Bach's Technique of Transcription and Improvised OrnamentationAuthor(s): Putnam AldrichSource: The Musical Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Jan., 1949), pp. 26-35Published by: Oxford University PressStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/739578Accessed: 25/07/2010 23:55

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unlessyou have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and youmay use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=oup.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The MusicalQuarterly.

http://www.jstor.org

BACH'S TECHNIQUE OF TRANSCRIPTION

AND IMPROVISED ORNAMENTATION

By PUTNAM ALDRICH

HOWEVER flagrant and numerous the misdeeds committed against Bach by transcribers, the purist cannot, in conscience,

invoke the master's name to denounce the art of transcription as such, for Bach himself was passionately devoted to it. It is true that the pressing need for new compositions to use in the fulfillment of his duties may occasionally have obliged Bach to rework material already at hand. So often, however, does the quality of the new work equal or even transcend that of the old that one is forced to conclude that the greater part of Bach's output in this field must owe its exis- tence to enthusiasm rather than to exigency. Moreover, the practice of transcription, widespread in the 18th century, looks back on many centuries of cultivation at the hands of the most eminent composers.

Bach's transcriptions fall into two categories: 1) his own earlier works that he transcribed for a new medium; and 2) transcriptions of works by other composers. The first category includes most of the harpsichord concertos (arranged from violin concertos, overtures, and choruses from cantatas), certain choruses and sinfonias to can- tatas (arranged from movements of the Brandenburg concertos), the triple concerto for flute, violin, and harpsichord (transcribed from a prelude and fugue for harpsichord solo), and numerous other compositions. These pieces are all eminently worthy of study, from both the point of view of musical value and that of technique of transcription.

The transcriptions in the second category, however, are even more interesting, and it is with these arrangements by Bach of other com- posers' works that we are here primarily concerned. In almost every case Bach has done far more than adapt the notes of the original

26

Bach's Technique of Transcription sc Improvised Ornamentation 27 score to a style appropriate to another instrument. Most of these pieces represent actual transformations and amplifications of the musical ideas contained in the originals. It is in this connection that Schering has spoken of Bach's "ability to put life and character into the monotonous parts of such works by drawing upon his own imagination, adding and supplementing with his own ideas".

The available material for the study of Bach's method of tran- scription includes the following:

1. Sixteen concertos for various instruments transcribed for harpsichord solo.

2. Three concertos transcribed for organ solo. 3. A concerto for four violins by Vivaldi transcribed for four

harpsichords. 4. Two trio-sonatas from Johann Adam Reincken's Hortus

Musicus transcribed for harpsichord solo. The MS containing the concertos transcribed for harpsichord

was found among the posthumous works of Johann Ernst Bach, son of Johann Bernhard Bach of Eisenach. It bears the title: XII Con- certi di Vivaldi elaborati di J. S. Bach. Spitta and the editors of the Bach-Gesellschaft edition, finding no reason to doubt the veracity of the title, attributed the entire set of concertos to Vivaldi, and Spitta identified the originals of the first, fifth, and seventh concertos as Nos. 7, 12, and 3 of Vivaldi's Most Celebrated Concertos, Op. 3, published by Walsh in London. Waldersee identified the second harpsichord transcription as No. 2 of Vivaldi's Op. 7, and the ninth and fourth as Vivaldi's Stravaganze, Op. 4, Nos. 1 and 6.1 Schering has since proved that the originals of the harpsichord transcriptions Nos. 3, 11, 13, 14, and 16 were not by Vivaldi but by Benedetto Marcello (No. 3), Georg Philipp Telemann (No. 14), and the Duke Johann Ernst of Sachsen-Weimar (Nos. 1 1, 13, and 16).2 Nos. 6, 8, 1o, 12, and 15 have not yet been identified, to my knowledge.

