ayesha akbar shafia imtiaz amal faisal omer bin asad
DESCRIPTION
SOCIAL TAGGING. Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad. ". ". SOCIAL TAGGING(FOLKSONOMY). SOCIAL BOOKMARKING Social Bookmarking is the practice of saving bookmarks to a public Web site and tagging with the key words. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
"
Ayesha AkbarShafia ImtiazAmal FaisalOmer Bin Asad
SOCIAL TAGGING
1
![Page 2: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
"
2
![Page 3: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SOCIAL BOOKMARKING Social Bookmarking is the practice of saving bookmarks to a public Web
site and tagging with the key words.
It is simply a method for Internet users to organize, store, manage and search for bookmarks of resources online.
BOOKMARKING Bookmarking, on the other hand, is the practice of saving the address of a
Web site you wish to visit in the future on your computer.
SOCIAL TAGGING(FOLKSONOMY)
3
![Page 4: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Furl
Simpy
Delicious
Citeulike
It is particular useful when collecting set of resources that are to be shared with others. Social Bookmarking is another component of Social Media.It
enables users to express different perspective on information through tagging.
WHO IS DOING IT?
4
![Page 5: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The creator of the bookmark assigns tags to each resource resulting in a user directed method of classifying the information.
Descriptions may be added to these bookmarks in the form of metadata, so users may understand the content of the resource without first needing to download it for themselves.
As social bookmarking services indicate who created each bookmark and can provide access to that person’s other bookmarked resources, users can easily make social connections with other individuals interested in just about any topic.
HOW DOES IT WORK ?
5
![Page 6: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HOW DOES IT WORK ?
6
![Page 7: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Gives users the opportunity to express differing perspectives on information and resources through informal organizational structures.
It allows like-minded individuals to find one another and create new communities
of users that continue to influence the ongoing evolution of folksonomies and common tags for resources.
It helps one find information related to the topic you are researching, even in areas that aren’t obviously connected to the primary topic.
WHY IS IT IMPORTANT
7
![Page 8: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Improve search capabilities of search engines
Metadata that is associated with resources.
Tag patterns emerge for documents tagged by multiple users allowing for describing their contents and characteristics.
This contextual information is created by content consumers (reader-to-author evaluation)
Hence, more trustful than the metadata provided by content producers.
Advantages
8
![Page 9: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
No controlled vocabulary used.
Tags emerge freely among users.
Thus, no rigid classification done like librarians.
Advantages
9
![Page 10: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Done by amatuers
No oversight as to how the resources are organized and tagged
Result : Inconsistent or poor use of tags.
Reflects the use of community of users
Result: Skewed view on any particular topic
For example, if a user saves a bookmark for a site with information about greyhounds but only tags the site with the term
“greyhound” and not also with “dogs” or perhaps “dog racing,” that resource might never be found by someone looking for
information about breeds of dogs.
Downsides
10
![Page 11: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In 2003 Joshua Schachter launched del.icio.us, the first social bookmarking website.
Delicious uses a non-hierarchical classification system in which users can tag each of their bookmarks with freely chosen index terms (generating a kind of folksonomy). A combined view of everyone's bookmarks with a given tag is available; for instance, the URL "http://delicious.com/tag/wiki" displays all of the most recent links tagged "wiki". (Courtesy: www.wikipedia.com )
Its collective nature makes it possible to view bookmarks added by other users.
Tool: Deli.icio.us
11
![Page 12: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Tool: Deli.icio.us
12
![Page 13: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
HOW TAGGING HELPS IN SEMANTIC WEB
13
![Page 14: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
30 and 50 percent of URLs posted to del.icio.us have only been bookmarked once or twice.
Given that ,average bookmark has 2.5 tags.
Result: a query for a particular tag will return a bookmark only posted once or twice are low.
In other words, our recall for single tag queries is heavily limited by the high number of rare URLs with few tags.
