ba544chap008

Upload: abhay-agrawal

Post on 03-Jun-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    1/50

    8CHAPTER

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2013 by The McGraw-H il l Companies, I nc. All ri ghts reserved.

    Corporate Strategy:Vertical Integration

    and Diversification

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    2/50

    Part 2 Strategy Formulation

    8 2

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    3/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    4/50

    Chapter Case 8 Refocusing GE: A Future ofClean-Tech and Health Care ?

    Jeffrey Immelt appointed CEO of GE Sept. 7th

    2001

    Environmental Change (e.g., 9/11 and Global Financial Crises)

    GE s stock price fell by 84%

    Lost AAA credit rating

    Refocus on green economy and health care industries

    Sold majority stake in NBC Universal to Comcast

    Ecomagination : solar energy, hybrid locomotives, fuel cellsetc.

    Healthymagination : increase quality and access to health care8 4

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    5/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    6/50

    Chapter Case 8 Refocusing GE: A Future ofClean-Tech and Health Care?

    GEs Changing Geographic Scope

    Source: Author s depiction of data in GE annual reports. 8 6

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    7/50

    What Is Corporate Strategy?

    Corporate strategyCorporate strategy is the way a company creates value through theconfiguration and coordination of its multi-market activitiesQuest for competitive advantage when competing in multiple industries

    Example: Jeffrey Immelt s initiative in clean -tech and health care industries

    Corporate strategy concerns the scope of the firm

    Industry value chainProducts and services

    Geography

    8 7

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    8/50

    EXHIBIT 8.1 Three Dimensions of Corporate Strategy

    Scope o f the f i rm determines boundaries along these 3 dimensions .

    8 8

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    9/50

    LO 8-1 Define corporate-level strategy, and describe the three dimensions alongwhich it is assessed.

    LO 8-2 Describe and evaluate different options firms have to organizeeconomic activity.

    LO 8-3 Describe two types of vertical integration along the industry value chain:

    backward and forward vertical integration.LO 8-4 Identify and evaluate benefits and risks of vertical integration.

    LO 8-5 Describe and examine alternatives to vertical integration.

    LO 8-6 Describe and evaluate different types of corporate diversification.

    LO 8-7 Apply the core competence market matrix to derive differentdiversification strategies.

    LO 8-8 Explain when a diversification strategy creates a competitive advantage,and when it does not.

    8 9

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    10/50

    Transaction Cost Economics and Scope of the Firm

    Transaction cost economics

    Explains and predicts the scope of the firm"Market vs. firms" have differential costs

    Transaction costsCosts associated with economic exchanges

    Either in the firm OR in the marketsEx: negotiating and enforcing contracts

    Administrative costsCosts pertaining to organizing an exchange within ahierarchy

    Ex: recruiting & training employees

    8 10

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    11/50

    Firms vs. Markets: Make or Buy

    Should a firm do things in-house (to make)? Or obtainexternally (to buy)?

    If Cin-house < C market , then the firm should ver t ica l ly in tegrate

    Ex: Microsoft hires programmers to write codein-house rather than contracting out

    Firms and markets have distinct advantages and

    disadvantages (see Exhibit 8.2)

    8 11

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    12/50

    EXHIBIT 8.2 Organizing Economic Activity: Firm vs. Markets

    8 12

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    13/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    14/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    15/50

    1 15

    STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 8.1 Toyota Locks Up Lithiumfor Car Batteries

    World demand for lithium-ion batteries for carsGrow from $278 million in 09 to $25 billion in 2014

    Toyota wants to secure long-term supply of lithium topower its hybrid fleet

    Orocobre holds exploration rights to a large salt-lake areaUpfront investment to extract of lithium is very high

    Should Orocobre make the investment to supply Toyota?To encourage investment, Toyota took anequity position

