ayb219 taxation law and practice notes - amazon...
TRANSCRIPT
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 1 of 98
Lecture 1 – Introduction
Two general types of tax: o Direct taxes – taxes are levied on the person who is liable to pay the tax, e.g. income tax o Indirect taxes – tax is passed onto consumers by incorporating the taxes into the price of
goods & services, e.g. GST
Historical background of tax o 1902-1915: Queensland levied personal income tax o 1915-1942: Both state and commonwealth governments levied income tax o 1942: Commonwealth Government gained sole control of income tax under the Income Tax
Assessment Act (1936)
Constitutional Basis of Taxation o s51 of constitution
“The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: (i) Trade and commerce with other countries, and among the States: (ii) Taxation; but so as not to discriminate between States or parts of States”.
o s55 of constitution “Laws imposing taxation shall deal only with the imposition of taxation, and any
provision therein dealing with any other matter shall be of no effect. Laws imposing taxation shall deal with one subject of taxation only”.
Taxation Acts o Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA)
Deals with incidence, assessment & collection of tax Determines taxable income on which income tax is levied Does not “impose taxation” Two ITAAs, 1936 and 1997
1963 is difficult to understand
The ITAA 1997 overrules the ITAA 1936 o Income Tax Rates Act
Imposes and fixes the rate of taxation
Administration of Income Tax o ATO enforces compliance, parliament sets tax rates o Taxpayers charter sets out a taxpayers rights, but it is
statement of intention with no legal force
Sources of taxation law and rules o Statute law
ITAA (1936 / 1997) FBT Assessment Act (1986) Taxation Administration Act (1953)
o Case law Administrative appeals tribunal -> federal court ->
full federal court -> high court o ATO Tax Determinations & Tax Rulings
Not law Commissioner’s opinion on how a particular aspect of tax law should be interpreted Two types of rulings: public (for everyone) and private (for a particular person’s case)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 2 of 98
Assessing Income Tax
Ordinary Income
Income is not defined in ITAA 1936 or 1997
Determined by the courts (case law) o Developed “income according to ordinary concepts” o Leading case: Scott v C of T (1935) SR (NSW) 215 o 9 characteristics
What comes into the pocket
Tennant v Smith (1892) AC 150 o Amount must come home to the taxpayer o Unrealized gains and saving from not incurring expenditure (fixing the
toilet yourself) is not income o Money doesn’t have to be physically received (i.e. may be in the form
of receiving shares) Money or money’s worth
Income received must be: o Money o Capable of being converted into money
E.g. barter arrangements (someone washes the dishes for you instead of paying for their meal)
o FCT v Cooke & Sherden 80 ATC 4140 Resulted in the addition of s21A ITAA (1936) that business
related gains are income Income in the hands of the person that has derived it
Tax is paid by the person who derives the income Often exhibit periodicity, recurrence and regularity
More regular receipts are more likely to be income
Not essential to be considered income
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 3 of 98
Normal proceeds of personal exertion, property or business are income
Personal exertion – income
Return on investment – income
Carrying on a business – income
Unless a pastime of hobby Compensation receipts may be income if it replaces a revenue loss
Compensation receipts: same character as the item/amount it replaces o e.g. compensation for loss of wages = ordinary income o e.g. compensation for loss, surrender or substantial impairment of a
capital asset = capital Higgs v Oliver (1951), TC 899
Even if the receipt is illegal, immoral etc. it may be income
Same test for legal & illegal activities (i.e. 9 characteristics)
Proceeds of illegal activities are assessable as income o e.g. drug dealing, burglary, illegal bookmaker etc
“Mutual” receipts are not income
Principle of mutuality: a person cannot derive income by dealing with themselves
o i.e. only income if derived from external sources o e.g. income derived by members of a club/association = generally not
assessable o income from non-members (visitors) = generally assessable
Capital gains are not income
Sale of a capital asset = capital gain o Not income according to ordinary concepts
I.e. fruit generates income but sale of the tree does not
Reportable under capital gains tax since 1985 Exempt Income
s6-20 ITAA 1997
Income that is ordinary or statutory income
But specifically made exempt from income tax by: ITAA or other commonwealth law
How is income exempt? o Entity is exempt (Div 50)
Charities Educational institutions Scientific & religious institutions etc
o Type of income is specifically exempt (Div’s 51 & 52) d51 Certain types of income are exempt from income tax
e.g. income derived whilst being a part-time member of the Army or Navy Reserve Forces (s 51-5)
d52 Social security payments (e.g. some Centrelink payments)
Majority exempt: (see para 10-195 Master Tax Guide)
e.g. carer allowance, mobility allowance, seniors supplement etc
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 4 of 98
Examples Constitution
a) Can a Commonwealth bill that imposes a tax on plastic bags be enacted (as law) if the same bill also seeks to introduce a $1,000 note as a new denomination of currency? Briefly explain why/why not. No
b) Can a Commonwealth bill that only imposes a tax on plastic bags be enacted (as law) if the tax is only to be imposed on those bags sold in Queensland? No
Assessable Income Determine whether the following amounts constitute income according to ordinary concepts:
1) A lump sum of $25,000 awarded as damages to Simon by Guardian Insurance. The money was paid to him under an income protection policy as he was unable to work for 10 weeks due to breaking his leg. Yes, as it replaces a revenue loss
2) Paul receives a payment of $4 per pizza from his employer, Beagle Boys Pizza when he delivers a pizza. He also occasionally receives tips from customers when the pizzas are delivered Yes, as it is a proceed of personal exertion (both the tip and payment)
MCQ Which of the following statements is correct?
a) Exempt income is included in assessable income b) Only ordinary income can be exempt income c) Ordinary income includes income from personal exertion, income from property & income from
business d) A capital gain derived under the capital gains tax provisions is an example of ordinary income
Exempt Income Which of the following is NOT considered exempt income?
a) A double orphan pension received from Centrelink b) An apprenticeship wage top-up payment received c) A mobility allowance paid under the Social Security Act 1991 d) An allowance paid to a member of the Defence Force e) All of the above amounts would be considered exempt income
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 6 of 98
Lecture 2 – Income 1 Compensation and Gifts
Income from personal exertion o Reward to taxpayer as a result of their exertion/services o All personal exertion income = ordinary income (s6-5)
May also be statutory income:
“Your assessable income includes the value to you of all allowances, gratuities (tips), compensations, benefits, bonuses and premiums provided to you in respect of, or for or in relation directly or indirectly, to any employment of or services rendered by you”. s 15-2 ITAA 1997
o Allowances vs. reimbursements Allowance: Upfront payment for a predetermined amount
Cover an estimated expense o e.g. travel or uniform allowance o Assessable: s 15-2
Reimbursement: Employee compensated exactly for all / part of an expense already incurred
Not assessable or deductible
Exception: reimbursed for car expenses using cents per kilometer method (s 15-70)
o Compensation (insurance) Loss of wages
e.g. income protection policies
Assessable: ordinary income o FCT v Inkster 89 ATC 5142
Personal injury
e.g. loss of limb, eye etc
Not assessable
Gifts vs. Income o A gift is not assessable o The most important question to ask is: why was the payment made
If it was connected to services provided then it’s assessable If it was because of personal qualities then it’s not assessable
o Important cases Midland Railway Co v Sharpe (1904) AC 349 at 351:
“As long as the receipt accrues by virtue of the taxpayers office, it constitutes income.”
Hayes v FCT (1956) 96 CLR 47
1939 - 1950, Mr Hayes acted as Mr Richardson’s full-time accountant & financial advisor. He was adequately remunerated for this work
Mr Richardson’s business prospered & in 1950 became a public company
Later that year, Mr Richardson made several large cash gifts to various public bodies & gifts of shares in his public company to his two sons & certain other persons, including Mr Hayes, who was given 12,000 shares in the company
Over the years, Hayes had become close friends of Richardson & his wife often exchanging social visits
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 7 of 98
High Court held: transfer of shares = gift; stated: "In this case, it was not sufficient that the gift of shares had been motivated to some extent by the taxpayer's past services. Richardson had also been motivated by a general feeling of goodwill arising from a close relationship, which had both a business aspect and a personal aspect.
What is decisive is the fact that it is impossible to relate the receipt of shares by Hayes to any income producing activity on his part. Hence, the shares were no more than a gift from a grateful friend."
o Considerations when making the distinction Relationship between the parties
e.g. personal friends? known each other long? Motive of donor
Thank you for services rendered or thank you for being a close/good friend? Something given in return? Person receiving the gift owed money for outstanding fees? Expected or unexpected? Customary in this industry? Re-occurring & regular? Time of the year gift was given?
Income of sportspersons o Does the sportspersons earn income from their sport?
Payments & prizes assessable
Commercial exploitation of their skills
Unless pastime or hobby o Taxation Ruling TR 1999/17
o Income includes: prize money, sponsorship & appearance fees FCT v Stone (2005) 222 CLR 289
Windfall gains and prizes o e.g. lottery winnings, betting / gambling wins
Generally not assessable Unless carrying on a business of betting/gambling
o Doesn’t display usual characteristics of ordinary income Unexpected, isolated, lump sum payment etc
o Lacks connection with income producing activity o Taxation Ruling IT 167: TV or radio
Prizes won for the first time: not assessable Regular appearances or invited back
Income: assessable o Exploiting skill or expertise o = Ordinary income
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 8 of 98
Business Income
Determining the existence of a business o Important because:
Business income is assessable (s6-5), Hobby income is not assessable Deduction for expenses necessarily incurred in carrying on a business (s8-1) Taxpayers carrying on a business must adjust for trading stock (division 70)
What constitutes carrying on a business? o No “black & white” determinations (e.g. $ or period of time) o Courts have established the characteristics of a business
Repetition of acts & transactions
Frequency and duration of taxpayers activities o Repetitive and sustained conduct indicated business
Ferguson v FCT 79 ACT 4261
Single transaction can constitute a business o Provided a commercial character exists
Evans v FCT 89 ATC 4540 FCT v St Hubert’s Island Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 210
Commercial nature of the activities
Systematically & Regularly (Hyde v Sullivan (1956) 73 NSW 25)
Trade on the open market on normal terms and conditions o Not just use products themselves or sell to friends/family
Rutledge v IRC (1929) 14 TC 490 Size and scale of the activities
Smaller scale less likely to be a business & visa versa o FCT v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 355
While volume & size relevant → not determinative o May be a small business but still a business
FCT v Walker 85 ATC 179 Existence of a profit motive
Courts: existence of a profit motive very important o Intention to make a profit
Does not actually have to make a profit
Businesses: undertaken with a view to making profit
Activities with little prospect of commercial success more likely = hobby Whether the activity is conducted in a continuous & systematic manner
Emphasis on commerciality / business-like nature of activities o Businesses: conducted in organised & systematic manner
Do you keep accounts? o Hobbies: usually little/no commercial characteristics
o The ATO has determined some questions that would identify a business Do you have a business plan?, Specialised knowledge or skills, which you use?, Have
you had prior experience in this area?, How much capital have you invested?, Have you done market research?, How much time do you spend on the activity?, Activity part-time or side-line or your main income earning activity?, Do you give quotes and supply invoices or tax invoices?, Have you obtained an ABN or registered for GST?, Have you registered a business name & opened a bank account?, Do you have printed letterhead, business cards & a web page?, Do you advertise?