Social Tag Prediction
14
![Page 15: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
For example, a user labeling a new software tool for Apple’s Mac OS X operating system might annotate it with “software,” “tool,” and “osx.” A second user looking for this content with the single tag query (or feed) “mac” would miss this content, even though a human might easily realize that “osx” implies “mac.”
Social Tag Prediction
15
![Page 16: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
In the market-basket model, there are a large set of items and a large set of baskets each of which contains a small set of items.
Goal: find correlations between sets of items in the baskets.
Market Basket Model
16
![Page 17: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Market-basket data mining produces association rules of the form X → Y .
Association rules commonly have three values associated with them:
– Support :The number of baskets containing both X and Y – Confidence: P(Y |X). (How likely is Y given X?)– Interest : P(Y |X)−P(Y ), alternatively P(Y |X) P(Y ) . (How much more common is X&Y than expected by chance?)
Market Basket Model
17
![Page 18: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
![Page 19: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
RESEARCH 1Researches
19
![Page 20: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Paper: Can Social Bookmarking Enhance Search in the Web?
Writers :Yusuke Yanbe ,Adam Jatowt, Satoshi Nakamura ,Katsumi Tanaka Department of Social Informatics, Kyoto University
This paper investigate the usefulness of social bookmarking systems for the purpose of enhancing Web search through a series of experiments done on datasets obtained from social bookmarking systems.
Research-Sentiment Analysis
20
![Page 21: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Often tags contain sentiments expressed by users towards bookmarked resources.
This could allow for a sentiment-aware search that would exploit user feelings about Web pages.
Sentiment Analysis
21
![Page 22: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
In order to measure the number and kinds of sentiment tags used by bookmarking dataset, obtained from Hatena Bookmark is used.
Tags in this dataset were classified into two groups according to tag taxonomy defined by Golder and Huberman [9]:
• a) tags that identify what or whose the resource is about Content Tags• b) tags that identify qualities or characteristics of resources (scary, funny, stupid
etc.) Sentiment tags
Sentiment Analysis
22
![Page 23: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Examined top 1,100 tags from the dataset to detect content and sentiment tags.
Then, translated into English.
It can be seen that content tags are on average more common than sentiment tags.
The Research
23
![Page 24: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
![Page 25: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• The top 30 tags the ratio of content tags to sentiment tags is about 10:1.
• Top 3 sentiment tags are very common, while the other tags are rather less used.
Observation
Frequency distribution of top 20 content and sentiment tags
25
![Page 26: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Top 54 sentiment tags placed on the negative-positive scale including the information about their frequencies.
The tags appearing more than 3000 times are above the dashed line, while those with frequencies less than 100 times are below the horizontal axis.
Observation
26
![Page 27: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Findings
The most popular sentiment tags are: useful, amazing and awful.
In general, there are more positive sentiment tags than negative ones and positive ones are also more frequently used.
Only one negative sentiment tag was used more than 100 times (“it’s awful”).
Conclusion: This means that social bookmarkers usually do not bookmark resources to which they have negative feelings.
27
![Page 28: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
RESEARCH 2Researches
28
![Page 29: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Research and it’s Implications
In order for researchers to understand the benefits and limitations of using user-generated tags for indexing and retrieval purposes, it is important to investigate to what extent community influences tagging behaviour, characteristic effects on tag datasets, and whether this influence helps or hinders search and retrieval.
29
![Page 30: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The Research Paper Used
This article reports on research presented on a panel at The American Society for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T) 2007 annual conference which investigated the use of social tagging in communities and in context.
30
![Page 31: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The Purpose
Panel participants described studies around the world that explore to what extent and in what manner users, consciously or unconsciously, take into account their communities of practice when assigning tags.
Each study examines how different communities use social tagging to disseminate information to other community members in the online environment.
31
![Page 32: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Social Tagging in the Code4Lib
Community
To what extent community members consider community while tagging.
