background checks 2012

42
Do's and Don'ts of Background Reference Checks October 10, 2012

Upload: this-account-is-closed

Post on 22-Jan-2017

1.952 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Background Checks 2012

Do's and Don'ts of

Background Reference

Checks

October 10, 2012

Page 2: Background Checks 2012

Presenters

2

Elisa Scali

Partner, Ottawa

t 613-786-0224

[email protected]

Katerina Kouretas

Associate, Ottawa

t 613-783-8982

[email protected]

Page 3: Background Checks 2012

Background Checks

Why employers conduct background checks?

Many employers see background checks as a means to verify whether candidates really are who they say they are.

Employers rely on background checks to:

• verify information obtained from the candidate from outside sources

• obtain insight into trustworthiness of candidate

• assess whether candidate likely to steal or commit fraud;

• assess whether the candidate possesses the skills necessary to handle financial matters

Page 4: Background Checks 2012

Background Checks

If background checks are not handled properly, can

lead to liability for employers

Two main areas where employers can run afoul of

the law:

1. Violation of Human Rights Legislation

2. Violation of Privacy Laws

Page 5: Background Checks 2012

Background Checks

Overview

• Review Different Types of Background Checks

• Process

• Use of information obtained from background check

• Best practices (Do’s and Don’ts) for completing

background check

• Human Rights and Privacy Issues and Risks

Page 6: Background Checks 2012

Background Reference Checks

Different types of Background Reference Checks

• Criminal Records Check

• Credit Check

• Reference Check

• Driver’s Record Check

• Social Media Check

Page 7: Background Checks 2012

Criminal Record Check

THE PROCESS

Names based search - no match no further inquiry conducted

If there is a match to a criminal record, an inconclusive result will be returned

To get further details, candidate required to attend at a Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) Agency to be fingerprinted after which a certified criminal records check will be undertaken.

Fingerprint based searches can take up to 120 days, and there is no means by which the process can be expedited.

Page 8: Background Checks 2012

Criminal Record Check

USE OF INFORMATION

• Varies by jurisdiction

• Governing law – Human Rights Legislation

1. Alberta, Sask, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Nfld, New Brunswick: no limit on use of information. Employer can refuse employment based on any criminal conviction.

2. Ontario, NWT, Nunavut – employer can only consider criminal offences for which a pardon has not been granted. Provincial offences may also be considered only if related to a bona fide occupational requirement

3. British Columbia, Yukon, PEI – permit consideration of criminal or summary convictions only if related to intended employment

4. Quebec – combination of 2 and 3

Page 9: Background Checks 2012

Criminal Background Check

To conduct a Criminal Background Check

candidate must provide:

• 2 valid pieces of identification;

• all names ever used; and

• informed consent.

Page 10: Background Checks 2012

CAUTION: information obtained in order to complete a Criminal Records Check may reveal characteristics of the candidate that are protected by human rights legislation, e.g. marital status, age, disability

If receive information related to a characteristic protected by rights legislation, employer is presumed to have considered this information during the hiring process

Burden is on employer to rebut this presumption = heavy burden

Page 11: Background Checks 2012

Criminal Background Check

BEST PRACTICES

DO weigh the need for the information relating to criminal convictions with the risk of the disclosure of information related to a prohibited ground under human rights legislation

DO mitigate the risk of disclosure of information related to a prohibited ground by (1) asking the candidate to obtain his/her own criminal background check, (2) hiring an agency to collect the information and complete the criminal background check; and/or (3) ensure that the person within your organization responsible for criminal records checks is not the same person that makes the hiring decisions

DO consider whether the Criminal Background Check will be completed prior to the proposed start date for the candidate

Page 12: Background Checks 2012

Criminal Background Check

BEST PRACTICES (cont’d)

DO obtain the prior written consent of the candidate to conduct

criminal background check on hiring and during employment

DO consider for hiring purposes only criminal offences for which a

pardon has not been granted and which relate to the intended

employment of the candidate regardless of jurisdiction

DO not target certain candidates for background checks

Page 13: Background Checks 2012

Credit Checks

THE PROCESS

• governed by provincial consumer protection legislation

• may require notification or consent of candidate and identification of the consumer reporting agency that will be conducting the credit check.