The harpsichord sonatas in A minor and C major long passed as Bach's original compositions because in the MS they are desig- nated as "di Signor J. S. Bach". In the first edition of his book Spitta considered them particularly characteristic of Bach." He later identi-

1 Paul Graf Waldersee, in Vierteljahrsschrift fiir Musikwissenschaft, I (1885), p. 356. 2 Arnold Schering, Zur Bachforschung, in Sammelbdinde der internationale Musik-

gesellschaft, IV (19o3), 234; V (1904), 565- 3 Philipp Spitta, Johann Sebastian Bach, Leipzig, 1873, I, 411.

28 The Musical Quarterly fled them with the first and third sonatas of

.1. A. Reincken's Hortus

Musicus, which has since been published by the Maatschappij tot bevordering der Toonkunst.4

Studies in which Bach's transcriptions are compared with what originals were available have been made by Spitta, Waldersee, and Schering.5 These writers have commented on the following points: 1) Bach's improvements on the contrapuntal writing of the originals; 2) Bach's addition of extra voices, to enrich the texture where it was thin; 3) Bach's extension of short movements by continuing the contrapuntal development of the same materials; and 4) Bach's al- most complete transformation of the slow movements. In regard to this last point, Spitta writes as follows:

The Largo (Larghetto in the original) is almost a new composition; Vivaldi had written a sostenuto air for violin, proceeding only in eighths and dotted quarter notes with an accompaniment of simple chords in eighth notes. Bach, realizing the ineffective character of such a melody on the clavier, worked it up into an arabesque movement and invented an independent middle part from whose nobly melodious flow no one could believe that it had not formed a part of the original.

Similarly, speaking of the A minor Sonata, he writes: "The mate- rial supplied by Reincken has actually become Bach's property by his treatment of it, though he has ... done no more than paraphrase it freely and richly in a highly admirable and masterly way." 6

No one, as far as I know, has yet investigated the essential factor involved in Bach's transformation of these slow movements, namely, the fact that the technique he used in writing them is that of impro- vised ornamentation as it was commonly taught in his time to every student of vocal or instrumental performance. If this observation is correct, as I hope to demonstrate by the analysis of specific ex- amples, the study of these pieces can be of great value not only as an aid to understanding Bach's own style, but also as an approach to the correct interpretation of similar pieces by other Baroque composers.

In the first place, it will be noted that Bach's style in these move- ments does not differ essentially from his customary style in original

4 Spitta, Musikgeschichtliche Aufsdtze, Berlin, 1894, 111. 5 In the articles cited above. 6 Johann Sebastian Bach (transl. by Clara Bell and A. Fuller-Maitland), London,

1884, I, 430o.

Bach's Technique of Transcription kc Improvised Ornamentation 29

compositions of similar character; Spitta, as we have already re- marked, considered them particularly characteristic of Bach. But we know that these melodies of Bach's are elaborations of simpler melodies by other composers. We observe, further, that in elab- orating them he used the technique that other musicians employed during performance but not in composition, and that the results of this elaboration are characteristic of Bach's own style. This justifies the assumption that, in composing original slow movements of this type, Bach, like other composers of the time, conceived his musical ideas in the form of simpler basic melodies, but that he, contrary to customary procedure, worked out the ornamentation on paper in- stead of leaving it to the inspiration and taste of the individual performer.

Corroboration of this assumption may be found in the attitude that some contemporary musicians showed towards Bach's music. Scheibe's well-known criticism in Der critischer Musikus for May 14, 1737, is a case in point:

This great man would be the admiration of all nations if he had more amenity and if his works were not made unnatural by their turgid and confused character, and their beauty obscured by too much art... All the graces, all the embellishments, everything that is ordinarily taken for granted in the method of performance, he writes out in exact notes, which not only deprives his pieces of the beauty of harmony, but makes the melody totally indistinct.'