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 9 of 98
Realisation of Capital Assets o Not every receipt received by a business is “income according to ordinary concepts” o Sale of assets incidental to business activities may be treated as capital
e.g. Scottish Australian Mining Co Ltd v FCT (1950) 81 CLR 188 o Principles
Profit derived from sale of capital asset is not income according to ordinary concepts if:
Sale is outside business’ ordinary operations
Minimal efforts made to dispose of property But will be if:
Realisation of income becomes so significant it amounts to a carrying on a business in its own right
Investment Income
Interest Income o Interest income is ordinary income (s6-5 ITAA 1997) o Interest derived by a resident from all sources must be declared to the ATO
When received or credited (cash basis) o ATO: data matches information
Dividend income o “Dividend” defined:
Any profit distribution made by a company to its shareholders Whether in money or other property (e.g. shares)
s 6(1) ITAA 1936 o Resident taxpayers: declare all dividends paid from any source o Non-resident taxpayers: Aus source
s 44(1) ITAA 1936 o Previously, double taxation on dividends
Dividend imputation system introduced 1 July 1987
Credit for income tax paid by company to the shareholders o “franking credit” or “imputation credit” o Removed double taxation on dividends
o Example
In November 2011, Simone, an Australian resident receives a $70 cash dividend plus franking credits of $30 attached from Silver Ltd. Assume Simone has a marginal tax rate of 30%. Calculate Simone’s income tax to pay for the 2012 income year
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 10 of 98
o Types of dividends Unfranked dividend
Company chosen not to attach franking credits
Shareholders: declare amount of unfranked dividend (cash) received in ITR
Effectively double taxed o No franking credit available to offset dividend income
Franked dividend
Company chosen to attach franking credits to dividend o Franking percentage: 1% - 100%
Shareholders: o Receive a credit for company tax paid o Declare amount of dividend received (cash) plus amount of franking
credit in ITR (s 207-20)
Company paying dividends must provide shareholders with a distribution statement
o Calculating amount of franking credit Distribution statement may only provide franking %
Shareholder:
Entitled to credit for amount of franking credit (s207-20)
Franking credit exceeds net tax payable? o Excess is refundable
Rental Income o Ordinary income: s 6-5 ITAA 1997 o Rental income earned by co-owners of a property
Shared according to their legal interests E.g. 40/60 legal split = 40/60 income/expenses split
Trading Stock
Why is it important? o Sales of trading stock = ordinary income
s6-5 ITAA 1997 o Deduction allowed for cost of purchasing trading stock
s8-1 ITAA 1997 o Taxpayers carrying on a business must adjust for trading stock
Movement between opening & closing stock (statutory)
Defined in s70-10 ITAA 1997 as including: o Anything produced, manufactured or acquired that is held for purposes of manufacture,
sale or exchange in the ordinary course of a business & o Livestock o Inventory = goods held with the intention of sale o Goods acquired for the purpose of hire to customers
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 11 of 98
Meaning of stock on hand o Inventory “on hand” if you have legal power to dispose of it
Depends on terms of shipping not physical possession
FOB shipping & FOB destination
“free on board” or “freight on board” o FOB shipping point: legal title to goods passes to the buyer at the point of shipping o FOB destination: legal title to goods remains with seller until goods are received by buyer at
destination
Valuation of trading stock: taxation o s70-45(1): each item of trading stock on hand at end of IY can be valued at either:
Cost Market selling value Replacement
o Different basis may be adopted for each class of stock & each individual item of stock
Obsolescence o Value of trading stock falls due to obsolesce / other circumstances
E.g. discontinued product line May elect to value trading stock at its obsolete value
s 70-50 ITAA 1997
Taxation ruling TR 93/23 provides guidelines in these circumstances
Disposal of stock o Stock given to others
E.g. donations, gifts to friends/family members etc Taxpayer must include in the AI market value of stock on date of disposal (s70-90)
o Stock taken by owner for personal use Taxpayer must include in their AI cost price of stock on date of disposal (s70-90)
Small business entities & trading stock o Special trading stock rules apply to small business entities (SBE) o A business is classified as a SBE if:
It carried on business in that year; and Its aggregated turnover for the year is < than $2 million
s328-110 ITAA 1997 o Where difference between the value of opening & closing stock is less than $5,000
Determined by a reasonable estimate SBE does not have to:
Value each item of trading stock on hand at year end
Account for any change in value of trading stock
Closing value same as opening value for the year
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 12 of 98
Lecture 3 – Income 2
Assessable income is divided into ordinary income (income under ordinary concepts) and statutory income (statute classifies it as income)
Assessable income is affected by: o Residency – where earned o Source – where from o Derivation – when
Residency
Taxation of residents o s 6-5(2) & 6-5(3): main assessing provisions dealing with ordinary income o s 6-5(2) states:
“if you are an Australian resident, your assessable income includes the ordinary income you derived directly or indirectly from all sources whether in or out of Australia during the income year
Taxation of non-residents o s 6-5(3) states:
If you are a foreign resident, your assessable income includes:
The ordinary income you derived directly or indirectly from all Australian sources during the income year;
Other ordinary income that a provision includes in your assessable income for the income year on some basis other than having an Australian source
Residents: taxed on all income / Non-residents: only taxed on Australian income
Who is a resident for taxation purposes? o Resides test
Reside means to dwell permanently or for a considerable time, to have one’s settled or usual abode, to live, in or at, a particular place (dictionary)
There is not much difficulty in defining the residence of an individual, it is where he sleeps, lives and eats (Cesena Sulphur Co Ltd v Nicholson (1876) LR 1 Ex D 428)
Court’s interpretation of “resides” in Australia depends on:
Length of their physical presence
Family, employment or business ties
Maintenance of a home or place of abode
Frequency, regularity & duration of visits
Habits & mode of life (ie. day-to-day behaviour whilst in Aus)
Business & social relations Resides test: commissioner’s 4 factors
TR 98/17 o Applies to individuals entering Aus o Length of time spent in Aus not decisive
Critical question: o Whether individual’s day-to-day behaviour in Aus is consistent with
someone residing in Aus Similar continuity, routine or habit Emphasis on 4 factors
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 13 of 98
(a) Intention or purpose of presence o “Why is the individual here?” o Settled purpose may support an intention to reside in Aus
E.g. long-term employment, enrolling in Bachelor/ Masters degree
Traveller/visitor doing casual work to supplement income?
(b) Family & business / employment ties o Individual bring their family to Aus with them?
More likely to be considered Aus resident (Peel v The Commissioners of Inland Revenue (1927) 13 TC 443)
(c) Maintenance & location of assets o Occupation of a dwelling in Aus? o Owns, rents or leases accommodation for a significant period of time? o Other assets here? (e.g. cars, furniture, bank accounts?)
More likely to be Aus resident o What about assets located overseas?
Doesn’t affect Aus tax – i.e. doesn’t matter if you have a home overseas
(d) Social and living arrangements o May also indicate Aus resident e.g.
Joining sporting or community organisations Enrolling children in school Redirecting mail to Aus Committing to a residential lease
Resides test summary
Does an individual reside in Aus? o Intention o Family & business / employment ties o Assets o Social & living o Length of time
Commissioner: individual an Aus resident if: o Physically present in Aus for at least 6 months and
6 months test is only applicable if all other tests are inconclusive – based on intentions not actuals
o Behaviour consistent with an Aus resident
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 14 of 98
o Domicile test Domicile = legal concept, defined as:
“The intention that a person has to make his home indefinitely in that country.”
s 10, Domicile Act (1982) An Aus domiciled person = deemed Aus resident:
Unless individual has a permanent place of abode (PPOA) outside Aus A person will retain Aus domicile if they:
Travel overseas temporarily
Do not intend to permanently set up home in another country
Intend returning to Aus within a definite period To be regarded as a non-resident:
Must prove they changed domicile to another country
i.e. have a “PPOA outside Aus” o A person establishing a residence or home outside Aus o “Permanent” ≠ everlasting but more than temporary o Practically = having a fixed address outside Aus
FCT v Applegate 79 ATC 4307
Background o Taxpayer was an Aus solicitor o Transferred to Vila in Vanuatu to set up a branch of his firm o Taxpayer’s wife & children accompanied him o Transferred for indefinite time o Intended to return to Australia eventually o Taxpayer left no assets in Aus & gave up lease on his house o In Vila, taxpayer leased premises, obtained resident status & was
admitted to practice o Taxpayer returned to Aus after 21 months due to ill health
Commissioner treated taxpayer as Aus resident o i.e. taxpayer had retained his Aus domicile on basis he intended to
return to Aus o Had not established a PPOA outside Aus
Court disagreed, held: taxpayer was not an Aus resident o Had established a PPOA in Vila o Abandoned home in Aus o Intention of saying in Vila an indefinite & substantial period
August 1991, Commissioner issued IT 2650
Applies to domicile test
In particular for residents departing Australia
6 factors Commissioner will consider if taxpayer has a PPOA outside Australia o Intended & actual length of taxpayer's stay o Whether taxpayer intended to return at some definite point in time o Whether taxpayer has established a home outside Aus (fixed address) o Whether place of abode exists in Aus or has been abandoned
because of the overseas absence o Duration & continuity taxpayer's presence in the overseas country o Durability of association that they have with Aus
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 15 of 98
Iyengar & FCT (2011) AATA 856
Taxpayer spent 2 years 7 months working in Qatar
Lived in a serviced apartment
Did not buy/lease any assets
Paid in Aus $; mostly sent back to Aus
Wife & children remained in Aus
Tribunal: still Aus resident: retained Aus domicile o Didn’t establish PPOA outside of Australia o “Temporary”
Domicile test guidelines
Taxpayer leaves Aus for 2+ years (or intends to) and
Establishes a home in another country or
Only a vague possibility of returning to Australia o Taxpayer has a PPOA outside Australia o i.e. domicile test not met
Taxpayer leaves Aus with definite intention of returning within 2 years o Normally remain an Aus resident o Unless established a PPOA outside Aus
o 183 days test
Deemed Aus resident if physically present in Aus for > 183 days in an income year However, only applies where taxpayer:
Does not have a usual place of abode outside Aus and
Has the intention to take up residence in Aus IT 2681:
Presence in Aus does not need to be continuous
Time starts when person arrives in Aus
Based on income year
o Superannuation fund test Active contributing member (or immediate family member is) of a Commonwealth
superannuation scheme
Deemed to be an Aus resident Relevant to Commonwealth Government employees located in an overseas country
e.g. Australian embassy employees in a foreign country
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 16 of 98
(Residency Test Summary) Derivation of Income: timing
“When has the income been derived? o Determines income year amount will be assessed in
2 methods: o Cash basis (receipts)
When does the taxpayer received cash? o Accrual basis (accruals)
Treated as income when taxpayer accrues the right to receive income
e.g. when goods are delivered / services performed Which basis to use?
Dependent upon the type of income derived
Not the taxpayer o 5 types of income
Income from personal exertion o I.e. manual labour – building o Deemed to be derived when received
I.e. cash basis Whether payment for past or current services
Brent v FCT71 ATC 4195
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 17 of 98
Trading (business income) o Income from carrying on a business must be on accruals basis
i.e. income recognised when earned not when cash is received
Henderson v FCT (1970) 119 CLR 612 o Exception: income from lay-by-sales
Derived when buyer pays final instalment & goods delivered
Revenue received in advance o Payment received upfront for goods / services yet to be provided
Consider accounting & tax implications o e.g. Arthur Murray (NSW) Pty Ltd v FCT (1965) 114 CLR 314 o Tax implications
High Court: payments received up-front were not income
Receipts assessable in income year when dance lessons provided Accruals basis was appropriate
On basis refunds were given If deposit refunds are not given = cash basis (TR 95/7)
Income from professional practices o Accounting basis depends on several factors
Most important: size of professional practice o Smaller professional practices:
Income earning more like personal services income? Cash basis appropriate
FCT v Firstenberg 76 ATC 4141 o Larger professional practices
Accruals basis appropriate if:
Income earning constitutes carrying on a business
More like trading income
Large scale of operations o e.g. Henderson v FCT (1970) 119 CLR 612
Commissioner: borderline cases = accruals basis generally appropriate
Income from property o Interest, dividends & rent
Cash basis o Exceptions: taxpayer carrying on a business of money lending (e.g. banks) or landlord
Accruals basis appropriate
Summary of derivation rules
Type of income Derivation rule
Income from personal exertion Cash
Trading (business) income Accruals
Revenue received in advance Accruals (where refunds given), Cash (no refunds)
Income from professional practices Cash (small)
Accruals (large)
Income from property Cash (individual)
Accruals (main business)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 18 of 98
Source: where
Source is a question of “where?” o “Where has the income been derived?”
Geographical location at which the act, transaction or event that produces the income occurs
Link between source & residency o Issue is only relevant for non-residents
Course: type of income
o Source of income depends upon the type of income derived, not the taxpayer o Income can be classified as:
Income from personal services Trading (business) income Interest Dividends Rent Royalties
Income from personal services o Source of salary, wages, professional services income etc. may be:
(i) Place where the contract was entered into (ii) Place where the work is performed (iii) Location of payment
o Courts held: source is determined based on the most important factor in each case o French v FCT (1957) 98 CLR 398
Taxpayer (Aus resident); employed as an engineer in Aus Taxpayer spent 2 to 3 weeks a year in NZ acting as an inspecting engineer for his
employer His salary was paid into his Sydney bank account as usual Taxpayer argued income earned whilst in NZ was sourced outside Aus & therefore
should be exempt (old section) Court found the source was the place where the work was performed (NZ)
As the services which gave rise to the remuneration were carried out in NZ o FCT v Mitchum (1965) 113 CLR 401
Taxpayer, an actor, was a USA resident He contracted with a Swiss company to be paid $50,000 to act in 2 films Entitled to payment even if his services were not utilised Film was produced largely in Aus Taxpayer was sent to Aus for 11 weeks to act & provide consultancy services Payment was made in the USA Court: most important factor: where contract was signed
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 19 of 98
o Personal services general rule Normal contract of employment/for services?
Source = where work is undertaken Creative powers/special knowledge involved?
Where the work undertaken may be relatively unimportant
Source? Where contract/payment made?
e.g. an author writing a book o On a certain subject? o On a particular country?
o Income from property
(a) Interest
Location of bank account where money deposited or
Place loan contract is made
Spotless Services Ltd v FCT 95 ATC 4775 (b) Dividends
Where company paying the dividends made its profits
Esquire Nominees Ltd v FCT 72 ATC 4076 (c) Rent
Country where the property is located (d) Royalties
Right to use intellectual property (IP) o e.g. copyright, patents, trademarks, designs, licenses etc o Source: country where IP is located & registered
Source summary
Type of Income Source Rule
Income from personal services Where work performed
Trading (business) income Place of business profits
Interest Bank a/c located
Dividends Place of business profits
Rent Place of rental property
Royalties Where IP registered
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 21 of 98
Examples Michelle is a doctor who comes to Australia from France to conduct medical research for five months. She actually stays for seven months to complete the Australian phase of her research project. Michelle's husband and children do not accompany her to Australia. They stay in their home in Paris. From Australia, she assists her husband in running the family business. While in Australia, Michelle stays in a hotel. She uses credit cards to meet day-to-day expenses that are reimbursed by her employer. Her concentration on her research is often interrupted because she has to constantly fax and phone her husband about their emerging business problems. In fact, she occasionally makes a quick trip home for a week to Paris to sort out business dilemma’s.
