axial period: non- western thought chinese philosophy
TRANSCRIPT
Axial period: Non-Western thought
Chinese Philosophy
Prelude
Chou (Zhou, Western) dynasty from around ~1000 B.C.E. to ~770 B.C.E.
Started off as a ‘Golden Age’, all was united under one rule
Eventually barbarians drove the Chou east and empire disintegrated Eastern Chou ~720 to
Independent states arose that were no longer loyal to the emperor Spring and Autumn period (722 to 481 BCE) Warring States period (5th century BCE to 221 BCE)
• Ended with unification of empire by the Qin
Chinese thought
Period of 100 philosophers Confucius Lao tzu (Laozi) Mo tzu (Mozi) Mencius (Mengzi) Hsun Tzu (Xunzi) Chuang tzu (Zhuangzi) Legalists
Confucius
b. ~551 BCE Master K’ung (Kung fu-tzu)
Western contemporaries Presocratics
• Heraclitus• Eleatics
• Xenophanes• Parminedes
• Pythagoras 4 stages of life
15-30 Learning period• ‘At fifteen I was bent on study; at thirty my mind was firmly established’
30-55 Teaching and Politics• ‘At 40 I had no doubts. At fifty I knew the will of the heavens.’
55-68 Traveling period• ‘At 60 my ear obeyed truth’• Sought to have political ideas put in practice by current rulers
68-72 Period of revision• ‘At 70 I could follow what my heart desired without transgressing what
was right.’• Back to teaching, founding of Confucian school of thought
Confucius
Offered a philosophy of man and society
Provides a doctrine of social order with emphasis on benevolence (ren) and propriety (li)
Saw himself as the preserver of a declining culture
Confucius: Governance
Confucian society Benevolence
Harmony of social relations, love of mankind• ‘In the practice of propriety, harmony is valuable’• “The superior man attends to the root of things. From the root
of things grows the Way. Filial piety and fraternal submission are the root of benevolence.”
Propriety Focus on adherence to traditional (Chou) ways which were
better and now lost• Key theme of ceremony, which entails all rites, customs,
manners, conventions, social etiquette (i.e. good manners) Feudal in nature, but with right action people would be happy
and at peace
Confucius: Conduct
The Ethics of the Sage Member of ruling class (a la Plato’s philosopher-king),
though his ethics would be considered universal outlined as follows: One must act as society dictates they should Love all men Treat others as oneself
• The single thread: likening-to-oneself• “Tzu-kung asked ‘Is there a single word which one could
act on all one’s life?’ The Master said ‘Wouldn’t it be likening-to-oneself? What you do not yourself desire do not do to others.”
• The golden rule Think highly of justice and despise benefit (personal
profit)• “Advance the upright and set aside the crooked.”
Confucius: Politics
Same idea of benevolence applies Benevolent government, virtuous rule
In favor of class distinction, but the rulers should be men of virtue Similar to Plato’s guardian “If he presides over them solemnly, they’ll revere him.
If he is filial and kind to all, they’ll be faithful to him. If he advances the good and teaches the incompetent, they’ll eagerly seek to be virtuous.”
Value education and culture, keep penalties at a minimum, such things will lead to a peaceful and content populace
Confucius: Knowledge
Education Emphasized learning over
innate knowledge Very few sages
Education should be equally available to all, regardless of class
Not just the passing of knowledge but the cultivation of virtue
Emphasis in applied science (practical concerns) over pure science
What you are acquainted with know it, and what you are not, acknowledge as such. This is true knowledge
Socrates
The Master said, "Yû, have you heard the six words to which are attached six becloudings?" Yû replied, "I have not.“
"Sit down, and I will tell them to you. "There is the love of being
benevolent without the love of learning;-- the beclouding here leads to a foolish simplicity. There is the love of knowing without the love of learning;-- the beclouding here leads to dissipation of mind. There is the love of being sincere without the love of learning;-- the beclouding here leads to an injurious disregard of consequences. There is the love of straightforwardness without the love of learning;-- the beclouding here leads to rudeness. There is the love of boldness without the love of learning;-- the beclouding here leads to insubordination. There is the love of firmness without the love of learning;-- the beclouding here leads to extravagant conduct."
