background information on health care...
TRANSCRIPT
Background Information on
Health Care System
Compiled by: Blue Ribbon Commission on Health Care Staff Team
June 22, 2006
Background Information -- 1
Costs
Background Information -- 2
Health Expenditures by Country, 2004: Per Capita and as Percent of GDP
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
Turk
ey
Mex
ico
Pola
nd
Slov
ak R
epub
lic
Kore
a
Hun
gary
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Spai
n
Portu
gal
Gre
ece
New
Zea
land
Finl
and
Japa
n
Uni
ted
King
dom
Italy
Med
ian
Aust
ria
Irela
nd
Aust
ralia
Belg
ium
Swed
en
Den
mar
k
Net
herla
nds
Fran
ce
Icel
and
Ger
man
y
Can
ada
Luxe
mbo
urg
Nor
way
Switz
erla
nd
Uni
ted
Stat
es
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Spending Per CapitaPercent of GDP
"Health Spending in the United States and the Rest of the Industrialized World," Gerard F. Anderson, et. al.; Health Affairs: July/August 2005; Volume 24, Number 4.
Total US health care expenditures:2004: $1.9 trillion2014: $3.6 trillion (projected)
Background Information -- 3
0
Meet the SharkOutswim It or Spend >50% of Employee and Retiree Income on Health Care
© 2005 A. Milstein MD
Annual Percent Changes per Capita in Health Care Expenditures and in Average Hourly Wages for Workers in All Industries, 2000 through 2005. Average annual incremental benefit = 44 days of good quality life.
0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Year
Ann
ual P
erce
nt C
hang
e
Health Care Spending Average Hourly Wage PEBB
Data from Kaiser Permanente/Health Research & Educational Trust 2005. Dental work by Dr. Milstein.Background Information -- 4
Top 5% of HCA UMP enrollees are responsible for 45% ($153 million) of expenditures.Top 5% of DSHS Medicaid Fee-For-Service enrollees account for 42% ($1.2 billion) of expenditures..
Why are we trying to better manage chronic disease?
Data notes: Sources: 2004 Uniform Medical Plan claims. 2004 DSHS Medicaid Management InformationSystem.
Percent of UMP Users vs. Percent of Expenditures (Non-Medicare, CY2004)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0% 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Users
Expe
nditu
res
45% of costs
5% of users
30% of users
2% of costs
Percent of DSHS Users vs. Percent of Expenditures (CY 2004)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0% 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%Users
Expe
nditu
res
42% of costs30% of users
3.5% of costs
5% of users
Slide # 11Background Information -- 5
�2
Medicare is the national health insurance program for people age 65 or older, some people under age 65 with disabilities, and people with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), which is permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant.
Medicaid is a program that pays for medical assistance to individuals and families who meet certain categorical eligibility criteria based on income, assets (like home ownership), and in most states, very high medical expenses. This program is jointly funded by federal and state governments. Medicaid is the largest source of funding for medical and health-related services for people with limited income.
State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is operated by states. This program allows each state to offer health insurance for certain children up to age 19 who are not already insured. Each state sets its own guidelines regarding eligibility and services.
Figure 6:
Public and Private Sources Pay for Health Care, 2003
Other Public Spending is made up of other federal programs like those serving veterans, military and their families, and Native Americans. State and local programs are also included in the percentage of other public spending.
Out-of-Pocket payments are made directly by people receiving health care at the time services are used.
Private Health Insurance is insurance provided through organizations not operated by the local, state, or federal governments. The majority of private health insurance is employer-based, meaning people receive insurance as part of their compensation packages.
Other Private Spending is made up of money spent by private organizations such as charities, which help people pay for health care.
*Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Out-of-pocket payments do not include premiums.Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Health Accounts, 2003
17%
16%
13% 5%
36%
14%
Background Information -- 6
0
Employer and Government Share Is Increasing
Background Information -- 7
1
Health Insurance Total Family Premium as a Percent of U.S. Minimum Wage Earnings
020406080
100120
1970 2005Blue Cross/Blue Shield Higher Option Blue Cross/Blue Shield Lower Option
AFFORDABILITY
Minimum wages during this period has increased
from $1.45/hour to $5.15/hour, a 3.6-fold
increase.