• for example, in Ontario, the Consumer Reporting Act (CRA) provides:

• credit information may be released to an employer if the employer intends to use the information for employment purpose and therefore no consent from the candidate is required; however

• a candidate must be notified in writing, in bold type or underlined and in letters at least 10 point in size, before the check is done.

• if the candidate asks, they must be given the name and address of the consumer reporting agency supplying the report.

Page 14: Background Checks 2012

Credit Check

PROCESS (cont’d)

In the event that an employer obtains credit information on a candidate and subsequently rescinds the job offer, regardless of the reason, the CRA requires the employer to deliver to the person:

• the nature and source of the information where the information is

furnished by a person other than a consumer reporting agency; or of the name and address of the consumer reporting agency, where the information is furnished by a consumer reporting agency; and

• notice to the candidate of his/her right to request the information obtained by the employer

Page 15: Background Checks 2012

Credit Checks

USE OF CREDIT CHECK INFORMATION

A credit check will provide employer information on the candidate’s

credit history

Primary reason employers complete credit checks is for theft and

fraud prevention

No human rights related restrictions on use of credit information

Depending on jurisdiction, privacy laws may limit use of credit check

information when making hiring decisions

Page 16: Background Checks 2012

Credit Checks

Mark’s Work Wearhouse Ltd. (Alberta)

Turned down a worker who applied for a sales associate position because credit report contained negative information

Based on Alberta’s privacy legislation, Court held collection of information not reasonably required to assess applicant’s ability to perform duties of job or determine whether had a tendency toward committing theft or fraud

Page 17: Background Checks 2012

Credit Checks

BEST PRACTICES

DON’T conduct credit checks unless a candidate is being

considered for a position that requires them to handle money or if there is some other reason why the candidate’s credit rating is relevant to the position in question

DO obtain the candidate’s written consent to conduct the check even if legislation may not require that you obtain such consent

DO keep any credit information obtained strictly confidential; and

DON’T disclose the information to third parties without the candidate’s consent.

Page 18: Background Checks 2012

Credit Checks

BEST PRACTICES (cont’d)

DO assess whether there are other ways, such as

extensive reference checks, to get the information you

need to assess a candidate’s suitability for a position.

DON’T be too quick to judge candidates that have a poor

credit history. Give them a chance to explain their poor

credit score.

Page 19: Background Checks 2012

Credit Checks

Many people consider credit checks as an

unnecessary invasion of privacy, and so

employers should only perform credit checks in

situations where it is reasonably necessary for

the requirements of the position.

Page 20: Background Checks 2012

Reference Checks

THE PROCESS

Relatively easy to perform if contact information for

references provided by candidate

Employer will speak with candidate’s previous

employers and/or personal references

Page 21: Background Checks 2012

Reference Checks

USE OF INFORMATION

To verify that what the candidate is saying about experience and abilities

May also want to know about aspects of employment history not discussed with candidate (e.g. attendance, absenteeism)

BE CAREFUL

DO NOT ask questions which either directly or indirectly relate to characteristics of the candidate that are protected by human rights legislation, e.g. marital status, age, disability.

Page 22: Background Checks 2012

Reference Checks

CAUTION: If you discuss with a former employer,

for example, a candidate’s history of illness or injury,

request for religious accommodation,

accommodation based on family status etc. and you

decide not to hire, candidate may allege that this

information caused the you to refuse employment in

breach of human rights legislation.

DON’T assume that what you discuss during the

reference process will not get back to the candidate

Page 23: Background Checks 2012

Reference Checks

BEST PRACTICES

Although consent will be deemed to be given if contact information is provided, DO obtain the candidate’s express consent to obtain references to avoid an argument that he or she was unaware that such information would be confirmed

ALWAYS obtain express consent that you are free to contact current employer. Contacting current employer could jeopardize current employment and lead to liability

DON’T ask questions which relate to a characteristic protected by human rights legislation (e.g. disability, religion, age, family status). Once you have the information you are presumed to have considered it during hiring process

DO assign someone other than the person making the final hiring decision to check references

DO train the person conducting reference checks to relay only the “relevant” information to the person making the final hiring decision

Page 24: Background Checks 2012

Driver’s Record Check

PROCESS

Employers can conduct various searches regarding candidate’s driving record

• Statement of driving record (3 year

snapshot of a driver’s history)

• Driver’s licences history

• Statement of driving record (5 year restricted)