Confucius: The Tao
The Tao Tao “the Way”
For Confucius the proper course of human conduct and organization of government exhibited by the rulers and societies of antiquity
Te “Power or Potency” Virtue of a thing in the manner of its purpose
• Recall Aristotelian entelechy, potentiality The capacity to act in accordance with the Way
The Golden Mean ‘The due medium is virtue, this is the highest attainment’ ‘To go too far is as bad as to not go far enough’ Aristotle’s later Doctrine of the Mean
Confucius: Summary
Valued human society highly, but neglected the world of nature for the most part Application over Theory ‘When I hear a man speak, I must also see
him act.’ Praised stability, harmony, unity, opposing
disorder and rebellion Promotion of spiritual needs over material The rewards of experience
Confucius says…
Lao Tzu & Taoist philosophy
6th century BCE (Laozi) ‘Old master’ ‘the old child’ Very little known about true author, supposed
contemporary of Confucius Tao Te Ching
The Way and its Power Only the Bible has been translated more (more
than 80 in English) Shift of focus to the individual, and how one
should respond to the world Although sometimes seen as rivals to Confucius,
in many instances the Taoists are more complementary
The opposites of the Pythagoreans Winning by yielding Doing nothing
Lao Tzu: the Tao What is Tao? Tao as Origin The No-thingness that gives rise to the infinity of nature (“the
10,000 things”) as experienced It was from the Nameless that Heaven and Earth sprang;
The named is but the mother that rears the ten thousand creatures, each after its kind. (1)
There was something formless yet complete,That existed before heaven and earth;
Without sound, without substance,Dependent on nothing, unchanging,
All pervading, unfailing.One may think of it as the mother of all things under heaven.
Its true name we do not know;Were I forced to say to what class of things it belongs
I should call it Great (25) For Tao is hidden and nameless.
Yet Tao alone supports all things and brings them to fulfillment. (41) Tao gave birth to the One;
The One gave birth successively to two things,Three things, up to ten thousand.
(42)’
Unlike the Prime Mover however, the creation is spontaneous and non-interfering
So there is the Tao that can be named (“the 10,000 things”) and the Tao which cannot, the formless yet complete nothing that was before, yet there is simply Tao
Lao Tzu: the Tao Tao as principle
That by which things become what they are
Non-Being vs. Being Being and Non-Being give birth
to one another Metaphysically different but
necessary to what is (Tao) Being as manifestation of Tao Things continuously change
according to a pattern, or Way, Tao, which is unchanging and eternal The changeless by which things
change
We put thirty spokes together and call it a wheel;But it is on the space where there is nothingThat the usefulness of the wheel depends.
We turn clay to make a vessel;But it is on the space where there is nothingThat the usefulness of the vessel depends.
We pierce doors and windows to make a house;And it is on these spaces where there is nothing
That the usefulness of the house depends.Therefore just as we take advantage of what is,
We should recognize the usefulness of what is not.
(11)
Lao Tzu: the Tao
Push far enough towards the Void,Hold fast enough to Quietness,
And of the ten thousand things none but can be worked on by you.I have beheld them, whither they go back.
See, all things howsoever they flourishReturn to the root from which they grew.
This return to the root is called Quietness;Quietness is called submission to Fate;
What has submitted to Fate has become part of the always so.To know the always-so is to be Illumined;
Not to know it, means to go blindly to disaster.He who knows the always-so has room in him for everything;He who has room in him for everything is without prejudice.
To be without prejudice is to be kingly;To be kingly is to be of heaven;To be of heaven is to be in Tao.
Tao is forever and he that possess it,Though his body ceases, is not destroyed.
(16)
Lao Tzu: the Tao
Nothing under heaven is softer or more yielding than water;But when it attacks things hard and resistant there is not one of them that can prevail.
For they can find no way of altering it. (78)
Tao as function Principle of Non-action
Action in accordance with Tao, Non-Action toward what goes against nature
Wei wu-wei: Action by Non-action Not so much what is done but the attitude: effortless spontaneity Egoless non-possessiveness
(Not) Doing is (Not) doing as Tao, effortless, spontaneous creation out of nothingness
Lao Tzu: the Tao Tao as virtue Act in accordance with nature
Truly, if one uses the Way as one's instrument,The results will be like the Way;
If one uses the “power” as instrument,The results will be like the “power”.
If one uses what is the reverse of the “power”,The results will be the reverse of the “power”.
For to those who have conformed themselves to the Way,The Way readily lends its power.
To those who have conformed themselves to the power,The power readily, lends more power.
While to those who conform themselves to inefficacy,Inefficacy readily lends its ineffectiveness.
“It is by not believing in people that you turn them into liars.” (23)
The sage is no-man, possessing nothing, nameless marked by being yielding, contentment, simplicity
I alone am inert, like a child that has not yet given sign;Like an infant that has not yet smiled.
I droop and drift, as though I belonged nowhere.All men have enough and to spare;
I alone seem to have lost everything.Mine is indeed the mind of a very idiot,
So dull am I…...
