balms abogados newsletter oct-nov-dec 2014

C/ Generalife nº 9, Aloha Pueblo, Aloha Golf, 29660 Nueva Andalucía, Marbella

Tel: +34 952 81 21 00 Fax: 952 81 27 67

web: www.balms.com

LEGAL AND FISCAL UPDATES

NEWSLETTEROCTOBER-NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2014

WARNING

The information included in this publication is purely for informative purposes in relation to certain legal and fiscal matters. It is general information which therefore does not constitute legal advice in any area of the law.

Although we always try to ensure that the information included is current and correct, we cannot always guarantee that it will continue to be correct in the future. Therefore if this information is used as reference, it should be previously verified and checked and relevant professional advice should be sought.

It is forbidden to copy, reproduce or pass on all or part of this publi-cation, by any means or method, without previous express and writ-ten permission from BALMS ABOGADOS ANDALUCIA S.L.P.

Latests news

Another turn of the screw - “The Entrepreneurs Act” Civil bonds vs. Criminal bonds, or: Why is Blesa not in prison?

The end of “floor clauses”?

Rebus sic stantibus

Judgement of eviction for non-payment

News flash

Most retweeted tweets

News

Balms Abogados expands its Procedural department with two new recruits

Foro Europa 2001 Awards ceremonyCont

ents

3

5

6

8

9

13

15

16

LATEST NEWS

News published on our website (www.balms.com) on our blog (www.balms.com/blog) and most retweeted tweets

3

Another turn of the screw - “The Entrepreneurs Act”

people are unfortunately doubting due to the social chaos.

As a lawyer, I examine the attitu-des of many companies from many different sectors every day; esta-blished businesses, enthusiastic entrepreneurs, prudent manage-ment and some “kamikazes”. All of them have the same view on the situation: there is reduced turno-ver, adjusted profit margins, a lack of capital and credit. Add payment delays to all of this and the situa-tion becomes uncontrollable.

However, the problem that really worries employers is the state of working relations. Some directly attack their workers, arguing that “they don’t understand how diffi-cult this situation is at the mo-ment, or the financial strain. They are only concerned about their own problems…”, and they think that employers “are fighting day in, day out to protect their jobs…”. This is all true, and they are partly right, however considering that the main problem in Spain is not the social

Law 14/2013, dated 27th September.

In the current European finan-cial climate, an intense decade of significant changes and the im-plementation and rapid progress of new technology have caused a huge change in business models. This, combined with many other circumstances, has inevitably re-sulted in a never-ending financial, economic and social crisis. We are now facing and have to deal with a new and unknown socio-economic scenario. Some countries are ma-naging better than others due to their culture.

There are ongoing debates over the causes of such a deep recession, over the consequences, the pos-sible solutions. Everyone has their own opinion and perspective, but there is nothing new that has not happened before. The key is how to adapt and manage this evolving process, whilst keeping in mind the values and principles which should come above all else and that many

system but rather unemployment, the question is:

Who is really responsible? Is it the workers, or is it managers who bla-me their workers for the failure of their management to solve the re-curring problems posed by the cu-rrent situation and the many chan-ges forced upon businesses in the past few years?

Of course, it is neither one nor the other. We have to accept the situation as it is and assess the position of our businesses in the current social climate. We should consider human capital as the main asset in any business, and similarly we need compromise, adaptability, flexibility, understanding and sa-crifice from everyone involved. We need mutual respect, while not forgetting the hierarchy of the bu-siness world and the values which should come before the interests of any party.

From a legal perspective and consi-dering the modifications to labour law from February 2012, which are insufficient in my opinion, the government passed the Entrepre-neur Act 14/2013, dated 27th September. This law undoubte-dly stimulates and shakes up the market and introduces social and labour changes which encourage business creation and security.

As usual, the law gives us many varied reforms with interesting concerns such as “leadership, initiative, ideas, ability to accept mistakes, intuition, decision ma-king…”, all of which should be ap-preciated. Of course, the law is

NEWSLETTER OCTOBER-NOVEMBER-DECEMBER

4

not a cure-all and it lacks many re-levant aspects, but all legislation can be improved upon, especia-lly at this time, so we should try and view the positives and impro-vements that this new law brings about.