Code4Lib is an organic community consisting of librarians and library software developers. One way Code4Lib shares information is by bookmarking items in del.icio.us, a popular social tagging Web site, with the tag ‘code4lib’.
32
![Page 33: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Social Tagging in the Code4Lib
Community Once an item is tagged with ‘code4lib’, it is shared in three ways:
A. On a Web page created through the del.icio.us site, on the Planet Code4Lib blog aggregator,
B. On the Code4Lib Internet Relay Chat (IRC) channel. It is assumed that members of the Code4Lib community want to share an online resource with the community if the set of tags applied to the bookmark includes the tag ‘code4lib’.
C. Conversely, it is assumed that community members are bookmarking resources for their own personal use when they do not include the ‘code4lib’ tag in the set of social tags they assign.
33
![Page 34: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Process of Experimentation
Tags of fifteen Code4Lib members who bookmarked at least five items with the tag ‘code4lib’ on del.icio.us were reviewed.
All users whose tags were reviewed are active community members and are aware that items tagged with ‘code4lib’ are shared with the community.
Ten recent bookmarks tagged with ‘code4lib’ (community) were analyzed.
If community members tagged less than 10 items with ‘code4lib’, all bookmarks with the tag were reviewed. Ten items bookmarked by these members that did not include the ‘code4lib’ tag (personal) were also examined.
34
![Page 35: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Process of Experimentation
All tags (n=872) associated with bookmarked resources were analysed (according to Golder and Huberman’s seven categories of tags.)
Sets of tags were separated by user and were placed into categories based on the inclusion or exclusion of the ‘code4lib’ tag within the set.
Both the overall number of tags and the numbers of tags in each category were analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranked tests to determine if there was any statistical difference in kinds or number of tags used
35
![Page 36: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Findings
While casual observation shows differences in how some individuals tagged for themselves (set of tags which did not include ‘code4lib’) versus for the community (set of tags which included ‘code4lib’), overall, there was no significant difference in types of tags used in each set.
There was a significant difference (α = 0.01) found in the number of tags applied for the two sets. The average number of tags used in a set when 'code4lib' was included as a tag was 3.70 compared to only 2.97 tags when 'code4lib' was not included.
A larger number of tags was applied when tagging for the community.
36
![Page 37: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Findings
This may indicate that community members do indeed tag differently for a community than they do for themselves.
However, when the tag code4lib is excluded from the count of tags for these resources, the difference does not turn out to be statistically significant. This suggests that the only difference is the inclusion of the community tag.
37
![Page 38: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Metadata Tagging in China: Three Models of Tag Use
There are three models of how tagging is used in China as metadata . The first way is where the user employs tagging to link information through the tag to the user. This is tagging being used as a way to indicate the relationship of the user to the information, showing how the user perceives ('reads') that information object
38
![Page 39: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Metadata Tagging in China: Three Models of Tag Use
The second model portrays users that are connected together through their use of tags. This is where real social networking comes in, as users are tagging to relate their concept of information to another user's concept of some piece of information.
39
![Page 40: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Metadata Tagging in China: Three Models of Tag Use
Within the final model, tags are used to link banks of data (or information) to other Information. The tags are acting as metadata to allow search engines to know which information is related to other information. This type of tagging is used greatly within ontologies.
40
![Page 41: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
"
Referenceshttp://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7001.pdf
http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue54/tonkin-et-al/
http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/775/1/2006-10.pdf
http://www.dsc.ufcg.edu.br/~baptista/cursos/BDCopin/p195-heymann.pdf
http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/834/1/2008-18.pdf
41
![Page 42: Ayesha Akbar Shafia Imtiaz Amal Faisal Omer Bin Asad](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051003/56816532550346895dd7b910/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
References• http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7001.pdf• http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue54/tonkin-et-al/• http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/775/1/2006-10.pdf• http://www.dsc.ufcg.edu.br/~baptista/cursos/BDCopin/p195-
heymann.pdf• http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/834/1/2008-18.pdf
42