b2 lesson 3

Upload: ginutzaf

Post on 10-Oct-2015

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

lesson

TRANSCRIPT

  • Lesson 1: Global warming

    ExpressionsVocabularyNatureListeningandSpeaking

    The topicUseofEnglishListeningGlobalwarming

    Writing

    ReadingClimateChangeDoubtersReadingcomprehensiontest

    GrammarRelativeclausesA.Definingrelativeclauses

    B.NondefiningrelativeclausesC.RelativePronouns

    D.RelativeAdverbs

    Phonetics

    Extra informationCulturalfocus

    GamesAdditionalmaterial

    UN

    IT

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Expressions

    Vocabulary Nature

    Listen to the following expressions and repeat them:

    o Til now man has been up against Nature; from now on he will be up against his own nature, Dennis Gabor.

    o Just living is not enough; one must have sunshine, freedom, and a flower, Hans Christian Anderson.

    o In an underdeveloped country, dont drink the water. In a developed country, dont breathe the air, Jonathan Raban.

    o With Laissez faire and price atomic Ecologys Uneconomic

    But with another kind of logic

    Economys Unecologic, Kenneth E. Boulding.

    o Our modern industrial economy takes a mountain covered with trees, lakes, running streams and transforms it into a mountain of junk, garbage, slime pits

    and debris, Edward Abbey.

    The listening is available in the virtual classroom

    Choose the correct definition of the previous expressions:

    o Til now man has been up against Nature; from now on he will be up against his own nature, Dennis Gabor:

    a) From now on Nature will be against mankind.

    b) Until now, Nature and man have been enemies.

    c) From now on man has to fight against himself.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    o Just living is not enough; one must have sunshine, freedom, and a flower, Hans Christian Anderson:

    a) There is nothing better than having a good quality of life.

    b) Without a flower, one cannot have a good life.

    c) One has to care for Nature.

    o In an underdeveloped country, dont drink the water. In a developed country, dont breathe the air, Jonathan Raban:

    a) An underdeveloped country is a place where there is no water.

    b) A developed country is a place where there is no air.

    c) It is better to be in a developed country than in an underdeveloped country.

    d) None of the previous answers is correct.

    o With Laissez faire and price atomic Ecologys Uneconomic

    But with another kind of logic

    Economys Unecologic, Kenneth E. Boulding:

    a) Price atomic has to be understood here as atomic price, thats why its not

    logical.

    b) The fact ecology is not economics is completely illogical.

    c) The fact ecology is not economical is completely illogical.

    o Our modern industrial economy takes a mountain covered with trees, lakes, running streams and transforms it into a mountain of junk, garbage, slime pits

    and debris, Edward Abbey:

    a) This is a modern version of the famous saying with Mohammed and the

    Mountain.

    b) Our modern economy ruins our landscapes.

    c) If our faith doesnt move the mountain, our industry will.

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Listening and Speaking

    Listen and repeat the following quote by Bjorn Lomborg: On average,

    global warming is not going to harm the developing world.

    The listening is available in the virtual classroom

    o Who is Bjorn Lomborg? What does he mean? Describe your point of view and record yourself. The recording must be at least one minute.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    The topic

    Use of English

    Match the following words with their correct definition:

    A. To fluctuate 1. To support.

    B. To cycle 2. To move up and down.

    C. To advocate 3. To send outrays of heat.

    D. To drive up 4. To approach by driving a car.

    E. To radiate back 5. To ride on a bicycle.

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

    Listening Global warming

    Listen to the video which explains what global warming is. Listen to the

    video once before we start to work with it and write down all the

    vocabulary you can understand connected to the environment.

    The video is available at:

    http://youtu.be/0F3QPY83NZQ

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Listen to each of the following four expressions and then repeat them

    again at the same time as the presenter pronounces them.

    o The planets temperature has risen unusually fast (minute 0:10). o even since the industrial revolution began (minute 0:27). o by the end of the century (minute 2:08). o Although much remains to be learned about global warming (minute 2:37).

    Have a look at the following words, expressions and phrasal verbs that

    appear in the video and use the dictionary to look up the meanings.

