author's reply

1
L~sing hospital based emergency medical technicians (~Ts) to take vital signs can allow the physician and ~ursi~g personnel more time for the cognitive processes 0f triage. Use of an electronic thermometer greatly re- duces the time required to obtain vital signs. The child ¢ith high fever (thus prone to seizures), the hypertensive patient, the dizzy patient with an arrhythmia, and the -^ung girl with a pulmonary embolus and unexplained Y~ ~.,,ardia, are a few examples of patients who may look essential!y well, but do fall in the category of '~true emergencms- proper triage by paramedical and nursing personnel ~ill allow the emergency physician to meet the demands placed on the emergency department. Jerry Goddard, MD Emergency Physician's Group, PC Tacoma, Washington Author's Reply I appreciate Dr. Goddard's comments regarding our ar- ticle. Basically, I agree that it would be optimal to obtain vital signs on every person coming to the emergency de- partment, and as I pointed out in the paper, this would, in fact, moderately increase the precision of nurse triage. It was my opinion, however, that the increase in time necessary to obtain complete vital signs was not cost ef- fective for the nurse triage process. John Mills, MD Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases University of California, San Francisco Schizophrenia Defined To the Editor: Michael Eliastam, MD, wrote you (January 1977) con- coming his desire to "improve the quality of scientific evaluation ..." I would beg of him, and of you, please allow those of us in psychiatry the same privilege. Schizophrenia is admittedly a vaguely defined diag- nosis but it is not a synonym for "confusing," "improper," or "unscientific," all of which could have been used in Dr. Eliastam's letter to more portray his feelings. J. F. Hooper, MD Department of Psychiatry University of Kentucky Author's Reply Dr. Hooper's comments are obviously appropriate. I have already been verbally assaulted by my wife, a psychiatry resident, who pointed out t~at I was using an entirely incorrect clinical definition. In attempting to hold an embattled position, I would like to point out that I used the word schizophrenic to SUggest that the author's comments on the value of the esophageal obturator airway reflected a form of dissocia- tion or "splitting." The dissociationrelated to the absence of good clinical studies to support the claims about the "proven" applicability of tracheal intubation in the pre- hospital care setting. Michael Eliastam, MD Director of Emergency Services Stanford University Medical Center Complications of G-Suit To the Editor: "Clinical Use of the G-Suit," by Soler, et al (August 1976) does much to explain some of the theoretical as- pects of the G-suit and is certainly timely. There are two areas, however, I must disagree with. "A drop of 40-60 mm Hg or more in blood pressure can be expected on deflation." This is true if the trousers are rapidly deflated. However, they should never be rapidly deflated. The authors state that in rare cases of pro- longed use without surgery, deflation should proceed step by step. I believe step by step deflation should take place in all cases. Step by step deflation and monitoring the blood pressure as the various compartments (beginning with the abdominal) are deflated, will give adequate re- turn of blood pressure before anesthesia is induced. This can frequently be accomplished over a period of 20 to 40 minutes, while a patient is being prepared for surgery. If complete deflation cannot be accomplished prior to initia- tion of anesthesia, the abdominal segment at least usu- ally can be deflated and gradual deflation of the leg seg- ments accomplished intraoperatively. No hypotension should occur. "Sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure can pro- duce dyspnea, frank respiratory embarrassment, emesis, defecation and/or urination." Although these complica- tions are mentioned in the literature 1 and in the man- ufacturer's information (David Clark), in our recent ex- perience of 50 cases reported in September to the Ameri- can Association for the Surgery of Trauma, 2 we had none of these complications. In only three cases was there a drop in blood pressure in the range of 30-60 mm Hg. This was due to someone inexperienced in the use of the trousers not properly replacing fluids and monitoring blood pressure during their deflation. I would like to compliment the authors on their work but do not feel that complications are of the frequency commonly believed but do feel they are theoretical. I em- phasize that they do not need to produce severe hypoten- sive problems. Norman E. McSwain, Jr, MD, FACS Department of Surgery Kansas University Medical Center REFERENCES 1. Kaplan BC, _Civetta TM, Nagel EL, et al: The military anti- shock trouser in civilian pre-hospital emergency care. J Trauma 13:843-848, 1973. 2. McSwain NE: Report of 50 cases of G-suit use. J Trauma (to be published). ~ ] ~ ) 6:5 (May) 1977 225/71

Upload: john-mills

Post on 17-Sep-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

L~sing hospi tal based emergency medical technic ians (~Ts) to t ake v i ta l s igns can allow the phys ic ian and ~ursi~g personnel more t ime for the cognit ive processes 0f triage. Use of an electronic t h e r m o m e t e r g rea t ly re- duces the t ime requ i red to obta in v i ta l signs. The child ¢ith high fever (thus prone to seizures), the hyper tens ive patient, the dizzy pa t i en t wi th an a r r h y t h m i a , and the -^ung girl wi th a pu lmonary embolus and unexpla ined Y~ ~.,,ardia, are a few examples of pa t i en t s who m a y look essential!y well , b u t do fal l in the c a t e g o r y of '~true

emergencms- proper t r i age by pa ramedica l and nur s ing personnel

~ill allow the emergency phys ic ian to meet the demands placed on the emergency depar tment .