First of all, the law attempts to improve procedures for setting up companies. It allows limited liabili-ty companies to be set up online, significantly simplifying paperwork i.e. (i) the business name can be reserved “online” and the corres-ponding certificate can be sent within 6 hours; (ii) some similar re-gulations have been introduced; (iii) an electronic diary for the notary was created, so that it is possi-ble to make an appointment to sign the Articles of Association within 12 hours; (iv) when the company is set up, the notary will obtain the tax code and (v) will send it within 6 hours of its receipt to the Regis-trar of Companies to be registe-red. Therefore, it should be possi-ble to set up a company in a period of 24-48 hours.

Another notable point is the reduc-tion of contribution costs for new self-employed workers and busi-nesses by introducing a flat rate for the first 6 months, which at-tempts to encourage the setting up of businesses. Equally important is the reduction of the employer’s liability in case of bankruptcy, which prevents hypothetical creditors from seizing their homes, even if this is only applicable to private bu-sinesses and not the government, tax office or Social Security.

Moreover, the legal formalities in businesses’ day to day workings have been substantially reduced, such as getting rid of the very outdated guestbook for work ins-pections, and the removal of the

Census declaration from the Tax Agency, which has been replaced by the DUE.

From a tax perspective, VAT collec-tion on a cash basis has been intro-duced. This means that businesses and self-employed workers who are under this scheme will not have to pay VAT bills, as long as they have not paid the invoices. Further tax incentives have been introduced, such as the deduction of 20% of the capital invested by individuals in projects run by entrepreneurs or recently created businesses. Corporate tax for companies set up after 1st January 2013 is now fixed at 15% for the first 300,000 Euros and at 20% for anything above that during the first tax pe-riod.

Notary and registry fees have been significantly reduced, residency visas are granted to foreigners who intend to set up a business in Spain, internationalization of Spa-nish companies is being financed, and more. There are many propo-sals which aim to stimulate this

depressive market and society. We should celebrate these initiatives!

Clearly the law cannot solve these problems, but the measures help, as does the growth of unemployed people who have used their unem-ployment benefits to set up busi-nesses during 2013. The impro-vement of the old macro data and the positive outlook that we must regain in our day to day lives also help; in difficult situations, even the smallest things matter.

In short, we have to adapt to changes, to the current situation, to reconsider these lost values such as respect, sacrifice, merit, work and professionalism. This is the only way we can bring about a change in mentality, be able to work and live together and put an end to this identity crisis once and for all.

Jorge Martín LosaSocio Balms Abogados Madrid

LATEST NEWS



Civil bonds vs. Criminal bonds, or: Why is Blesa not in prison?

Last week, Judge Fernando Andreu posted a bail of 16 million euros for Miguel Blesa, and another of 3 million euros for Rato. So, why is Blesa not in prison, if he has not paid the requested bond?

Because, in this case, the bond posted by the judge is a civil bond, which is a guarantee of his civil responsibility and not a precautionary measure to prevent his imprisonment.

Criminal Judgement Act

Article 589

When the summary trial results in criminal charges against a per-son, the Judge will set a bond which acts as a guarantee of financial liability. The same decree will state the amount of assets which can be seized to cover said liability if the bond is not paid.

This quantity will be fixed in the same decree and may not be less than a third of the likely sum of the financial liability.

A civil bond is used in cases involving criminal charges, and it guarantees the responsibilities that may arise for the victim

in a trial. In Blesa’s case, as he has not paid the requested sum, the judge will seize enough of his assets to cover the bond, and if there are insufficient assets to cover the bond, he will seize wages to the quantity specified in the law. Howe-ver, a civil bond does not lead to imprisonment.

Criminal Judgement Act

Article 597

If the bond is not paid on the day following the creation of the de-cree, the assets of the accused will be seized. Sufficient assets will be seized to cover the value fixed for financial liability.

On the other hand, a criminal bond is used to reduce the pos-sibility that the accused will escape justice. This bond aims to guarantee (as far as possible) that the accused will be prosecuted. In this case, non-payment of the bond will lead to imprisonment. Application for a civil trial does not necessarily mean a criminal trial will subsequently be requested, nor does it eliminate the possibility. All there is to do is wait and see how the proceedings unfold.

5

LATEST NEWS



Good news for those who took out a mortgage with a “floor clause” included: on 24th October, the Supreme Court published sentence 464/2014, which invalidated the floor clauses of eight individuals who took out mortgages with Caja Segovia (now Bankia), alleging that the company had not been transparent enough with respect to these clau-ses with the clients who had signed said mortgages.

