authority implementation stanford university lynn mcrae csg presentation september 18, 2002
TRANSCRIPT
Authority ImplementationStanford University
Lynn McRaeCSG Presentation
September 18, 2002
Contents
1.Background
2.Design & Implementation Strategy
3.Rationalization of Function
4.Financial Authority
5.Roles
6.Future
Background
• Rich, integrated, highly customized mainframe systems
• Complete administrative systems replacement
• Summer 2000, Central/Enterprise authority
• Timing and project ties
• Full year lead time
• Three phases 6 months apart – Student, HR, Finance
Design & Implementation Strategy
• Use of Registries architecture• Ties to Person (identity, affiliation, privgroups)
• Ties to Organizations (scoping, distribution model, re-org resistant)
• Ties to Workgroups (roles)
• Space Dogs• Mix of technical and non-technical
• Vetting architecture
• Vetting design
• Buy-in to high level integration approaches
• Need queen (or king) of project authority
Rationalization of Function
• High level approach
• Role of naive inquirer
• Strong mapping into local auth layouts
• System levels vs project controlled levels
• Only see what you have to grant
Functions (cont)
• HR (15 functions)• Benefits• Payroll• Time/Leave• Faculty• Labor Costs
• Student (29 functions)• Prospect/Applicant• Course• Finances• Financial Aid• Records
Functions (cont)
• Financial (73 functions)• Accounts Payable• Accounts Receivable• Fixed Assets• GA/General Accounting• GL/General Ledger• Labor Distribution• Purchasing
Financial Authority
• Much more complicated requirements; no “practice” implementation
• Project has been deferred one year, but requirements continue to evolve and have implementation ambiguity
• Multiple central offices represented
• Needs much deeper understanding of business units of meaning
• Change from Authority entities to Organization/Financial entities
• Capture true chain of authority
Roles
• Financial Approval roles
• School/Department super-users
• Organization roles, assigned outside the Authority Manager
• Department defined roles
Future• Currently authority is directed only to
specific consuming systems
• Good use of XML for privileges document
• Underlying infrastructure evolution• PKI• Events/messaging• Web services
• Publishing authority information to the infrastructure• As callable service• As directory artifacts• Supported in other infrastructure services