Travel Market, analysing its importance, its specific
characteristics and requirements of business travellers. This will lead to a better
understanding over this theme.
A business travel involves a journey work related and paid by the employer
which, in many cases might be the same person (Doganis 2002). Business trips
include travelling either inside national borders or overseas to meet with: clients,
suppliers, subsidiaries, parent companies and other organisational groups as
well as to visit trade shows and conferences (Mintel Report 2000).
The Business Air Travel segment has been for many years the mainstay of
Traditional Carriers. High fare and high frequency business travellers help
airlines to offset their balance sheets and therefore TNCs long recognising this
fact, make all their efforts to secure this highly profitable market. Business
travellers fly with high frequency and are normally charged a premium in
exchange to full flexibility and certain specific tailored service features offered byairlines to this segment market. Seaton and Bennett (1996) indicate that although
this segment represents a tiny percentage of the total traffic of the airlines it
accounts for a very high percentage of the total airlines revenue.
Nonetheless, the Business Air Travel Market has been changing in the last few
years and business travellers are becoming increasingly frugal, due to the main
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
20/115
11
World economies downturn and consequently companies adopting more restrict
Travel and Entertainment regulations for their employees (Max 2003).
This will be discussed more detailed, in following chapters.
To better comprehend the characteristics and requirements of the short haul
Business Air Travel Market, it is important to differentiate the former in two sub
segments. As Shaw (1999) recognizes, there are distinct sub segments in the
Business Travel Market, the corporate Business Traveller and the Independent
Business Traveller. The former, generally works for large companies, is
constrained to corporate travel policies, is less worried over the price issues since
companies are the ones to pay the bills and tends to be more demanding as far as
services standards. On the other hand, the Independent Traveller is normally the
owner of his own business or works for small compan ies and is very price
conscious in the flight choices, since he/she is paying from his/her own pocket
(Mason 2001). For independent Business Travellers price assumes a great
importance and they are willing to trade-off some of airlines product frills
against a cheaper fare (Pels and Rietveld, 2004).
In general, business travellers have the same requirements when travelling by
air. Next follows an explanation of the requirements of business travellers in the
short haul (Source: Shaw 1999):
o Frequency and timings- These are very important requirements for anybusiness traveller that likes to have at disposal many daily flights times to
choose from. Early morning and late afternoon flights allow business
travellers to make day-return flights, hence coming right after the business
affairs to their homes or offices and take more advantage of their scarce
time. An airline which is able to offer high frequency and at appropriate
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
21/115
12
timings will certainly have a big competitive advantage towards the
Business Segment.
o Punctuality- This is tremendously important for the business travellers.Flight delays are extremely inconvenient, since they provoke great
disturbance to customers schedules and may signify missing
appointments or important meetings. An airline with very a strong
reputation of poor punctuality has fewer chances to secure a big share of
this Market Segment.
o Seat Availability- Seat Availability signifies the probability of a passengerto be able to book a flight timely close to a flight due to depart. Business
travellers many times require the right to cancel bookings and rebook on
later flights. In many unexpected and sudden occasions business
travellers have the need to fly in a next flight out basis and they will see
no value on an airline offering a very high frequency in a specific route, if
all the flights were totally booked days in advance.
o Frequent Flyer Benefits- To establish and maintain loyalty of theseimportant segment, airlines have long time been offering their customers
Frequent Flyer Programs (Bandeira, A. 1994). This is a marketing tool
which is mainly focused to the business travellers who fly frequently
throughout the year, and has the main goal of encouraging preference and
frequent usage of a specific airline or an alliance of airlines (Bandeira, A.
1994). The rewards to the business traveller is that each time he flies,
receives a certain number of miles, which can be exchanged, for example,
by free air tickets to the very desired nice summer vacations. This is an
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
22/115
13
important factor for the choice of an airline since in order to get as many
miles as possible the traveller tend to choose loyally the same company or
alliance of companies to fulfil his transportation needs. Normally FFP
members will require the airline they are travelling with, to be connected
with other airlines, in order to have wider destinations choice without
loosing the FFPs benefits.
o In Flight Service- This is an aspect of airlines service where there is possibleto differentiate and therefore can influence the airline-choice of the
business travellers. In short haul, in-flight service represents a not so
important role, as other services mentioned before. However a good
service can determine airlines to have a high reputation, which is
fundamental to attract new customers and to maintaining the preference
and loyalty of existing ones. Service features like the seating comfort
contemplating a wide seat pitch are appreciated. Likewise a separate
Business Class area with a quiet and cosy ambience is important for
business travellers, since it gives them the opportunity for example to read
important documents before the business affairs. Finally the offering of a
meal and drinks suitable for the time of the day, is a plus when the
objective is to provide a very calm and agreeable time on board for these
demanding customers.
o Airport Location- In the short-haul, business passengers prefer to fly fromthe nearest local and easily accessible airport, rather than from crowded
and distant Hubs. They require loosing as less time as possible with their
business trips. The expression Time is money is extremely suitable
motive to explain this demand.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
23/115
14
o Airport Service- When travelling short haul, the time sp ent on the groundmight exceed the flight time, hence the services provided on the airports
are of major importance for business travellers while choosing an airline.
Requirement of business travellers are normally the possibility to do late
check-in hence maximising their time, to take their luggage on board or
when travelling in business class to use a separate check in and to have a
lounge to take a coffee break or send some e-mails.
Notably not always the business traveller is the person who chooses the airline to
fly with. Companies have usually a very big influence in the purchase decision
making process of business travel. Consequently, it is very important for airlines
to understand the difference between customer and the consumer in Business
Travel (Table 1). Although, in many firms employees may have the right to
choose freely their business trips, this is not always the case (Shaw 1999). More
and more companies restrain their employees with tight Travel Policies, limiting
their freedom to choose the airline to fly with. Additionally, often busy business
travellers delegate these functions to their secretaries or to a travel agent, in a
commissionable basis, to book their flights instead of doing it themselves. In the
above example, the business traveller is the consumer of the business travel
service and the assistant or travel agent who made the buying decision is the
customer.
Many companies also have a distinct travel manager or management department
that has the job of buying and booking the business trips for their employees
(Shaw 1999). These travel managers focus normally on one or two airlines for
their preferred air travel suppliers, committing for a certain travel volume in
exchange to discounts and lower airfares (Farrel 2002).
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
24/115
15
Table 1-The distinction between customer and consumer in business travel
Customer Consumer
Employers or sponsoring organisations
that make decisions or give permissions
for employees to travel.