Michelle is likely a non-resident under the resides test o There was no intention for a long term stay o There is no family or permanent employment ties o Assets are located overseas o Social and living arrangements are that of a non-resident o The length of time was intended to be short
Mohammad is a student from India who comes to Australia to study a 4-year bachelor degree in civil engineering. Mohammad lives in rental accommodation near the university with fellow students and works part-time at the university social club as a barman. Soon after arriving, he receives a call from his mother informing him that his father is seriously ill. After five months, Mohammad withdraws from his studies and permanently returns home to India.
Mohammad is likely a resident under the resides test o There was an intention for a long term stay o Assets are located in Australia o Social and living arrangements are that of a resident o The length of time was intended to be long
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 22 of 98
Lecture 4 – General Deductions
Deductions under s8-1
s8-1(1): You can deduct from your assessable income any loss or outgoing to the extent that: o (a) It is incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income, or o (b) It is necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for the purposes of gaining or
producing assessable income
Hence there are considered to be two positive ‘limbs’
s8-1(2): No deduction is allowed under s8-1(1) to the extend that: o (a) It is a loss or outgoing of capital, or of a capital nature o (b) It is a loss or outgoing of a private or domestic nature o (c) It is incurred in relation to the gaining or producing your exempt income, or o (d) A provision of this Act prevents you from deducting it
Hence there are considered to be four negative ‘limbs’ First Positive Limb s8-1(1a) “You can deduct from your assessable income any loss or outgoing to the extent that it is incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income”
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 23 of 98
When is a loss or outgoing “incurred?” o “Incurred:” not defined in either ITAA 1936 or 1997 o Courts: expenditure is incurred if it is:
Definitively committed to (existing obligation) & Capable of reasonable estimation (quantifiable)
o Courts have held that incurred does not mean the same as paid
Does a loss or outgoing have to be exactly quantified? o CIR v Mitsubishi Motors New Zealand Limited (1995) 17 NZTC 12,351 o Taxpayer assembled motor vehicles & sold them to dealers o Based on previous experience, taxpayer estimated:
63% of all vehicles sold in 1998 contained defects covered by warranty Total cost of all repair work for those vehicles
o Taxpayer offset these costs against income from vehicles sold o Court: followed RACV Insurance v FCT 74 ATC 4169
Confirms incurred ≠ paid: para 6(a): "A loss or outgoing may be incurred within s 8-1 even though it remains unpaid (at
year-end), provided the taxpayer is 'completely subjected' to the loss or outgoing"
Expenses incurred before business starts o “Preparatory” acts
Incurred before business activity undertaken Not deductible under s 8-1: incurred “too soon”
Deductible under s 40-880? o When does a business start?
“current operations” begin o Softwood Pulp & Paper Ltd v FCT 76 ATC 4439 o Goodman Fielder Wattie Ltd v FCT 91 ATC 4438
Expenses incurred in closing down a business o E.g. payments to receivers, liquidators, ASIC in deregistering a company etc. o Generally non-deductible under s8-1
Taxpayer is no longer carrying on a business Expenditure incurred “too late”
o Peyton v FCT (1963) 109 CLR 315
Expenditure incurred after business has ceased operations o Entity may incur day-to-day business expenses after business has ceased trading
Generally non-deductible: not deriving any AI
Placer Pacific Management Pty Ltd v FCT 95 ATC 4459
FCT v Jones (2002) ATC 4135 o May be deductible provided expenditure deductible if business was still trading
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 24 of 98
s40-880 Blackhole expenditure o Business-related capital expenditure not deductible elsewhere
Deductible under s 40-880 ITAA 1997 Section of last resort
o Expenses deductible over a 5 year period 20% deduction each year Expenditure not apportioned if incurred part way through IY
Second Positive Limb s8-1(1b) “You can deduct from your assessable income any loss or outgoing to the extent that it is necessarily incurred in carrying on a business for the purposes of gaining or producing assessable income.”
Meaning of “necessarily incurred” o Courts: outgoing appropriate to taxpayer’s business o ≠ absolutely essential or necessary o Some connection with taxpayers business/income earning process
e.g. head office expenses, entertainment etc
Magna Alloys & Research Pty Ltd v FCT 80 ATC 4542 o “For practical purposes and within the limits of reasonable human conduct, it is for the man
who is carrying on the business to be the judge of what outgoings are necessarily incurred. o It is no part of the function of the Act or those who administer it to dictate to taxpayers in
what business they shall engage or how to run the business profitably or economically.”
First Negative Limb s8-1(2a) “It is a loss or outgoing of capital, or of a capital nature”
Expenses of a capital nature
Accounting: o Expense: P&L – generally deductible for tax o Acquisition of asset: capital – balance sheet
Tax: o “Income” & “Capital” not defined o Courts: 3 tests to distinguish
Once & for all test
Vallambrosa Rubber Co Ltd v Farmer (1910) 5 TC 529:
“…capital expenditure is something that is going to be spent once and for all, and income expenditure is a thing that is going to recur every year”
General rule, not definitive in every case Enduring benefit test
British Insulated & Helsby Cables Ltd v Atherton (1926) A.C. 205
“When expenditure is made…with a view to bringing into existence an asset or an advantage for the enduring benefit, I think that there is very good reason for treating such an expenditure as properly attributable…to capital”
What does the payment represent? Or what is it for?
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 25 of 98
Business entity text -> generally most important
Incurred to create / enhance profit-yielding structure: generally capital
Question o Incurred to restore the profit-yielding structure? Or o Protect/defend day-to-day business operations?
Generally deductible
Sun Newspapers Ltd & Associated Newspapers Ltd v FCT (1938) 61 CLR 337 o Held expenditure not deductible because: o (i) Lump sum payment incurred to remove competition o (ii) Made to enlarge taxpayer's organisation o (iii) Consequences, e.g. loss in circulation, were of a lasting character o (iv) Transaction involved purchase of a capital asset, i.e. printing
equipment
Legal fees: capital or deductible? o Use previous tests, i.e.:
Incurred to enlarge, preserve, protect or defend profit yielding structure = capital Existence of the business is threatened = capital Incurred to protect / defend day-to-day business operations = deductible under s 8-1
Second Negative Limb s8-1(2b) “It is a loss or outgoing of a private or domestic nature”
Expenditure directly related to income earning activity? o Consider: clothing, food, home-office expenses
“Essentially” private or domestic nature o No deduction allowed
FCT v Cooper 91 ATC 4396 o Food consumed not deductible
Clothing o Clothing classified into 5 categories: (a) Conventional, (b) Compulsory uniforms, (c) Non-
compulsory uniforms, (d) Occupation specific, (e) Protective o Tax deductibility: Division 34 ITAA 1997 o Day-to-day clothing = private expense
Non-deductible under s 8-1 o Employer requires taxpayer to dress in a particular way?
Suits for lawyers/accountants, sports clothes by sports teachers etc?
Still ‘conventional clothing’ as can be worn outside of work
Limited exceptions to rule: TR 97/12 o Non-conventional clothing which employee required to wear = deductible o Non-compulsory uniforms: not deductible
Unless uniform design entered on Register of Approved Occupational Clothing at time expense incurred (s 34-25 ITAA 1997)
Uniform must have a sufficiently distinctive look & an obvious identity
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 26 of 98
o Occupation specific clothing
Deduction generally allowed
Provided not conventional clothing
E.g. nurse’s traditional uniform, chef’s hat, barrister’s wig o s 34-20(1) ITAA 1997
o Protective clothing Protective clothing & safety footwear = deductible
Provided use relates to income earning activity Clothing worn to protect taxpayer from personal injury, disease or death Protect taxpayers everyday clothing from damage
Laundry and dry cleaning o Costs of laundry and dry cleaning follow clothing treatment o Amount claimed < $150
No need to keep records Commissioner will accept estimate: TR 98/5
Hairdressing & Grooming expenses o Non-deductible: private expense o Taxpayer required to maintain high standard of appearance?
TR 69/18 o Performing artist
May be deductible if required for particular role
Home-office expenses o Carried on business or employment activities at home?
May be entitles to home-related deductions o TR 93/30: is the home a:
Place of business? Or A convenient place to work
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 27 of 98
o Deductions may be available for: Interest on home, rent, insurance, council & water rates** Heating & lighting Depreciation, insurance, repairs & maintenance for relevant equipment & furniture
relating to business Repairs & maintenance to home** Cleaning calculated on floor space area Telephone costs ** Only available for place of business
o Deduction is apportioned between business & private use E.g. floor space Floor area of business / total floor area of house * relevant expenditure Para 16-480 2012 CCH Australian Master Tax Guide
o Claiming home office expenses Actual expenses vs. 34 cents per hour: TR 93/30 Heating/cooling & lighting
Difference between what actually paid & what would have paid if not worked from home
Depreciation: items used in income-producing activities 34 cents per hour: record amount of time working from home over 4-week period
Third Negative Limb s8-1(2c) “It is incurred in relation to the gaining or producing your exempt income”
Deduction not allowed o Not deriving any assessable income o E.g. expenditure incurred by a taxpayer doing voluntary work for a charity
TD 93/185 Fourth Negative Limb s8-1(2d) “A provision of this Act prevents you from deducting it”
E.g. deduction under s 8-1(1) specifically denied for: o Fines & penalties for breaching the law (s 26-5) o HECS & HELP payments (s 26-20) o Recreational club fees (s 26-45) o Leisure facilities (s 26-50) o Bribes paid to public officials (ss 26-52 & 26-53) o Most entertainment (subdivision 32-B) o The first $250 of self-education expenses (s 82A) o Employee’s car parking expenses (s 51AGA)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 30 of 98
Examples Rachel is a sales consultant with a telemarketing company. She uses her mobile telephone, to make work-related telephone calls. Her mobile phone bill for the month of June 2012 was $100. Based on a breakdown of these calls, Rachel reliably estimates that she used the phone 75% for business and 25% for private purposes What amount is deductible to Rachel under s 8-1?
$75 is deductible is it fits 8-1(1a), but the remaining $25 is excluded under 8-1(2b)
Ned, an Australian resident individual taxpayer, receives his Telstra telephone bill (for $290) for the month of June on 16 June 2012. Ned pays his telephone bill on 2 July 2012. Ned used the telephone 100% for work-related purposes When has Ned incurred the telephone expense? 2012 income year or 2013 income year?
The 2012 income year as it is a quantifiable, existing obligation for the 2012 income year Jim operates a renovation business. Jim is contracted to renovate Suzie’s kitchen for $5,000. Jim finishes this work on 12 August 2011 & is fully paid for this work on that date. At Christmas, Jim gives Suzie a bottle of champagne as a gift. Jim expects the gift will either generate future business from Suzie or motivate her to refer Jim’s services to others Is Jim able to deduct the cost of the champagne under s 8-1?
Yes, it is an entertainment expense that has some connection to the taxpayer’s business An engineering consulting firm “Eng Co” employed James. One of the terms of his employment agreement was that if James left Eng Co & took clients with him, he would reimburse Eng Co. James resigned from Eng Co & some clients followed James into his new business. Eng Co sued for breach of contract. James incurred $8,500 in legal expenses regarding the legal action, which eventually resulted in an out of court settlement. The out of court payment settled in full any claims made by Eng Co in relation to the clients, so that James was able to continue his new business. Is James able to deduct his legal costs under s 8-1?
No – as it is capital expenditure
It brought into existence an asset or an advantage for enduring benefit
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 31 of 98
Jessica builds & markets houses in Brisbane. Following allegations of improper business tactics, a Royal Commission was established to investigate her activities. The Royal Commission proceedings are unlikely to threaten the existence of the business itself. However, the proceedings are likely to cause embarrassment to Jessica and a decline in her future business. Jessica incurred $50,000 of legal expenses & another $20,000 in public advertising to counter the allegations made Can Jessica deduct these costs under s 8-1?
No, as it wasn’t to protect day-to-day operations Galvin owns a successful cocktail bar & restaurant. Sam applies for a liquor license to open a cocktail bar near Galvin’s business. Galvin opposes the license & incurs legal fees of $3,500 Is the cost of the legal fees deductible to Galvin under s 8-1?
No, as it is incurred to protect/defend Greg, a pharmacist, is sued due to reckless dispensing of certain drugs. The maximum penalty that can be imposed is a fine of $5,000. Greg cannot be suspended or deregistered if found guilty. Greg incurs legal fees of $2,000 in defending these charges Is the cost of the legal fees deductible to Greg under s 8-1?
Yes, as it is to defend day-to-day business operations Kirstin works as bank teller from 9-5pm, 5 days a week. 2 days a week she also work at a liquor store from 6-9pm. Before starting work at the liquor store, Kirstin buys an evening meal for $15 Is the cost of the meal deductible to Kirstin under s 8-1?
No, as it is essentially of domestic nature Mel is a marriage celebrant who purchases dress suits, accessories, shoes & stockings for her work. She does not wear these items when she is not working. The items are far more extensive than she would ordinarily acquire. During the 2012 income year Mel spends $2,820 on clothing to wear when acting as a marriage celebrant Would Mel be able to claim a deduction for the clothing costing $2,820 under s 8-1?
No, as it is still conventional clothing that can be worn outside of work
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 32 of 98
Evelyn is a lawyer. Evelyn works from home in her study approx. 20 hours per week (out of approx. 80 hours per week), 45 weeks of the year. The study is principally used for her work, though is occasionally used for personal reasons. Based on the house’s floor plans, the study consists of 16% of the house’s floor area. Evelyn asks you whether she can claim a deduction for a portion (16%) of interest on her mortgage, rates & insurance premiums (totaling $10,000), and if so, how much?