Historians and critics have been wont to dismiss Scheibe as an inordinately self-esteemed, minor musician, who "mistook Bach's miraculous technique for artificiality, and was insensible of the poetical feeling that controlled it".8 What they do not seem to have noted is that Scheibe's criticism is directed against the graphic aspect of Bach's music rather than its sound. Bach's harmony and melody are indistinct because he has encumbered the score with non-harmonic and ornamental notes that destroy the graphic beauty of the page. This unorthodox appearance of Bach's music, as well as the reason for it, is discussed in the answer to Scheibe's attack by Bach's friend, Johann Abraham Birnbaum. Birnbaum defends Bach's manner of writing, saying that thanks to it no performer would now be able to destroy the effect of a piece by applying his

7 Johann Adolph Scheibe, Der critischer Musikus, Leipzig, 1745, pp. 62-63; reprinted by C. S. Terry in Johann Sebastian Bach, eine Biographie, Leipzig, 1929, p. 285-

8 C. S. Terry, Bach, a Biography, London, 1928, p. 238.

30 The Musical Quarterly own method of ornamentation: those who went wrong would be put right, and the honor of the master would be upheld.9

Internal evidence that the technique of ornamentation that Bach used in his transcriptions is identical with the technique he used in original composition may be found in such pieces as the 14th and 29th of the Goldberg Variations, the Andante of the Italian Concerto, and many slow movements in his sonatas and solo concertos. When these pieces are reduced to their basic melodic forms it will be seen that the ornaments used in elaborating them correspond to the types described in the textbooks on improvised ornamentation. This process of "de-coloring" Bach's melodies is valuable in that it enables the performer to identify certain orna- mental formulas which are known to have possessed recognized expressive functions and which might otherwise pass unnoticed, enveloped as they often are in continuous successions of rapid notes. In her book, Music of the Past, Wanda Landowska has published the Andante of the Italian Concerto as it appears when reduced to its basic melodic form, with all the various types of ornaments indi- cated by signs or letters. The general character of this basic melody bears a striking resemblance to that of many slow movements by Italian composers of the period, such as, for example, the originals of the concertos transcribed by Bach.

The above discussion leads to the rather startling conclusion that Bach's music did not actually sound so different from that of many of his contemporaries; it merely looked different. Nor was his style as individual as is commonly supposed. I do not mean to belittle Bach's creative powers. There is no doubt that what Bach worked out carefully on paper is far superior in imagination and expression to what the average musician of his time could have improvised on the spot. Nevertheless, it is unjust to judge composers like Corelli, Vivaldi, or even Handel by comparing the mere skeletons of their works-which they never intended to be played as written-to Bach's carefully worked-out elaborations. We may be sure that when Vi- valdi, Marcello, or Telemann-all accomplished performers and well versed in the technique of improvisation-played their own concertos, they did not sound as dull and monotonous as they often appear on the printed page; they sounded, doubtless, more nearly

9 Quoted by K. H. Bitter, Johann Sebastian Bach, 2nd ed., Berlin, 1881, IV, p. 20o6. This passage is given in English translation by H. T. David and A. Mendel in The Bach Reader, New York, 1945, p. 245 f-

Bach's Technique of Transcription & Improvised Ornamentation 31 the way Bach made them sound in his transcriptions. The bare sim- plicity of Handel's melodies and the uniformity of his figures, resulting from his use of pre-existing types, have been criticized as defects. One forgets that he relied on the inventiveness of a per- former skilled in improvisation to animate these melodies and instill variety into the uniform types through the use of numerous different solutions. The orthodox composer of the 18th century should not be blamed for conforming to a long-established graphic tradition, when it is Bach who was the rebel. Nor should his works suffer through the mis-interpretation of playing them as written.

The injustice done to these musicians can be remedied in only one way, namely, by giving the modern audience some idea of how they intended their pieces to sound. If it is too much to expect modern performers to learn to improvise in the style of a past period, it is not too much to expect of the musicologist or editor to work out elaborations of these skeletal melodies that will in some degree correspond to the composers' intentions. A large number of text- books of the period give detailed instructions concerning .the tech- nical methods employed in this process. There are also a few ex- amples of slow movements which the composers themselves have worked out, such as the edition of Corelli's Opus 5 published by Pierre Mortier in Amsterdam in 1700, and a movement of one of Tartini's sonatas elaborated in 17 different ways by Tartini himself. However, it would be hard to find a better guide to this procedure than Bach's use of it in his transcriptions.