Employees who actually travel and
consume business travel services.
Employers or sponsoring organisations
that usually pay the bill for the travel
undertaken by employees.
Employees who travel but do not
usually pay the bills themselves.
Source: Swarbrooke and Horner 2001
Airlines being aware of the difficulty of knowing who is responsible for the
purchase decision of business air travel tend to use multiple marketing strategies
in order to attract business travellers.
The following are examples of marketing actions are:
o Corporate programs tailor made for the needs of each corporation.o Rewards to the Business Traveller through the aforementioned FFPs
offering companies the supply of all their business travel needs, granting
air fares discounts (Shaw 1999).
2.1.2. The actual Situation of the Business Air Travel Market inEurope
The volume of international Business Travel has increased constantly since the
1990s until 2000. However a combination of events like the effects of the
September 11, in 2001, the world economic slowdown with the consequent
cutbacks in travel expenditure by companies, together with the war in Iraq and
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
25/115
16
the SARS epidemic, caused the rate of growth to slow considerably in last couple
of years (Mintel Report 2003c). However, there are signs of a turnover on the
business travellers confidence, with the year of 2003 recording a growth of 3%,
of 4, 5% by the end of 2004 and pre-11 September levels being reached by 2005.
Today the idea that in the Business Market, customers are not concerned about
the cost of travelling and that will pay any price in exchange for ticket flexibility
and high frequency is fading away (Mintel Report 2003c). In fact, the
aforementioned changes occurred in the last few years have been the main
reasons for the change on the priorities for Air Business Travel. Price seems to be
more and more a major concern for corporations and there is an increasing
pressure to hold business travel budgets (Easen 2003a). As Franke et al (2002)
indicated that corporations are tightening their belts by encouraging their
employees to travel only the essential, and to search for lower fares by booking
flights in advance or accepting less flexible tickets by scheduling itineraries that
included a Saturday night stay. Business travellers who have traditionally be
responsible for as much as 60 percent of traditional airlines revenues and well
over 100 percent of their profits (Franke et al 2002), are definitely not longer
going to put up with the high fares that they have been paying before (Koch
2002).
Travel and Entertainment related expenses accounts for as much as 7% of
companies` total operating costs (Day 2000), and is seen as one of the most
controllable cost centre (Zea 2001). Hence, corporations are increasingly
controlling and restricting how much they spend on travel and how frequently
employees ar e leaving the office (Mintel Report 2003c).
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
26/115
17
The increasing influence of the Internet in the Travel Business have allowed
business travellers to become increasingly savvy and to look for more effective
ways to obtain savings by getting the best online deals for their air travel needs
(Day 2000). In fact, business travellers are starting to realize that airlines are
building up fences in order to maintain high revenue business customers (Farrel
2002), asking them to pay five times more than leisure travellers (Viles 2001).
Moreover and as a consequence Business Travellers are bypassing negotiated
Airlines Corporative travel programs whose discounts are in fact not always
based on the lowest fares and preferring to use alternative low fare operators
(Velikova 2002).
This major turnaround in the short haul Air Travel occurred at a time when low
fare carriers were emerging and offering cheaper air travel options which were in
line with the intended companies cutbacks on their Travel Budgets
(TravelDailyNews.com 2002). Additionally, this have been forcing traditional
airlines to offer promotional fares or changing completely their price structures
in order to be able to compete with the low cost operators (American Express-
News 2003).
Next it will be analyzed the Business Class and its current situation in the Short
haul Air Travel.
2.1.3. The Business Class
For many years, business travellers were expressing displease to the fact that full
fare tickets were rendering nothing more than a flexible economy class seat and a
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
27/115
18
big chance to sit beside noisy families with babies crying or backpackers, who
normally paid much less than they did (Stokdyk 1998). This led to the
introduction of a separated business class in most airlines in the world.
KLM claims to have been the first, in 1978, to provide its full-fare paying
executive travellers a separate catering (Stokdyk 1998).
Basically to differentiate the business class product from one leisure focused
economy ticket, airlines provide with a set of benefits. These benefits comprise,
the offer of a Frequent Flyer Programme that reward frequent passengers among
other things with free flights, a dedicated check-in, a bigger seat pitch rendering
greater leg space, a comfortable seat, a distinct in-flight meal service with free
drinks, free magazines and newspapers, access to airport lounges and big
number of daily flights frequency that gives full flexibility for the traveller to
choose the most convenient time to fly (Mason 2000).
Next chapter will examine the current situation of business class in the European
short haul in Europe.
2.1.4. The current situation of Air travel Business Class in
European Short-Haul
With the recent downturn in the economy, many European companies are
focusing on the reduction of the T & E expenditure. Therefore, companies are
trying to save all the unnecessary expenses with air travel expenses of its
employees, which according to Zea (2001) account for 44% of companies total
T&E spend.
Corporate travel policies are nowadays being used more frequently than ever
before, limiting the class of ticket employees can use and imposing the cheapest
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
28/115
19
fare for their short haul travelling needs. In 1999, OAG Lifestyle surveyed 3000
frequent Business travellers of 13 countries (Mintel Report 2000), and showed
that a whopping 80% of business travellers are limited by their corporate travel
policies on class ticket compared with 67% in 1998, and while in 1999 40% were
tied by airline contrasting with 28% in 1998. This clearly shows how corporate
travel policies have been restricting and reducing employees to fly in business
class and the consequent big reduction in demand for this air travel class.
According to Mintel Report (2000) the demand for Business class decreased 6, 3%
between 1997 and 1999.
Inside corporations, is sometimes controversial the decision about the class of
travel in which their employees are allowed to fly. Some years ago, it was normal
companies board members to travel first class, directors in business class and
while the rest of staff in econom y class (Stokdyk 1998). Additionally, as Stokdyk
(1998) and ITM report (in Mintel, T&TI 2003j) asserts, today many companies
have been eliminating this hierarchical privileges and often is possible to find the
junior sales recruit flying between London and Paris in economy class and the
same happening with his chief executive. The most common situation seems to
be the policy of booking economy class tickets for journeys lasting up to five or
six hours and business class tickets for longer trips (Stokdyk 1998).