No, as it is not the only place available for business (as required for interest repayments)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 33 of 98
Lecture 5 – Allowable Specific Provisions
General and Specific Deductions
s 8-5(1) ITAA 1997 states: o “You can also deduct from your assessable income an amount that a provision of the Act
allows you to deduct.”
s 12-5 ITAA 1997 contains a summary of all the specific deductions available to taxpayers
Importance of deduction o The size of your tax deductions is directly related to your ability to know and tack all your
expenses o To balance out inequalities o ATO’s focus for 2012-13
Defence Force IT managers Plumbers Medical practitioners Tax avoidance schemes Data matching (dividends, interest, capital gains, foreign income) “How can this expense be legitimately related to my income?”
Repairs s25-10
s25-10 ITAA 1997: repairs deductible? Must: (i) Incur repair in income year (ii) Not be capital (iii) Be to premises, plant etc used for producing AI (iv) Not be an initial repair
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 34 of 98
Borrowing Expenses s25-25
Expenses incurred in borrowing money: o Not interest o Transaction costs etc.
If money is used to produce AI; expenses are deductible over: o 5 Years or o Loan Term (or period of loan if repaid early)
Whatever is shorter
Calculation is done on a daily basis Car Expenses: Div 28 ITAA 1997
What is a car? o S995-1 ITAA 1997
Car expenses deductible under s8-1 ITAA 1997 if: o Own or lease car o Incurred in deriving AI or carrying on a business
Cost of travelling between home & work/business is not deductible o Lunney v FCT (1958) 100 CLR 478
4 Methods to claim car expenses: s28-15 o Cents per kilometer o 12% of original value o One-third of actual expenses o Logbook method
Choose any method for each car o Can change methods at end of IY (s28-20) o ATO: work related car expenses calculator can be helpful
1. Cents per km method
o s28-25: claim maximum of 5,000 business kms Number of business kms travelled during income year * rate per kms (cents)
o Records: not required to maintain logbook / keep receipts Justify how business kms estimated
o Rate per km (cents) depends on car’s engine capacity
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 35 of 98
2. 12% of original value: s28-45 o Only use this method if:
Travelled > 5,000 business kms during IY Or would have if car owned for full year
o 12% of original cost of car * number of days owned in income year
o Original cost = acquisition price / MV of car when leased
Limited to luxury car limit $57,466 for 2012 IY
3. One-third actual expenses: s28-70
o Only use this method if: Travelled > 5,000 business kms during IY Or would have if car owned for full year
o Calculation
One-third of actual expenses
o Records: not required to maintain logbook / keep receipts
4. Logbook Method: s28-90 ITAA 1997 o Use this method regardless of number of kms travelled
o Records: logbook detailing odometer readings for each trip undertaken for 12 consecutive
weeks Valid for 5 years if no change in pattern of use Separate logbook for each car Receipts of all car expenses must be kept
o Business % * total car expenses incurred during IY
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 36 of 98
Depreciating Assets: Div 40 ITAA 1997
s8-1(2): denied immediate deduction for any outgoing of a “capital nature”
Deduction for: decline in value o “Depreciating asset” o Holder (generally owner) o Used in the course of gaining or producing AI
Two methods to calculating the depreciation deduction
What is a depreciating asset? o Asset with limited effective life o Expected to decline in value
E.g. plant & machinery, computer equipment etc o Expenditure on capital works (e.g. buildings):
May qualify for capital works write-off: Division 43 o Cost: purchase price & incidental costs o Holder?
Determining an asset’s effective life o Decline in value based on asset’s effective life
Expressed in years o 2 choices:
Commissioner’s determination: TR 2011/2 Self-assess
o Choice made when: asset first used or Installed & ready for use (s 40-60)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 37 of 98
Diminishing Value Method o Base value = cost – accumulated depreciation o Pro-rated on day count (max 366 days) o “Diminishing value rate”
200% if asset acquired on/after 10 May 2006 Otherwise 150%
Special rules for individual tax payers
Low Value Pool (LVP) o Once allocated to a LVP, asset must remain in LVP o No need for day count test if asset bought/sold
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 38 of 98
Depreciation rules for small business entities
Large business taxpayers
Computer software o Computer hardware (e.g. computers, screens etc.) depreciated using ordinary rules o Computer software: special deprecation rules
2 types:
Internally developed software o Optional: “software development pool”
Intended use: solely for producing assessable income o Depreciable using prime cost method:
0% in 1st year, 40% in 2nd year, 40% in 3rd year, 20% in 4th year
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 39 of 98
Purchased software (“in-house” software) o Software purchases “off the shelf” o Developed/commissioned software not allocated to software
development pool o Depreciated over 4 years using prime cost method
I.e. 25%
Disposals of depreciated assets o “Balancing adjustment event” o Accounting term = gain / loss on sale
Comparison of accounting and tax terminology
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 40 of 98
Deduction for Capital Works Expenditure
Available when capital works used to produce AI
Calculated on daily basis
Based on original construction cost o ATO will accept estimates TR 97/25
Rate depends on: o Year construction commenced and use of capital works
Division 43: “capital works”
What does construction expenditure include? o Construction costs o Preliminary expenses o Integral structural features o Does not include costs associated with:
Acquiring land Clearing land Demolishing existing structures Pre-construction site clearance Landscaping
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 41 of 98
Substantiation of Work-Related Expenses
Required to substantiate: o Work, car & business travel expenses
Written evidence Retained for minimum of 5 years
Not required for: o Employment related expenses if total claim < $300 o Laundry expenses < $150 o Travel & overtime meal claims if < allowance received o Car expenses using cents per km method
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 42 of 98
Examples William purchases a house that appeared to be in good repair. To make it more attractive to prospective tenants, minor repairs & renovations are undertaken costing $3,200. During the course of these repairs & renovations, William discovers that the ravages of white ants seriously affect the woodwork. William incurs $27,000 to remedy the problems caused by the white ant infestation & to restore the property to a state in which it is suitable for occupation by tenants What deductions (if any) can William claim under s 25-10 ITAA 1997?
No as it is an initial repair
Ken runs a manufacturing business in a building in which the wooden floor needs repairing. Ken’s options are either to repair the old floor or to replace it with an entirely new one of steel & concrete. Ken decides to adopt the second option because it will save future repairs & because it has distinct advantages over the old wooden floor Can Ken claim a deduction under s 25-10 ITAA 1997 for the replacement of the wooden floor?
No as it is a capital replacement cost On 17 January 2012, Mark incurred borrowing expenses totaling $8,240 with the Commonwealth Bank in arranging a $350,000 loan to finance the purchase of a rental property. Mark also incurred interest of $9,050 from 17 Jan - 30 June 2012. Property will be used exclusively for renting to tenants. Loan is for a term of 20 years What amount can Mark claim under s 25-25 ITAA 1997 in respect of the 2012 income year? Hint: from 17 Jan 2012 - 30 Jun 2012: 165 days
8240/(5*365)*165 = $745 On 22 February 2012, Debbie purchased a rental property for $450,000 & immediately rented it out. Debbie obtained a report from a quantity surveyor stating that the property was built in 2002 for an estimated construction cost of $300,000 What can Debbie claim as a capital works allowance for the 2012 income year? Hint: there are 129 day from 22 Feb 2012 to 30 Jun 2012
$300,000 * 2.5% * 129/365 = $2,651
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 43 of 98
Lecture 6 – Capital Gains Tax
s102-5 ITAA 1997 says specifically that a net capital gain is included in your assessable income
CGT introduced on 20 Sept 1985 o Parts 3-1 & 3-3 ITAA 1997
CGT is not a separate tax
CGT applies: o Disposal of capital asset acquired on or after 20 Sept 1985 (examples?) o Disposal not undertaken in ordinary course of business
Assessable: s 6-5 (examples?)
Examples of where CGT applies: o Property (but not the house you live in – it is exempt) o Shares
CGT only applies if you are not taxed under your normal taxable income conditions
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 45 of 98
Step One: What is a CGT Event?
CGT Event A1: Disposal of a CGT asset o Disposal = change in legal & beneficial ownership o Event A1 occurs when:
(a) Contract signed (not settlement) (b) If no contract: physical change of ownership
CGT Event C1: Loss or destruction of a CGT asset o CGT event C1 occurs when:
Taxpayer insured: first received compensation Taxpayer not insured: destruction occurred
Can’t determine: loss is first discovered o Capital gain: capital proceeds received > cost base o Capital loss: capital proceeds received < cost base
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 46 of 98
Step Two: What is a CGT Asset?
Post-CGT asset
S108-5(1) ITAA 1997: any kind of property o Examples? o How does CGT affect depreciating assets?
Classification: o Collectables
s 08-10(2):
(a) Paintings, sculptures, drawings, engravings, photographs, jewellery, an antique, coin or medallion;
(b) A rare portfolio, manuscript or book; or
(c) A postage stamp or a first day cover
that is used or kept mainly for the taxpayers personal use or enjoyment Calculation of CG & CL from collectibles
Rule 1: collectable acquired for > $500: CGT applies
Rule 2: collectable acquired for <= $500: exempt from CGT
Rule 3: Capital losses from collectables can only be used to offset capital gains from collectables
o Personal-use assets s108-20(2): CGT asset kept mainly for the taxpayer’s personal use or enjoyment
Excludes: o Collectibles o Land & buildings
E.g.: boats, furniture, electrical goods, household items (including pets) Calculation of CG & CL from personal use assets
Rule 1: personal use asset acquired for > $10,000: CGT applies
Rule 2: personal use asset acquired for ≤ 10,000: exempt from CGT
Rule 3: capital losses from personal use assets: disregarded o Other assets
Land and buildings
s108-55(1): land & buildings = separate assets for CGT purposes
Important for pre-CGT land & post-CGT buildings o Pre CGT land: exempt from CGT o Post CGT buildings: CGT applies
What is a post CGT building? o Contract?
Capital improvements
Capital improvements to post CGT asset o Included in cost base (4th element: s 110-25(4))
Capital improvements to pre-CGT asset? o Separate CGT asset if (s 108-70(2)): o Cost base when CGT event occurs is greater than:
CGT improvement threshold (2012: $130,418) and 5% of capital proceeds from sale of asset
Otherwise exempt from CGT
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 47 of 98
Step Three: Exemptions
Step Four: Rollover Relief
CGT rollover = CGT deferred
4 situations quality for rollover relief e.g.: o Disposal of CGT asset by an individual to wholly-owned company
There is no Step Five: Does a capital gain or loss eventuate?
s 100-45 : 3 steps to calculate capital gain or loss: o 1. Determine capital proceeds (CP) o 2. Determine cost base (CB) or reduced cost base (RCB) o 3. Capital gain = CP – CB
Capital loss = RCB – CP
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 48 of 98
Step Six: Exceptions to Capital Proceeds Rule
1. Market value substitution rule o E.g. no proceeds received / associated parties
Market value of CGT asset at time of disposal 2. Apportionment rule
o Receives payment which relates to 1+ CGT event 3. Non-receipt rule
o Does not receive some / all proceeds o Payment subsequently received?
4. Non-receipt rule o Taxpayer repays part of proceeds to purchaser
5. Assumption of liability rule o Does purchaser assume any unpaid liability over asset?
6. Misappropriation rule o Agent or employee misappropriates capital proceeds
CP’s decreased Determining Cost Base
Reduced cost base o Capital proceeds < cost base: capital loss is possible o CL = reduced cost base (RCB) - capital proceeds (CP)
o Div 43 allowance always deducted Not based on date criteria like cost base
o No elements indexed under indexation method
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 49 of 98
Examples On 17 June 1998, Lauren bought a factory for $400,000. On 1 May 2012, Lauren’s factory is completely destroyed by a fire. The market value of the factory on 1 May 2012 was $650,000. Lauren received $600,000 in compensation from her insurance company on 1 August 2012
What CGT event (if any) applies? o Insurance is a capital gain o Destruction is a capital loss
What is the timing of the CGT event? o 1st May
What if Lauren did not have insurance? o Always a capital loss
What is Lauren’s capital gain/loss o CL = 0 – 400,000 = $400,000 o CG = 600,000 – 400,000 = $200,000 o CL of $200,000 overall
During the 2012 income year, Adrian sells 2 collectables: a painting & a book. He derives a capital gain of $6,000 from the sale of a painting and a capital loss of $7,000 from the sale of a book. He also derives a capital gain of $10,000 from the sale of 2,000 Woolworth’s shares. What is Adrian’s assessable income for the 2012 income year?
CG = 6,000
CL = (7,000) – however it can only actually be 6000 as only collectables can offset collectables
CG = 10,000 – an other asset
Total assessable income is $10,000 On 15 December 2005, Geoff buys a boat for $12,000, which he used for his own personal use and enjoyment.
If Geoff sells the boat for $15,000 in August 2011 what are the CGT consequences (if any)?
If Geoff sells the boat for $11,000 in August 2011 what are the CGT consequences (if any)?
Sells boat for $15,000 - $3,000 CGT
Sells boat for $11,000 - $0 CGT Loss is offset (loss can never use used to offset for personal-use items)
Classify each of the following assets for CGT purposes
A fridge used in the family home PERSONAL USE ASSET
An expensive bottle of French wine PERSONAL USE ASSET
A basketball signed by Michael Jordan PERSONAL USE ASSET (Doesn’t fit definition of collectable)
A photograph signed by Michael Jordan COLLECTABLE (Fits definition)
A Canon EOS 500 camera PERSONAL USE ASSET
A kangaroo sculpture COLLECTABLE (Fits definition)
A holiday home at Noosa OTHER ASSET
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 50 of 98
11 March 1982 Melanie purchased a block of land for $60,000. 1 May 1994 Melanie started construction of a building on this block of land, which ultimately cost $175,000. 6 March 2012 Melanie sold both the land & building for $350,000. At the time of sale, the land was valued at $140,000 Calculate Melanie’s capital gain for the year ended 30 June 2012
Value of building: 350,000 – 140,000 = 210,000
(140,000 of Land was sold tax free as it is pre CGT)
Gain on building = 210,000 – 175,000 = $35,000 CGT liability On 20 May 1993 Sharon purchases a rental property in Samford for $155,000. On 16 May 2005 she adds a veranda to the property at a cost of $35,000. On 9 February 2012 Sharon sells the rental property for $620,000 Is the veranda regarded as a separate asset for CGT purposes?