Before attempting to analyze Bach's method it will be necessary to outline the general principles of "diminution"-which was the technical term for improvised ornamentation. One must realize that Bach comes at the end of two centuries of musical activity during which the mastery of diminution was considered the chief artistic asset of every performer, whether instrumentalist or singer. Every- thing pertaining to this technique, from the treatment of the sim- plest appoggiatura to the most complicated coloratura passage, was taught methodically to the student at an early stage of his musical training. Literally scores bof instruction books dealing with this sub- ject alone were printed in Italy during the 16th century, from Sylvestro Ganassi's Fontegara, which appeared in 1535, to Bovicelli's Regole di musica of 1594. In the early 17th century the art spread to Germany, where its technique is explained by such teachers as Praetorius, Herbst, and Wolfgang Kaspar Printz, who base their

32 The Musical Quarterly instructions primarily on Italian models. At the time of Bach's greatest activity the use of improvised diminution was by no means on the wane. Its principles are treated by Bach's contemporaries, Fuhrmann, Stierlein, Mattheson, and Walther. Even after the middle of the 18th century chapters devoted to the elaboration of slow movements are included in the treatises of Quantz and Leopold Mozart. It is obvious that in the course of its passage through so many different periods and schools the art of diminution must have incor- porated many different styles of expression. The most I can do, at present, is to indicate the main characteristics of this technique that were prevalent in Germany and Italy at the beginning of the 18th century. Furthermore, the terminology employed must necessarily be an arbitrary one, for the names given to individual ornamental formulas differed not only from period to period but even among contemporary writers.

The basic principles involved in the ornamentation of a simple melody are these:

i) The salient structural points of the original melody (such as its cadences, its highest note, its longest note, the extreme notes of wide intervals, etc.) are emphasized through the addition of certain partially stereotyped ornaments which bring these points still further into relief by a) introducing dissonant notes (appoggiaturas) or b) heightening the rhythmic and melodic activity at these points without departing far from the note of the original melody (trills, turns, mordents, Anschliige).

2) The intervals between the notes of the given melody are filled in more or less completely with free melodic ornaments, scale- wise or arpeggio figures beginning and ending on the given notes. This type of ornament was known as a passaggio. It had no fixed form; nevertheless its use was taught systematically, as follows: the instructor took up each possible interval that could occur in a basic melody (i.e. unison, ascending 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc.). The student was required to memorize a large number of passaggi, in various rhythms, that could be used appropriately to fill out each interval. The num- ber of possibilities is, of course, infinite, and the student, after having become proficient at introducing a good number of representative patterns, was encouraged to invent his own. Certain frequently recurring forms of passaggio were given specific names, such as cir- colo, mezzo-circolo, tirata.

Bach's Technique of Transcription & Improvised Ornamentation 33

3) Occasionally the notes of the given melody do not all appear in their original rhythmic positions, the whole outline of the melody between two of the salient points being dissolved into smaller note- values which follow only the harmonic structure of the original.

4) The proper effect of the ornamentation is cumulative. If the original melody is a sequence, each member of the sequence is orna- mented differently, the ornamentation becoming progressively more elaborate with each recurrence of the pattern. If a passage in the original is repeated exactly, the repetition in the embellished ver- sion contains more ornaments than the first occurrence.

As examples illustrative of Bach's procedure I have chosen the opening phrase of the A minor harpsichord sonata, transcribed from the first sonata in Reincken's Hortus Musicus, and the first phrase of the slow movement from his third concerto, transcribed from an oboe concerto by Benedetto Marcello, the original of which I found at the Liceo Musicale in Bologna. The Hortus Musicus is published complete in a modern edition and the movement in question may be found in the Appendix to the later editions of Spitta's J. S. Bach. I have transposed the Marcello example up one tone to correspond with Bach's arrangement in D minor.