Stokdyk (1998) adds that there is not a big difference between the product
offered in economy and business class on the short-haul. He affirms that the seat
pitch offered in the short haul business class is almost the same as in economy
and that the marginal service plus offered in respect to the in-flight service seems
not enough to justify such big price difference.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
29/115
20
As a result of this reduction in demand for Business class, airlines are putting the
fares down in the pursuit of attracting back the lost business class travellers. Top
Travel Management Company BTI UK affirms that there has been a big decrease
in the sale of business class seats, especially in intra Europe short haul routes and
in their main market, the UK, which was accompanied with a shift to the
economy class (Mintel, T&TI 2003i). BTI UK adds that there were decreases in
economy fares of 15 per cent in Europe and 11 per cent in the UK. Such decreases
were result of the increasing use of online deals along with the increasing
tendency in the short haul Business Travel Market to use the most cost effective
way possible to travel and also a result of the new fare structures of many TNCs
to face the LCCs threat.
Nowadays with companies trying to control T&E expenditure to a maximum, the
modus operandi seems to be to take advantage of getting the best deals online.
And the interesting fact is that such policies are being applied not only by the
junior management but also by their board directors (Mintel, T&TI 2003j). As
Stone ITM chairman (Mintel, T&TI 2003j) adds, to justify their travel options
business travellers usually say: we are not going to spend a fiver when 1 will
do the job. Clearly this seems to be the generalised motto in the Corporations
environment and airlines are bringing down premium fares in Business Class in
order to regain their business share. Mathew Davis, global director of AMEX`
Global Consulting Services (Mintel, T&TI 2003b), clearly portrayed the situation
in the Business Class: We have seen the price of premium fares come down as
airlines look to special promotional fares and discounts in business class to
stimulate the market. As a profit stream for airlines, it is better for airlines to sell
a business class ticket at a lower cost than to sell no ticket at all.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
30/115
21
Dale Moss, director of worldwide sales for BA affirms that the golden days
where airlines could manage a price premium of 200 to 300 over economy class
have faded away (Business Traveller 2004b). In fact, McWhirter (2003) has
reported that booking with short advance a business class within Europe can
even be even less expensive than an economy class seat.
It is becoming more and more evident the difficulties for airlines to attract clients
to their business class and hence the viability for the maintenance of this separate
class in the short haul has been questioned by the majority of airlines in Europe
(Business Traveller 2003).
In 2002, SAS affirmed its intentions to abolish its business class and slash its
economy class prices by 30% (BBC News 2002). This was a measure taken to
fight against the poor economic and the bad market conditions influenced
mainly by the low cost airlines growing presence and importance in Scandinavia.
SAS has meanwhile opted to maintain business class and like other main airlines
like BA or Air France are trying to offer promotional fares between main
European cities (Business Traveller 2003 and 2004b). SAS CEO Soren Belin
affirmed that there are still people who are willing to pay premium for a special
treatment and hence his airline will be continuing to offer this high class product
(Business Traveller 2004b). He adds that is not possible anymore to sell business
class seats with such price difference comparing to economy class as before and
considers the prices cutting measure as a last option for his airline which still
sees business class as an important revenue source.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
31/115
22
2.1.5. Key Findings of chapter 2.1
This sub chapter analyzed the situation of the Air Travel Business Market in
Europe. Now, it will be summarized its key findings and conclusions:
The Business Market is divided in two distinct sub-segments: corporatebusiness traveller Independent business traveller and the.
The downturn in economy made companies to tighten their T & E expensebudgets, to encourage employees to search Internet for lower fares and to
use budget airlines.
Today not only Independent business travellers are using LCCs but alsobusiness travellers from medium and bigger firms.
Price in the short haul is assuming today for business travellers bigimportance when choosing an airline to fly with. Many seem to be willing
to exchange some of the traditional frills offered by full service airlines for
a lower fare.
The fares differential of Traditional airlines and LCCs is narrowing.Nowadays companies favour price competition since they are increasingly
looking for ways to reduce costs.
Demand for Business Class in the short haul has been reducing. As aresult TNCs are offering much lower fares on this class, to attract back
corporate travellers.
According to sometraditional airline managers think there is still a marketfor their Business Class however not at the level of that airlines have been
charging so far.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
32/115
23
2 .2. Background of Air line Industry in Europe- the
liberalisation of the Sector
The European Airline Industry have been changing tremendously since the 90`s,
due to the deregulation and liberalisation of this sector by the EU countries. In 10
years, from 1987 and 1997, the EU gradually eroded all the rights for its Member
States to regulate the airline industry (Lawton 2002). As a result of the
introduction of the third and last legislative package in 1992, the Consecutive
Cabotage was set, which meant that any European carrier was allowed to fly
between destinations within any Member State, should it precede a flight from
its origin country (Lawton 2002). Finally as a completion of this process, by early
1997 full cabotage was established, giving the allowance of any airline to be
based on any community country and with no restrictions to set intra EU-routes
flights (Sull 1999). Clearly this was a major measure taken to foment competition,
grounded that it therefore would encourage the efficiency and better function ofthe airlines, by offering better services at lower costs and prices. Furthermore this
allowed people which could not beforehand afford to fly, to do so, enhancing the
populations welfare and knowledge of the other Member States peoples and
countries. The steady increase in Air Travel across Europe, by the European
population, was set out in EU`s Transport Policy (Harrington, 2001) as a major
objective and visibly the liberalisation was noticeably the beginning of the
democratisation of the air travel, mainly because of the enhancement of the
competition that it brought about. This time marked the end of the Big Flag
Carriers monopolies, which helped by their governments, were entrenched in
their own national frontiers and furthermore, the stimulus for the entry in scene
of new, very price competitive breed of carriers. It was the sunrise for the so
called Low cost Carriers.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
33/115
24
2 .3. Low Cost Carriers
2.3.1. Their appearance and development in Europe
In the last decade the European Aviation industry has experienced important
changes. As mentioned before, one of the most important changes was with no
doubt the completion of the single market in the EU (Mason 2001). This was the
beginning of the demise of the historical domination of the big flag carriers and
the opening of the market to new low cost and low fare model based airlines
(Kangis and OReilly 2003).
Historically, the European airline Industry has been strongly regulated and each
state used to own and protect their national flag carriers away from the
competition (Kangis and OReilly 2003). These carriers ruled for years their
national domestic travel markets and apart from some few independent
scheduled airlines and from charter-flight operators which were basicallyfocusing on the very seasonal leisure segment market, there was no other
competitors to wrestle with (Sull, 1999). In 1996 an EU report showed how
monopolised the aviation sector in Europe was (Sull, 1999). In staggering 64% of
all routes within the EU were served by only an airline in monopoly status, 30%
served by 2 operators and mere 6% were presented with more than two airlines.