    China Rare Earth Video

    http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/11/11/world/asia/1248069298846/china-halts-shipments-of-rare-earths.html?scp=1&sq=rare%20earth&st=csehttp://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/11/11/world/asia/1248069298846/china-halts-shipments-of-rare-earths.html?scp=1&sq=rare%20earth&st=csehttp://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/11/11/world/asia/1248069298846/china-halts-shipments-of-rare-earths.html?scp=1&sq=rare%20earth&st=csehttp://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/11/11/world/asia/1248069298846/china-halts-shipments-of-rare-earths.html?scp=1&sq=rare%20earth&st=csehttp://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/11/11/world/asia/1248069298846/china-halts-shipments-of-rare-earths.html?scp=1&sq=rare%20earth&st=cse
  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    16/50

    LO 8-1 Define corporate-level strategy, and describe the three dimensions alongwhich it is assessed.

    LO 8-2 Describe and evaluate different options firms have to organize economicactivity.

    LO 8-3 Describe two types of vertical integration along the industry value

    chain: backward and forward vertical integration.LO 8-4 Identify and evaluate benefits and risks of vertical integration.

    LO 8-5 Describe and examine alternatives to vertical integration.

    LO 8-6 Describe and evaluate different types of corporate diversification.

    LO 8-7 Apply the core competence market matrix to derive differentdiversification strategies.

    LO 8-8 Explain when a diversification strategy creates a competitive advantage,and when it does not.

    8 16

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    17/50

    EXHIBIT 8.4 Backward and Forward Vertical Integrationalong an Industry Value Chain

    8 17

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    18/50

    Types of Vertical Integration

    Full vertical integrationEx: Weyerhaeuser

    Owns forests, mills, and distribution to retailers

    Backward vertical integrationEx: HTC s backward integration into design of phones

    Forward vertical integrationEx: HTC s forward integration into sales & branding

    Not all industry value chain stages are equal ly prof i tab leZara primarily designs in-house & partners for speedynew fashions delivered to stores

    8 18

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    19/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    20/50

    LO 8-1 Define corporate-level strategy, and describe the three dimensions alongwhich it is assessed.

    LO 8-2 Describe and evaluate different options firms have to organize economicactivity.

    LO 8-3 Describe two types of vertical integration along the industry value chain:

    backward and forward vertical integration.LO 8-4 Identify and evaluate benefits and risks of vertical integration.

    LO 8-5 Describe and examine alternatives to vertical integration.

    LO 8-6 Describe and evaluate different types of corporate diversification.

    LO 8-7 Apply the core competence market matrix to derive differentdiversification strategies.

    LO 8-8 Explain when a diversification strategy creates a competitive advantage,and when it does not.

    8 20

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    21/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    22/50

    Benefits of Vertical Integration

    Benefits of vertical integration

    Market power Entry barriers Down-stream price maintenance Up-stream power over prices

    Securing critical supplies

    Lowering costs (efficiency)

    Improving quality

    Facilitating scheduling and planning

    Facilitating investments in specialized assetsEx: HTC started as OEM & expanded to fully integrated 8 22

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    23/50

    Benefits of Vertical Integration

    Specialized assets Assets that have significantly more value in theirintended use than in their next best use

    Types of specialized assetsSite specificity

    Co-located such as coal plant andelectric utility

    Physical asset specificityBottling machinery

    Human asset specificityMastering procedures of a particular organization

    8 23

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    24/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    25/50

    1 25

    STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 8.2 Back to the Future:PepsiCos Forward Integration

    PepsiCo acquired bottlers in 2009Gain control over quality, pricing, distribution, andin-store display.

    Reversed a 1999 decision to sell off Pepsi bottlers

    Goal now is faster innovative products launched Forward integration

    Enhance flexibility and improve decision making

    Cost saving and interdependence

    Coca-Cola did the same: forward integration with bottlers

    8 25

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    26/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    27/50

    Alternatives to Vertical Integration

    Taper integrationBackward integrated but also relies on outside market firmsfor supplies

    OR

    Forward integrated but also relies on outside market firmsfor some of its distribution

    Strategic outsourcing

    Moving value chain activities outside the firm's boundaries

    Example: EDS and PeopleSoft provide HR services tomany firms that choose to outsource it.