But wherein I most am different from menIs that I prize no sustenance that comes not from the Mother's breast. (20)
Lao Tzu: the Tao
Tao as technique Way of ruling
Treatment of all as equal, doing what is needed, not doing what is not
The Sage has no heart of his own;He uses the heart of the people as his heart.
Of the good man I approve,But of the bad I also approve,And thus he gets goodness.
The truthful man I believe, but the liar I also believe,And thus he gets truthfulness. (49)
By not-ruling, the state will be at peace
Mo Tzu and the Mohists
b. ~470 BCE (Mozi) Western contemporaries
Sophists Socrates
Most likely an artisan A reaction against Confucian teachings Explains benevolence (ren) through the concept of
Universal Love (jianai) So the first hippie was Chinese? Not exactly
Mo Tzu
Like we have seen with some Greeks, makes arguments by discussing alternatives and suggesting they are untenable
Some divergence from Confucians: Judges institutions by their utility rather than tradition
• Are they beneficial to people? Disagrees with their deterministic view that all has been
decreed by heaven Sees Confucians as overly extravagant and wasteful in their
rituals• Neglects those in need• Frugality a virtue
Find inconsistency and hypocrisy in their ideas of reverence for past
• E.g. those of the past engaging in those practices to begin with were clearly not doing what the Confucians are now, i.e. were creating their own customs
Disagreed that one should follow superiors/elders blindly
Also, they wear strange clothes and probably smell bad too.
Mo Tzu
Universal love Be nice to the nice people!
Outlines the idea of universal love and what it is not Concern for others, treating with respect, not harming
etc. vs. lying, cheating warring etc. Compares the individual engaging in universal love vs
not Confronts the argument that it can’t be done on the
large scale Was in the past Other changes have taken place on such a grand
scale even within a short time• People want to please their superiors
Mo Tzu
What is beneficial? What is harmful? lying, cheating warring etc.
Where do such harms come from? Lack of concern for others
We see that it is not conducive to living well, what do we replace such action with? Concern for others and a focus on mutual
benefit How so?
Act in accordance with universal love on all levels
Mo Tzu
The doctrine of universal love seems near Confucian concepts, but there are differences
Love without grades Confucians hold some, e.g. family, above
others Against classism
Results in insult and humiliation A main reason to engage in universal love
is so that it will be reciprocated Better than the alternative
Mo Tzu
Politics Embraced the trend toward centralization ‘Elevate worth and employ ability’
So though in favor of heavy government which provides a unifying morality, give the man his props
Promote those that do well (contrast Confucian seniority), and criticize those who don’t
Mo Tzu
Logic Note two forms of dialectic
One consists of truth propositions in which only one can be correct The other is more general and reflects concerns about what is right
• Mohist logic Several functions of a broad dialectic
Distinguish right and wrong Determine good vs. bad government Note similarities and differences Examine the principles of names and actualities Distinguish the beneficial from the harmful Determine the correct course of action to be taken
Forms of the general dialectic Imitation (model, theory) Comparison Parallel reasoning Analogy Induction (generalization) Refutation (falsification)
Mencius
~372–289 BCE Western contemporaries
Aristotle
Continued the ideas of Confucius Disciple of his grandson
Like Confucius held court with many rulers and officials but without much implementation of ideas
His ideas were more formally stated and worked through, compared to the aphorisms of Confucius
Mencius
With Mencius we see shifts in focus and some discrepancies with earlier Confucian ideas
For Confucius, all men are alike and only differ in training/education Mencius goes further to state that man is by nature good, however
this innate ability must be consciously recognized and developed “All men have a mind which cannot bear to see the suffering of
others” Also rejects fatalism of Confucius
Ceremony and ritual are now focused inward in acting virtuous 4 virtues: benevolence, right action (justice), propriety, and wisdom Although takes a different approach than Confucius, believes the
Mohists do not concern themselves enough with filial relations etc. Man can achieve virtuous state, in contrast to Confucian sages of
antiquity being the only ones having achieved it Our innate capacity for good allows for it
Mencius
Politics and Ethics Although more along the lines of Mohist universal love
than Confucian, was not as utilitarian as they Focused on the rights of others, unlike Confucius, in
terms of respect for others rather than Mohist consequences Do it because it is benevolent, right, not on calculation
of benefit Like others, believes good governance entails being a
compassionate ruler who strives to win his people’s support
Hsun Tzu
~310-237 BCE (Xunzi)
Ideas stem from and continue Confucian thoughts, but can be quite contrasting
The Confucian emphasis on propriety and humanity (benevolence) can be seen as split between Mencius and Hsun-Tzu Mencius focus on benevolence
• Man innately good Hsun Tzu focus on propriety
