baf 2013 abc of jv3_ken thomson
TRANSCRIPT
HEADING size 54 Arial
• TEXT size no small than 28 Arial
SUB-HEADING size 44 Arial
The A-B-C of JV3 A Practitioner’s Approach
HEADING size 54 Arial
• TEXT size no small than 28 Arial
SUB-HEADING size 44 Arial
The A-B-C of JV3 Introduction
Section J - DTS of the Gold Coast University Hospital + part of the energy modelling team
DTS vs JV3 Let’s compare the basic intent
Deemed-to-Satisfy
OBJECTIVE To reduce Green House Gas
Emissions
TARGET PROJECTS Simple constructions with simple
architecture
Alternative Method JV3
OBJECTIVE To reduce Green House Gas
Emissions
TARGET PROJECTS Everything else
Any project aiming for predictive energy use
DTS vs JV3 The A – B – C pathway of doing an assessment
A – Architecture B – Building Services
C – Compliance
DTS vs JV3 Comparing the Method of Assessment
A – Architecture B – Building Services C – Compliance
JV3 Alternative Solution – using energy modelling to verify
performance
JV3
Project pathway (phases) PI
SD
DD
CD
CA
JV3 • Steps 1 to 6
– The first 6 steps in DTS and JV3 are the same • Steps 1 to 3 are completed during the PI phase, thus
before any of the design work has commenced
JV3 • Step 4
• Step 4 occurs at SD phase of the project – NO LATER!
• Step 4 helps the entire design team understand the impacts and issues
– Determine the building envelope – Determine the approximate minimum insulation values of
walls, floors, ceilings and roofs – Determine if required insulation thickness will impact on
internal space allocation of the design – Do the preliminary glazing calculations to see if there are any
issues
A
JV3 • Step 5
• Step 5 occurs at DD phase of the project – NO LATER!
• Step 5 helps the entire design team understand the impacts and issues
– Determine if all air-conditioned zones are identified – Determine if any insulation issues with pipework and
ductwork may be a co-ordination problem, especially in ceiling spaces
– This is generally advice provided by the Mechanical Engineer
NOTE: On small projects the Mechanical contractor may not have this capability
B
JV3 • Step 6
• Step 6 occurs at CD phase of the project – NO LATER!
• Step 6 helps the entire design team understand the impacts and issues
– Check if any clauses or requirements have been missed in the design
– This includes items like control of air-conditioning for zones near operable windows and doors to outside
– Identifying where Hydraulic, Electrical, Mechanical and Architectural design requirements interact and may result in reduced energy efficiency, such as roof penetrations
B
JV3 • Step 7
• Step 7 occurs at CD phase of the project – NO LATER!
• Step 7 is the construction of the baseline model – At this stage it is in the hands of the modeller and their skill in
representing the building within the software used – Use of the appropriate Specification JV protocols and data
should be included in all reporting – A verifiable model can be built by another JV3 energy
modeller in the same or different software package and get a similar baseline result, if all information is provided in the report.
B
JV3 • Step 8
• Step 8 occurs at the end of CD phase of the project – NO LATER!
– At this stage of the project major design changes should be avoided
– Advice give by the assessor during the previous phases of the project should mean no surprises – i.e. additional shading required, changes to the glass
– This stage should be purely about verification of the prior design advice
– The proposed model must model the actual design and if the building is built to the design the energy performance value here should be within 10% of the actual building energy use
B
JV3 • Step 9
• Step 9 occurs early in Phase D of the project – NO LATER!
C Building Baseline Baseline Proposed Services Baseline Proposed Proposed MWh MWh MWh Lighting 1.5222 1.5222 1.5222 Equipment 1.4642 1.4642 1.4642 Heating, cooling, and Ventilation - packaged unit 2.4568 2.4568 2.2892 Lifts 0 0 0 Hot Water 1.3705 1.3705 1.3705 Total - MWh 6.8137 6.8137 6.6461 Conversion to MJ - factor 3.6 3.6 3.6 Total MJ 24.52932 24.52932 23.92596 Conversion to Kg CO2/yr - factor 0.0548 0.0548 0.0548
Kg CO2/yr 1.344 1.344 1.311 Assessed area (m2) 60 60 60 kWh/m2 114 114 111
The Comparison table
JV3 • Step 10
• The Report • Following is a detailed outline of what is in a
comprehensive JV3 report • As the report is to demonstrate compliance with
legislative requirements – it must be a signed document
C
Prepared By
Ken Thomson
Signature
JV3 - Report Executive summary and introduction
• Executive Summary – This report is provided as an assessment for compliance in
accordance with the National Construction Code - BCA Volume 1, Section J energy efficiency requirements for the project.
– The intent of the BCA Section J is to reduce Green House Gas emissions. This report provides an assessment of the building in accordance with this intent.
– The assessment of this project for compliance with the BCA section J is done in accordance with the current guidelines and protocols as provided by the Australian Building Codes Board.