Mason (2000) adds that in 1992 only 4% of European city pair routes had more
than two operators, and that in 1997 this number had only increased to 7%. This
is a very significant sign of the lack of choice in prices, schedules and service
which was offered to customers, some time before the air travel market opened
in the EU.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
34/115
25
Suddenly the aviation environment in Europe changed completely. The
liberalisation program, whose major regulatory changes took place gradually
from 1992 on, was focused on the fulfilment of its main objective of enhancing
the competition in the European skies. One of the main effects of market
deregulation was the increase competition pressures that arose from it, which
forced companies to offer better prices and at same time better service quality
and efficiency (Lawton 2002). This was furthermore the major step to the so
called democratisation of the air travel, which led to the appearance of Low
Cost Carriers.
Such liberalisation led to the entry of many low fare airlines, which were
described as airlines which able to offer fares similar to those of charter airlines
as well as comfort and convenience of scheduled services (Lawton 2002).
Between 1995 and 1996 an impressive number of 80 new airlines entered the
market as a result of the liberalisation process that was carried out (Sull 1999).
The UK was the country where the development of the low fare, low cost concept
began. Ryanair and easyJet were the first and are still the biggest two low cost
airlines established in the UK (Mintel 2004). Although Eire registered, Ryanair
always had it main base in Stansted airport. The success of these two airlines will
be thoroughly examined in the third chapter.
At the beginning there was a focus of Low cost operators on the development of
routes inside the UK and mainly from Stansted and Luton (Morgan Stanley
2002). Recently Western Europe also assisted the set up of this type of airlines
(Mintel 2004) and in the last couple of years there has been a rapid expansion of
the main LCCs to the mainland.
This evolvement in the rest of Europe outside the UK began when the full
cabotage and the full liberalisation were established in 1997. At this time a big
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
35/115
26
wave of new routes to continental Europe from these two big UK Low Cost
bases were set and were followed by a spread of other base airports on this
huge and unexplored market (Morgan Stanley 2002).
Moreover, the enlargement of the EU to eastern countries meant new
opportunities for low cost carriers, to explore with no restrictions the possibilities
of these markets. Since the 1st of May 2004 there have been many new routes
openings by new low cost carriers established in new EU member states. This is
the case of the Wizz Air, Air Polonia and SkyEurope, respectively the former two
Polish and the latter Slovakian based airlines (BBC News UK 2003b and BBC
News UK 2004b).
LCCs always tend to argue that they stimulate traffic growth and that by
capturing most of this new market, they create their own market rather than
stealing customers from the TNCs (Mintel Report 2003b). However the situation
is becoming different from the outset with LCCs becoming more and more
important, enjoying a very significant place in the European market and taking
in fact a big slice of the TNCs market. This trend is expected to continue as more
and more passengers show their dissatisfaction by the high fares charged by the
legacy carriers (Mintel Report 2003b).
Tim Robinson, from BBC News Business (2002), clearly asserts about the actual
challenging situation posed by LCCs to the traditional airlines:
Once upon a time, these budget airlines seemed content to nibble away at the big
airlines' market share. Now, though, they are gearing up to take large chunks out of their
rivals. In a decade, low-cost airlines may be the dominant form of air travel in Europe.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
36/115
27
In fact they have been successful in attracting new air customers, away from
other modes of transport like train, bus, ferries, but also from the Traditional
Network Carriers, by competing with very low prices (Lawton 2002). Thanks to
their exceptional business model which enables them to offer very low priced
direct flights, they encourage people who seldom or never fly to do so and on a
frequent basis (Mintel Report 2003a). Additionally they allow the existing
travellers to increase their travel frequency by enabling business travellers to take
more business trips or for many leisure travellers to make the so-called visiting
friends and relatives trips (Lawton 2002).
CAA (in Lawton 2002) acknowledges that the entry in the market of this type of
airline had generally impacted by stimulating new air traffic. Table 2 has the
traffic information of the London airports. From it we can clearly observe the big
traffic increase that occurred in those airports, where Low Cost Carriers have
settled their bases. Stansted and Luton saw very large increases of traffic as the
result of Low Cost Carriers growth, while other airports like Heathrow and
Gatwick maintained more or less the same traffic figures.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
37/115
28
Table 2: Scheduled passenger movement in London airports, 1999-2001
1998 1999 2000 2001 % change
between
000 000 000 000 1999-2001
Heathrow 60,237 61,186 64,121 60,332 *
Gatwick 18,126 1,946 20,959 20,010 +10
Stansted 5,307 8,080 10,548 12,464 +135
Luton 2,734 3,878 4,813 5,132 +88
Source: Mintel Report Low Cost Airlines 2003
The rise of the low cost airlines in Europe in the last three years is even more
impressive if we consider the difficult environment of the world aviation,
affected by the poor economic conditions compounded with the terrorism attacks
of the 11th September, the SARS epidemic and the war in Iraq (Mintel Report
2003a). They had performed and grew in an outstanding way, in spite of the set
of factors which were at the same time depressing the major airlines. This can be
explained as they offer value for money and fares that most of the people can still
pay in a difficult economic period (Mintel Report 2003a). Therefore they even
took advantage of this glooming time to consolidate their market position against
the TNCs by taking the increased demand for cheaper air travel either for
business or leisure proposes (Mintel Report 2003b). Franke (2004) affirms that it
became obvious that LCCs have thrived in a sustainable way, to establish an
alternative business model, which is better prepared to adapt in difficult periods
to the changes in demand for short haul travel. He adds, saying that it took long
for TNCs managers to challenge this new business model which was seen as
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
38/115
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
39/115
30
In the last couple of years there were many airlines setting up operations and
competing in the Low Cost arena with the long time emperors Ryanair and
easyJet. In the UK among others emerged: bmibaby, a subsidiary of independent
carrier British Midland Airways, Flybe, developed from the network carrier
British European, MyTravel Lite, a low-cost operator whose parent is the large
My Travel group and formerly known as Airtours, Jet2 or the Scottish
Flyglobespan (Mintel Report 2003a). In continental Europe is where the spread of
LCCs has been lately more intense, as there are still a big number of unexploitedmarkets which are still underserved by a low fare alternative (Morgan Stanley
(2002). Examples of emergent Low Cost ventures in the European mainland are:
Virgin Express, which is one of the longest established in continental Europe and
based in Brussels, Hapag-Lloyd Express, Germanwings, Air Berlin, which are all
Germany based, Wizzair and SkyEurope, based in Polonia and Slovakia
respectively and VolareWeb, from Italy.