    8 27

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    28/50

    EXHIBIT 8.6 Taper Integration along the Industry Value Chain

    Outside suppliers couldalso be off-shored whenthey are not located in thehome country

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    29/50

    Risks in undertaking cooperativeagreements or strategic alliances

    Adverse selectionPartners misrepresent skills, ability and otherresources

    Moral HazardPartners provide lower quality skills andabilities than they had promised

    HoldupPartners exploit the transaction specificinvestment made by others in the alliance

    8 29

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    30/50

    Corporate Diversification:Expanding Beyond a Single Market

    Degrees of diversificationRange of products and services a firm should offer

    Ex: PepsiCo also owns Lay's & Quaker Oats .

    Diversification strategies :Product diversification

    Active in several different product categoriesGeographic diversification

    Active in several different countriesProduct market diversification

    Active in a range of bo th product and countries

    8 30

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    31/50

    EXHIBIT 8.7 Different Types of Corporate Diversification

    8 31

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    32/50

    1 32

    STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT 8.3 ExxonMobil Diversifies intoNatural Gas

    ExxonMobil earned highest profit in its history in 2008

    Majority of profits come from petroleum-based products.

    Environmental change toward clean energy

    ExxonMobil must react to the change.

    ExxonMobil to focus on clean energy: natural gas. ExxonMobil acquired XTO Energy

    Leverage core competence in exploration and

    commercialization of energy sources into natural gas.85% today fossil fuels

    Exxon is largest producer of natural gas on the planet.

    Exxon XTO video 8 32

    http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/12/14/business/energy-environment/1247466126026/exxon-mobil-will-buy-xto-energy.html?scp=1&sq=exxon%20xto&st=csehttp://video.nytimes.com/video/2009/12/14/business/energy-environment/1247466126026/exxon-mobil-will-buy-xto-energy.html?scp=1&sq=exxon%20xto&st=cse
  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    33/50

    LO 8-1 Define corporate-level strategy, and describe the three dimensions alongwhich it is assessed.

    LO 8-2 Describe and evaluate different options firms have to organize economicactivity.

    LO 8-3 Describe two types of vertical integration along the industry value chain:

    backward and forward vertical integration.LO 8-4 Identify and evaluate benefits and risks of vertical integration.

    LO 8-5 Describe and examine alternatives to vertical integration.

    LO 8-6 Describe and evaluate different types of corporate diversification.

    LO 8-7 Apply the core competence market matrix to derive differentdiversification strategies.

    LO 8-8 Explain when a diversification strategy creates a competitiveadvantage, and when it does not.

    8 33

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    34/50

    Motivations For Diversification

    Value Enhancing Motives :

    Increase market powerMulti-point competition

    R&D and new product developmentDeveloping New Competencies (Stretching)Transferring Core Competencies (Leveraging)

    Utilizing excess capacity (e.g., in distribution)Economies of ScopeLeveraging Brand-Name(e.g., Haagen-Dazs to chocolate candy )

    8 34

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    35/50

    Leveraging Core Competencies forCorporate Diversification

    Core competenceUnique skills and strengths Allows firms to increase the value of product/serviceLowers the cost

    Examples: Wal-mart global supply chainInfosys low-cost global delivery system

    The core competence market matrixProvides guidance to executives on how to diversifyin order to achieve continued growth

    8 35

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    36/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    37/50

    Other Motivations For Diversification

    Motivations that are Value neutral:

    Diversification motivated by poor economic performancein current businesses.

    Motivations that Devaluate:

    Agency problemManagerial capitalism (empire building) Maximize management compensationSales Growth maximization

    Professor William Baumol

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    38/50

    Diversification

    Issue #1 : When there is a reduction in managerial(employment) risk, then there is upside anddownside effects for stockholders:

    On the upside, managers will be more willing to learn

    firm-specific skills that will improve the productivityand long-run success of the company (to the benefitof stockholders).