    Vocabulary Expressions Phrasal Verbs

    To fluctuate Global warming To drive up

    To cycle Greenhouse effect To release into

    Fossil fuels To come in second To radiate back

    To trap To hit highest levels To reflect back

    To intensify By the end of the century To come in (second)

    String Around the house

    To shrink Ever since

    To advocate

    To switch

    To cut

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Writing

    Answer the following questions using full sentences. Write your answers

    and compare them with the suggested ones.

    o According to the video, what has happened in the last century? o What effect do the greenhouse gases have?

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Reading

    Climate Change Doubters

    Al Gore calls BS on Climate Change Doubters

    Adapted from: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/08/al-gore-calls-bs-on-climate-

    change-doubters/

    ABC News' Amy Bingham reports.

    The ice caps are still melting, the ozone layer is still disappearing and Al Gore is getting pissed.

    In a speech at the Aspen Institute last week the former Vice President hid no emotion when he

    disputed claims that global warming was not happening by repeatedly shouting bullsh*t.

    They pay pseudo-scientists to pretend to be scientists to put out the message: This climate

    thing, its nonsense. Man-made CO2 doesnt trap heat. It may be volcanoes. Bullshit! It may be

    sun spots. Bullshit! Its not getting warmer. Bullshit! Gore said, without knowing that his

    comments were being streamed online.

    One audience member said Gore's speech was a "tour de force of ideas expressed with humor,

    passion and insight," according to the conference's coordinator Charlie Firestone, the executive

    director of the Aspen Institute's Communication and Society Program.

    Gore went on to say that the organized activity of these pseudo-scientists has polluted

    public opinion on climate change.

    There is no longer a shared reality on an issue like climate even though

    our very existence of our civilization is at threat. People have no idea,

    Gore said. Its no longer acceptable in mixed company, meaning

    bipartisan company, to use the godd*mn word climate. They have polluted

    this to the point where we cannot possibly come to an agreement on it.

    While the jury may still be out on the publics opinion, President Obama has shown that he, at

    least, is on Gores side. The Obama Administration has poured more than $90 billion into clean

    energy in the past three years, almost all of which came from stimulus funds in the Recovery

    Act.

    But in the five years since Gore released his climate change documentary An Inconvenient

    Truth, just how much progress has been made toward his goal of reducing carbon emissions?

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Not much, if you look at the big picture of overall greenhouse gas emissions. In fact from 1990 to

    2009 emissions increased 7.3 percent, according to a 2011 Environmental Protection Agency

    report.

    There is a glimmer of progress, though. In both 2008 and 2009 emissions decreased by 2.8

    percent and 6.1 percent respectively. The report noted that the decrease was probably due in

    large part to the economic recession which caused a decrease in energy consumption, suggesting

    that emissions could rise again as the economy picks up.

    The two largest contributors of greenhouse gases were the transportation and electricity

    generation sectors, which together account for about 60 percent of all emissions.

    The president announced today a new set of energy efficiency standards that could help

    decrease transportations share of emissions by reducing oil consumption by 530 million barrels

    over the lifespan of heavy trucks and buses produced between 2014 and 2018, the

    administration claims.

    The new standards will require reductions in fuel consumption by 23 percent for semi-trucks, 15

    percent for heavy-duty pick-up trucks and vans, and 10 percent for buses, delivery trucks and

    garbage trucks.

    Obama unveiled new efficiency standards last month requiring cars and light-duty trucks to

    achieve 54.5 millions-per-gallon by 2025.

    Considering the United States consumes almost 7 billion barrels of oil every year, these new

    efficiency standards will be just a drop in the barrel toward the sweeping greenhouse gas

    reductions that Gore has been advocating for over the past decade.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Reading comprehension test

    Answer the following questions:

    o According to Al Gore what has the effect of these pseudo scientists been? o How much progress has been made to reduce carbon emissions since Al Gores

    documentary An Inconvenient Truth was made?

    o What was the reason for the decrease of emissions of 2008 and 2009?

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

    This is one of the paragraphs from the article. Which other discourse

    markers could be used instead of the one in bold?

    There is no longer a shared reality on an issue like climate even though our very existence

    of our civilization is at threat. People have no idea, Gore said. Its no longer acceptable in

    mixed company, meaning bipartisan company, to use the godd*mn word climate. They have

    polluted this to the point where we cannot possibly come to an agreement on it.