With the big number of new entrants, the competition is set to increase as carriers
start to compete head-to-head with each-other in many European city pairs
(Baker, C. 2004). Up to now, European LCCs tried to avoid launching routes
where they would encounter competition from other low cost contenders.
However as LCCs continue to expand and adding capacity it is becoming very
difficult to avoid direct confrontation. A very good example is the last
announcement from Ryanair to strongly invade the up to now stronghold of
easyJet, Luton airport, with the launch of 9 new routes from there (Ryanair
(2004m). At the same time easyJet is expanding its operations from this airport to
Central and Eastern Europe entering in direct battle with some new low cost
entrants, such as SkyEurope and Wizzair.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
40/115
31
The rise of this crowd of LCCs is consequently causing an unprofitable and
unrealistic pricing war, putting pressure on the revenues per passenger and
profits of the giants Ryanair and easyJet (Lavery 2004). OLeary, Ryanair chief
executive predicts a bloodbath in the low cost sector in the next few months,
with many smaller entrant airlines having to leave the business (BBC News
2004k). In fact many analysts foretell that in the medium- and long-term there
will be fewer carriers in the low cost sector, due to the consolidation and only the
financially soundest ones will survive in this industry (Airline Business 2004b).
Nonetheless with more or less number of competitors in the future, there is no
doubt that the LCCs came to stay in Europe and became a major feature of the
commercial aviation. This type of airlines are said to reach this year 20% of the
traffic, and moreover to achieve growth percentages several times higher than
the TNCs competitors (Airline Business 2004a). The main LCCs like Ryanair and
easyJet have achieved impressive growth rates of 20% to 60% between 2000 and2001 and continue to grow in a good pace (Pels and Rietveld 2004). IATA (in
Mintel Report 2003b, p. 20) moreover emphasises the momentum of the LCCs by
affirming: this is not a temporary phenomenon and it will continue to challenge the
full-service carrier.
After analysing the emergence of LCCs in Europe and the general situation of the
sector at the moment, there is now the need to examine what are the recipes and
formulas that led LCCs to success. It will follow in the next chapter, a thorough
study of the formula for success of the LCCs.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
41/115
32
2.3.2. LCC`s formula for Success.
The success of the LCCs in Europe has been unquestionable. The lure of low
priced fares has attracted many new air travellers and enticed those who already
travel to do it in a more frequent basis. They have been able to grow the
European air travel market and also to conquer a big chunk of the long secured
TNCs high yield segment.
Today it may be easier to understand the LCCs formula of success than the idea
of how TNCs have been able to charge so much money for so long time and still
not be profitable. The truth is that TNCs have been victims of the tightly
regulated air market and the consequent low competition environment which
had allowed these airlines to maintain their high fares, extracting maximum
revenues while labouring with very high fixed costs structures (Airline Business
2004a).
The good results and success of LCCs are all about cost advantage which these
airlines have proved to achieve and the question is how LCCs are able to
produce with such low costs? Next their product and process design will be
examined.
Southwest Airlines has been considered the model for all the LCCs in the world.
In thirty consecutive years since this Texas based company was founded, it has
been recording profits and a remarkable performance in such difficult industry
(ATW 2003). At the top of its objectives is to tightly control all possible costs.
Low cost airlines tend to present common characteristics which have the goal of
simplifying the product and to slash all unnecessary costs. Following there is a
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
42/115
33
comprehensive explanation about the so-called LCCs product design, which is
to say the characteristics of the product offered by the LCCs and how it
differentiates to the TNCs product:
First these airlines offer very little in terms of amenities and comforts. Oftenit is offered not more than the trip from A to B in a safe and reliable way
(Gillen 2003). Furthermore, LCCs promise very little in terms of their
product offering which can in turn be a competitive advantage in relation
with the Full Service Network Carriers (Gillen 2003). In fact very often, FullService Carriers tend to stress in their marketing promotions their high
service offering, putting very high their customers expectations. Every time
these service level standards are not met, customers will have an idea of
lack of value for money. On other hand by promising very little for their
customers, LCCs put their passenger expectations very low and therefore
are able to surprise their passengers with a simple but very reliable, efficient
and customer oriented service. Customer satisfaction accrued from a high
quality of the service and the perception of good value for money which
accrues from this strategy will result in customer loyalty and therefore it can
become an important competitive advantage (Lawton 2002).
Another strategy normally followed is the employment of a uniformed fleettype, which is in most of the cases the Boeing 737 and that enables to extract
several cost benefits (Gillen and Morrison 2003). This allows first of all,
bulk buying for aircrafts and parts needed with advantageous price
conditions from a single supplier (Kangis and OReilly 2003). Moreover,
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
43/115
34
there will be required less training both for cockpit crews and engineers,
which will be able to operate any aircraft of the fleet (Gillen 2003).
The choice of airport is also important in order to cut costs. The use of underused airports in smaller cities or less congested airports around big cities,
enable LCCs to lower their costs and to be more productive (Gillen and Lall
2004). These airports charge less landing and terminal fees due to their more
basic terminal facilities. Additionally these less crowded airports allow a
reduction of in- air waiting time and taxi times and therefore enabling to
perform quicker turnarounds, to increase punctuality rates and to use more
productively staff and aircrafts (Gillen 2003).
Another source of savings is the seat density. By offering just one class ofservice, LCCs are able to provide more seats than in the two classes of TNCs
planes (Gillen 2003). Hence for each flight, there is a possibility to reduce
the variable fixed costs per seat and is therefore possible to charge less per
seat to produce profits. Research of CAA (in Lawton 2002,pp.40) indicates
that the big cost disadvantage of Traditional airlines lies in the provision of
a business class which clearly reduces the seat capacity of their planes and
increases the cost per seat.
Another source of differentiation is the in-flight service. LCCs do notprovide free food and drink service; instead sandwiches, snacks, appetizers
and drinks are sold on board (Gillen and Lall 2004). Stelios Haji-Ioannou,
EasyJets owner (in Sull 1999, pp.23) clearly expresses the philosophy that is
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
44/115
35
behind this measure: When someone is on a bus he doesn' t expect any free
lunch... I couldn' t see why we cannot educate our customers to expect no frills on
board. This is an important characteristic of the LCCs product which
enables to transform a before cost source in an extra revenue source.