Noteworthy, in the sonata, is Bach's emphasis of the salient points of Reincken's melody by means of stereotyped ornaments: the mor-

Ex. 1p A p Bach P P

tAI- Iigia ira P-P r - ggio

rdenReincken r

i --Ii u ] !

a

| I I

m i "

dent and lower appoggiatura on the A and C, respectively, of the first measure; the upper appoggiatura on the first beat of the second measure and on the D-sharp of m. 5. In between, Bach has intro- duced passaggi of various types. These passaggi are obviously much more than a mere filling-in of the intervals between the notes of the original melody. Their range is far greater, and their direction is

34 The Musical Quarterly calculated to throw the characteristic intervals of the basic melody into still greater relief. The note of the basic melody is often approached by the skip of an octave (e.g. the A in the first measure, the D and A in m. 4). The rhythmic position of the basic melody- note is occasionally shifted a beat or two, to give time for a more extensive passaggio (e.g. the D and A in m. 4). These procedures are characteristic of Italian diminution.

The Marcello example illustrates the cumulative effect of orna- mentation as applied to sequential melodies. First of all Bach places a mordent on each of the culminating notes of Marcello's rising

Ex. 2 Bach A A( 4 )n AA n A I AP"(" An-,' l

w An

Marcello

P. ,

P" JJ

i FIE i 1 'li F

.

A

_

F I II Al turn A A&2

F:=As~lp

figures (B-flat in m. 2, A in m. 4, G in m. 6, F in m. 8). The first two- measure figure is allowed to stand as it is, with the exception of an appoggiatura on the penultimate note. At the first sequential recur- rence of this figure a mordent (written out in notes) is placed on the weak beats (m. 3).10 At the second recurrence Bach uses the synco- pated mordent again, but alternates it with an Anschlag. In m. 7, the climax of Marcello's sequence, Bach dissolves the melody into continuous thirty-second notes, using turns and inverted turns.

These examples show some of the methods that Bach used to elaborate simple melodies. In principle they may be applied to the interpretation of solo music for stringed or woodwind instruments or voice by Handel, Telemann, Corelli, Vivaldi, Veracini, and many other composers of the time. It may be objected that Bach's harpsi-

10 This, incidentally, is one of Bach's favorite ornamental devices. The syncopated mordent-always written in notes rather than signs-takes on great importance in many of his works (e.g. the C minor Fugue in Book I of the Well-tempered Clavier, where it is incorporated in the subject); he even bases entire compositions upon rami- fications of this ornament (e.g. the first movement of Brandenburg Concerto No. 3).

Bach's Technique of Transcription 8c Improvised Ornamentation 35 chord style would not be an appropriate model for the performance of Italian violin music. The fact is, however, that Bach here delib- erately wrote in the Italian style. Furthermore, these movements contain little that is specifically designed for harpsichord. This is evidenced by the fact that most of Bach's passaggi and diminutions may be found in textbooks intended for performers on the violin, flute, oboe, etc., or for singers.

The problem for the modern interpreter is not to find ready- made formulas for diminution; a wealth of such material, arranged in systematic order, abounds in the instruction-books of the period. The difficulty is rather one of selecting and combining appropriate formulas for specific musical contexts, fitting them in to the rhythm and mood of a particular movement-in short, acquiring a sense of the living art of improvised ornamentation that goes beyond the stereotyped and necessarily mechanical methodology of the text- books. It is here that the analysis of Bach's practice can be of invalu- able assistance.

Article Contentsp. 26p. 27p. 28p. 29p. 30p. 31p. 32p. 33p. 34p. 35

Issue Table of ContentsThe Musical Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Jan., 1949), pp. 1-178Front Matter [pp. 160-160]The Music of Randall Thompson [pp. 1-25]Bach's Technique of Transcription and Improvised Ornamentation [pp. 26-35]The Music of the Old Hall Manuscript--Part II [pp. 36-59]Dixie [pp. 60-84]Il Teatro Alla Moda--Part II [pp. 85-105]Current Chronicle [pp. 106-146]Reviews of BooksReview: untitled [pp. 147-151]Review: untitled [pp. 151-153]Review: untitled [pp. 153-156]Review: untitled [pp. 156-159]

Quarterly Book-List [pp. 161-166]Quarterly Record-List [pp. 167-177]Back Matter