• Man is innately evil, requires ceremony, government for right action
Hsun Tzu
Heaven and Earth, separate from man, leave tools at his disposal with no instructions on how to use them
Human nature is evil, only through education, society and training does one acquire goodness
So for Mencius, we have the seeds for good and develop those
For Hsun Tzu, we have a predisposition toward evil but a capacity for good, and through our environment may become so
The role of government is to ‘keep us in line’ so to speak, i.e. allow for the cultivation of the good
Hsun Tzu
Like Aristotle, focus of our being resides in the heart ‘Good’ men have natural desires that tend them
towards such Use their heart to control impulses
Others follow their bad (i.e. anarchic) nature Hsun-tzu continues with the Confucian emphasis on
morality or right action along with ceremony Morality is the defining characteristic of the individual,
ceremony places restrictions on man’s natural inclinations
Hsun Tzu
Logic Theory of naming
• See Mohists Function of names are to note similarities and
differences, and to denote actualities Actualities primary, names secondary General names, and classifying names which are
extensions of those names E.g. ‘thing’ as the most general name
3 fallacies regarding names Using names to confuse names Using actualities to confuse names Using names to confuse actualities
Chuang Tzu
~4th century BCE (Zhuangzi) Western contemporaries
PlatoAristotle
Irrationalist Continued the Taoist trend though a
bit different approach than seen with Lao Tzu*
*We’re not actually sure he followed Lao Tzu
Chuang Tzu
Written with fables, allegories, metaphors, analogies… becomes a playful exposition of Taoist thought
Written from varying points of view on positions, often misleading as to which his might be, and even ending with no resolution (another question)
Focus on the individual experiencing Tao The person is necessary to experience Tao,
and once the knowledge is gained it must then be forgotten
Chuang Tzu
Tao simply is, and is without distinction; in fact, one cannot make distinctions whatsoever.
“One night, Zhuangzi dreamed of being a butterfly — a happy butterfly, showing off and doing things as he pleased, unaware of being Zhuangzi. Suddenly he awoke, drowsily, Zhuangzi again. And he could not tell whether it was Zhuangzi who had dreamt the butterfly or the butterfly dreaming Zhuangzi. But there must be some difference between them! This is called 'the transformation of things'.”
“How do I know that enjoying life is not a delusion? How do I know that in hating death we are not like people who got lost in early childhood and do not know the way home?”
“I go nowhere and don't know how far I've gotten. I go and come and don't know where to stop. I've already been there and back, and I don't know when the journey is done. I ramble and relax in unbordered vastness; Great Knowledge enters in, and I don't know where it will ever end.”
Just as the Tao is unnamable, it is impossible to classify that which is in fact Tao
“Forget the years, forget distinctions. Leap into the boundless and make it your home!”
Chuang Tzu
Ethics Such lack of distinction carries over into Chuang Tzu’s
ethics There is no true basis for distinguishing right from
wrong The sage keeps his heart in a state of indifference,
and engages in non-action to allow things to go their natural way
“Right is not right; so is not so. If right were really right it would differ so clearly from not right that there would be no need for argument. If so were really so, it would differ so clearly from not so that there would be no need for argument. “
“The life of things is a gallop, a headlong dash – with every movement they alter, with every moment they shift. What should you do and what should you not? Everything will change of itself, that is certain!”
Legalism
Amoral science of statecraft As wars increased among the states, rulers
became more distant from the philosophy of those like Confucius and Mo Tzu, instead preferring more practical approaches
Legalists sought to impose order through the construction of laws which serve the state and ruler Punishment and reward
Han Fei
Legalism
Legalists rejected the institutions of the past Different customs from the past, we have no basis for
adhering to one over the other What works now?
Forward looking, took an evolutionary approach to understanding the past Must adapt to change
Man is motivated chiefly through self-interest Not really good or bad
‘Anti-egoism’ based on human nature (self-interest), as opposed to Confucian patriarchal morals Being selfless and adhering to law is the manner in
which to judge man Virtue is living in accordance with the state’s interests
Legalism
Han Fei’s metaphysics and dialectics Attempted to put legalism in the context of the Taoism
of Lao Tzu (even lapsed into verse a la Tao Te Ching) Notion of pattern and opposites that we have seen
also among the Greeks Opposites form an underlying unity (continuum) to
which things belong It is in the nature of things to change
With human beings, they are easily prone to extremes and at such points their weaknesses are born out
Knowledge is understanding of the determinants of change
Although in an ideal state people would not require a ruler, desires of the ruler result in the impossibility of rule by non-action In this sense, anti-Taoist