Moreover as there is no separate Business Class there is a less need for flight
attendants which enable obvious staff costs reductions (Gillen 2003). All
interlinked is the fact that no food and drinks supply make possible to
reduce the number of bathrooms as there is less need for passengers to use
the toilet and also makes possible the increase of the plane capacity (Zea
2001). Additionally is also possible to make quicker turnarounds, as there is
less garbage to clean and besides the catering loading is much simpler.
Another product feature is the elimination of any interlining arrangementand frequent flyer programs (Gillen 2003). The former means that LCCs do
not transfer passengers or luggage between flights. This could delay the
whole turnaround process and take away all the benefits of the simplified
LCCs organisational structure against the TNCs model.
Furthermore the non utilization of FFPs is explained as they take awayrevenue due to the consequent less availability of seats for paying
passengers and in addition to that they are a source of big administrative
costs (Gillen 2003).
Moreover there is no seat number allocation. This is a measure which hasthe goal of urging people to get on planes quicker and to make the boarding
process quicker and with no delays to the company. The rationale is that
when passengers do not have allocated seats, they become anxious to board
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
45/115
36
and to make sure they sit together with their friends and relatives. Therefore
they will be willing to board as soon as possible, making the boarding
process quicker and allowing airlines to comply with the fast turnaround
time objective.
Basically, LCCs have tried to reduce to the maximum, the complexity of the
product design by unbundling all the services that are not absolutely
necessary. The specific characteristics of the LCCs product design render big cost
savings, however these airlines are able to extract even higher savings through
their specific process design. In other words process design is the way that the
product is delivered to the customer (Gillen 2003). It will be explained how LCCs
process design differentiates from the TNCs and how the former achieve cost
advantages:
LCCs offer only point-to-point flights, hence focusing on the local anddestination markets in contrary to the hub system of TNCs. This can be
regarded also as a product design characteristic, since passengers always
see much more convenience on travelling directly to their destination rather
than through a hub (Gillen 2003). The Hub and spoke system used by TNCs
require that many flights arrive at the same time in order to connect the
passengers to their following destinations. Normally this provokes
temporary congestions and a significant operational cost with the payment
of extra staff needed (Franke 2004). LCCs with the point-to-point system can
spread their flights during the day, and require much less staff to prepare
each flight (Gillen 2003). Beyond that, the resultant less congestion will
mean more productivity and punctuality performance of the airlines.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
46/115
37
Another advantage for airlines by using the point-to-point system is thatthis allows a better utilisation of the airplanes. With the elimination of the
problems associated with connecting passengers and their luggage of the
Hubbing system and the use of less congestioned secondary airports,
airlines can avoid delays and spend much less time on turnarounds (Gillen
2003). This enables airlines to maximise the utilisation of the most expensive
capital assets, their aircrafts, and therefore to reduce their linked operational
variable costs (Gillen and Lall 2004). As an example, British Airways has a
time of utilisation of 7,1 h a day of its Boeing 737-300, whereas easyJet uses
the same plane for 10,7 h per day (in Mason 2000 Civil Aviation Authority,
1998b)
Other LCCs process design characteristic is the outsourcing of all thepossible services, like the aircraft maintenance or ground handling. This
permits carriers to choose the best firms for those services at the best prices
and furthermore to reduce costs by maintain their staff numbers to a bare
minimum (Gillen 2003).
The distribution process by LCCs is defined to be simply and the most costadvantageous possible. These carriers urge passengers to book their flights
by Internet rather than through travel agents or any other middlemen.
Ryanair claims to have reached an Internet sales percentage of 97% in
March 2004 (Ryanair Site 2004). Also is being generalized the use of e-
ticketing. This measure was firstly used by Southwest and allows LCCs to
save in costly ticket production costs (Gillen 2003).
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
47/115
38
Another simpler procedure in LCCs is the check-in process. LCCs use re-usable or very cheap boarding passes and the boarding card issuance
process is designed to be the quick and efficient, therefore reducing the
number of staff required to perform the process (Gillen 2003). There is no
pre-assigned seat scheme which makes the check-in and boarding easier for
both airline and passengers, that guarantees that planes depart on time and
that there is no time spent on queuing. EasyJet (2004a) announced lately to
be doing trial tests at Nottingham airport (East Midlands) on automated
self-check-in, which is intended to be a step further in order to speed the
process of check in and to reduce costs with staff.
All these LCCs product and process design aspects explain somehow the
differences over TNCs and the various sources of savings. However there are
also important organizational factors that further accentuate the differences.
The most successful LCCs like Southwest or Ryanair, bind their companys
success with their employees personal success, whether through shares
ownership or profit distribution (Gillen 2003). Basically the success of these
airlines bases on their internal organisational culture and this measure makes a
big contribution in the stimulus and motivation of the workers, resulting in gains
of productivity. Additionally, the big motivation together with the simpler
product and process designs enables the use of a flatter organizational structure,
with less need for management and consequently savings in staff expenses
(Gillen 2003). In fact LCCs need much less employees per aircraft than TNCs and
this means considerable savings in operation costs. For example Ryanair employs
32 workers per aircraft in contrast with BA, a traditional full-service airline that
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
48/115
39
need to operate 159 workers for each aircraft (calculations based on Ryanair
2004o and Cisco Systems 2002).
Additionally, together with the highest priority of reducing costs LCCs normally
focus their efforts in providing a very good customer service, which is
considered to be essential for any airline that is willing to get a long term
competitive advantage (Lawton 2002).
A last and important characteristic that LCCs share is discipline in organisational
strategy. Is very important in order to become a successful LCC to adhere with
the strict principles of the Low Cost system and hence to grow in a consistent
manner. Many companies collapsed as they tried to divert their product, process
and organisation design strongly from the Low cost formula. This was the case of
Debonair which departed from the truly low cost strategy by offering two
separate classes of service and collapsed by failing to become profitable (Mintel
Report 2003a).
2.3.3. Propensity for business travellers to use low cost carriers in
the short haul flight distances.
After having studied in previous chapters the situation of the short haul business
market, it will now be analysed the actual disposition of European Business
Travellers to use Low Cost Carriers for their business travel needs.
It was verified how well LCCs are able to outperform in terms of efficiency and
cost control traditional network carriers. They have been undoubtedly successful
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
49/115
40
by offering very low fare tickets, which together with a good service more and
more European travellers have been testifying and considering very good value
for money.