As the property is a post CGT asset then all improvements are included into the cost
CG = 620,000 – 35,000 – 155,000 = $430,000 Ruby sells a parcel of land under a contract of sale for $600,000, which was signed on 1 June 2012. Settlement (change of ownership) occurs on 1 July 2012. Ruby requires payment to be made in 3 instalments of $200,000 on 10 June 2012, 10 Sept 2012 & 10 Dec 2012.
What CGT event applies to Ruby? o Event A1 occurs
When does the CGT occur? o Event A1 is deemed to have occurred when the contract is signed, 1st June
What is Ruby’s capital proceeds? o Ruby’s capital proceeds are $600,000
When does she return this as assessable income? o CGT event A1 occurs 1st June 2012, cash she is entitled to receive happens at that time so it
is all in the 2012 income year.
On 14 April 2012, Mark transfers a vacant block of land to his wife, Tina, for no consideration. Mark acquired the land in March 1996 for $75,000. Market value of land on 14 April 2012 is $125,000
What CGT event (if any) applies to Mark? o CGT event A1 – change of ownership
What is Mark’s capital proceeds? o Are deemed to be $125,000 (the market value on sale) – even though he got no money. o He must include a capital gain of $50,000 in his tax return
Are any exemptions/concessions/rollovers available? o A vacant block of land gets none of this (could be a rollover if Family court ordered Mark to
give his wife the property)
What impact does that have on Tina? o Tina has dammed to have bought the property for $125,000. So if she later sells, this is cost
base
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 51 of 98
On 16 May 2012, Joe signs a contract to sell a block of land to Maryanne for $275,000. Joe acquired the block of land in April 1996. Joe initially took out a loan with ANZ Bank to finance the acquisition of the block of land. On 16 May 2012, Joe still owes ANZ Bank a total of $200,000. As part of the sale agreement, Maryanne gives Joe $75,000 cash & agrees to assume liability for the outstanding amount of the loan (i.e. $200,000).
What CGT event (if any) applies to Joe? o Sale of land
What is Joe’s capital proceeds? o $75,000 + $200,000
15 November 1995, Paul acquired a rental property for $240,000 that was used exclusively for income-producing purposes. He paid legal fees of $4,000 & stamp duty of $5,200 on the same date. On 14 August 1999, Paul added a swimming pool to the house at a cost of $17,500. On 10 May 2012, Paul sold his rental property for $300,000. Sales commission totalled $9,000 Determine the cost base of the rental property with references to the various elements contained in s 110-25
240,000 is a capital cost
Legal fees of $4,000 & stamp duty of $5,200 are not tax deductible but you do count them in your cost base (as they are once off costs associated with acquisition)
17,500 pool is a capital cost
Sales commission is counted in the capital cost (as it is an expense of sale)
Cost base: $275,700 Peter acquired a rental property under a contract on 10 May 1996 for $200,000. Incidental costs of acquisition were $8,000. Peter has claimed 2.5% capital works allowance as a deduction under Div 43 of a total of $40,000 (based on a total construction cost of $100,000). On 10 May 2012 Peter sold the rental property for $200,000 Calculate Peter’s capital gain/(loss) on sale (if any) Capital gain: 200,000 – 208,000 = (8,000) Reduced cost base: 208,000 – 40,000 = 168,000 Capital loss = 168,000 – 200,000 = (32,000) As both the gain and loss formulas are negative, there is neither a gain or a loss. Hence the client has to pay no tax, yay!
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 52 of 98
Lecture 8 – Capital Gains Tax Advanced Reducing a capital gain: 2 methods
Can use different methods for each CGT asset o Choose method with lowest capital gain o Note: conditions to use each method
Indexation method o Division 114: allows for effects of inflation o 1. CGT asset held for <12 months before disposal
No indexation available o 2. CGT asset held for > 12 months before disposal
Capital gain = capital proceeds – indexed cost base o Indexed cost base
Each element of cost base
Multiplied by relevant indexation factor
Rounded to 3 decimal places
Except 3rd element (ownership costs) Formula to obtain indexed cost base: quarter in which asset is disposed of / quarter
in which cost was incurred o SEE EXAMPLES ONE AND TWO FOR WORKING
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 53 of 98
CGT discount method o Was brought in to make things easier! o CGT asset held < 12 months before disposal
Discount method not available o CGT asset held > 12 months before disposal
Capital gain = (capital proceeds – cost base) x (100% - discount percentage)
o Discount percentages: Individual – 50% Trust – 50% Super Fund – 33.33% Company – 0% Partnerships – doesn’t apply because profit goes back to an individual and
depending on their circumstances, it falls under one of the other four entity types o Rules surrounding use
Date the CGT Asset was acquired and
disposed of
Methods available to be used by eligible taxpayers
Indexation method CGT discount method
Asset acquired and disposed of before 21 September 1999
Asset acquired before 21 September 1999 and disposed of
after 21 September 1999
Asset acquired and disposed of
after 21 September 1999
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 54 of 98
What method should you use?
Applying Capital Losses
Capital losses only offset against capital gains derived o Oldest losses used first o Capital losses fully utilised?
Indexation: against indexed capital gain
CGT discount method: against gross capital gain o Before CGT discount applied
No capital gains? Capital losses carried forward
Applying Capital Losses: Example
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 55 of 98
Main Residence Exemption: Basic Concepts
s118-110: any CG or CL from a taxpayer’s dwelling & adjacent land is disregarded if: o Taxpayer is an individual and o Dwelling was taxpayer’s MR throughout entire ownership period
CGT will apply if: o MR used for purpose of producing assessable income o MR for only part of ownership period
What is a dwelling? o s118-115: any unit of accommodation that is used mainly for residential purposes &
includes: House or cottage Apartment, flat or unit Unit in a retirement village Caravan, houseboat or other mobile home
o How long do you need to live in dwelling? o Adjacent land (s118-120)
MR exemption extends to “adjacent land” Applies provided adjacent land is:
Close to or near dwelling
Used primarily for private or domestic purposes in association with the dwelling
Total area of the land does not exceed 2 hectares (or 4.94 acres)
Land & dwelling must be sold under same contract of sale
Changing MR o Taxpayer only entitled to 1 MR at any one time o Taxpayer acquires a dwelling that will become their MR but still owns an existing residence?
Both dwellings treated as MR for up to 6 months if:
Old dwelling was taxpayer’s MR for continuous period of at least 3 months in previous 12 months before sale
Old dwelling was not used for producing assessable income in any part of that 12 month period &
New dwelling becomes the taxpayer’s MR
Only 1 MR o Takes longer than 6 months to sell old MR?
Taxpayer still entitled to 6-month exemption Time period > 6 months subject to CGT
o CG/ CL pro-rated: Number of days in excess of six-month period Total number of days taxpayer owned the dwelling
Choice of MR o Taxpayer can only claim MR exemption:
For 1 MR at a time (subject to 6-month overlap rule) Even if owns 2 places & lives in both concurrently
E.g. city home & coast home
Elect 1 as MR exemption Choice made when tax return is prepared for year when first property is sold
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 56 of 98
Spouses with different MRs o s118-170(1): taxpayer & spouse occupying different MRs
Must choose 1 dwelling as their MR Each person only nominate maximum of 50% of each residence
o “Spouse” = legal or de facto husband or wife (s 995-1) Not living permanently separate & apart from taxpayer
Building, renovating or repairing a MR o Taxpayer acquires land & then builds a dwelling on land
Partially completed dwelling (& land) can be treated as MR for up to 4 years before taxpayer’s moves in
o Completed dwelling must become taxpayer’s MR as soon as practicable & o Taxpayer resides in MR for at least 3 months before sale o No other dwelling can be taxpayer’s MR during same period
Except 6-month double up exemption
Absence from MR o Taxpayer who initially occupies a dwelling as a MR & then ceases to occupy it
Still treat dwelling as their MR for: o Max 6 years if dwelling used to produce assessable income while taxpayer is absent o Indefinitely if dwelling is not used to produce assessable income (s 118-145(3))
Change of purpose of MR o Taxpayer may change the use of their entire property e.g. from a MR to a rental property
CGT impact depends on when change of use occurred
I.e. before/after 20 August 1996 o Before 20 Aug 1996: apportioned on time basis o After 20 Aug 1996: based on market value when change occurred
Apportioned on time basis from that point
o Property first used to produce assessable income before 20 August 1996 s118-185: MR exemption is pro-rated on a time basis Calculation:
o Property first used to produce assessable income on or after 20 August 1996 s118-192: taxpayer deemed to have acquired dwelling at its market value
At time property first used to produce assessable income Then pro-rated on a time basis from change of use (if applicable) Calculation:
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 57 of 98
Use of MR for producing AI o Taxpayer uses part of their MR to conduct a business?
Apportioned on both a time & area basis o Time basis: rules previously discussed still apply
I.e. when did change of use occur? Before/after 20 August 1996? o Area basis:
Lecture 4: deductions pro-rated based on floor space CG / CL also apportioned based on floor space
CGT Administration
If taxpayer inherits a CGT asset: important to keep appropriate records: o MV of pre-CGT assets on date of death o Cost base details for post-CGT assets o Capital expenditure incurred by legal representative during administration of the estate
Option of maintaining records or an asset register
CGT Records o s121-20(1): required to keep records of:
Every act, transaction, event or circumstance Reasonably expected to be relevant in calculating a CG/CL from a CGT event
o Not required if CG/CL is disregarded E.g. pre-CGT assets or CGT exempt assets
o s121-25: records maintained for 5 years from date of CGT event
Asset register o s121-35: information required:
Date of asset’s acquisition Cost of the asset A description, amount & date of each cost associated with asset’s purchase (e.g.
stamp duty & legal fees) Other relevant information (e.g. capital improvements) Date of the CGT event (e.g. date of disposal) Capital proceeds in respect of the CGT event
o Entries certified by a tax agent & in English o Source documents retained for 5 years from entry into register
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 58 of 98
Examples Louise purchases 2,500 Wesfarmers Ltd shares on 17 June 1991 for $10,000. She sells these shares on 4 Jan 1998 for $17,500.
What is the indexed cost base for these shares? o (120.3/106.0) = 1.13490 = 1.135 o $10,000 * 1.135 = $11,350
What is Louise’s net capital gain? o CP $17,500 – (ICB) $11,350 = $6,150
1 Jan 1989, Angela signed a contract to acquire a commercial building for $1,000,000. 1 Feb 1994, Angela made capital improvements of $40,000 to enhance the building. 8 Sept 2011 Angela sold the buildings for $1,750,000 under a contract of sale. Legal & commission costs totaling $30,000 relating to the sale were incurred on 8 Sept 2011 Calculate the indexed cost base of the building for CGT purposes and Angela’s net capital gain for inclusion in her 2012 income tax return
(123.4/92.9) = 1.3283 = 1.328 o $1,000,000 * 1.328 = $1,328,000
(123.4/110.4) = 1.118 o $40,000 * 1.118 = $44,720
What is the net capital gain? o $1,750,000 - $44,720 - $1,328,000 - $30,000 = CG of $347,280
Bought and sold before 21 Sept 1999. 7 March 1994, Joe acquired 500 BHP shares for $6,000. 17 August 1999, Joe sells these shares for $12,000
Can only use the indexation method: CG = CP – ICB
ICB = $6,000 * (123.4/110.4 = 1.118 rounded to 3DP)
ICB $6,708; CG = CP $12,000 - $6,708 = $5292 Bought before & sold after 21 Sept 1999. 7 March 1994, Joe acquired 500 BHP shares for $6,000. 12 May 2012, Joe sells these shares for $12,000
The indexation and discount methods can both be used: pick the one that gives the lowest CG
Indexation CG: $5,292
Discount Method: CG = (CP $12,000 – CB $6,000) * 50% = $3,000 Bought & sold after 21 Sept 1999. 22 Jan 2003, Joe acquired 500 BHP shares for $6,000. 12 May 2012, Joe sells these shares for $12,000
Can only use the discount method
CG = (CP $12,000 – CB $6,000) * 50% = $3,000
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 59 of 98
During the 2012 income year, Joe sold:
500 BHP shares for $12,000. These shares cost Joe $6,000 in Jan 2003
A rental property. Under the indexation method, Joe made a capital gain of $85,000 Joe also has capital losses brought forward of $4,000 & collectible losses brought forward of $3,500 Calculate Joe’s net capital gain to be included in his assessable income for the year ended 30 June 2012
Discount method o Applying loss against shares
CG on shares: 6000 PY losses: (4000) Notional CG: 2000 50% discount: $1,000
+ $85,000 from property = $86,000 o Applying loss against rental property
CG on shares: 6000 50% discount: $3,000
+ $85,000-$4,000 from property = $84,000
Main Residence. Robert owns a 1.5-hectare property on which he has a house, swimming pool & tennis court. This is considered his main residence. There is a public access laneway at the side of the house that separates the tennis court from the rest of the property
Yes
Land doesn’t have to be touching – but the tennis court must be sold at the same time as the house On 13 November 1988, Anne bought a house, which she used as her MR. On 1 January 2012, she bought a new house and moved in immediately. At this point, Anne put her old house up for sale. On 15 April 2012, Anne signed a contract to sell her old house.
