ayp/sina/dina iowa statewide data conference tom deeter idoe bureau of information & analysis...
TRANSCRIPT
AYP/SINA/DINA
Iowa Statewide Data Conference
Tom DeeterIDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis
Geri McMahonIDOE Bureau of School Improvement
August 10, 2015
AYP Review• Target – 100 %, since 2013-14.
• Reading Comprehension, Mathematics
• Participation, Performance
• Other Academic Indicators: Attendance, Graduation Rate
• Progression: Watch, SINA, Delay, Removed
Steps in Meeting AYP1. Meet the Target (within Confidence Interval, CI)2. Safe Harbor – reduce % of non-proficient students by 10%3. Biennium Data – Uniform Averaging – data for past 2 years, CI4. Triennium Data – Uniform Averaging – data for past 3 years, CI• Add in the students meeting growth (approved growth model)• Repeat Steps 1-4
Safe Harbor
Given: 70% Proficient last yearthat means 30% are not proficientReduction of non proficient by 10% = 30 x .10 = 3%Add the 3% to 70To meet Safe Harbor, you have to reach 73% proficient this year
Exceptions to 2015 AYP Decisions
• Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Field Test schools.• Used 12-13 data as “prior year data” to evaluate Safe
Harbor
• Dynamic Learning Maps alternate assessment consortium.• Proficiency data not available • Used DLM students for Participation only, not Proficiency
2015 AYP Determinations• 338 Districts, 1336 Schools
•Met Participation Rates:• 100% Districts, 99% schools
•Met Other Academic Indicators:• 99.7% Districts, 98.5% Schools
2015 AYP DeterminationsMathematics Proficiency• Districts – 70.7 % Met, 29.3 % Missed, 9.2 % DINA• Schools – 33.5 % Met, 66.5 % Missed, 40.9 % SINA
Reading Proficiency• Districts – 64.2 % Met, 35.8 % Missed, 11 % DINA• Schools – 29.8 % Met, 70.2 % Missed, 48.2 % SINA
2015 AYP Determinations SummaryDistricts Schools
Missed both R & M Proficiency (includes DINA/SINA, Watch)
19.5 % 53.6 %
Met both R & M Proficiency (includes Delay, Met, Removed)
54.4 % 16.8 %
Missed for R or M Proficiency 26.0 % 29.6 %
Total Missed for Something (includes one or both subjects)
45.6 % 83.2 %
• FY13 Actual - $83,471,134• FY14 Actual - $84,975,853• FY15 Actual - $91,258,673 • The state can set aside up to 4% of the Title I
allocation for SINA allocations• District allocations –
https://www.educateiowa.gov/documents/no-child-left-behind/2015/08/2015-2016-title-i-allocations
Title I Allocation
• 12-13 School year• SINA set aside $3,369,881• Number of SINA schools 188• Average SINA allocation $19,625
• 13-14 School year• SINA set aside $3,338,845• Number of SINA schools 251• Average SINA allocation $14,447
• 14-15 School year• SINA set aside $3,399,034• Number of SINA schools 310• Average SINA allocation $11,020
• 15-16 School year• SINA set aside $3,650,347• Number of SINA schools ?• Average SINA allocation ?
SINA Allocations
• ttps://www.educateiowa.gov/pk-12/no-child-left-behind/schools-and-districts-need-assistance-sinadina/guidance-schools-and
• SINA/DINA Timelines• C-Plan link for Building SINA Plans• Parent Notification Letters• Corrective Action Guidance• Restructuring Guidance• School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
Information
Guidance for SINA/DINA
Professional Developments Set Asides Requirements
•SINA 1 and 2- must set aside and spend 10% the building allocation for professional development•DINA 1 and 2- must set aside and spend 10% of the district Title I allocation for professional development•This set aside is budgeted in the Title I General Budget
• SINA 1 -20% of the district allocation for Choice: ALL• SINA 2 and above- 20% of the district allocation
for Choice & Supplemental Education Services (SES)• The Notification of Unexpended Funds form
must be submitted to release the required 20% for use in other areas. This form is available after April 1st.
School Choice & SES Set-Aside (budgeted on the General Title I Budget)
Eligibility• ALL students of SINA schools• Priority is given to the lowest achieving, low income
students
Eligible Schools that can receive students• Higher academic achievement• No SINA
Must offer more than one choice if available
Choice: ALL SINA Schools
Length of Time for Choice• Until graduated from choice school
What if no schools are available?• Parents must still be notified of SINA status• Parents must be notified that no choices are available
Choice: ALL SINA Schools
An LEA’s notice to parents:• Available ONLY to “poverty children”• Explain how parents can obtain SES for their child• Include the SEA list of approved providers within the LEA or
its geographical location, including on-line providers• Describe briefly the services, qualifications and evidence of
effectiveness for each provider
SES Notification: SINA 2 +
• Indicate providers that are able to serve students with disabilities or LEP students
• Include an explanation of the benefits of receiving SES
• Application procedures
• Explain how the LEA will notify parents about enrollment dates and start dates
• Fair and equitable procedures for serving students if not all students can be served
• Identify the District contact person
• Districts-Enter into agreement with provider
• NO District contract with only one provider
• District should not show preferential treatment for any one provider
SES Notification: SINA 2 + cont’
SINA Plans and Budgets
• Both due November 1• Submit plan through C-Plan on the Iowa Education Portal: https://portal.ed.iowa.gov/iowalandingpage/Landing.aspx • Submit each building’s SINA budget through the Title I Application
Upcoming technical assistance in regard to your SINA plan
•August 27 webinar 3:00-4:30• September 16 webinar 9:00-10:30 and 3:00-4:30•October 13 Symposium 9:00-4:30
Accountability AmendmentsSubmitted to USED
1. 3 items on DLM (FAY definition, use in AYP, use in growth)
2. Definition of a “new school” for SINA purposes (consolidations)
3. 6 and 7 year graduation rates
4. ADA fixed target at 95%.
Contact Information