LCCs have been usually regarded as budget airlines with a focus on the low
yield and price sensitive non-business market sector. The anecdotal situation is
that today reality seems to contradict this perspective, as increasingly low fare
airlines succeed in appealing and attracting big number of travellers from the
Business Market sector (Pels and Rietveld 2004). Many European low cost
airlines have been declaring to successfully attract many business travellers
(Mason 2001). EasyJet claims that in some of their routes business traffic reach a
proportion of at least 50% (in Mason 2000). Furthermore in a recent survey,
Barclaycard indicated that easyJet occupies the third position after BA and KLM
on UK business flyers top option, and is followed by another no-frills airline BMI
baby in the 4th
position (BBC News 2004d).
The appeal for business travellers to use LCCs seems to be exacerbated due to the
following factors (Pels and Rietveld 2004):
Firstly, as seen in previous chapters this can be explained because of theeconomic downturn that made companies in Europe reduce their T & E
expenditure budgets and therefore to look for cheaper alternative airlines
to travel or even reduce their business travel frequency (Mintel Report
2003c). Coincidently this happened in a period of time in which
liberalisation was in effect and allowed the rise of many new very
competitive, low fares, low cost airlines, which were a cheaper option to
fly.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
50/115
41
Furthermore, the big awareness increase of European customers about thisnew type of airline was very important. Slowly, business travellers started
regarding LCCs product as a better value for money alternative in relation
to TNCs, for their business travel needs. According to a Company
Barclaycard survey (in Mintel T. & T. I. 2002a) two thirds of all business
travellers had used a low cost airline, comparing with just 28 percent two
years before. Additionally, from those who have not tried yet, 86% said
they would consider in trying out these low fare airlines. This evidently
shows that the opinions of the business travellers towards the LCCs are
good and that these airlines are really being capable of seducing this
market segment.
Pels and Rietveld (2004) affirm that LCCs can be considered as real competitors
and real threat for TNCs in all market segments, since it seems evident that they
are able to attract not only leisure travellers but also to lure the business segment
market, which was considered for a long time a more or less secured high
revenue source for the TNCs.
A survey in UK (in Mason 2000) showed that 40% of passengers flying with
LCCs from Luton and Stansted, traditional Low Cost Carriers bases, were
travelling for business purposes. Moreover, Carlson Wagonlit (in Mintel Report
2003c) affirms that Low Cost Carriers routes accounts for 8% of the total business
travel. From these figures seems to be obvious that LCCs are succeeding in
taking away business travellers from TNCs. Even though in some markets there
may be no direct competition from LCCs to TNCs due to the fact that they often
fly to faraway secondary airports rather than to main airports, main carriers still
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
51/115
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
52/115
43
Additionally, a 2003 BTI UK client survey (in Mintel T. & T. I. 2003i) showed that
79% of its client companies were authorising their employees to use Internet to
take advantage of the best deals online and almost 90% were allowing using
LCCs for their travel needs. Mason (2001) affirms that business travellers that fly
with TNCs also use LCCs and vice versa, which is a signal that they have no
problems to use LCCs if the price is better.
The scenario is clearly changing with companies opting to buy their fares online
rather than through corporate deals. Farrel (2002) affirms that Corporate
travellers are feeling deceived because airlines are excluding the cheapest fares
from corporative travel programs and therefore it is often cheaper to spot buy
on the Internet. The BTI UK survey (in Mintel T. & T. I. 2003i) concludes that
there is a big change towards online buying and a continuing death of the system
of corporative rebates programs.
Clearly, the development of the Internet as a form of distribution is the
responsible for these changes which allow business travellers to look the best
deals and hence to bypass travel agents or airlines corporate deals (Farrel 2002).
This situation is causing apprehension to TNCs, which were convinced to have
tightly secured the business market segment through the offering of corporate
deals (Mason 2001). Mason (2000) indicates that LCCs have been quite successful
in attracting business travellers from small and medium sized companies, but
have more difficulties to attract those from big companies. This is due to the fact
that many big firms have travel corporate deals with major traditional airlines for
all their worldwide travel needs. Although this still might be somehow true, the
situation is inverting and LCCs are nowadays also making inroads in the big
companies market (Mason 2001). The German LCC Germanwings for example is
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
53/115
44
investing in building in its website an area dedicated for companies (Business
Traveller 2004i). There companies have the opportunity to book, change or cancel
flights. Like some others LCCs, the airline has invest ed in hiring b usiness travel
sales teams which have the goal to negotiate with important companies like
those already contracted such as Deutsche Telekom or chemicals group Bayer.
The traditional view of business travellers is that they have specific requirements
when flying short haul, namely flexibility, punctuality, frequency, frequent fliers
programmes and in-flight awards (Lawton 2002). But in fact nowadays, the
usage of LCCs by business travellers contradicts in some extent this view and
hence can be regarded as a sign that some of the benefits given when flying in
business class are nowadays less appreciated or simply considered has not
providing value for money (Mason 2000). An IATA study (1997, in Mason 2000)
revealed that business travellers see in-flight comfort followed by nothing
differentiates business class from economy as the main difference of business
class from economy class in short haul flights. Moreover in several studies,
Mason 1995, OAG 1996 and Carlson Wagonlit Travel 1998 (in Mason 2000),
factors like convenience of schedules, speedy check-in or sufficient legroom,
were praised by corporate travellers far in front other factors that would
normally be thought more important, like in-flight catering or airport business
lounges.
LCCs are able to provide what most business travellers seem to value most, such
as high punctuality performance, a fast check-in process and a reliable, safe and
efficient service (Lawton 2002). For LCCs the pursuit in quality of service, is
followed along with the continuous focus on cost reduction. This is considered
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
54/115
45
imperative to guarantee total clients satisfaction and consequently obtaining a
sustainable competitive advantage.
LCCs believe that in order to satisfy their customers, the service standards which
are cost justifiable and considered important to satisfy their clients needs are the
core service standards (in Table 4). All others, called ancillary service standards,
are not offered or supplied for an extra charge to customers, like food and drinks
or newspapers. This way, airlines are able to cut costs without endangering the
overall product service quality by offering what customers regard as most
important and have furthermore the possibility to obtain some extra revenues.
Table 4- Airlines product
Core Service Standards Ancillary Service Standards
Safety Reliability Punctuality Baggage delivery Customer support Problem responsiveness
Complimentary food andbeverages
Free newspapers Frequent flyer programme Access to airport business
lounges
Source: own author, based on Lawton 2002 pp.82
2.3.4. Key Findings of chapters 2.2 and 2.3
Having examined the appearance, evolvement of LCCs in Europe as well as the
current propensity of business travellers to use budget carriers, following there
are the summarized key findings:
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
55/115
46
The liberalisation of the airline industry in 1997 in Europe was the mainstep to foment competition and allowed the development of the low cost
airlines. This was the beginning of the so-called democratisation of air
travel.