Which house(s) can Anne claim the MR exemption for?
Both Does it make any difference if Anne were to rent out her old house before she sells it?
Yes, because it would then be used to produce assessable income David & Karen currently rent an apartment in Indooroopilly. In April 2008, they purchased a block of land with the intention of building their dream house. Construction of the house did not commence until March 2011. Construction is completed in December 2011. David & Karen move into the house in January 2012 & are currently residing there What CGT consequences does this have for David & Karen?
None, they would be able to get the entire exemption – have a 4-year exemption.
If construction was delayed, then CGT would be apportioned for time over the 4 years only
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 60 of 98
Absence from MR. In July 1995, Debbie buys a house in Windsor for $80,000, which she immediately moves into and nominates as her MR. In July 1998, she is posted to New York for 5 years and rents out her Windsor house. Whilst in New York Debbie rents her apartment. In July 2003, Debbie returns to Australia and moves back into her Windsor house for 4 more years. In June 2007, she is sent by her employer to Paris & rents her Windsor house out for another 5 years. In Paris, Debbie rents a house. In March 2012, Debbie returns from Paris & sells Windsor house in May 2012 for $440,000 Advise Debbie of any CGT consequences
Main residence exemption is still valid: because the 6-year period is never breached. o She returned home which started the period again
On 1 July 1990, Gabe buys a house in Kedron for $125,000, which he uses as his MR. On 1 July 1995, Gabe buys a new house in Newmarket, which he immediately moves into & rents out his old house at Kedron to tenants. On 1 July 2011 he sells the house at Kedron for $375,000, making a capital gain of $250,000 Calculate Gabe’s capital gain if he elects to use CGT discount method
MR discount: $250,000 * 16/21 = $190,476
CGT discount method also applied: $190,476 * 50%
= $95,238 Use the same facts as Example 11. Now assume Gabe rents out his old house at Kedron on 1 July 2004. The market value of the Kedron house at this date is $300,000. He sells the Kedron house on 1 July 2011 for $375,000 Calculate Gabe’s capital gain if he elects to use the CGT discount method
($375,000 On 1 May 1992, Kate a self-employed doctor, buys a house for $200,000, which she uses as her MR. 4 years later, on 1 May 1996, Kate converts 1 room in the house into a doctor’s surgery. The surgery occupies 20% of the house. On 1 May 2012, Kate sells the dwelling for $500,000
Calculate Kate’s capital gain if she elects to use the CGT discount method
Initial CG = CP ($500,000 - $200,000) = $300,000 o $300,000 * 16/20 (time) * 20% = $48,000 o * 50% = $24,000
On 1 May 1992, Kate a self-employed doctor, buys a house for $200,000, which she uses as her MR. On 1 May 1998, Kate converts 1 room in the house into a doctor’s surgery. On this date the market value of the house is $250,000. The surgery occupies 20% of the house. On 1 May 2012, Kate sells the dwelling for $500,000.
Calculate Kate’s capital gain if she elects to use the CGT discount method
Initial CG = $500,000 – MV when change occurred $250,000 = $250,000 * 14/14 (time) * 20% = $50,000 * 50% = $25,000
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 61 of 98
On 1 May 1992, Kate a self-employed doctor, buys a house for $200,000, which she uses as her MR. On 1 May 1998, Kate converts 1 room in the house into a doctor’s surgery. On 1 May 1998, the market value of the house is $250,000. The surgery occupies 20% of the house. On 1 May 2010, Kate closes down the surgery. On 1 May 2012, Kate sells the dwelling for $500,000 Calculate Kate’s capital gain if she elects to use the CGT discount method
Initial CG = $500,000 - $250,000 = $250,000
$250,000 * 12/14 (time) * 20% * 50% = $21,429
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 62 of 98
Lecture 9 – Tax Payable Rates and Tax Offsets
Rates o Residency o Medicare levy o Medicare levy surcharge o Minor
Refundable tax offset o PAYG withholding o PAYG installments o TFN withholding o Franking credits
Non-refundable o Low income rebate o Dependent rebate o Medical expenses o Zone rebate
2012 Tax Return
Due date for lodging 2012 individual ITRs o 31 October 2012 o Unless tax agent (up to 15 May 2013)
Individuals required to lodge ITR? o Resident: taxable income > tax-free threshold ($6,000) o Non-resident: Aus sourced income > $1
Other situations where Aus resident must lodge ITR?
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 63 of 98
Resident income tax rates: 2012 IY o Plus 1.5% Medicare levy (if applicable)
Calculated on taxable income
Non-resident income tax rates: 2012 IY o Non-residents not liable for 1.5% Medicare levy
Nor entitled to certain tax-offsets
Reduction of the tax-free threshold o ss 16 to 20 Income Tax Rates Act (1986) o $6,000 tax-free threshold reduced if:
Taxpayer became / ceased to be Aus tax resident during income year
Part-year resident o Tax free threshold: number of months taxpayer was Aust resident x $500 per month
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 64 of 98
Steps to calculating estimated tax payable For individuals, use following 6 steps:
1. Calculate taxpayer’s taxable income (AI – AD) 2. Calculate tax on taxable income 3. Deduct non-refundable tax offsets or rebates 4. If applicable: add 1.5% Medicare levy (TI x 1.5%)
o Liable for additional 1% Medicare levy surcharge? o Total (steps 1 to 4) = net tax payable o Cannot be negative
5. Deduct refundable tax offsets or credits 6. Take step 5 away from step 4
o Positive = estimated tax payable to ATO o Negative = estimated tax refund owing by ATO
Format for calculating tax payable
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 65 of 98
Medicare Levy
Resident individual taxpayers may be required to pay 1.5% Medicare levy o ss 251R to 251Y ITAA (1936) o Medicare Levy Act (1986) = rate of levy
Rates o TI ≤ $19,404: no Medicare levy payable o TI between $19,405 & $22,828: Medicare levy at a reduced rate (not examinable) o TI > $22,828: Medicare levy = 1.5% of taxable income
Calculating the medicare levy
Persons exempt from paying medicare levy o Person entitled to full free medical treatment as a member of Defence Forces or as a
relative of a Defence Force member o Veteran’s Affairs Repatriation Health Card (Gold Card) holders o Blind pensioners who receive Centrelink sickness allowances o Persons not residents of Australia for taxation purposes o Residents of Norfolk Island o Persons who have a certificate from the Levy Exemption Certification Unit of the Health
Insurance Commission showing that they are not entitled to Medicare benefits o Members of diplomatic mission or consular posts who are not Australian citizens and do not
ordinarily reside in Australia
Medicare levy surcharge o Applies if high-income earner does not maintain adequate private health insurance o High income earner:
Taxable income plus reportable fringe benefits:
Single taxpayer no dependent children > $80,000
Single taxpayer with dependent children > $160,000
Couple > $160,000 Dependent children? Increase MLS threshold by:
$1,500 * (number of children – 1)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 66 of 98
Apportionment of medicare levy surcharge o MLS calculated on a daily basis o Apportionment required if taxpayer takes out private hospital insurance during an income
year o 1% MLS imposed on number of days taxpayer was not covered by private health insurance o Couple assessed for 1% MLS separately in own tax return
Tax Offsets
Dependent rebate (non refundable) o TP contributes to financial maintenance of a dependent
Resided together? TP gave dependent food, clothing & lodging? TP helped pay for living, medical & education costs?
o Eligible to claim? TP & dependant must be Aus tax residents TP’s “adjusted taxable income” ≤ $150,000 Dependents “adjusted taxable income” < threshold
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 67 of 98
o What is “adjusted taxable income?” Total of:
Taxable income
Reportable fringe benefits multiplied by 0.535
Reportable employer superannuation contributions
Target foreign income
Certain tax-free government pensions & benefits received from Centrelink or Veterans’ Affairs
Net investment loss
Less: child support you have paid o Dependent spouse rebate
Only available if dependent spouse born before 1 July 1971 Cannot claim if eligible for Family Tax Benefit (Part B) Maximum dependent spouse rebate = $2,355
Regardless of how many children taxpayer & spouse may have Dependant spouse rebate calculated:
o Dependent invalid relative rebate Invalid relative: a person aged 16+ who is a child, brother or sister of taxpayer &
who receives a disability support pension from Centrelink Calculated:
o Dependent parent / spouse’s parent rebate Maintaining their parent(s) or their spouse’s parent(s) for all or part of income year
Does not include grandparents Calculated:
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 68 of 98
Low Income Rebate (Non-refundable)
Medical Expenses Rebate (Non-refundable) o S 159P: net medical expenses > $2,060
Rebate: 20% of excess over $2,060 Net medical expenses: less any Medicare refunds or private health fund rebates No upper limit Medical expenses must be paid by taxpayer for themselves & any dependents
o Who is dependent? “Dependant” defined in s 159P(4) as:
Spouse of taxpayer
Taxpayer’s child (< 21 years of age)
Student under 25 who is studying full-time & whose adjusted taxable income < $1,786
Invalid relative, parent or spouse’s parent provided taxpayer is entitled to claim a dependant rebate
Zone Rebate (Non-refundable) o Taxpayers living in remote areas of Aus
May be eligible to claim a zone rebate (s 79A ITAA 36) o Must reside in Zone A or Zone B at least ½ income year to qualify (183 days)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 69 of 98
o Zone rebate calculation Base component (fixed amount = Depends on the zone your in) PLUS
Percentage of “relevant rebate amount” PLUS
Dependant spouse: notional rebate = max $2,736 (instead of $2,355) if have dependent children
Each dependent student < 25 adds an additional $376 to maximum rebate available: “notional child rebate”
For dependent non-student children: < 21 o 1st non-student child = $376, then $282 for subsequent children o Provided ATI < $286 (for all children)
Dependent spouse amount (if ineligible for dependent spouse rebate due to age limit)
Income of Minors (Children) o Calculating tax payable on income of minors
Special rules apply: Division 6AA ITAA 1936 o Certain types of income over certain level taxed at highest marginal tax rate (45% of 2012) o 3 key terms:
1. Prescribed persons – are they a minor? 2. Eligible taxable income – are they given the money? 3. Expected assessable income – did they earn the money themselves?
