automating federal environmental compliance activities
DESCRIPTION
Automating Federal Environmental Compliance Activities. Bruce Nielsen – GIS Specialist Stephen Ball, PhD – Cultural Resources Specialist David Stratman - Biologist. National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Who are we? Present in all 92 Indiana counties - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Automating Federal Environmental Compliance
Activities
Bruce Nielsen – GIS SpecialistStephen Ball, PhD – Cultural Resources Specialist
David Stratman - Biologist
1
National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)• Who are we?
– Present in all 92 Indiana counties– Disburses $35-40 million annually in
Indiana
• What do we do?– Subsidize conservation practices on
private agricultural lands2
What Conservation Practices?
• Soil• Water Quality• Wildlife
3
Soil
4
Water Quality and Wildlife
5
6
Linton
Goose PondGoose Pond2,406 ha 2,406 ha (5,945 ac)(5,945 ac)
Beehunter MarshBeehunter Marsh483 ha 483 ha 1,193 ac1,193 ac
7
Macro Topography
(eco-wiggles)
Prairie Grasses
Tree Plantings
Main Pool(1012 ha)
• Many NRCS practices require excavation which can potentially impact environmental and cultural resources
8
National Historic Preservation and Environmental Laws
• National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)
• National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)– We don’t own the land– We don’t construct the practice
• BUT we are responsible for ensuring the practices are compliant with federal law 9
The Problem• Thousands of practices are planned
and subsidized by the Indiana NRCS annually– They need to be reviewed to ensure they
do not negatively impact Threatened and Endangered (T & E) Species or Historic sites• Both processes require access to restricted
datasets requiring professional qualifications
10
• T & E Species database is maintained by US Fish & Wildlife– Restricted locational information
• Database of historic and prehistoric sites is maintained by Indiana DHPA– Access is restricted to professionals
(archaeologist/historians) with advanced degrees
11
The Bottleneck
• Biologists and Archaeologists employed by the Indiana NRCS– ONE Biologist– ONE Archaeologist
12
Evolution of Compliance Tools
• Printed map– Insecure– Labor intensive– Static– Limited extent– Subject to
interpretation
13
Evolution of Compliance Tools
• Printed Map• Data & ArcMap
Layer File– More (but not)
secure– Less labor intensive– Subject to
interpretation
14
Does Hiding Data Make Sense?• Google Street View
15
Does Hiding Data Make Sense?• Drinking Water Protection Areas
16
Source: http://www.in.gov/indot/3160.htm
Source: http://www.indy.gov/eGov/City/DPW/Environment/LandQuality/Pages/wellhead.aspx
Does Hiding Data Make Sense?Yes, When:• Required by law or contract• Publishing the data will
compromise it’s value• The location is immaterial to the
user
17
Evolution of Compliance Tools
• Printed Map• Data & ArcMap
Layer File• Compliance Tools
– Most Secure– Lowest
Maintenance– No interpretation
18
Compliance Tools• Utilize ArcSDE technology
– Single data source– Rapid access across WAN & VPN
• Provide info related to environmental compliance and program eligibility
• Don’t require human interpretation of data
19
Compliance Tools• Utilize Sensitive Datasets
– Cultural Resource sites– Threatened & Endangered Species
locations
• Protect Sensitive Datasets from accidental release
20
Demonstration
21
Future Enhancements
22
Questions?
23
Thank you for attending
USDA is an equal opportunity employer
24