Page 25: Background Checks 2012

Driver’s Record Check

CAUTION: Driver’s record will tell you candidate’s

age (protected characteristic under human rights

legislation) and in Ontario, Highway Traffic Act

offences

If you decide not to hire the candidate because of

the results of a driver’s record search, candidate

could allege you relied on information regarding age

or previous provincial offences in breach of human

rights legislation

Page 26: Background Checks 2012

Driver’s Record Check

BEST PRACTICES

DON’T conduct driver’s record check unless

candidate is being considered for a position in which

operating a vehicle is an essential duty of the job

DO obtain consent of candidate prior to conducting

driver’s record check even if candidate’s consent is

not required to access the information

Page 27: Background Checks 2012

Social Media Checks

• An increasingly popular and informal type of background check

is a social media check

• There are many ways that employers can search for social

media content about an individual using search engines on:

Information from blogs using customized search engines like

Google blogs search (www.google.com/blogsearch).

Social networking sites (Facebook), and Niche sites target certain

regions (http://mixi.jp ), activities (www.couchsurfing.com/), ethnic

groups (www.blackplanet.com/) or faiths (http://muxlim.com/).

micro-blogging sites like Twitter

file sharing sites (including photographs and video) such as

www.flickr.com and www.dropbox.com

27

Page 28: Background Checks 2012

Social Media

• Perceived Benefits of Social Media Background

Checks

• Faster

• Simpler

• Seemingly public source of information

• 90% of recruiters use social media background

checks to screen out candidates based on

information they view on social media sites

28

Page 29: Background Checks 2012

Privacy and Social Media

• The fact that the individual posted the

information on social media site does not mean

is it not personal information

• Personal Information is information about an

identifiable individual such as their name,

address, gender, etc.

• Individuals have an expectation of privacy and

assume that their personal information will not

be collected by an organization without their

consent.

Page 30: Background Checks 2012

Privacy Legislation

• In several jurisdictions in Canada (BC, Alberta and Quebec), provincial

privacy legislation governs the collection, use and disclosure of

employee personal information by an organization. If the applicant

resides in any of those jurisdictions, then the privacy legislation of

those provinces will apply.

• If the applicant resides in Ontario, private sector organizations that

collect, use or disclose personal information are governed by the

federal privacy legislation which does not cover employee personal

information. This may change if Ontario adopts its own privacy

legislation.

DO: treat employee personal information in Ontario as if it is subject

to privacy legislation similar to the provincial legislation in Alberta, BC

and Quebec.

30

Page 31: Background Checks 2012

31

10 Privacy Principles of Canadian Privacy Legislation

• Privacy legislation in Canada is based on 10 privacy principles, which

outline responsibilities that private sector organizations must follow

when collecting personal information.

1. Accountability

2. Identifying Purposes

3. Consent

4. Limiting Collection

5. Limiting Use, Disclosure, and Retention

6. Accuracy

7. Safeguards

8. Openness

9. Individual Access

10.Challenging Compliance

• Some of these may be difficult to comply with when social media checks

are performed given the fact that information is collected indirectly, and

not captured as a written record.

Page 32: Background Checks 2012

Principle 2 - Identifying Purposes

• The purposes for which personal information is collected shall be

identified by the organization at or before the time the information

is collected.

• DO: Advise applicants that you will be performing social media

background checks in your background check consent form or

conditional offer.

• DO: Be clear what you are checking and what the purpose is (that

is, what you are trying to confirm). Assess other, less intrusive

measures that meet the same purposes.

• DO: Ensure that your employees doing the checks are trained to

only collect and use the information for the identified purpose.

• DON’T: Wait until after the social media check has been conducted

to advise the individual of the check and the purpose.

32

Page 33: Background Checks 2012

Principle 3 - Consent

• The knowledge and consent of the individual are required for the collection, use, or disclosure of personal information, except where inappropriate.

• Individuals may revoke consent.

• DO: Ensure your documentation (application form, background check consent form, or conditional offer) include a consent (to be signed by the applicant) to the background check.

• DO: Remember you may see personal information of others (not just the applicant). Do you have that individual’s consent?

• DON’T: Use any information obtained during this check for a hiring decision if the individual revokes their consent.

Page 34: Background Checks 2012

Principle 4 - Limiting Collection

• The collection of personal information shall be limited to that

which is necessary for the purposes identified by the

organization. Information shall be collected by fair and lawful

means.