Premiums have increased 24-38 times over 1970 levels. 1970 premiums were $38.33 for high option family
coverage and $20.37 for low option family coverage. 2005
premiums are $901.96 for higher option
coverage and $771.29 for the lower option plan.
Figures here reflect total premiums. Note that
under the FEHBP program, employees pay
a minimum of 25% of premium.
Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management; U.S. General Accounting Office Staff Paper, “Information on 1976 Health Insurance Premium Rate Increases for Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, “ pub. #094882.
Note: Figures reflect monthly Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHBP) total premiums for the government-wide Blue Cross/Blue Shield options for non-postal workers and minimum wage earnings for full time work of 173.33 hours per month (2080 hour per year/12) in California.
Chart © 2005 California HealthCare Foundation
Why Is Uninsurance/Underinsurance the Current Fate of Many Low Wage Workers and Their Employers?
Background Information -- 8
2
Health and Related Costs*
appropriated state dollars in billions and as percent of all state fund expenditures
$4.8
$12.0
$4.5$4.2
$3.6$3.6$3.4$3.1$2.7
$9.7$10.2
$10.7 $10.5 $10.6 $10.6
$11.725.2%
28.5%
21.7%
23.5%24.2%
25.4%
28.3% 27.8%
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20070%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Health and Related Expenditures
All Other Expenditures
Health & Related as % of All State Expenditures
*Includes direct health costs such as Medicaid, Basic Health, public health; plus long-term, institutional, and behavioral health costs.
Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management (July 2005)Background Information -- 9
3
State Health Costs
Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management (July 2005)
dollars in billions - includes direct health programs, public health, institutional care, and behavioral health
$10.6
$13.9
$7.434.8%
$4.228.3%
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
State Funds Only All Budgeted Funds
All Other ExpendituresHealth-Related Expenditures
$14.8 billion
$21.3 billion
GF-state = $3.4 bHSA = $0.5 bOther state = $0.3 b
Background Information -- 10
4
Washington State Health Expenditures
dollars in millions • appropriated state funds • actuals FY00-FY04, budget FY05-FY07
$0.0
$500.0
$1,000.0
$1,500.0
$2,000.0
$2,500.0
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
DSHS Medical Assistance Long-Term & Institutional CareDSHS Behavioral Health DOCDepartment of Health HCA - Basic HealthHCA - Clinic grants, policy, WSHIP, etc. Employee Health Benefits & K-12 SubsidyK-12 Student Health Programs L&I Health Expenditures
Source: State of Washington Office of Financial Management (July 2005)Background Information -- 11
Is WA State paying more than large WA private sector employers?
Analysis• WA State is spending more per employee for
health benefits than large (500+) private sector employers in WA.
Action• Improve the PEBB procurement strategy by:
•Review Mix of plans•Plan design•Care Management•Eligibility•Data Warehouse•Benchmarking.
• Make sure state employee health care benefits are comparable and benchmark favorably to plans offered by other large employers in the State.
Health Care Authority Goal 1: Reduce Cost Trend
Data notes: Sources: 2002 & 2004 Mercer National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans. HCA Finance & Budget. Costs include medical, dental, Rx, and specialty benefits.
WA State Employee Health Benefit Cost Compared to WA Private Sector (Per Employee Per Year)
$5,5
46
$5,9
57 $6,9
74
$7,5
92
$5,1
62
$5,7
58
$5,9
57 $6,6
53
2001 2002 2003 2004
HCA - PEBB WA Private 500+
Background Information -- 12
3.8%
17.1%
-0.7%
2.5%
1.3%
5.1%
5.8%
4.3%
0.7%
4.0%
4.4%
6.0%5.3%
8.1%
14.5%15.6%
12.2%
16.6%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Perc
ent I
ncre
ase
Health Insurance Premiums
Median Wages
Median Gross Business Income
Washington Small Business: Increases in Health Insurance Premiums Compared to Workers' Earnings and Business Revenue
Source: Washington State ESD /DOR data bases, OIC small group market rate filings
Background Information -- 13
97
70
56
28
97
69
28
56
97
64
49
22
0
20
40
60
80
100
Top 1% Top 5% Top 10% Top 50%
1987 1996 2002
Per
cen
tag
e o
f ex
pen
dit
ure
s
Figure 1. Concentration of health care expenditures in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population
Population ranked by expenditures
Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 1996 and 2002 Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, National Medical Expenditure Survey, 1987, and Household
6469
56
31 24
49
0
20
40
60
80
100
Top 1% Top 5% Top 10%
1996 2002
Per
cen
tag
e o
f ex
pen
dit
ure
s
Figure 2. Concentration of health care expenditures in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population
Population ranked by expenditures
1996 and 2002
(age <65 years)
Source: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, AHRQ, Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey,
Background Information -- 14
Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, CDC.