It seems that the need for transparency is the key to the Supreme Court considering a clause wrongful, even when it has been read by a notary and it is clear from a gram-matical point of view, as is the case with these clauses.

This is the second time that the Supreme Court has acted against floor clauses so it reinforced the doctrine already put in place by the previous sentence on 9th May 2013 (which was discussed on this blog by our colleague Ernes-to de Gregorio in two articles), which invalidated all floor clauses included in mortgages with the companies Caja-mar, NCG and BBVA. This almost guarantees that all floor clauses will be eliminated since jurisprudence has been stablished.

In Spain, jurisprudence is not considered a source of Law, as according to article 1 of the Civil Code, only “the law, custom and general principles of law are sources of the Spanish legal system”. However, article 1.6 of the Civil Code says that “jurisprudence complements the legal system under the doctrine established by the Supreme Court to interpret and apply the law, custom and general principles of law”. Therefore, although it is not considered a direct source of Law, it is an indirect source and so is relevant and important. Moreover, jurisprudence begins after two or more sentences from the Supreme Court interpret a regulation in the same way. This is the main reason why those who have a mortgage containing a floor clause should remain hopeful for a positive outcome to their lawsuits.

In the sentence made on 9th May 2013, the Supreme Court established that floor clauses would have to go through two filters; incorporation (through delivery of the binding offer or of previous contractual information, as ap-propriate) and transparency. It established that a floor clause is not transparent if:

a) There is insufficient information ona key element ofthemainobjectofthecontract.

b) Itisincludedinconjunctionwith“roofclauses”andasaconsiderationofthis.

c) Whenthecontractwasmade,therewerenoexamplesofvariousrelatedscenarioswithexpectedbehaviourofthetypeofinterest.

6

The end of “floor clauses”?

Fast and efficient “floor clause” claims.

Balms Abogados achieves the annulment and refund of “floor clauses” in record time.

The firm has had a significant procedural success in a lawsuit filed against one of the country´s main financial entities. After the defendant company was notified, the bank contacted our lawyers to sign an agreement and immediately annul the floor clause. The bank also agreed to refund the amounts charged to the client, and provide compen-sation for the work carried out.

This case clearly shows that the best option in such claims is to get legal involvement as soon as possible, because the banks tend to avoid lawsuits and come to agreements which are very beneficial to the clients.

For consultations on this matter, contact our lawyer Julia Crespo.

Tel: 952 81 21 00e-mail: [email protected]

LATEST NEWS



d) There is no clear and comprehensible prior information on the comparative cost with other types of loan offered by the company, if there are any, or if there is no warning that they will not be offered to the particular client.

e) In the case of the clauses used by BBVA, the clauses were hidden amongst an overwhelming amount of data which distracted the customer.”

Therefore, it is not enough that the bank gave a binding offer to the client which contained said floor clause; although said clause, as previously stated, made gram-matical sense, it also had to be checked for transparency, a check which none of the studied clauses passed.

To summarise and according to the press release from the General Council of the Spanish Judicial Authority:

The sentence, which reinforces the previous sentence on floor clauses, establishes the transparency check which is defined in the general regulations. This check involves the necessary fulfillment of special duties when drafting contracts which allows the customer to fully understand the legal and economic conse-quences of the product or service being offered to them.

his transparency check means that clauses must be clear, and not only from a grammatical point of view.

In the case examined by the Supreme Court – clauses in loans from Caja Segovia – the floor clause did not pass the transpa-rency check, as it was not part of the preliminary negotiations and agreements which took place, nor did it stand out in the contract or in the previous binding offer as it was included in a much broader and more generic clause on variable interest..

Clearly, although this battle is won, the war continues be-cause the Supreme Court maintains that a floor clause which works on a minimum flat rate is not illegal. In these cases, its illegality is based on its lack of transparency, and this is unlikely to be admitted retroactively (after the signing of the loan agreement) or nonretroactively (after the sentence). In this case, the Supreme Court cannot examine the consequences of the annulment of the floor clause, which means that it cannot decide if the amount paid (including interest) should be returned, because this was rejected in the first decision, and was not appealed.

We will just have to wait for the next sentences on the matter…

7

LATEST NEWS



Without carrying out an in depth analysis of the sentence given by the Supreme Court on 30th June 2014 by Fran-cisco Javier Orduña Moreno, it should be noted lawyers should not overlook the sentence because it sets out in detail a new doctrine on the rebus sic stantibus clause.