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Have a look at the following words, expressions and phrasal verbs that

    appear in the text and use the dictionary to look up the meanings:

    Vocabulary Expressions Phrasal Verbs

    Ice cap Tour de force To get pissed (USA= to get angry/UK= to get drunk/UK to get angry = to get pissed off)

    To melt To be at threat To go on to do something

    Bullshit To have no idea To put out

    To pretend to be To be on someones side

    To get warmer

    Nonsense To look at the big picture

    To come to (an agreement)

    To stream A drop in the ocean (here the barrel!!)

    To be out (a jury)

    Insight To pour into

    To pollute To pick up

    Goddamn To account for

    Glimmer of hope/progress

    To advocate for

    Greenhouse gases

    Lifespan

    A Standard

    Garbage truck (US)

    To unveil

    Light-duty truck

    Sweeping

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Grammar

    Relative clauses

    The boys, who studied English, went to England.

    The boys who studied English went to England.

    Whats the difference in these sentences?

    The first sentence we find between commas is a non-defining relative clause,

    which does not define or limit the noun it follows. The sentence implies that

    all the boys went to England.

    On the contrary, the second sentence is a defining relative clause, which

    defines or limits the noun (boys). Only the boys who were studying English

    went to England.

    A. Defining relative clauses

    They qualify a noun, and tell us exactly which person or thing is being referred to. They

    add necessary information to identify something or someone.

    There is no pause before or after a defining relative clause and no commas when we

    write. You could omit the relative when the relative functions as the object not as the

    subject.

    The man who came was Oscar.

    The horse which won the race was black.

    The car that runs faster is mine.

    If the relative pronoun is the object it can be omitted.

    The person (whom) you saw yesterday is Peter.

    The dog (which/that) I saw yesterday was white.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Prepositions usually come at the end of the relative clause and usually the relative

    pronoun is omitted.

    This is the man to whom I lent the money.

    This is the man I lent the money to.

    B. Non-defining relative clauses

    They add secondary information to a sentence. Usually, they are written between

    commas. Never use that.

    Myles, who is a student, lives very far from school.

    These glasses, which I found in the bus, are similar to Lauras.

    John, who I have never seen studying, will have problems to pass.

    My bike, which was broken yesterday, has been repaired today.

    As in the defining clauses, prepositions come at the end of the relative clause.

    Hotel Ibis, at which we stayed, was a dreadful place

    Hotel Ibis we stayed at was a dreadful place

    C. Relative Pronouns

    Relative pronoun

    Use Example

    WHO Subject or object pronoun for people. I told you about the woman who lives next door.

    WHICH Subject or object pronoun for animals and things.

    Do you see the cat which is lying on the roof?

    THAT

    Subject or object pronoun for people, animals, and things in defining relative clauses (who or which are also possible).

    I dont like the table that stands in the kitchen.

    WHOSE Possession for people, animals and things.

    Do you know the boy whose mother is a nurse?

    WHOM

    Object pronoun for people, especially in non-defining relative clauses (in defining relative clauses we colloquially prefer who).

    I was invited by the professor whom I met at the conference.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    That preference to which:

    After the superlative Who is the silliest boy that has ever been in this school?

    After first, second, all, everything, only, etc.

    This is the first student that...

    All that he said was...

    After 2 or more nouns Isabel tell us about the people and the countries that she has seen

    D. Relative Adverbs

    A relative adverb can be used instead of a relative pronoun plus preposition. This often

    makes the sentence easier to understand.

    This is the shop in which I bought my car.

    This is the shop where I bought my car.

    Relative adverb

    Meaning Use Example

    WHEN In/on which Refers to a time expression.

    The day when we met him.

    WHERE In/at which Refers to a place. The place where we met him.

    WHY For which Refers to a reason. The reason why we met him.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Exercises

    Complete the sentences using the appropriate relative pronoun, where

    necessary:

    o There's something wrong with the Ipad _____ I bought yesterday. o Selena, ____ parents live in New York, often travels to see them. o The button ____ he pressed was the correct one. o Many gadgets __ have changed our lives produce pollution. o All the information ____ is kept in the computer can be recovered very quickly. o Mark , ____ has always been good at History, is looking forward to going to

    university.

    o Is that the cottage ____ you are thinking of renting? o King Juan Carlos , ____ reign lasts for over 0 years, was born in 1938. o This painting, _____ I am very fond of, was painted by my boyfriend. o I dont want to know anything ___ Brian told you.