Zone category Base amount
(fixed) Percentage of “relevant
rebate amount”
Zone A: ordinary $338 50%
Zone A: special $1,173 50%
Zone B: ordinary $57 20%
Zone B: special $1,173 50%
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 70 of 98
o Eligible taxable income Subject to special rates of tax
ETI ≤ $416 taxed under normal rates
ETI > $416 ≤ $1,307 tax is greater of: o 66% of excess over $416 o Amount of tax payable on entire taxable income less tax payable on
excepted assessable income
ETI > $1,307 tax payable on all eligible taxable income at 45% The LITO cannot be used to offset a minor’s ETI
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 71 of 98
Examples Example 5: Dependent Spouse Rebate Mandy is a resident individual taxpayer. Mandy has an adjusted taxable income of $120,000. She fully maintains a resident, dependent spouse, Christopher for the full 2012 financial year. Christopher was born on 16 May 1970. Christopher has an adjusted taxable income of $2,500
What is the indexed cost base for these shares? o Max rebate: $2,355 o Reduced: (1/4 * ($2,500 - $282)) = $554 (ignore cents) o Dependent spouse $1,801
Example 6: Low Income Rebate
Example 7: Medical Expenses Rebate Susan is a resident individual taxpayer. She incurs a total amount of $6,200 in respect of eligible medical expenses during the 2012 income year. Susan has private health insurance with MBF for which she receives a refund of $2,400. Susan also receives a refund of $1,000 from Medicare
Calculate Susan’s medical expense rebate for the 2012 income year o $6,200 - $2,400 - $1,000 = $2,800 “net medical exps” o ($2,800 - $2,060) * 20% = $148
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 72 of 98
Example 8: Zone Rebate Gordon is a resident of Special Zone A. Gordon’s taxable income is $135,000. He has a dependent spouse, Anne who was born on 22 September 1970 & 3 dependent children who are all at school. Anne has adjusted taxable income of $1,578. Anne is not entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part B. None of the children have any adjusted taxable income
Calculate Gordon’s dependent spouse & zone rebates (if applicable) for the 2012 income year o Dependent spouse rebate
$2,355 – (1/4 * ($1,578 – 282)) = $ 2,031 o Zone rebate
Maximum notional dependent spouse rebate (instead of $2,355) – 2,736 Less: reduced by spouse’s sdjusted taxable income
(1/4 * ($1,578 – 282)) = $324
Notional dependent spouse rebate = $2,736 - $324 = $2,412 Notional student rebate ($376 x 3 children)
= $1,128 Relevant rebate amount = $3,540
o Zone rebate: $1,173 + (50% * $3,540) = $2,943 o Gordan can claim dependent spouse and zone rebate
Example 9: Zone Rebate Gordon is a resident of Special Zone A. Gordon’s taxable income is $135,000. He has a dependent spouse, Anne who was born on 22 September 1973 & 3 dependent children who are all at school. Anne has adjusted taxable income of $1,578. Anne is not entitled to Family Tax Benefit Part B. None of the children have any adjusted taxable income
Calculate Gordon’s dependent spouse & zone rebates (if applicable) for the 2012 income year o Dependent spouse rebate
Not entitles as Anne born after 1 July 1971 o Zone rebate
Maximum notional dependent spouse rebate (instead of $2,355) – 2,736 Less: reduced by spouse’s sdjusted taxable income
(1/4 * ($1,578 – 282)) = $324
Notional dependent spouse rebate = $2,736 - $324 = $2,412 Notional student rebate ($376 x 3 children)
= $1,128 Relevant rebate amount = $3,540
o Zone rebate: $1,173 + (50% * $3,540) + $2,031 = $4,974 o Gordan can claim dependent spouse and zone rebate
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 73 of 98
Example 10: Income of minors Leighton, a full-time high school student, aged 16, earns $6,800 working on weekends at the local McDonalds. His grandfather recently deposited $100,000 into a bank account in Leighton’s name. Leighton derived $10,000 in interest from this account. The grandfather operates the account
Calculate Leighton’s tax payable for the year ended 30 June 2012 o McDonalds is earned income – taxed as normal
($6,800 - $6,000) * 15% = $120 o Interest income
Unearned income – taxed at penalty rates $10,000 * 45% = $4,500
o LITO ($1,500) only applies to earned income of $120 down to nil o Still have to pay to tax on $4,500 – exempt from low income rebate
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 74 of 98
Lecture 10 – Entities & GST Entities
Taxation is focused on the taxation of individual taxpayers
Other entities? S4-1 ITAA 1997 o Income tax is payable by each individual & company, and by some other entities
Other taxpayers who have to lodge an annual ITR: o Partnerships o Trusts o Companies o Superannuation funds
Partnerships
Definition o S 5(1) Partnership Act 1892: 2 or more persons carrying on a business with a view to profit o For tax purposes, “partnership” more widely defined
S 995-1 ITAA 1997 o An association of persons carrying on business as partners or in receipt of ordinary or
statutory income jointly, but does not include a company
Taxation o Not a separate legal entity o Is a taxpayer because it services income
Required to lodge a partnership ITR (“P form”)
Disclosure purposes only
“Net income of the partnership” o Net income distributed to each partner
Determining a partnership’s net income o Assessable income does not include:
Net capital gains
Instead: included in each partner's ITR o Allowable deductions do not include:
Prior year losses Personal superannuation contributions made by partners Partner’s salaries (but gets first distribution of partnership profits)
Not allowed to tax income paid to yourself (partnerships are not a separate legal entity)
Interest on partner’s capital contributions Drawings
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 75 of 98
Trusts
Types o Discretionary trust (family trust)
Trustee has discretion to determine:
How much of the trust’s net income or capital to distribute (if any)
Which beneficiaries to distribute to & what amount o Fixed trust
Beneficiaries' entitlements to trust’s net income or capital are fixed o Unit trust (type of fixed trust)
Taxation of trusts o Not a separate legal entity o Is considered a taxpayer because it derives income
Required to lodge a trust ITR (“T form”)
Disclosure purposes only
“Net income of the trust estate” o Net income distributed by the trustee
Depending on trust deed (i.e. fixed/discretionary trust) Income included in beneficiary's ITR
Who has the liability to pay tax? o Depends on whether beneficiaries are:
Under a legal disability
Minor
Bankrupt
Mentally incapable Presently entitle to their share of net income
Beneficiary entitles to immediate payment of the distribution?
Condition or restriction imposes by law/trust deed?
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 76 of 98
* = At 45% + Medicare Levy (1.5%) under s 99A unless s 99 applies (e.g. deceased estate) Companies
s 995-1 ITAA 1997: o “A body corporate or any unincorporated association or body of persons, but does not
include a partnership.”
Is a separate legal entity o Has taxable income (considered a taxpayer) o Required to lodge company ITR (“C form”)
Considered to be an Aus resident if it is: A. Incorporated in Aus B. Not incorporated in Aus, but carries on business in Aus and its central management &
control is in Aus C. Not incorporated in Aus but carries on business in Aus and has its voting power controlled
by Aus resident shareholders
Taxable income calculation same as individual TPs except: o Rules restricting ability to carry forward tax losses o Not eligible for CGT discount method o But CGT rollover provisions o Access to Research and Development (R&D) tax concessions
Differences in calculation of tax payable: o Flat rate of 30% o No tax-free threshold o Do not pay 1.5% Medicare levy or 1% MLS
Comparison of the various entities
Type of Entity Separate
Legal Entity
Pays tax in its own right?
(taxable income)
Taxpayer for Taxation
Purposes?
Required to Lodge ITR?
1. Individual Yes Yes Yes Yes (I Form)
2. Partnership No No Yes Yes (P Form)
3. Trust No No Yes Yes (T Form)
4. Company Yes Yes Yes Yes (C Form)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 77 of 98
Goods and Services Tax
GST commenced on 1 July 2000
Legislation = Goods and Services Tax Act (1999)
Flat 10% broad-based indirect tax
Price of goods & services shown GST inclusive o Amount of GST included in price = price / 11
An indirect tax: an example
GST main principles: o Registration: only GST registered enterprises can:
Charge GST / claim back GST paid o Liable for GST? (pay GST to ATO)
“Taxable supplies” only o Claim back GST on purchases?
“Creditable acquisitions” only o Derivation
Cash vs non-cash (accruals)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 78 of 98
Taxable supplies o Taxable supply arises if:
Supply of goods or services Made for Consideration Supplier is Registered for GST Supplied in course of carrying on an Enterprise Connected with Australia Not a GST-free or input-taxed supply
o “SCREAN” o If supply not a taxable supply → no GST arises
GST-free supplies (Div 38) o Examples of GST-free supplies:
Basic food Health Education Exports for consumption outside Australia Religious services
o Supplier does not charge GST Can still claim back input tax credits on goods/services used to produce the GST-free
supply
Input-taxed supplied (Div 40) o Examples of input-taxed supplies:
Financial supplies Residential rent
o Supplier does not charge GST Cannot claim back input tax credits on goods/services used to produce input-taxed
supplies’
Types of supplies (summary)
Creditable Acquisition o Claim back GST paid (an “input tax credit”) if:
Consideration paid (or liable to be) By GST Registered entity Entity Acquired something Acquisition was For a creditable purpose Thing supplied was a Taxable supply
o “CRAFT” o If not a “creditable acquisition” cannot claim back GST paid
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 79 of 98
Acquisition partly for creditable purpose o e.g. mobile phone 60% used for creditable purpose
Only 60% of input tax credit can be claimed o Note luxury car limit: $57,466
Maximum input tax credit $5,224 ($57,446 / 11) Then adjust for any non-creditable purpose
o Input tax credit can’t be claimed if: Expense is not deductible under ITAA 1936 or 1997
s 69-5(3) GST Act
Most common example is entertainment
Registration o Entity required to register for GST if it: (s 23-5)
Carries on an enterprise and Its annual turnover meets registration turnover threshold
o $75,000 or $150,000 for non-profit organisations o Annual turnover less than turnover threshold?
Entity can voluntarily register (s 23-10) When would an entity want to do this?
Attribution (derivation) basis o 2 methods accounting for GST
Cash method Non-cash method (accruals)
o Cash basis GST payable to ATO when cash is received Claim back GST (input tax credit) when cash paid Date of tax invoice irrelevant Partly paid / cash partly received?
o Accruals Basis GST payable in tax period the earlier of when:
Tax invoice provided to customer or
When any part of the consideration is received GST claimed in tax period the earlier of when:
Tax invoice is received
Any part of consideration is paid
But entity cannot claim an input tax credit unless it holds a valid tax invoice
Tax periods / net amount o Period for which entity calculates its GST & lodges Business Activity Statement (BAS)
Calculate “net amount”
GST collected – GST paid o 2 tax periods for GST purposes: monthly / quarterly o Must use a monthly tax period if:
Annual turnover is $20 million+
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 80 of 98
Examples Example 1: Net Income of a Partnership Michael and Lisa are equal partners in a partnership. Both are Australian residents for taxation purposes. The partnership agreement states Michael is to receive a salary of $20,000 per annum for managing the business. The accounting profit of the partnership for the year ended 30 June 2012 was $35,000 after paying Michael’s salary Calculate Michael’s & Lisa’s share of the partnership’s net income for the year ended 30 June 2012
Net income of partnership: $35,000 + $20,000 (salary is not an allowable deduction for tax purposes) = $55,000
Michael: $20,000 + 50% of balance (55,000 – 20,000) o $20,000 + $17,500 = $37,500
Lisa: 50% of balance = $17,500 Example 2: Taxation of Trusts The Barker Family Trust is a fixed trust. Mr Robert Barker is the trustee. The net income of The Barker Family Trust for the year ended 30 June 2012 was $80,000. According to the trust deed, the beneficiaries are as follows:
Anne (Robert’s wife aged 46)
Jane (Robert’s daughter, aged 21 who is mentally handicapped)
Tom (Robert’s son, aged 17)
Kathy (Robert’s daughter, aged 15)
Trust deed states the net income of the trust estate is to be distributed as follows:
50% to Anne
20% to Jane
15% each to Tom and Kathy (total of 30%). The trust deed states this money is to be accumulated (but not paid) to each child until they reach the age of 21 or marry, whichever is the earlier. Determine the tax consequences for each beneficiary (including who pays the tax)
50% to Anne (80,000 * 50% = $40,000): Anne will include distribution in her individual ITR & pay the tax at that point
20% to Jane (80,000 * 20% - $16,000): Under a legal disability – trustee pays the tax @ her marginal rate
15% each to Tom and Katy (80,000 * 15% = $12,000 each): Under legal disability (minor), condition (not presently entitled to their share of income) – trustee pays the tax @ 46.5%
Examples 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 81 of 98
See GST Worksheet Document Lecture 11 – Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) FBT Basics
Doesn’t earn much money – is here for quality
Tax payable by employers on value of non-cash benefits provided to their employees (or associated) in respect of employment
Tax levied at 46.5% on “grossed-up” amount
FBT year: 1 April to 31 March
Annual FBT return: lodged by employer by 21 May
Employers claim income tax deduction for both cost of fringe benefit provided & FBT paid under s8-1
Example o Option 1: cash salary o Option 2: company pays for a GST free item - how to get it back to the same tax payable o Option 3: company pays for a GST included item – how to get it back to the same tax
payable
What are fringe benefits?
S136(1) FBTAA 1986: o Any benefit o Provided at any time during the FBT year o By the employer (or their associate)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 82 of 98
o To an employee (or their associate) o In respect of the employee’s employment
Income tax implications o Employer
Income tax deduction
FBT paid
Cost of benefit GST claim back
o Employee No impact (NANE – non-assessable and non-exempt)
Calculating FBT
1. Type 1 fringe benefits (2.0647) a. Employer entitled to input tax credit (for GST paid on benefit provided to employee) b. Taxation value = GST inclusive benefit amount
2. Type 2 fringe benefits (1.8692) a. Employer not entitled to input tax credit b. Taxable value = GST exclusive benefit amount
Calculation Hints 1. Determine the taxable value of each fringe benefit 2. Determine whether fringe benefits are a Type 1 or Type 2 fringe benefit 3. Calculate fringe benefits taxable amount of each benefit (“grossed-up” amount) 4. Total fringe benefits taxable amounts 5. Calculate amount of FBT payable
The “otherwise deductible” rule o FBT taxes “private” component of each benefit o Taxable value of fringe benefit reduced if benefit used for employment-related purposes
I.e. could employee claim an income tax deduction if they incurred expenditure?
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 83 of 98
If so, expenditure = “otherwise deductible” o Employee declaration required
Employee contribution o If employee makes an after-tax contribution towards a benefit which is subject to FBT
Taxable value of fringe benefit is reduced Car Fringe Benefits
Arises if: car provided to employee & car is either: o Actually used for private purposes, or o Made available for private use
Car garaged / kept overnight at employee’s home/nearby?