LCCs enjoy today a very significant position in the European market andare taking away a big share of the TNCs market.
LCCs are expected to become the dominant form of air travel withinEurope within a decade.
LCCs took advantage of the bad economic conditions in the last couple ofyears to grow and consolidate their market position against TNCs.
LCCs competitive pressure made TNCs to restructure their cost structureand to reduce considerably their fares.
Increased competition from new low cost carrier entrants in themarketplace.
Only 2 or 3 financially strong LCC will stay and continue to develop in agood pace due price wars.
LCCs business model focus on a simple product offering and eliminate allunnecessary expenses.
The low cost product based on the pioneer Southwest consists genericallyon: short haul routes, no frills service, standardised fleet, use of cheaper
secondary airports, online reservations and ticketless system.
LCCs are attracting business travellers successfully. Such travellers aremore and more willing to use such airlines, considering their offer as a
very good value for money.
LCCs are able to attract business travellers working for companies that arelocated in regions outside the main cities and near the secondary airports
which they serve.
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
56/115
47
Corporate business travellers are having their autonomy in business traveldecision making diminished, constrained by corporate travel policies and
also authorised to buy online.
LCCs seem to attract today business travellers from small, medium butalso from big companies as they start employ like TNCs dedicated sales
teams to negotiate corporate deals with firms.
Business travellers top requirements when flying short-haul havechanged. Today the most appreciated factors are convenience of
schedules, speedy check-in and punctuality.
Service standards offered by LCCs such as excellent punctuality, a quickcheck-in and a reliable, safe and efficient service seem to fulfil more
important business travellers needs and demands.
2 .4. Traditional Network Carriers2.4.1. The current situation of TNCs in Europe
Europes main airlines have been struggling in the last 3 years to recuperate from
a series of events that continuously affected passenger traffic numbers. The
terrorist attack of the September 11 in 2001, together with the downturn of the
main world economies, the SARS and the Iraq War have been the main causes for
the severe passenger traffic slowdown to the majority of worlds TNCs (Mintel
Report 2003b). Main European airlines that heavily relied in the transatlantic
flights with the US had serious problems with the aftermath of the catastrophic
terrorist event of 2001, which made many people to simply refuse to fly (BBC
News 2001f). In the meantime the rise of a new breed of very price competitive
low cost airlines were taking advantage of the vulnerable times for TNCs,
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
57/115
48
challenging the long secured short-haul traffic markets within Europe (Clark
2001). These series of simultaneous events caused a big turmoil for TNCs which
became threatened both on their short and long haul markets.
The roots of this situation is undoubtedly the revenue boom after the first Gulf
war that lead to historical airline profit years and big airline capacity
developments (Franke 2004). The end of the golden economic years of the 90`s
together with the terrorist s threats, originated a generalised overcapacity of the
major Network carriers, and forced yields to decline enormously.
Notably, these series of events gave a massive push to LCCs. Their very cost
effective business model was able to offer very competitive fares, which were a
very attracting alternative for many passengers that were seeking for ways to
evade paying the high fares of TNCs (Franke 2004).
However the latest international passenger figures from IATA clearly show that
the worse period seems to have ended. They present positive numbers for the
first five months of 2004 with an increase of 19.4% in relation to 2003 (BBC News
2004e). Giovanni Bisignani director-general of IATA (in BBC News 2004e)further
adds : "Not only have we recovered from the impact of SARS and war in Iraq, all major
regions of the world are reporting traffic levels above those of 2000, the last normal year
for our industry."
In the last couple of years there has been a consolidation of the airline industry,
with TNCs forming a number of big alliances, normally led by a main US airline
and a main European airline (Lawton 2002). The alliances between TNCs offer
many benefits to the participating members, among other things: they render
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
58/115
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
59/115
50
Hence, main European TNCs have been trying to fathom out how to respond to
this new challenge and have adopted different strategies to combat the low cost
competition:
One of the options taken by TNCs is to enter themselves into the low cost arena.
With the democratisation of the short haul travel, consumers more and more
regard air travel as a commodity and their choice is primarily influenced by the
price. John Baker from Air Canada (2004) defends that it is very difficult for
TNCs to defend their domestic and short haul markets with their full service
model and that TNCs to succeed need to establish a lower cost alternative to
focus on the more budget conscious travellers. British Airways in 1997, right in
the early stages of the rise of LCCs, tried this option by starting operation of its
own Low cost subsidiary GO (Lawton 2002). This launch had the objective of
hindering the increasing pressure from Ryanair and easyJet in BAs fares.
However the strategy did not result has expected because instead of capturing
its rivals markets, it started to take away passengers from the mainline and to
become a real BA competitor itself (Lawton 2002). As a result of this failure BA
finally sold GO in 2001, arguing that a low cost airline does not fit with their full-
service strategy (Mintel 2002a). Another rather successful example is BMI,
another UK carrier which started in 2002 its own no-frills subsidiary BMI
baby. Up to date has been quite successful by complementing the operations of
its mother carrier and helping its mainline to compete face to face with the
strongest Low cost operators. BMI baby was considered the third biggest low
cost carrier in Europe (BBC News 2004a) and at the end of 2002 claimed to be the
fastest growing LCC in Europe (BBC News 2003a). Another TNC, SAS, have
established a low cost subsidiary, named Snowflake. This launch of this LCC
subsidiary by SAS has the goal of counter attacking the big threat of LCCs in its
-
8/6/2019 Bandeira Thesis
60/115
51
home market, mainly by Ryanair that established a base in Sweden and has
many flights to Scandinavia (Mintel Report 2003a).
Besides entering in the low cost battle with their own low cost subsidiaries,
many main traditional carriers have chosen to take radical measures to
restructure their business model and hence to compete more cost efficiently with
LCCs (BBC News 2004f). John Baker (2004) defends that in the short haul
markets, TNCs need to lower their operating costs structure and adopt a
different product strategy with smaller planes focusing on point to point routes
in order to compete more efficiently.
BA the biggest European airline has been restructuring its European Operations
and adopted some of LCCs practices, in order to cut costs and offer a more
competitive product (Mintel 2002a). With its "Future Size and S