backup exec 2012: revolutionising backup - … vision 2012 challenges of virtual machine protection...
TRANSCRIPT
Backup Exec 2012: Revolutionising Backup
Gareth Fraser-King, Product Management
Sharon White, Product Marketing
Luis Gomez, CEBI Foundation
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Agenda
Additional Resources
Luis Gomez
New User Interface and Architecture Overview
Where BE Came From
Today’s IT Challenges
4
3
2
1
5
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012 2
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Challenges Of Virtual Machine Protection
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
Need New Graphic
65% of virtual machines are unprotected
Cost and time to manage physical and virtual infrastructure backups
Virtualization increases storage consumption
4
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Data Growth And Storage Challenges
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
By 2020, IDC expects the amount of digital information will be 44 times as big as it was in 2009.
Need New Graphic
Up to 70% of data is duplicate and hasn't been accessed in more than 90 days¹
Data lifecycle management is becoming more challenging
5
2
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Today’s Disaster Recovery Challenges
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
Manual disaster recovery is time consuming and error prone
Need New Graphic
Downtime today is measured in minutes not hours or days
Critical systems require on and offsite protection
6
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Pricing and licensing complexity, too many “things” to choose from
Legacy centric product architecture; multi-faceted, complex backup job processes
Too much data; it’s like looking for a needle in a haystack of needles
Multiple solutions for backup and disaster recovery, physical and virtual
Eliminating Backup Complexity Challenges
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012 7
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
User Experience – Where We’ve Been
• Backup Exec is a successful product with long history
• Very wide breadth of users (From the local dentist office to large distributed corporations)
• Product has “evolved” over a very long period
• Sophisticated feature set (de-duplication, archive, cloud, virtualization, etc.)
Feedback over the years
• Years of feedback that we were increasingly complex
• New features such as de-dup and archive were difficult to "fit in" to the old model
• Each new feature often was perceived as "bolted on"
• Model prevented us from "helping the user" in many cases
Symantec Confidential 9
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Backup Exec 2012 Architecture
10 Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
Virtual Servers
File and Application Servers
Disk, NAS or NDMP
Tape Drives or Libraries
Symantec Backup Exec™ 2012 Server
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Backup Exec 2012 Core Components
11 Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
Options
• Enterprise Server • Data Deduplication • File/E-mail Archiving
• NDMP • Centralized Management
Agents (Physical servers)
• Protects remote systems • Windows, Linux, and Mac • Databases and applications
• VMware/Hyper-V (agent-less or agent-assisted)
3
Backup Exec Server
• Backup data sent from agents to media server for storage
• Disk or tape backup devices
1
2
A B
C D
1
3 Symantec Backup Exec™ 2012 Server
Physical Servers
2
Virtual Servers
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Pre-BE 2012: Job Model
• Multiple servers in one job
– If 1 server failed - result was job failure for entire job.
– Users had to restart entire job OR create a one-time job for one failure. Tedious
• Jobs were “globally scoped”
– No way to determine “up front” what the user goal is
– All options were exposed all the time: Overwhelming to new users - Option overload.
• Completely separate full or incremental jobs
– No constraints = User can shoot themselves in the foot
– They could create unsupported combinations.
• E.g. Create a full that used modified time and an incremental that used archive bit
Backup Exec 2012 12
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Pre-BE 2012: Job Model (Continued)
• Because full and incrementals were not explicitly related, restore was tedious and manual.
– No “Point-in-time” restore possible
– User had to choose all backup sets to restore
• Integration of archive was "resource centric" model forced into Jobs – unnatural fit
Backup Exec 2012 15
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Pre-BE 2012: Storage/Devices and Media
• Legacy of tape was pervasive
• Everything was either tape or a tape "simulator". "One size fits all"
• Effectively no or little differentiation between tape, disk, or cloud storage
– Every job still required tape related options even though they may be irrelevant to storage type
– Disk storage showed "virtual tapes". In order to delete data, they had to perform an "erase" of a virtual tape.
• We had to “Re-Think” from the ground up of how features are exposed
• Total re-vamp of the user experience for the product
• Involved rewrite of all user interfaces + addition of a “middle tier” system service that was entirely new.
Backup Exec 2012 17
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Backup Exec 2012 User Experience Creation
Backup Exec 2012
User Experience
Customer Focus
Groups
Demos & Feedback
Usability Reviews
SE Rotations
& Interlock
Telemetry
First 24 Hours
UI Review UCD &
External Consultants
2 TOIs & 3 Betas
Symantec Confidential 18
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
The User Experience Has Changed
Backup and Restore View
Better Experience
Restore Workflow
Storage View Less
Complexity
Backup Workflow
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012 20
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Ease Of Use
• New user experience
• Focus on ease of use
• Resource-centric
• Manage resources, not jobs
21
• Modular backup job stages
• Easy to expand protection
• Simply add an additional stage to: – Duplicate/copy backups
– Convert to virtual
– Etc
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
Backup job stages
Simplified new user interface
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Focus Design on Simplicity
Resource Centric
Goals Of Re-Design
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
• Reduce and consolidate options and choices
• Convey more information more concisely
• Focus on a more intuitive interface
• Anyone should be able to be productive within a short time
• Manage Data Protection from a data/systems point of view
• Intelligent use of customer architecture to show relevant options
• Few places to go to configure backup systems
• Elimination of backup policies and complexity
22
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Before And After
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
• Modern
• Resource Centric
• Unified workflow
• Consolidated views
• Toolbar instead of “task pane”
23
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
New! Resource-centric User Interface
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012 24
New Backup Exec 2012
Interface
User experience based around server protection status
Transition from job management to server management
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Simplified - User Only Shown Relevant Options
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012 25
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Consolidated Views
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
2 (really 3) views into 1
26
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
New! Modular Backup Protection Methodology
• New job stages feature
• Easily expand protection
• Just click “Add Stage”
Example:
27
Stage 1: Backup to Disk Stage 2: Copy to Tape Stage 3: Convert to Virtual
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Backup Exec 2012: Resource Centric
• Resource centric
– Previously there was no place in the product that showed the status of the data or servers they were protecting. Only job status was shown.
– Per Server Status: Now in Backup Exec 2012 – they can see server status
– Context: Since they choose backup scheme and server or resource first – We can show only relevant options
• Examples: Backup only shows options for resources on the selected system
– Granularity: If 1 server fails, only that server shows error. They can re-try server specific job
– Restore
• Now guided and based on what they are trying to do and what type of resource they are recovering:
– Examples: SharePoint recovery is broken down logically for SharePoint
• Point in time based since backups for server are explicitly related in a single workflow
Backup Exec 2012 28
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Backup Exec 2012: Storage
• Tape differentiated from disk, cloud
– Tape options shown when tape is targeted
– Options relevant to each Storage type now shown
– Disk is treated as disk
– They can specify time for retention explicitly when targeting disk
• Data in disk storage now shows actual data backed up – not virtual tapes
• Deduplication properties of the agent/client can be shown on those servers in the Backup and Restore View
Backup Exec 2012 29
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
BackupExec.com
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012
Datasheets and white papers
Flash Tours
Videos
34
SYMANTEC VISION 2012
Support Resources And Online Trouble Shooting
Technical Overview: Backup Exec 2012 36
Thank you!
Copyright © 2011 Symantec Corporation. All rights reserved. Symantec and the Symantec Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Symantec Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as advertising. All warranties relating to the information in this document, either express or implied, are disclaimed to the maximum extent allowed by law. The information in this document is subject to change without notice.
Presentation Identifier Goes Here 37
Presenter’s Name
Presenter’s Email
Presenter’s Phone