19961991
2003
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1991, 1996, 2003
No Data
<10%
10%-14% 15%-19% 20%-24% ≥ 25%
(*BMI ≥30, or about 30 lbs overweight for 5’4” person)
Background Information -- 15
Access
Background Information -- 16
Background Information -- 17
Project funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration’s Bureau of Professions State Planning Grant #1 P09 HS 00002-02
Background Information -- 18
Project funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration’s Bureau of Professions State Planning Grant #1 P09 HS 00002-02
Background Information -- 19
Distribution of Washington Uninsured (0-64)By Work Force Attachment (approx. 603,000 people)
Self Employed33%
Large Employers (50+)13%
Smaller-of-small employers (2-24)
18%
Small Employers (25-49)7%
Unemployed/ Not in Work Force29%
Source: State Planning Grant analysis of 1993, 1997, RWJF Washington Family Health Insurance Survey; 1998, 2000v5M, 2004v3M Washington State Population Survey
February 3, 2006
Background Information -- 20
Overview of Washington’s Insurance Coverage – 1993 to 2004
Washington State Planning Grant on Access to Health Insurance Project funded by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration’s Bureau of Professions State Planning Grant #1 P09 HS 00002
1993-2004: Washington's Insurance Story
9.8%
8.4%7.7%
9.5%
13.2%
11.5%
10.0%
11.4%
13.3%14.0%
11.0%13.1%
11.5% 10.3% 9.4%8.6%
6.0%
4.5%5.5%
7.8%7.6%
11.4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
Perc
ent U
nins
ured
Source: 1993, 1997, RWJF Washington Family Health Insurance Survey; 1998, 2000v5M , 2002v4M , 2004v3M Washington State Populat ion Survey(Adjustments made to account for M edicaid underreport ing are described in http:/ /www.ofm.wa.gov/sps/ index.htm)
A dult s ( 19 - 6 4 )
A ll under 6 5
T o t al Po p ulat io n
C hild ren ( 0 - 18 )
Primary Source of Insurance for those Under Age 65, 1993-2004
11.0%
11.5%
13.1%8.6%10.3% 9.4%
17.6%
12.5%17.6%
13.3%
8.9%
19.2%
5.6%7.2%7.1% 8.4% 6.1% 4.9%
65.8%70.9% 68.8% 68.0% 67.6% 66.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1993 1997 1998 2000 2002 2004Year
Perc
ent o
f Peo
ple
Source: 1993, 1997, RWJF Washington Family Health Insurance Survey; 1998, 2000v5M, 2002v4M, 2004v3M Washington State Population Survey(Adjustments made to account for Medicaid underreporting are described in http://www.ofm.wa.gov/sps/index.htm)
Employer
PublicUninsured
Individual
Background Information -- 21
The Coverage Gap, April 2006 State Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC)
Embargoed until April 26, 2006 – 12:01 a.m. (ET)
page 4
Uninsured adults are more likely to go without medical care than insured adults.