2 methods for calculating taxable value of a car benefit: o Statutory formula method o Operating cost method
Statutory formula method o Fringe benefits taxable value calculated as:
ABC / D – E A = Base value of the car B = Statutory fraction C = Number of days during FBT year that car fringe benefit was provided to employee D = Number of days in FBT year (365 or 366) E = Amount of employee’s contribution
o Statutory fraction
** New or altered vehicle salary packaging contracts entered into after 7:30 pm on 10 May 2011
Operating cost method o Formula: C x (100% - BP%) – R o C = total operating costs of the car during FBT year
Included deemed interest and deemed depreciation o BP = business use percentage o R = amount of receipts (employee’s) contribution
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 85 of 98
Loan fringe benefits
Applies if employer makes an interest-free or low-interest loan to an employee (or associate)
Low interest = below statutory rate of 7.8% for 2012 FBT year
Taxable value of a loan FB = statutory interest on loan – actual interest on loan Expense Payment Fringe Benefits
Arises if: o Employer pays a private expense to a third party on employee’s behalf o Employer reimburses employee for a private expense
Taxable value: o GST-inclusive amount of the expenditure which is paid or reimbursed to the employee by the
employer Property Fringe Benefits
Employer provides free or discounted property (asset) to an employee (or associate)
Property fringe benefits are classified as either: o Internal (i.e. in-house): employer sells those goods o External: employer doesn’t sell those goods
Taxable value depends on whether employer is a manufacturer or a retailer
I.e. Adidas employee has a discount on Adidas clothes
I.e. Adidas employee gets given a TV
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 86 of 98
Exempt Fringe Benefits
s 58X: eligible work-related items provided to employees o Used primarily for employment o 1 item exemption
s 58Y: fees & subscriptions paid by employer for an employee's: o Trade or professional journal subscription o Corporate credit card membership o Airport lounge membership
Reportable Fringe Benefits Amount
Employers required to include RFBA on employee's PAYG payment summary if: o Taxable value of FBs provided to employee is > $2,000
RFBA = grossed-up amount of FBs provided to the employee during the FBT year using 1.8692 (type 2 rate)
Employee: include RFBA in ITR o Used to calculate liability for certain items (e.g. Medicare Levy Surcharge)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 87 of 98
Examples Example 1: GST Gross-up factor Tech Ltd, an IT company provided the following fringe benefits to employee, Kelly:
On 26 November 2011, Tech Ltd paid for a 2-week holiday for Kelly to travel to Sydney. Cost of holiday was $5,500 (inclusive of $500 GST)
On 1 August 2011, Tech Ltd paid 1 year’s education fees of $2,000 (no GST charged) at a private school for Kelly’s 14 year-old daughter, Jessica
Tech Ltd is registered for the GST Calculate the amount of FBT payable by Tech Ltd
Holiday – taxable value $5,500 (including GST) o Gross up 2.0647 = $11,355.85 (pre-tax wage equiv)
School – taxable value $2,000 o Gross up 1.8692 = $3,738.40
Fringe benefits taxable amount = $11,356 + $3,738 = $15,094
FBT Payable = $15,094 * 46.5% = $7,018.83 Example 2: Otherwise Deductible
Sally works as a CPA for Pitcher Partners accountants
On 12 October 2011 Sally’s employer pays her home telephone bill totaling $110 (inclusive of $10 GST)
Sally goes through her telephone bill & determines that $40 of these calls were work-related. She provides a declaration to employer to this effect
Calculate the amount of FBT payable by Pitcher Partners
Payment of telephone bill $110 (including GST)
Less: otherwise deductible (40)
Taxable value = $70 * Gross up 2.0647 = $144.53 FB taxable amount (pre-tax wage equivalent)
FBT payable 46.5% = $67.21 Example 3: Otherwise Deductible On 1 June 2011, Janine's employer, Strike Enterprises Pty Ltd, paid her home electricity bill totalling $440 (inclusive of $40 GST). Assume the expense was 100% private. Janine made an after-tax contribution of $60 to her employer in respect of the payment. Calculate the Fringe Benefits taxable amount by Strike Enterprises Pty Ltd.
Employer paid $440 - after tax contribution (60)
Taxable value = $380 * 2.0647 = $784.59 (FB taxable value)
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 88 of 98
Example 4: Car fringe benefit Pretty in Pink purchases a new car on 1 April 2011 for $33,000 (inclusive of $3,000 GST). For entire 2012 FBT year, the car is made available to Samantha (the CEO) for her private use. Samantha travels a total of 30,000 kms during the 2012 FBT year & of these, 24,000 kms were work-related. Samantha makes an after-tax cash contribution of $1,100 to Pretty in Pink towards the cost of the car & provides them with the necessary declarations What is Pretty in Pink’s Fringe Benefits taxable value for the 2012 FBT year using the statutory formula method?
30,000 kms during
After tax contribution $1,100
Taxable value = ABC/D – E
(33,000 * 11% * 366)/366 – 1,100 = $2530 Example 5: Operating cost method
Pretty in Pink purchases a new car on 1 April 2011 for $33,000 (inclusive of $3,000 GST). The car is made available to Samantha (the CEO) for her private use for the entire FBT year
Samantha has kept a logbook which shows she travelled a total of 30,000 kms & of these 24,000 kms were work-related
Samantha makes an after-tax cash contribution of $1,100 to Pretty in Pink towards the cost of the car & provides them with the necessary declarations
For the 2012 FBT year the operating costs of vehicle are: registration (from 1 April 2011 – 31 March 2012) $600 insurance (from 1 April 2011 – 31 March 2012) $480 petrol & oil $3,800 repairs & maintenance $820
What is Pretty in Pink’s FBT liability for the 2012 FBT year using the operating cost method
Deemed depreciation $33,000 / 8 * 366/366 *200% = $8,250
Deemed interest ($33,000 * 7.8% * 366/366 = $2,574
Total operating costs 8250 – 2574 = $16,524
Apply private percent (100% - 80%) = $16,524 * 20% = $3,305 - $1,100 = $2,205 taxable value
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 89 of 98
Example 6: Loan fringe benefit
On 1 April 2011, Brett's employer Yellow Diggers Pty Ltd provided him with a loan of $100,000 at an interest rate of 1.00%
Brett used these monies to purchase a home for himself & his family (i.e. to be used as his main residence)
Brett did not make any repayments during the 2012 FBT year
What is Yellow Diggers Pty Ltd’s Fringe Benefit taxable amount for the 2012 FBT year?
Taxable value o Statutory interest: $100,000 * 7.8% * 366/366 = $7,800 o Less: actual interest: $100,000 * 1% * 366/366 = ($1000)
Taxable value $6,800 * 46.5% = $3,162 Example 7: Loan fringe benefit
On 1 April 2011, Brett's employer Yellow Diggers Pty Ltd provided him with a loan of $100,000 at an interest rate of 1.00%
Brett used all of the funds to buy an income-producing rental property
Brett did not make any repayments during the 2012 FBT year
What is Yellow Diggers Pty Ltd’s FBT liability for the 2012 FBT year?
Otherwise deductible rule – Reduced taxable value down to nil
If the loan was given to him AND his wife – then the otherwise deductible rule would only apply to his component
Example 8: Expense Payment Fringe Benefit
On 24 January 2012, Sue's employer paid her home telephone bill of $100 (inclusive of $9 GST)
Sue provides a declaration to her employer confirming that 25% of this amount is work-related (i.e. $25)
Sue made an after-tax contribution of $20 to her employer in respect of the payment
What is sue’s employer’s FB Taxable value for the 2012 FBT year?
Payment of telephone bill $100
Otherwise deductable rule ($25)
After tax contribution (20)
Taxable Value $55
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 90 of 98
Example 9: Property Fringe Benefits
Tanya works for Country Road (a clothing store)
Country Road buys a particular line of women’s polo shirts from a clothing wholesaler for $40 each. These polo shirts are sold to public for $160 each
During 2012 FBT year, Tanya was given 10 polo shirts for free o Calculate the FBT payable by Country Road
Taxable value $40 * 10 = $400 - $0 = $400
First $1000 free – nothing payable
Example 10: Property Fringe Benefits
Justine also works for Country Road (a clothing store). During the 2012 FBT year, Country Road provides Justine with a DVD recorder
The DVD recorder cost Country Road $420 (including GST) & has a market value of $650 (including GST)
Justine does not make a contribution towards the DVD recorder
Calculate the Fringe Benefits taxable value by Country Road
Taxable value = $420 - $0 = $420
Then multiple by type 2 rates (GST inc) then times by 46.5% to get the tax payable
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 91 of 98
Lecture 12 – Tax Administration Self-Assessment System
2011 income year: 15.6 taxpayers lodged ITRs o 72% of individuals lodged through a tax agent
Prior to 1987: o ATO reviewed every individual ITR before issuing income tax assessment
Now: self-assessment o Taxpayers assumed to have knowledge of tax law o ATO review or audit assessment several years later
Notice of Assessment
Taxpayer lodges ITR with ATO o Commissioner required to assess & o Provide taxpayer with notice of assessment (NOA)
“Assessment”: s6(1) ITAA 1936: o “the ascertainment of the amount of taxable income & the amount of tax payable on that
taxable income”
NOA deemed to be received when o When NOA expected to have arrived in ordinary course of the post o NOT date of issue of assessment or date taxpayer actually receives assessment o For the purposes of AYN 438: date of service of NOA =
Date of issue of NOA plus 1 day Amending an Assessment
Who can amend original assessment? o Taxpayer o Commissioner
How long does taxpayer/Commissioner have to amend an assessment? o Depends – has fraud or evasion occurred?
If so: Commissioner may amend at any time
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 92 of 98
Rulings
2 types of rulings: o Public rulings
E.g. taxation rulings (TRs), tax determinations (TDs), product rulings (PRs) & class rulings (CRs)
o Private rulings “sanitized private rulings = ATO interpretative decisions (ATO ID) You can: (a) accept this, (b) appeal this, or (c)
Objections
Taxpayer dissatisfied with an: o Original NOA o NOAA (Notice of amended assessment) o Private ruling
May lodge an objection in writing with the commissioner o Time limits
When must objection be lodged? When does objection period start?
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 93 of 98
Appealing the Decision
If the commissioner disallows an objection the taxpayer may: o 1. Apply to the Small Taxation Claims Tribunal (STCT) if amount of tax in dispute is < $5,000 o 2. Applying to Administrative Appeals Tribunal (ATT) to review decision o 3. Appeal directly to Federal Court against decision
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 94 of 98
Penalties & Interests
2 types of penalties commissioner may levy: o Administrative – late returns, failing to provide information upon requests (often doesn’t
result in fine) o Tax-shortfall – wrong claim
Penalties: not tax deductible (s26-5 ITAA 1997)
Tax shortfall penalties o May be imposed if taxpayer:
Makes a false or misleading statement that results in an underpayment of tax Disregards a private ruling Enters into a tax avoidance scheme
o Calculation: shortfall amount x base penalty % Base penalty – depends on what you did wrong
What is the base penalty?
Base penalty & depends on why tax was underpaid
Altering the base penalty % o Voluntary disclosure before notification of tax audit:
100% reduction if shortfall amount is < than $1,000 80% reduction if shortfall amount is > than $1,000
o Voluntary disclosure after notification of tax audit: 20% reduction
o Increase in base penalty %? 20% if taxpayer hinders investigators
General interest charge (GIC) o Applies if taxpayer fails to pay tax on time or lodges returns late
Levied on unpaid tax Calculated daily on a compounding basis
Shortfall interest charge (SIC) o Applies to underpaid tax resulting from a tax shortfall
From: Due date for payment of original assessment To: day before issue date of the NOAA
Cause of Shortfall Amount Base Penalty Percentage
(a) Intentional disregard of a taxation law (b) Recklessness (c) Failure to take reasonable care (d) No reasonably arguable position
75% 50% 25% 25%
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 95 of 98
Further Taxation Offences
Part IIA of Taxation Administration Act, 1953 o Offences carry substantial fines and/or imprisonment o Higher penalties for second+ offences o E.g. falsifying, concealing, destroying or altering records
Table 4 of background notes
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 96 of 98
Examples Example 1: Amended Assessments
Simon lodged his 2011 income tax return on 12 August 2011 which included deductions for mileage between his home & work
At the time of filing his ITR Simon thought that he was able to claim this as an allowable deduction (he now realises that this is incorrect)
Simon tells you he doesn’t check his mail very regularly & only received his NOA on 30 August 2011 (when he opens his mail)
The date of issue of the NOA was 23 August 2011 Assuming Simon chooses not to disclose this error to the Commissioner what date does the Commissioner have until to amend his assessment?
24th of August 2013 Example 2: Objection Time Limit
The ATO issued a NOAA to Chris (an individual) on 9 March 2012 – this is the date of issue are per his NOAA
Chris received his original NOA on 31 July 2011 (the sate of issue per the NOA is 30 July 2011)
What date does Chris have until to object to the NOAA?
The later of: o 60 days after NOAA served: date of service 10 March 2012 o 2 years after original NOA was served = 1 August 2011
Chris has until 1 August 2013 Example 3: Shortfall Amount
For the year ended 30 June 2012, Electrix Ltd claimed a deduction of $25,000 relating to repairs to its equipment
Repair was of a capital nature and not deductible
Electrix Ltd declared a taxable income (after claiming the $25,000 deduction) of $100,000
Calculate the “shortfall amount” Company tax rate = 30%
Tax actually paid $100,000 * 30% = $30,000
Tax should have paid ($100,000 + $25,000) * 30% = 37,500 o Difference $7,500
Extra deduction claimed $25,000 * 30% = $7,500
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 97 of 98
Example 4: Shortfall Penalty
Same facts as Example 4: shortfall amount was $7,500
The Commissioner considers that Electrix Ltd failed to take reasonable care in determining whether the $25,000 was deductible or capital in nature
Calculate the shortfall penalty that the Commissioner can impose
$7,500 * 25% = $1,875
AYB219 – Taxation Law and Practice Notes
Page 98 of 98
Lecture 13 – Exam
Question 1 (16 Marks) o Three parts o Capital gains tax
Calculating net capital gain
Question 2 (18 Marks) o Three parts o Taxable income -> calculation of tax payable & tax administration
Question 3 (5 Marks) o GST and other entities (lecture 10)
Question 4 (11 Marks) o FBT
CGT Events
First thing in a question: has an event occurs
We are only dealing with A1 and C1 events, and these have different rules for timing
Make sure things are not exempt o Need to know the exemptions o There is a table in the lecture notes of exemptions o If you use something 100% for work it is exempt because it is a depreciable asset (s118-24)
I.e .a fridge in a rental property is used to produce assessable income, so it can be depreciated, meaning it is exempt
Step 4: rollovers – is not applicable (not covering it in the course)
How do we minimize a capital gain if we have one? o CG = CP – CB o CP normally very easy to calculate o CB (Cost Base)
Acquisition costs + incidental costs of acquisition & disposal + Ownership costs + Enhancement costs + Title costs – Deduct capital works already claimed if building is bought on or after 13 May 1997
Question will always ask you to calculate your net capital gain o If you have more than one asset that’s being sold. What’s your total gain?