Until this new sentence, the application of this case law doctrine was very restrictive. This means that for it to be applied, the change in economic conditions would have to be significant and unexpected and the difference between services and payment for services brought about by such a change would have to be extreme, to the point that the contract would collapse. The new sentence means that the rebus sic stantibus clause may now be applied in less extreme circumstances.

The sentence indicated that there has recently been a progressive shift in the traditional view of said situation. This change means that the highly res-trictive or exceptional framework for implementation has to be normalised, with a progressive goal for a technical base for application which is conside-red “compatible with codified law”. This means taking into account public eco-nomic policy, the rule of “the commu-tative nature of the legal trade as an expression of a basic balance between exchangeable assets and services”, and also the principle of good faith.

Unlike the previous case law doctri-ne, this new one states as that the current economic crisis “can clearly be considered as an economic pheno-menon capable of seriously disrupting or distorting the circumstances and therefore altering the basis on which contractual relationships were founded and developed”. It could be very im-portant given that it applies to all cu-rrently effective bilateral contracts en-tered into before this economic crisis.

8

Rebus sic stantibus

The economic crisis itself cannot be the sole basis for application of the rebus sic stantibus clause and until now, its possible application was vetoed for almost all con-tracts which have immediate effect, such as buying and selling, and as a general rule its application was rejected for cases of financial difficulties of those with payment debts. Therefore, if the contract was entered into before the crisis, it is unclear to what point an economic re-cession with significant and lasting effects, like this, can qualify as an extraordinary change of circumstances which may cause a significant disparity between the respective payments of the parties, and therefore meriting the appli-cation of the clause.

Juan Carlos López-Morago Balms Abogados Madrid

LATEST NEWS



Balms Abogados and Balms Group International are on board with new technologies and new

direct communications systems

www.balms.eswww.balms.es/blogwww.twitter.com/balmsabogadoswww.facebook.com/balmsabogadoswww.es.linkedin.com/in/balmsabogados

www.bgi-law.com www.bgi-law.com/blog www.twitter.com/bgilaw www.facebook.com/bgilawwww.es.linkedin.com/in/bgilaw

10

On the 11th October 2011, Law 37/2011 was published in the BOE (the Official State Bulletin), which is the law on Procedural Improvement Measures. It presents procedural reforms to in-troduce “improvements which speed up various proceedings, without de-creasing guarantees for those awaiting trial”, as stated in the Explanatory Me-morandum in the Preface.

Such improvements were seen in a noted change in the summary procee-dings of the Eviction for Non-payment, which was “reconstructed” in a similar extension of the monetary procedure. Since then, the general outline of the proceedings has become the following: initial request, period for the defendant to pay or oppose, conducting a hearing in the case of the latter and, in the absence of either of these actions, it would proceed directly to eviction.

Clearly, like all urgent reforms or like all fast decisions, the new proceedings established by this reform have some omissions which have caused problems in many new Eviction for Non-Payment trials which began after its entry into force. This is why the most recent law, 4/2013, dated 4th June, Measures for Adaptation and Development of the Housing Rental Market, within its main goal of improving and invigorating the rental market, introduced slight modi-fications to the proceedings to solve these problems. In the opinion of the undersigned these measures are in-sufficient, so in daily procedural practi-ce there is no unanimity in procedures between the different judicial bodies on the guidelines for eviction, grounds for opposition, the obligation to request the eviction previously or not, and many other reasons we will not go into in this article, for lack of space and so as not to confuse the reader.

The goal of this analysis is to explain the basic workings of these judicial proceedings (after the last reform, it is also possible to request eviction from leases registered in the Property Re-gister by going through a notary). The goal is also therefore to try to clari-fy the main queries that both owners and tenants have about knowing what to expect when they begin or are invol-ved in proceedings for an eviction for non-payment. This is of great interest under the existing regulatory and eco-nomic framework, and is encouraging rentals of many empty urban proper-ties (both residential and commercial) which are privately owned due to the economic crisis. It also helps proper-ty owners (whether they are real or legal persons, Spanish or foreign), as knowledge of these processes can be useful when putting their property on the rental market.