Jerry Goddard, MD Emergency Physician's Group, PC

Tacoma, Washington

Author's Reply I appreciate Dr. Goddard 's comments r ega rd ing our ar-

ticle. Basically, I agree tha t i t would be op t imal to ob ta in vital signs on every person coming to the emergency de- partment, and as I pointed out in the paper , th is would, in fact, modera te ly increase the precis ion of nurse t r iage . It was my opinion, however, t h a t the increase in t ime necessary to ob ta in complete v i ta l s igns was not cost ef- fective for the nurse t r iage process.

John Mills, MD Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases

University of California, San Francisco

Schizophrenia Defined To the Editor:

Michael E l i a s t am, MD, wrote you ( Janua ry 1977) con- coming his desire to " improve the qua l i ty of scientif ic evaluation . . . "

I would beg of him, and of you, please allow those of us in psychia t ry the same privi lege.

Schizophrenia is admi t t ed ly a vague ly def ined diag- nosis but i t is not a synonym for "confusing," " improper ," or "unscientific," a l l of which could have been used in Dr. Eliastam's l e t t e r to more por t ray his feelings.

J. F. Hooper, MD Department of Psychiatry

University of Kentucky

Author's Reply Dr. Hooper ' s comments a re obvious ly app rop r i a t e . I

have a l r e a d y been v e r b a l l y a s s a u l t e d by m y wife, a psychiatry res ident , who pointed out t~a t I was us ing an entirely incorrect cl inical defini t ion.

In a t t emp t ing to hold an emba t t l ed posit ion, I would like to point out t ha t I used the word schizophrenic to SUggest t h a t the author ' s comments on the va lue of the

esophagea l ob tu ra to r a i rway ref lected a form of dissocia- t ion or "spl i t t ing." The d i s s o c i a t i o n r e l a t e d to the absence of good cl in ical s tudies to suppor t the c la ims about the "proven" appl icab i l i ty of t r achea l in tuba t ion in the pre- hospi ta l care set t ing.

Michael Eliastam, MD Director of Emergency Services

Stanford University Medical Center

Complications of G-Suit To the Editor:

"Clinical Use of the G-Suit ," by Soler, et al (August 1976) does much to exp la in some of the theore t ica l as- pects of the G-sui t and is ce r t a in ly t imely. There are two areas, however, I m u s t d isagree with.

"A drop of 40-60 m m Hg or more in blood pressure can be expected on deflat ion." This is t rue if the t rousers are rap id ly deflated. However , they should never be r ap id ly deflated. The a u tho r s s ta te t h a t in r a r e cases of pro- longed use wi thout surgery , def la t ion should proceed step by step. I bel ieve s tep by step def la t ion should t a k e place in al l cases. Step by step def la t ion and moni to r ing the blood pressure as the var ious compar tmen t s (beginning wi th the abdominal ) are def la ted, wil l give adequa te re- t u rn of blood pressure before anes thes ia is induced. This can f requent ly be accomplished over a period of 20 to 40 minutes , while a pa t i e n t is be ing prepared for surgery . If complete def la t ion cannot be accomplished pr ior to ini t ia- t ion of anes thes ia , the abdomina l segment at l eas t usu- al ly can be def la ted and g r a d u a l def la t ion of the leg seg- m e n t s accompl i shed i n t r a o p e r a t i v e l y . No hypo tens ion should occur.

"Sudden increase in i n t r a - a b d o m i n a l pressure can pro- duce dyspnea, f r ank r e sp i r a to ry embar r a s smen t , emesis , defecation and/or u r ina t ion ." Al though these complica- t ions are ment ioned i n the l i t e r a tu r e 1 and in the man- ufac turer ' s in format ion (David Clark) , in our recent ex- perience of 50 cases repor ted in September to the Amer i - can Associa t ion for the Surgery of Trauma, 2 we had none of these complicat ions. In only th ree cases was there a drop in blood pressure in the r ange of 30-60 m m Hg. This was due to someone i n e x p e r i e n c e d in the use of the t rouse r s not p rope r ly r e p l a c i n g f luids and m o n i t o r i n g blood pressure dur ing the i r deflat ion.

I would l ike to compl imen t the authors on the i r work but do not feel t h a t compl ica t ions are of the f requency commonly bel ieved bu t do feel t hey are theoret ical . I em- phasize t h a t they do not need to produce severe hypoten- sive problems.

Norman E. McSwain, Jr, MD, FACS Department of Surgery

Kansas University Medical Center

REFERENCES 1. Kaplan BC, _Civetta TM, Nagel EL, et al: The military anti- shock trouser in civilian pre-hospital emergency care. J Trauma 13:843-848, 1973.

2. McSwain NE: Report of 50 cases of G-suit use. J Trauma (to be published).

~ ] ~ ) 6:5 (May) 1977 225/71