Figure 1: Percent of Uninsured and Insured Adults (18-64)Unable to See a Doctor When Needed Due to Cost in the Past 12 Months
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Nor
th D
akot
a
Mon
tana
Wis
cons
in
Neb
rask
a
Mas
sach
uset
ts
Ariz
ona
Rho
de Is
land
Iow
a
Cal
iforn
ia
Nev
ada
Uta
h
New
Mex
ico
Sout
h D
akot
a
Mai
ne
Ohi
o
Wyo
min
g
Col
orad
o
Illin
ois
Del
awar
e
Verm
ont
Alas
ka
Flor
ida
Mis
sour
i
New
Yor
k
Penn
sylv
ania
Texa
s
Tenn
esse
e
Idah
o
Nor
th C
arol
ina
Loui
sian
a
Geo
rgia
Indi
ana
Con
nect
icut
Mic
higa
n
Dis
trict
of C
olum
bia
New
Ham
pshi
re
New
Jer
sey
Virg
inia
Sout
h C
arol
ina
Kans
as
Alab
ama
Mis
siss
ippi
Arka
nsas
Min
neso
ta
Okl
ahom
a
Mar
ylan
d
Was
hing
ton
Kent
ucky
Ore
gon
Wes
t Virg
inia
UninsuredInsured
Note: Wording of this question changed from 2002 BRFSS. These results are not directly comparable to 2002. Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data. National estimates for 2004 do not include Hawaii, because 2004 data were not available.
• Nationally, 41.1 percent of adults without health insurance coverage, compared to 9.2 percent of adults with health
insurance coverage, were unable to see a doctor when needed due to cost in the past 12 months. • Uninsured adults in Kentucky, Oregon, and West Virginia were less likely to see a doctor when needed than uninsured
adults in North Dakota, Montana, Wisconsin, and Nebraska. • The percent of insured adults unable to see a doctor due to cost is statistically less than the percent of uninsured adults
unable to see a doctor due to cost in every state.
Background Information -- 22
Quality
Background Information -- 23
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
U.S Airline flight fatalities/U.S. Industry Best of Class
Airline baggage handling
Breast cancerScreening (WA)
Health Care Quality Defects Occur at Alarming Rates
Detection &treatment ofdepression
Adverse drugevents
Hospital acquired infections
Hospitalized patientsinjured through negligence
1(69%)
2(31%)
3(7%)
4(.6%)
5(.002%)
6(.00003%)
Overall Health Care Quality in U.S.
(Rand Study 2003)
IRS Phone-in Tax Advice
U.S. birth defects
Recommendedwell-child visits (WA)
Treatment ofBronchitis (WA)
NBA Free-throws
Sources: modified from C. Buck, GE; Dr. Sam Nussbaum, Wellpoint; Premera 2004 Quality Score Card; March of Dimes
level (% Defects)
Def
ects
per
mill
ion
∑Background Information -- 24
3
9,600 deaths62% not screenedColorectal Cancer
10,000 deaths36% of elderly didn’t receive vaccinePneumonia
37,000 deaths39% to 55% didn’t receive needed medicationsHeart Attack
68,000 deaths< 65% received indicated careHypertension
2,600 blind; 29,000 kidney failureAverage blood sugar not measured for 24%Diabetes
Avoidable TollShortfall in CareCondition
Source: Elizabeth McGlynn et al, RAND, 2004
Patients get recommended care only half of the time; consequences are avoidable.
Preventing Complicationsand Premature Death
Background Information -- 25
Background Information -- 26
12
Causes of Death in U.S. - 2000
Leading Causes of Death Actual Causes of Death
0 10 20 30 40
Heart disease
Cancer
Other
Stroke
Chronic lower respiratory tract disease
Unintentional injuries
Diabetes
Influenza/pneumonia
Alzheimer’s disease
Kidney disease
Blood poisoning
Percentage (of all deaths) Percentage (of all deaths)
0 10 20 30 40
Tobacco
lack of exercisePoor diet/
Alcohol
Infectious agents
Pollutants/toxins
Motor vehicle
Firearms
Sexual behavior
Illicit drug use
Source: “Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000,” JAMA 291(10) 1238-1245 (March 10, 2004)Background Information -- 27
13
Causes of Death
Source: “The Case for More Active Policy Attention to Health Promotion,” Health Affairs 21(2), 78-93, March/April 2002
Behavior/ Lifestyle
Genetic Constitution
Environment Exposures
Lack of Access to Medical Care
Social Circumstances
40 Percent
30 Percent
15 Percent
10 Percent
5 Percent
Background Information -- 28