1. Reasons for initiating proceedings for an eviction for non-payment.

In general, the main responsibility of the renting party in rental contracts is to pay the agreed rent, as well as other quantities they are required to pay by the signed rental contract, in accordance with article 1555 of the Civil Code. In compliance with this, arti-cle 27.2.a of the current Urban Rental Law authorizes the renting owner to demand the payment of owed amounts in the case of non-payment by the te-nant and to end the rental contract, so regaining possession of the rented property.

Therefore, any instance of non-payment is a legal reason for the resolution of the rental contract and a sufficient reason to initiate proceedings for eviction, even if the tenant has only defaulted on one month´s payment. It

is consolidated case law doctrine that it is possible to terminate a tenancy, even “though the demand is based on the non-payment of a single month´s rent” (Supreme Court Sentence 24th July 2008).

There was also discussion about whether this ability to terminate te-nancies extends to the non-payment of amounts related to services and supplies for the property, including the I.B.I. In the case of the latter, as well as other non-specified charges, it should be pointed out that for the te-nant to be obligated to pay the rent, this legally must be agreed expressly and in writing.

Jurisprudence is also unanimous on this point: non-payment of the I.B.I. and other costs for services and supplies is a valid enough reason to termina-te the contract, even if the tenant is up to date with payment of rent (Su-preme Court Sentence 12th January 2007 and 20th July 2011). However, in the case of the I.B.I. it is necessary, sine qua non, that the tenant is given prior notice of at least the amount and the payment of said tax. If not, and if the landlord takes the claim directly to court without this prior notice, the tenant would be without proper legal defense.

Therefore, there is no doubt that the non-payment of these charges also allows the owner to proceed to a trial for eviction due to non-payment. Howe-ver, this type of owed costs must be broken down and defined in the request made and accompanying all supporting documents thereof.Finally, and most importantly, the con-tinued delay in payment of rent, even if it does not create debt or any instance of non-payment, also acts as support

Judgement of eviction for non-payment

LATEST NEWS



LATEST NEWS

11

the lawsuit, we highlight these three distinguishing aspects of these types of lawsuit:• The lawsuitmustshow if thedefendant has the option or not to stop the action, as well as the reasons for the existence or not of said possibility.• The requesting owner mayexpress their willingness to cancel all of the tenant´s debt if they leave the premiseswithin15daysofthelegalre-quest.• Similarly, if the sum owed isreclaimedatthesametime,werecom-mend requesting in the lawsuit thatthe defendant must pay, all costs in-curred during the proceedings as well astherentandallotheramountsowedbefore the start of the proceedings.Finally, we should note that to begin this type of proceeding, the correspon-dingCourtFeesmustbepaid.

3. Development of the proceedings:requirements and possibilities of thedefendant tenant

As stated in the introduction of this ar-ticle, the proceeding for eviction due to non-paymentwillbegin,throughalegalrequesttothedebtor,althoughinthiscasethedeadlinewillbewithin10wor-kingdays,not20asinthepaymentor-der.Thetenantisgiventhisdeadlinetocarry out one of the following actions:

1. Leavetheproperty.2. Alternatively or at the sametime,paythetotalowedtothelandlord(includingnewamountsaccruediftheywerespecificallyrequestedinthelaw-suit, and this request isapplicable tothe guarantor). In this case the tenant should indicate if they hope to stop the action or not, which is not possi-ble if the eviction had previously been stopped or, as indicated in the previous point, when the debts had been officia-lly requested from the tenant thirtydays prior to the filing of the lawsuit.3. Draw up a concise opposition to the lawsuit. Although the procedural lawdoesnotspecifywhatmotivesmay

initiating adjudicative actions. As es-tablished by the Supreme Court, thelandlord“isnotrequiredtoacceptthetenant´slatepaymentofperiodicpay-ments”.

2. Initiating proceedings against the in-dividuals involved

The proceedings for eviction due tonon-paymentarebegunupon request.Under these proceedings, the eviction action may be carried out togetherwith the reclaiming of rent and otherowedamounts,which the lawyerhereundersignedstronglyrecommends.Weshould not forget that these procee-dings are special and summary, so itwould be unreasonable to expect the evacuation of the property to reclaimtheowedamountsinalaterandlongerdeclaratory procedure than that explai-ned in this article.