    On the downside, top-level managers mayhave the economic incentive to diversify toa point that is detrimental to stockholders.

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    39/50

    Diversification

    Issue #2 : There may be no economic value to

    stockholders in diversification moves sincestockholders are free to diversify by holding aportfolio of stocks. No one has shown thatinvestors pay a premium for diversified firms --in fact, discounts are common .

    A classic example is Kaiser Industries that was dissolvedas a holding company because its diversificationapparently subtracted from its economic value.

    Kaiser Industries main assets: (1) Kaiser Steel; (2) Kaiser Aluminum; and (3) Kaiser Cement were independentcompanies and the stock of each were publicly traded.Kaiser Industries was selling at a discount which vanished

    when Kaiser Industries revealed its plan to sell its holdings. 8 39

    EXHIBIT 8 9 The Di ersification Performance Relationship

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    40/50

    EXHIBIT 8.9 The Diversification-Performance Relationship

    V i l I i d Di ifi i

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    41/50

    EXHIBIT 8.10 Vertical Integration and Diversification:Sources of Value Creation and Costs

    8 41

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    42/50

    EXHIBIT 8.11 BCG Matrix

    8 42

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    43/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    44/50

    Corporate Diversification

    Internal capital marketsSource of value creation in a diversification strategy

    Allows conglomerate to do a more efficient job ofallocating capital

    Coordination cost A function of number, size, and types of businesseslinked to one another

    Influence cost

    Political maneuvering by managers to influencecapital and resource allocation Bandwagon effects

    Firms copying moves of industry rivals

    8 44

    Oracle Corporate Strategy: Combining

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    45/50

    EXHIBIT 8.12 Oracle Corporate Strategy: Combining Vertical Integration and Diversification

    8 45

    P bl iP bl iP bl i

    R fR f

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    46/50

    Ch7-3

    Problems inAchieving Success

    Problems inProblems inAchieving SuccessAchieving Success

    IntegrationIntegration

    difficultiesdifficulties

    InadequateInadequateevaluation of targetevaluation of target

    Too muchToo muchdiversificationdiversification

    Large or Large or

    extraordinary debtextraordinary debt

    Inability toInability toachieve synergyachieve synergy

    Managers overlyManagers overlyfocused on acquisitionsfocused on acquisitions

    Too largeToo large

    IncreasedIncreased

    market power market power

    OvercomeOvercomeentry barriersentry barriers

    Lower risk Lower risk compared to developingcompared to developingnew productsnew products

    Cost of newCost of new

    product development product development

    Increased speedIncreased speedto marketto market

    IncreasedIncreaseddiversificationdiversification

    Avoid excessiveAvoid excessivecompetitioncompetition

    AcquisitionsAcquisitions

    Reasons forReasons forAcquisitionsAcquisitions

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    47/50

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    48/50

    Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    Trying to gain sustainable competitive advantage viamergers and acquisitions puts us right up against theefficient market wall:

    If an industry is generally known to be highly profitable,there will be many firms bidding on the assets already inthe market. Generally the discounted value of futurecash flows will be impounded in the price that theacquirer pays. Thus, the acquirer is expected to

    make only a competitive rate of return on investment.

    8 48

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    49/50

    Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    And the situation may actually beworse, given the phenomenon of thewinners curse .

    The most optimistic bidder usually over-estimates the true value of the firm :

    Quaker Oats , in late 1994, purchasedSnapple Beverage Company for $1.7 billion.Many analysts calculated that Quaker Oatspaid about $1 billion too much for Snapple.In 1997, Quaker Oats sold Snapple for$300 million.

  • 8/12/2019 BA544Chap008

    50/50

    Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    Under what scenarios can the bidder do well?

    Luck

    Asymmetric Information This eliminates the competitive bidding premise

    implicit in the efficient market hypothesis

    Specific-synergies (co-specialized assets) betweenthe bidder and the target.

    Once again this eliminates the competitivebidding premise of the efficient market