JV3 - Report Executive summary and introduction
• Introduction – Project details
Project Name:: Joe Blog’s Warehouse and office
Project Number: CE 3067
Property Title: Joe Blog’s Warehouse and Office
Address: Somewhere, Thereville
Building Class: Class 8
Building use: Manufacturing
Applicable BCA: Volume 1, 2012
Assessment Method: JV3 – energy modeling
Compliance with BCA parts: J1, J2 and J3
Location: Thereville, Buildland
Climate Zone: 5
Software used: IES-VE
A table of the basic project data
JV3 - Report Executive summary
and introduction • Introduction
• Project Description – The project description
needs to provide, or point, to all necessary details and description of the proposed project location, size and other relevant parameters such that someone else can directly use the report to verify the results.
JV3 - Report Methodology & Analysis
This part of the report should contain: • Assumptions • Outline of JV3 method
used • What clauses of the BCA
Section J are assessed • Building fabric
assessment (walls, floors, roof, ceilings, glazing)
• Building services assessment
• Any special conditions • Operating Hours
JV3 - Report Main body of the report
1. The main body is the modelling results and analysis of the modelling results 2. For a simple compliant building this section can be quite small as it is only
necessary to demonstrate results and why it complies – the next slide has 2 results tables for comparison
3. Any exclusions, or required design changes should be discussed here and reasoning provided as to why the changes to the building design are necessary
• The modeling excludes all process related Ventilation systems within the milling building
JV3 - Report Main body – Results tables
1. Results tables – what is sometimes presented – what should be presented
Annual Energy Consumption (MWh) Time Period
Reference Building
Proposed Building
Jan 78.1803 51.3554 Feb 69.8147 46.2047 Mar 70.0583 43.1365 Apr 59.9688 34.5594 May 54.5476 30.4192 Jun 45.5895 27.8947 Jul 46.0715 28.8246 Aug 49.1038 28.8666 Sep 54.0059 28.61 Oct 62.1816 34.7663 Nov 68.5068 41.5262 Dec 74.6208 46.9102
Total 732.6497 443.0738
Building Baseline Baseline Proposed Services – Mech, Elec Hydra Baseline Proposed Proposed MWh MWh MWh Lighting 1.5222 1.5222 1.5222 Equipment 1.4642 1.4642 1.4642 Heating, cooling, and Ventilation - packaged unit 2.4568 2.4568 2.2892 Lifts 0 0 0 Hot Water 1.3705 1.3705 1.3705 Total - MWh 6.8137 6.8137 6.6461 Conversion to MJ - factor 3.6 3.6 3.6 Total MJ 24.52932 24.52932 23.92596 Conversion to Kg CO2/yr - factor 0.0548 0.0548 0.0548
Kg CO2/yr 1.344 1.344 1.311 Assessed area (m2) 60 60 60 kWh/m2 114 114 111
OR
JV3 - Report Conclusions
1. For a compliant design this can be very brief
– The results as shown in Table 1 demonstrate the proposed building with proposed services is less greenhouse gas intensive than the baseline building with either baseline or proposed services. This is in compliance with the BCA Section JV3 alternative method.
2. For a non-compliant design this should provide all necessary instruction to inform the design team of what changes are required and refer them back to the main body sections for reasoning
JV3 - Report Appendices
A. Occupancy and Operational Profiles used in the assessment
B. Full table of all the input data for both the baseline model and the proposed model
C. A transmittal of all the Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, and Hydraulic Drawings used to generate the model
D. An assessment of the building envelope, if required E. All relevant calculations NOTE: Not all appendices are required for all projects
JV3 PROPOSED – 2 Page Compliance Document
– Would it be beneficial to have a standard 2 page compliance form?
– Could this form be an online form? – Would it be beneficial to certifiers to have all energy
assessors registered online?
• 2-page report – Covers energy assessors registration – Records project basic data – Records JV3 protocols applied to this project – Records results of energy modelling – Records any compliance issues
Things to Ponder Online Section J reporting submissions and verification
We do our banking online We buy lots of stuff over the internet
Why
– Online compliance assessment could reduce variation and inconsistencies in reporting
Advantages
– Energy efficiency compliance records are online – All compliance assessments and reports will have the same baseline – Potential for self assessment – reduced cost
Things to Ponder Does the current Reduction of Green House gas emissions take into account:
1. Life Cycle assessment 2. Cradle to Cradle products 3. Actual building energy use
What happens if the actual building does not performance to the design compliance assessment predicted – who is responsible – can the building owner sue?
Hints and Tips 1. In all assessments – make sure they are signed by
the energy assessor 2. Check the project details align with the Certifiers
details in their assessment 3. Check there are three energy models and results 4. Check the results include an assessment of GHG
emissions – not just kWh/annum 5. Read the list of assumptions - check they are
reasonable 6. Current BCA section J minimum compliance – results
that show 50% energy reductions are questionable without sophisticated energy management and high efficiency systems in the building, or alternative generation technologies
Summary – Started with looking at a quick comparison of
DTS and JV3 assessment – Ran through the process of JV3 assessment – Looked at the structure and contents of a JV3
report – Finally presented some items to ponder and
have given some hits and tips for assessing a report
Thank You