Prior to this request, the tenant canbe asked by certified fax to speed up thepaymentofthedebt,underpenaltyof beginning the process for their evic-tion.This isnotrequiredorobligatoryalthough it is advisable, not only becau-se it is always preferable to resolve all disputes out of court but also because if30daysafterreceivingsaid faxthetenanthasnotpaid the total amountowed, the tenant has no right to be angry when the lawsuit is filed and the proceedings are started. In other words, the tenant can no longer stay onthepremisesorpropertyandmustpay all that they owe and are legally re-quiredtopay.

The lawsuit may be filed against thetenant´s guarantor as well as against thetenant(ifthedebtsarerequestedtogether with the eviction action). In thiscase,however,asrequiredbyarti-cle483.3.3oftheCivilProceduralLaw,theguarantormusthavebeenaskedtopaythedebtspriortothesubmissionoftherequest.

Asfortherequirementsandhowtofile

be put forward, the reasons for the opposition must at least be expres-sed. The most common reasons arethepaymentof thedebt, the landlordrefusingtoacceptthepayments(moraaccipiendi), compensation, cancella-tion of the action, substitution of the contract, and various procedural ex-ceptions. However, we must remem-berthatthisisasummaryproceedingwhich does not have the effect of res judicata, therefore other reasons for opposition or those not connected with those stated will not be possible because they should be clarified in the relevant declaratory trial.

Therequestwillindicatethedatewhenthe possible trial will be held, which will only take place if the tenant opposes the landlord´s action, or if the landlord opposesthetenant´srequestthattheeviction is stopped. The request willalso state the date that the tenant must vacate the premises assumingthat said tenant does not carry out any of the above actions. Usually, to speed upproceedings,whichiscommendable,some judges also indicate two startdates:therequiredoneincaseofthedefendant not appearing in court, and another later one for when the hearing willpresumablytakeplace.

The defendant will have a deadline ofthreedaystorequestlegalaid,atthesametimeasthemainperiod.Theywillalsohaveanothersimultaneousperiodof five days to accept a cancellation agreementfromthelandlord,ifapplica-ble,andinthiscasewillhave15daystovacatethepropertyfromthedateoftherequest.

4.Endoftheproceedings:Implementa-tion, Appeal and Costs

Theproceedingsforevictionduetonon-paymentmayendintwoways:throughaDecreefromaCourtClerk,orajud-gementpassedbytheMagistrateJud-ge, which as previously stated will not have res judicata effects.

Newspublishedonourwebsite(www.balms.com)onourblog(www.balms.com/blog)andmostretweetedtweets


LATEST NEWS

12

The proceedings will end through a de-cree when the tenant takes no action before the deadline and once the land-lord is notified of this they must ask for the eviction to be carried out, so that it happens on the date indicated by the Judge. This is done via a simple written request, although some lawyers prefer a petition for a court order. The decree also ends the proceedings under the assumption that the tenant will volun-tarily vacate the property, therefore this resolution acts as an enforcement order to begin the relevant process to collect rent and other owed amounts. Of course this is only if the debts are collected together with the eviction, and the action of reclaiming these de-bts was not cancelled.

The proceedings will end through a jud-gement as long as the hearing has been held. If the hearing results in eviction, it will take place on the date indicated in said judgement, or on the date that

the Judge already indicated in the re-quest, if applicable. The hearing will of course be a sufficient enforcement or-der to begin the corresponding collec-tion proceedings for the rent and other debts.

This judgement may be appealed even if it results in a conviction. The tenant who wishes to appeal should have writ-ten proof that they have paid all of their rent and other debts at the time of submitting the appeal (as well as having paid the very high court fees, but that is another story).

Finally, it is important to note that fo-llowing the last reform, the tenant will always and under all circumstances have to pay the costs incurred, regar-dless of how the proceedings end, as long as the result was not acquittal and in all possible conclusions to the process explained here, as well as if the action is stopped.

5. Conclusion.

This is a simplified summary of these types of proceedings, even though cir-cumstances mean that proceedings and solutions vary from case to case. However, the intention was to give pro-perty owners and tenants an overview of what to expect, and more or less what the deadlines would be in case of non-payment and what the legal solu-tion would be. What can be taken from this article is that these new procee-dings, although they have some failings and omissions which could be reduced through everyday legal practice, they and the significant legal reforms ca-rried out to this effect should facilitate the movement of the rental market by above all helping property owners to sell their empty properties as quickly and profitably as possible. This helps to reduce the risk of properties being oc-cupied by non-paying tenants.