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

    Join both sentences into one using a relative clause

    o Have you found the keys? Did you lose them? o Martha is wearing a pink skirt. I dont like the skirt. o The museum in Madrid was being rebuilt. We wanted to visit it. o She showed me a photograph of her daughters. Her daughters are engineers. o That man over there is an actor. I dont remember his name. o Sallys mother goes to the gym every day. Sallys mother is 65. o I got the job. I applied for the job last month

    Check your answers in the Key Booklet

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Phonetics

    Fall (A Falling Tone)

    A falling tone is by far the most common used tone of all. It signals a sense of finality,

    completion, belief in the content of the utterance, and so on.

    A speaker, by choosing a falling tone, also indicates to the addressee that that is all he

    has to say, and offers a chance (turn-taking) to the addressee to comment on, agree or

    disagree with, or add to his utterance, without soliciting a response.

    Nonetheless, it would be polite for the addressee to at least acknowledge in some

    manner or form that he is part of the discourse.

    Now, let us see the areas in which a falling tone is used. The following is a proclamation

    in which a teacher is informing a student of the consequences of his unacceptable

    behaviour.

    Exclamations: Watch OUT!

    Exclamations

    When someone expresses strong emotions by yelling, roaring, hollering, etc. this can be

    described as an exclamation. Exclamations are usually manifested in high tones, and

    can convey a wide range of mental states including joy, outrage, hysteria, excitement,

    etc. As far as the intonation, exclamations tend to favour a rise in tone immediately

    followed by a steep drop. ( )

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Listen to the following and practice:

    o How ridiculous! o What great news! o Youve got to be kidding! o No way! o Sounds great! o Thats awful!

    Watch the following video by Victor Borge:

    The video is available at:

    http://youtu.be/6bpIbdZhrzA

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Extra information

    Cultural focus

    Read the following articles about recycling in European countries:

    Europe as a Recycling Society - Present recycling levels of Municipal

    Waste and Construction & Demolition Waste in the EU

    Adapted from: http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/publications/wp2009_2/wp/wp2009_2

    Conclusion All the old EU Member States and Norway and almost all of the new EU Member States have

    increased the recycling of municipal waste in the last 10 years; Both in terms of absolute weight

    and as a percentage of generation.

    There are still significant differences between recycling levels, both within the old EU Member

    States and within the new EU Member States. In general the level is higher in old Member

    States. However, some of the new EU Member States have relatively high recycling levels.

    Some of the old EU Member States with a lower recycling level have had a quite high yearly

    growth (> 0.75 percentage point) in the total recycling since 2000. Similarly, some of the new

    EU Member States have had a quite high yearly growth (>0.50 percentage point) since 2000.

    These changes indicate that even if the starting point is lower some positive changes are going

    on in these counties.

    Recycling of paper and cardboard and bio waste constitutes a large part of recycling in the

    countries with overall high levels of municipal waste recycling. In a few of the old EU Member

    States recycling of bulky waste is also significant.

    There is a difference between what fraction of packaging waste countries include in their

    municipal waste recycling figures. This indicates that some countries would have a higher

    recycling level if they reported the recycling of packaging waste as recycling of municipal waste.

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Waste

    Adapted from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/index.htm

    As European society has grown wealthier it has created more and more rubbish. Each year in

    the European Union alone we throw away 3 billion tonnes of waste - some 90 million tonnes of

    it hazardous. This amounts to about 6 tonnes of solid waste for every man, woman and child,

    according to Eurostat statistics. It is clear that treating and disposing of all this material -

    without harming the environment - becomes a major headache.

    Between 1990 and 1995, the amount of waste generated in Europe increased by 10%, according

    to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Most of what we

    throw away is either burnt in incinerators, or dumped into landfill sites (67%). But both these

    methods create environmental damage. Landfilling not only takes up more and more valuable

    land space, it also causes air, water and soil pollution, discharging carbon dioxide (CO2) and

    methane (CH4) into the atmosphere and chemicals and pesticides into the earth and

    groundwater. This, in turn, is harmful to human health, as well as to plants and animals.

    By 2020, the OECD estimates, we could be generating 45% more waste than we did in 1995.

