ayurvedic medicine case

Upload: mrpramba

Post on 05-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Ayurvedic Medicine Case

    1/2

    Ayurvedic medicine case: Himachal Pradesh HighCourt seeks reply from state by September 30

    Posted on: 17 Sep 2011, 05:14 PM

    ShareThis

    Previous

    Next

    HP Ayurvedic medicine case reaches court

    Shimla: In a move that may sicken the Department of Ayurved in the state, the High Court has taken

    cognizance of the purchase of medicines for Ayurvedic hospitals at a high price from outside the state.

    The court, further pronounced an order asking the state government to state the reasons behind the cited

    irregularities.

    A bench of Chief Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Rajiv Sharma, while hearing a petition filed by theHimachal Pradesh Ayurvedic Manufacturing Association, directed the state to file their response

    alongwith an affidavit to the Ayurved Director by September 30.

    In the petition it has been alleged that Director of Ayurved Department, misusing his powers bought

    medicines from companies outside the state.

    According to the rules, the state has to purchase 70 percent of the required medicines from companies

    within the state and for rest of the medicines the government can go for companies outside the state.

    However, the director allegedly flouting the norms bought medicines worth Rs 8-9 crore.

    Giving clarification in this regard, it was stated that the medicines were bought with the Centres grantedfinancial aid without overruling the rules laid by the Centre.

    However, the petitioner has argued that there is no provision in the Central rules citing that the

    medicines can be bought only from companies based outside the state. As per the applicant, the purchase

    orders based on 2009 quotations were sent through fax. No tenders were invited in this regard. In

    addition the PIL stated the Director Ayurveda had no knowledge about the quality of drugs as he fulfill

    the qualifications required for a Director under Drugs and Cosmetics Rules.

    The petitioner has also pleaded to the court to direct the state government to hand over the investigation

    of the case of purchase of medicines done in 2010-2011 to an independent investigating agency.

    (JPN/ Bureau)

    http://post.jagran.com/prisoners-fast-inside-beur-jail-to-demand-removal-of-officials-1316265038http://post.jagran.com/case-registered-against-husband-of-rld-mp-1316257222http://post.jagran.com/case-registered-against-husband-of-rld-mp-1316257222http://post.jagran.com/prisoners-fast-inside-beur-jail-to-demand-removal-of-officials-1316265038
  • 7/31/2019 Ayurvedic Medicine Case

    2/2

    The Tribune

    Purchase of Ayurvedic Drugs by Director

    High Court summons recordVijay Arora

    Shimla, October 24The state high court today summoned the record of the alleged purchase of ayurvedic drugs bythe Director, Ayurveda, on higher prices.

    The court passed this order after perusing the rejoinder filed by the petitioner, the HP AyurvedicManufacturing Association, wherein it further alleged that the department had purchased the

    medicines by violating the norms of the Centre.

    However, the state has contended in its reply before the court that the department had not

    violated any norms.

    It further contended that the medicines were not purchased on higher prices and refuted theallegations made by the association.

    While passing this order, the Bench headed by Chief Justice Kurian Joseph further listed the

    matter for November 11.

    The court passed this order on a petition filed by the association in which it was alleged that

    ayurvedic medicines were purchased by the Director, Ayurveda, in violation of the rules.

    It was further alleged that as per the relevant rules 70 per cent of drugs were purchased from

    state manufacturing units and 30 per cent from out of the state.

    The petitioner has further alleged that while purchasing the drugs, the Director had manipulated

    the rules to purchase the drugs at higher rates fromoutside.

    According to the petitioner, the department had shown undue haste in purchase of drugs insuch a manner that no tender was floated and the purchase order was placed.

    It was further alleged that on the basis of quotation and prices of 2009, the purchase order wasplaced through fax and they were asked to make the supply.