Fernando CambaBalms Abogados Galicia



NEWS FLASH...

13

Pontevedra High Court exempts an appellant from paying court fees, conside-ring them too high.

Section 1a of the Pontevedra Pro-vincial High Court, which specialises in commercial matters, passed two decisions which support a complaint filed by the administrator of a limi-ted liability company. The sentence meant that the administrator lost certain rights and had to pay subs-tantial penalties and a significant prior payment was requested to ap-peal it, according to information on the General Council of the Judiciary website.

Full article available in Legal Today http://bit.ly/1Fok1Ci

Qualities of a good junior lawyer.

To guarantee its continuation, its adaptation to its environment, a healthy rotation, and generatio-nal change by letting new profes-sionals access partner positions and gradually replace more senior workers, a firm should have em-ployees of all ages.

To achieve this, firms should re-cruit regularly and keep good young lawyers who will integrate into all areas of the firm. These young lawyers will develop their personality and life experience at the same time as progressing in their professional career within the firm, allowing for greater de-velopment of the firm and fulfilling the plan for succession and con-tinuity.

Full article available at Economist & Jurist http://bit.ly/1rbyalj

We’re starting September

with 3000 followers on Twit-

ter. Thank you to everyone! We

hope we don’t disappoint...

The European Court confirms that charging for checking in baggage is legal

The Court of Justice of the European Union has declared that the Spanish law which prevents airline companies from charging to carry checked in ba-ggage is contrary to Union law.

Full article available at Diario Jurídi-co. http://bit.ly/1tWF7VV

The Cantabria “Preferred Sha-res” Court supports victims in 99% of cases

The Cantabria “Preferred Shares” Court (Court 7-Bis) has supported the plaintiff in 98.73% of cases, as highlighted by the Committee for Victims of Preferred Shares Fraud in Cantabria, which is reflected in the information provided by the court itself on the first anniversary of its establishment.

The “Preferred Shares” Court was at first created for 400 cases, which was later increased to 600 and fi-nally 700. Of these 700 lawsuits, almost all of which were against Liberbank-Caja Cantabria, 500 have been resolved, either by sentence, agreement or withdrawal.

Full article available in El Boletín:http://bit.ly/1rozY56

Happy 50th Birthday,Mafalda!

So we have to respect these rights? Not going to happen, like with the Ten Commandments!



NEWS FLASH...

14

Transfer of the Civil Registry to company registrars and the “free rider” problem

Changes are being proposed to the current Spanish registry system to make a national registry agency, more like the British system. This causes problems for the registries, especially in terms of financing. There are four options for financing the transfer: charging for registry entries, state financing, users of the Commercial Registry paying for Civil Registry services, or a new cost for legal professionals to consult registry information. This transfer also causes a problem with “free riders”, meaning that some people will not pay for the services but will still receive the benefits.

Full article available in ¿Hay Dere-cho? http://bit.ly/1tgLTT1

The new lawyer: digital, com-petitive, global and with marketing knowledge

The president of the General Coun-cil of Spanish Lawyers, Carlos Car-nicer, led the opening of the Digital Year of ENATIC (The National As-sociation of Lawyers ICT sector) today, and said that the legal pro-fession cannot continue to be left behind in the current technological revolution. “We have to keep up to date with the latest research and scientists to be able to solve conflicts that arise”, he stated, and encouraged lawyers to get on board with new technologies and the new business opportunities that they bring.

Full article in Diario Jurídicohttp://bit.ly/1uflkkF

Using a driving license as a certified document to pre-vent money laundering

There is some confusion about using a driving license as a formal form of identification because it is a subject that has been continually questioned.

In the legal context of preventing money laundering, there were liable parties who did not know whether or not accepting a driving license when formally identifying certain natural persons was in line with the regulations for preventing mo-ney laundering or if it would incur a serious administrative penalty.

Full article available in Diario Jurídi-co http://bit.ly/1rLv5q4

Joint custody as the general rule

The Supreme Court claims that joint custody encourages the inte-gration of the child with both pa-rents. It ensures equal time spent with each parent, avoids a sense of loss, the capability of the parents is not questioned and it encoura-ges cooperation between the pa-rents for the benefit of their child. The Supreme Court adds that this model ensures the child’s proper development and emotional sta-bility. It is also beneficial because it is not a dramatic change from the living arrangements before the parents’ separation, in that it grants parental rights and respon-sibilities, as well as allowing them to participate in their children’s development and growth on equal terms, which is undoubtedly bene-ficial for the children.

