avoiding „dangerous“ climate change jennifer l. morgan april 24, 2006

27
Avoiding „Dangerous“ Climate Change Jennifer L. Morgan April 24, 2006

Upload: terence-mills

Post on 18-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Avoiding „Dangerous“ Climate Change

Jennifer L. MorganApril 24, 2006

2.

The Greenhouse Effect

Solar radiation passes through the clear atmosphere

Some solar radiation is reflected by the

Earth and the atmosphere

Some of the infrared radiation Some of the infrared radiation passes through the atmosphere, passes through the atmosphere, and some is absorbed and and some is absorbed and re-emitted in all re-emitted in all directions by directions by greenhouse gas greenhouse gas molecules. The molecules. The effect of this effect of this is to warm is to warm the Earth’s the Earth’s surface and surface and the lower the lower atmosphere.atmosphere.

3.Rise of greenhouse gases concentration compared with year 1750

4.

Ultimate objective to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system ... within a time frame sufficient to:

• allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change

• ensure that food production is not threatened

• enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner

Article 2 of the Climate Convention

5.

Climate Change Impacts

6.Part 1

Danger Threshold

2°C

7.Context: Reasons for Concern (IPCC TAR

WGII)

8.

9.

10.

Broadleaf tree cover

(gridbox fraction) in coupled

climate-carbon cycle simulation

Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research

11.

2005:All-Time Record Year for Hurricanes

• 26 Tropical Storms in the Caribbean• 14 Hurricanes (≥117 km/h)• 5 Events in Categories IV & V

„Wilma“ Generating• Lowest-Ever Air Pressure (882 mb)• Highest-Ever Gale Speeds (340 km/h)

• „Vince“ and „Delta“ Reaching Europe

12.

“Millions at Risk”

13.

Earth System Achilles Heels

14.Part 1

What CO2 concentrationcorresponds to 2°C?

15.Risk of overshooting 2°C (stabilisation)

16.The way to get to low stab. levels: peaking

17.Part 2

What are the necessary

global emission reductions?

18.Emissions relative to 1990

19.The Effect of Delay (same risk of overshooting)

20.Sir David King

“Delaying action for a decade, or even just years, is not a serious option” (Science, 9 January 2004)

21.

• For peaking at 475ppm and stabilization at 400ppm:– global GHG emissions have to be reduced by ~50%

below 1990 levels by 2050.

• Industrialised country emissions in 2020 will need to be reduced by about 15-30% below 1990 levels for 400-450 ppm Co2 Eq

• Participation of the USA and advanced developing countries in reduction commitments well before 2025 is needed

Emissions reductions required

22.

Non-Energy Use

1%

Final Consumption Transport

26%

Final Consumption Other Sectors

8%

Power Generation and Heat Plants (Coal)

33%

Power Generation and Heat Plants (Other fuels)

18%

Transformation, Own Use and Losses

4%

Final Consumption Industry

10%

Contribution of sectors 2002-2030

23.

Total emissions

(Source: EVOC model, Triptych approach)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

19

90

20

00

20

10

20

20

20

30

20

40

20

50

20

60

20

70

20

80

20

90

21

00

MtC

O2e

q.

EAsiaCPAsiaSAsiaMEAFRLAMREEURAIJPNRUS+EEUEU25USA

450 CO2 case, A1B scenario

Until 2010:• Annex I reaches Kyoto targets• Non-Annex I follows reference

24.

Results towards 450 ppmv CO2

Towards 450 ppmv CO2:

Threshold:10% below world average,

Convergence level:2.9 tCO2eq/cap

A1B scenarioExcl. LUCF CO2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

2055

2060

2065

2070

2075

2080

2085

2090

2095

2100

tCO

2eq

/cap

Annex I

Non Annex I

World total

Threshold

PhilippinesIndia

China

S. Africa

Kenya

Saudi Arabia

USAEU 25

Japan

Argentina

GHG per capita

25.Sir David King

• Solutions exist but are not being implemented at needed rate or scale– Energy efficiency has tremendous potential

across sectors– Renewable energy– CCS?

• Decouple GDP growth and energy intensity

• Money going into wrong places, have to turn the tide

Way forward?

26.Sir David King

• Assess what this means for our conservation priorities in WWF

• What does climate change mean for my ecoregion?

• How to buy some time while we all work together to get emissions down?

Way forward?

27.

WWF has the heart and the brains to make a huge difference

We need the will, the capacity and the courage to act together