    Obviously we must reverse this trend if we are to avoid being

    submerged in rubbish. But the picture is not all gloomy. The EU's

    Sixth Environment Action Programme identifies waste prevention

    and management as one of four top priorities. Its primary objective is

    to decouple waste generation from economic activity, so that EU

    growth will no longer lead to more and more rubbish, and there are

    signs that this is beginning to happen. In Germany and the

    Netherlands, for example, municipal waste generation fell during the 1990s.

    The EU is aiming for a significant cut in the amount of rubbish generated, through new waste

    prevention initiatives, better use of resources, and encouraging a shift to more sustainable

    consumption patterns.

    The European Union's approach to waste management is based on three principles:

    Waste prevention: This is a key factor in any waste management strategy. If we can reduce the amount of waste generated in the first place and reduce its hazardousness by reducing the

    presence of dangerous substances in products, then disposing of it will automatically become

    simpler. Waste prevention is closely linked with improving manufacturing methods and

    influencing consumers to demand greener products and less packaging.

    Recycling and reuse: If waste cannot be prevented, as many of the materials as possible should be recovered, preferably by recycling. The European Commission has defined several

    specific 'waste streams' for priority attention, the aim being to reduce their overall

    environmental impact. This includes packaging waste, end-of-life vehicles, batteries, electrical

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    and electronic waste. EU directives now require Member States to introduce legislation on

    waste collection, reuse, recycling and disposal of these waste streams. Several EU countries are

    already managing to recycle over 50% of packaging waste.

    Improving final disposal and monitoring: Where possible, waste that cannot be recycled or reused should be safely incinerated, with landfill only used as a last resort. Both these

    methods need close monitoring because of their potential for causing severe environmental

    damage. The EU has recently approved a directive setting strict guidelines for landfill

    management. It bans certain types of waste, such as used tyres, and sets targets for reducing

    quantities of biodegradable rubbish. Another recent directive lays down tough limits on

    emission levels from incinerators. The Union also wants to reduce emissions of dioxins and

    acid gases such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur dioxides (SO2), and hydrogen chlorides

    (HCL), which can be harmful to human health

    o Do you recycle? Do you think it is important to recycle? Why? Is it easy to recycle where you live?

    Look at the following vocabulary which appeared in the video:

    Vocabulary Expressions Phrasal Verbs

    Starting point To become/be a headache To go on

    Cardboard To reverse the trend To throw away

    Bio waste The picture is (not all) gloomy To discharge into

    Overall In the first place To be linked with

    Municipal waste Green products To lay down

    Bulky waste Waste streams

    Packaging waste End-of-life

    Hazardous As a last resort

    Solid waste

    To dump

    Landfill sites

    Landfilling

    Soil

    Decouple

    A cut

    A shift

    Hazardousness

    Monitoring

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    A directive

    To set guidelines

    To ban

    To set targets

    Biodegradable rubbish

    Tough

    Games

    Look at the following pictures and describe the similarities and

    differences between these two pictures:

  • English Link for B2

    UNIT 4 Lesson 1

    Additional material

    Listening

    Listening version of part of the speech by Al Gore mentioned in the reading:

    http://youtu.be/8SfWdDP5v_A

    Punctuation class with Dean Martin: http://youtu.be/lQ91SVKryYU

    Read and listen to the following text:

    Information on coral reefs

    Adapted from http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/coral-reefs-will-be-gone-by-end-

    of-the-century-2352742.html

    The claim is made in a book published tomorrow, which says coral reef ecosystems are very

    likely to disappear by the end of this century in what would be "a new first for mankind the

    'extinction' of an entire ecosystem". Its author, Professor Peter Sale, studied the Great

    Barrier Reef for 20 years at the University of Sydney. He currently leads a team at the United

    Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health.

    The predicted decline is mainly down to climate change and ocean acidification, though local

    activities such as overfishing, pollution and coastal development have also harmed the reefs.

    The book, Our Dying Planet, published by University of California Press, contains further

    alarming predictions, such as the prospect that "we risk having no reefs that resemble those

    of today in as little as 30 or 40 more years".

    Though not all scientists agree with the precise timescales set out by the book, the crisis is

    clear. "When you're talking about the destruction of an entire ecosystem within one human

    generation, there might be some small differences in the details it is a dramatic image and

    a dramatic statement," Professor Rogers says. "But the overall message we agree with. People

    are not taking on board the sheer speed of the changes we're seeing."