Full article in Legal Today:http://bit.ly/1xSjV5y

Relatives until death do us part

Relation by marriage ends with the dissolution of a marriage, the-refore you cannot be included in group III (Second and third degree collateral relatives, ancestors and descendents by marriage) for the purposes of Inheritance Tax when the tax is accrued for the previous death of a spouse.

Full article in Legal Today:http://bit.ly/11sVpel

“A lawyer is a humanist; therefore writings about history or literature are still about the law”

Rafael Altamira y Crevea.

I tweet, you tweet, the Real Academia Española tweets...

The twenty third edition of the Dic-tionary of the Spanish Language (DRAE) will appear in book shops this Thursday, in both Spain and Spanish speaking countries. Its pu-blication comes at the same time as the celebrations for the third centenary of the Real Academia Española (RAE), the Royal Spanish Academy).



NEWS

15

Balms Abogados expands its Procedural department with two new recruits

Julia worked as a practising lawyer from 2003 to 2006 with experience in private law, specifically in civil and commercial matters. In 2006 she began studying for the entry examinations for the Judicial and Fiscal Ca-reers while expanding her legal understanding, and she passed the exam in 2013. From 2010 to 2014 she acted as substitute judge in Málaga province, working in civil, criminal and juvenile law, and specifically in the judicial districts of Fuengirola, Torrox, Málaga, Vélez-Málaga and Torremolinos.

In 2014 she returned to work as a practising lawyer, with experience in both public and private sectors. She specialises in criminal, civil, family and procedural law and she is continuing with her training to expand her expertise.

Julia speaks English fluently, having spent a year stu-dying in Tampa, Florida, USA.

Rosalía has worked as a practising lawyer since 2008 with experience in administrative law and urban plan-ning, giving legal advice to various sectors and public authorities on administration law matters, and lega-lly defending them in administrative and judicial review procedures.

After completing her legal studies, she decided to ex-tend her training with an Executive Master´s Degree in Business Law and a specialization course for Official Receivers, amongst other courses.

Rosalía studies various English courses at the Univer-sity of Murcia, and she is preparing for her Certifica-te in Advanced English. She speaks English fluently, as well as Valencian and French.

Rosalía García Hernández

Julia Crespo Biehler



NEWS

16

Foro Europa 2001 Awards ceremony

The Foro Europa was foun-ded by José Luis Salave-rría on October 8th 1996 with the goal of creating meetings for European exchanges and expansion. On Thursday 19th Sept-ember, a dinner was held at the Westin Palace Ho-tel in Madrid for the Foro Europa 2001 award cere-mony.

Mr. Juan Luís Balmaseda de Ahumada y Díez was awarded the gold medal for his work as a business development lawyer in Eu-rope.

The gold medal was awar-ded to him by the Presi-dent of the Foro Europa, Mr. José Luis Salaverría.



Pº Gracia 116 bis, 4º08008 Barcelona

Tel: +34 93 311 3999 / Fax: +34 93 311 3862email: [email protected]

Pª General Martínez Campos 49, 6º28010 Madrid, España

Tel: +34 91 702 0156 / Fax: +34 91 702 0157email:[email protected]

C/ Reconquista 9, entresuelo36201 Vigo, Pontevedra, España

Tel: +34 986 44 31 43 / Fax: +34 986 44 60 23email: [email protected]

C/ Generalife nº 9, Aloha Pueblo, Aloha Golf29660 Nueva Andalucía, Marbella, España

Tel: +34 952 81 21 00 / Fax: +34 952 81 27 67email: [email protected]

MADRID

MARBELLA

GALICIA

CATALUNYA

ARGENTINA - ITALY - MOROCCO - HUNGARY - GERMANY - BOLIVIA - MEXICO - BULGARIA - PARAGUAY - CYPRUS - UNITED KINGDOM - COLOMBIA - ROMANIA -

FRANCE - SPAIN - RUSSIA - GIBRALTAR - AUSTRIA - URUGUAY - VENEZUELA

BALMS GROUP INTERNATIONAL

balms abogados newsletter oct-nov-dec 2014

Documents

social law

warningthe information

general information

new recruitsforo europa

enthusiastic entrepreneurs

entrepreneurs actpeople

legal advice

social crisis