• Organizations shall not collect personal information

indiscriminately. Both the amount and the type of information

collected shall be limited to that which is necessary to fulfill the

purposes identified.

• DO: Consider the types of information you will be able to view

and collect using social media and determine if you will be able

to limit the “collection” to information only required for the

hiring decision.

• DO: Consider separating the background check from the hiring

decision.

Page 35: Background Checks 2012

Principle 5 - Limiting Use, Disclosure, and Retention

• Personal information shall not be used or disclosed for purposes other than those for which it was collected, except with the consent of the individual or as required by law.

• Personal information shall be retained only as long as necessary for the fulfillment of those purposes.

• Personal information that is no longer required to fulfill the identified purposes should be destroyed, erased, or made anonymous.

• DO: Ensure you have practices and polices in place to meet these requirements (for example, training of staff, confidentiality agreements, limited access controls, data retention polices).

Page 36: Background Checks 2012

Principle 6 - Accuracy

• Personal information shall be as accurate,

complete, and up-to-date as is necessary for the

purposes for which it is to be used.

• DO: Evaluate whether or not you feel that

information from social media is accurate, complete,

up-to-date in terms of the purpose (i.e. a hiring

decision).

• DON’T: Treat all social media sites as equal in this

respect.

Page 37: Background Checks 2012

Principle 7 - Safeguards

• Personal information shall be protected by security safeguards appropriate to the sensitivity of the information.

DO: Take your obligation to safeguard personal information as seriously as you would with any other background check information.

DON’T: Assume that given the nature of this medium, personal information is not really being “collected” – viewing information is an indirect collection of personal information.

DO: Ensure that the person performing the checks is covered by appropriate contractual non-disclosure requirements and appropriate training.

DO: If a record is made of what has been viewed, consider the security safeguards that may be required based on the sensitivity of the information collected.

Page 38: Background Checks 2012

Principle 9 - Individual Access

Upon request, an individual shall be informed of the existence, use, and disclosure of his or her personal information and shall be given access to that information. An individual shall be able to challenge the accuracy and completeness of the information and have it amended as appropriate.

DO: Create a record of what was viewed.

DO: Be aware that applicants who may not have been offered a position (or whose conditional offer was revoked as a result of the check) may wish to review the record, and have the record amended to be more accurate.

DO: Consider building this into the process of hiring another candidate.

Page 39: Background Checks 2012

Legal Action for Invasion of Seclusion

• In addition to privacy legislation, Ontario now has a tort of ‘invasion of

seclusion’. A court will find that an individual or organization has

committed this tort where the intrusion into an individuals private

affairs was:

• Done without lawful justification,

• Highly offensive, causing distress, humiliation and/or anguish to the affected

individual, and

• Intentional or reckless.

• Damage awards can be up to $20,000 per infringement.

DO: Consider the potential for claims of invasion of seclusion as part of your

overall assessment of whether or not social media checks are necessary or

warranted for a particular position.

DO: Ensure that policies, procedures and documentation are in place to

substantiate hiring decisions based on merit.

Page 40: Background Checks 2012

Social Media Checks and Password Requests

• It is contrary to the terms of use agreements of many social media sites for users to share their password information with another party. For example, Facebook’s Statement of Responsibilities states that a user will not share his or her password, or let anyone else access their account.

• The Statement of Responsibilities states that you will not solicit login information or access an account belonging to someone else – this may be an issue if your organization has a Facebook page.

• DON’T: Ask for passwords to gain access to private pages of applicants, or ask to “friend” and applicant.

• DO: Limit your searches to information available without the use of a password.

Page 41: Background Checks 2012

Should you do Social Media Background Checks?

• Consider privacy principles when deciding if you want to

incorporate social media checks in your hiring decisions.

• Perform a privacy impact assessment, which reviews each of

the 10 privacy principles to identify the risks associated with

the collection and use of this personal information, including

risks resulting from actions taken based on inaccurate

information, and also identifies whether the organization has

the policies, procedures and controls in place to comply with

privacy principles.

• Consider what information you are looking for and why you

think social media can provide you information you cannot

obtain elsewhere.

41

Page 42: Background Checks 2012

Thank You

montréal ottawa toronto hamilton waterloo region calgary vancouver beijing moscow london

Elisa Scali

Tel: (613) 786-0224

[email protected]

Katerina Kouretas

Tel: (613) 783-8928

[email protected]