author bullock, terry; and others guidelines for the ...volume 1 number 10,-;;.--best copy amiable...
TRANSCRIPT
ED 096 269 ,
AUTHORTITLE
INSTITUTIONSPONS AGENCY
PUB DATEGRANTNOTE
z.TRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS
DOCUMENT RESUME
95. SP 008 397
Bullock, Terry; And OthersGuidelines for the Statement and Assessment ofStudent Competencies. Teacher Education Forum Series.Vol. 1, No. 10.
Indiana Univ., Bloomington. School of Education.Bureau of Educational Personnel Development(DHEW/OF), Washington, D.C.Aug 730EG-0-72-Q492-72573p.; For related documents, see ED 076 572, ED 075.913, and SP 008 390-396, 398, and 399
MF-$0.75 HC-$3.15 PLUS POSTAGECollege Students; *Evaluation Methods; *Guidelines;*Measurement Techniques; Skill Development; *TeacherEducation; *Teachin7 Skills
ABSTRACTThis paper, prepared by the Division of Teacher
rencation Evaluation Team at Indiana University, presents a set ofproposed student competencies and ways to assess them. It alsocontains the guidelines developed by the evaluation team to helpteacher education projects and programs in developing competenciesand measurement procedures, as well as the proposed competencies andmeasurement procedures that were subsequently developed. (Author)
Division of Teacher Education
U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION E ViELFAR4NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
EDUCATION22..2 DOCUMENT 220.5 BEEP. REPRO
MAID t xacTc2 AS REcEvED FROMTHE RiON OR ORGANIZATION 0141G.N
At tiG t POIPOS Ot VIE 1 091.2.02.4,STarf.0 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRE
5E%, eT of NAT.ONAL NsTiT,iti. 02
F c.' .0% POS.* 0% OW POI Cv
BEST COPY AWOKE
-11
Indiana University/Bloomington
a.
S
1.1
1f , 4, ... as.
L
C!
41%20";,410
(.1.-ee0 6 1
"VeA
$0C)...;};
---...... it.'
/ E.---,(1
, /-*":::
_.,,,,,)- ....
E 7-:1i
1
61 1
t. le %.... ,I\
4...4e..."' trtitikrav
\ 4:P , .
_._,:i 4:-- -\.-.//97V
tt,4,''V
A,
J
4
1. . t b
i BEST COPY AVAILABLE
ihc vol2;..: on of 11% :71
. ..-1 : n
It Ls int.:' .0 v.nd r...'. ; these
ht. rt:.itc.,.1 v! 0, L.-J"e..hvr
syrn, 1-.L02%; !"11, a Cis !,1 CCY,,.i .7. . L',Z.n.fenj t.
,Z0.3 rep- .
o, v1tIcn rt.F::0h or ev,..1w.:lon
r.:1. , c.. i ancil-:%on , /c-i cluc,s qf
1:1.1.1:v/ , b, c..:nrcry:*.o... or conven n ire--.novatIve :and cc-i.arios
vrt u1.1.1Llly avcr.:,..,e tun ihirty
written p!--:,cs; two vpi, 3 are req,J.:..r:,d. Bjb:1.1c:,1-1: cal follow
any ctyle; h:uvvr, all fc..An:)tes 1;e 1i in ('OZ.
fa.,1101-4. bu ol,T.:.:;:,tee, to A. editur. Edit-
oriol .1ro (.ez SCOT! Z"; 1-7!;0 !,;.);:ear
in print within trio to f:Alr month:,
LEO C. FAYdir,:ctor-dte
H.:,k.i'LD HARTY
directvr(.1cmination-(y..e
RICHnRD A. EARLE, editor.Indiana Univcrsity
AL 12-501,:i ROARD
R0r7P, 2
City of E. Chlo (Ind.)
GENE F!'.rIC
Indiana UniVn7ity
DAVID GLI1-3SUnivcr:;ity
CAFNENindina Urivr 1.
iniena
SIV
Indiana
27tflioz
CZ k t; 7 1. C j ; : . ( 7.: - ;
" 7 . .*
.1307 7: t t '3 f!..;
. . ;
; , i., 7 7 )
:t..1 1,.
I!
EONAi,D VA: ';
BEST COPY MIME
CUE,ELPES FOR TUC SiAnili.T ASSLSSi;C4T
OF STudLoT COJZTE.:CICS
EVALUATION TEAM
Terry BullockRoger FarrJudy Doerann GeorgeHarold HartyTed Miller
division of teacher education309 education buildingindiana universitybloonf.ngton, indiana 47401
August, 1973
Volume 1 Number 10
,-;;.--
BEST COPY AMIABLE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
REMARKS CONCERNING COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE . . .
PART II
COMPONENT PARTS OF COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT PACKAGE 3
Objectives of Competency Evaluation - Levels of Concern 4Options for Competency Statement 5A Possible Approach for Looking at Student Competencies 6Statement of Competencies--Helpful Hints 7A Sauple of Proposed Student Competencies 10.A Checklist Indicator of Evaluation Intentions 14Feedback Analysis of Contact Effectiveness 15
PART III
PROJECTS/PROGRAMS 16
Alternative Schools Program - evaluated by FLOYD COPPEDGE 17American Indian Project - evaluated by GARY ANDERSON 19Associate Instructor Program - evaluated by KEN MAJER 22Competency Based Social Studies Program - evaluated by LEE EHMAX 24Early Childhood Program - evaluated by MARY LAFOLLETTE 26Encore Program - evaluated by VERNON DROESSLER 29Field Based Social Studies Program - evaluated by NIFILYL ENGLANDER. . , 32Journalism Program - evaluated by LINLA GREGORY 34Latino Project - evaluated by Jin MAHAN 38Professional Year Program - evaluated by JIM CLARK 41
Multicultural Program - evaluated by GERALD BRACEY 43Relate Pro7;ram - evaluated by RICHARD STC.;E 48ShawLee Graduate Program - evaluate.i by WILLIAM PILDER 51Shawnee Undergraduate Program - evaluated by THOMAS GLASS 53
r
Preface
BEST COPY AVAlpilla
Members of the Evaluation Team met with all project and program directors
and evaluators last year to discuss their specific project/program competencies
and measurement procedures for these compet'encles. A competency assessment
package was developed (refer to Component Parts of Competency Assessment
Package, pp. 3-15) by the Evaluation Team to serve as a guideline for projects
and programs to help them determine their specific competencies and methods .to
measure these competencies. This package included some specific suggestions
on how.to develop and measure competencies as well as a sample model of one
proposed student competency plan that had been developed and submitted by the
Journalism Program.
The rest of this paper presents the proposed competencies and measurement
procedures for each project and program that was in the Division of Teacher
Education last year. There has been no attempt to judge the merits of any of
these proposed competency plans, because each project and program has their own
objectives which in turn are reflected in their individual competency proposals.
As a final note, many project, program, and professional component
directors and evaluators have expressed their interest to the Evaluation Team
during this current academic year that they would like to do some serious
evaluation in the area of student competencies. Because of this type of
interest, the Evaluation Team felt that this compilation would be both a
beneficial tool and guide for all faculty and staff in the new Division of
Teacher Education interested in student competency assessment. Therefore,
a general distribution is being made under the Forum Series to place this
document into he nands of all staff and faculty in the Division of Teacher
Education.
Terry BullockRover Farr
11.
ti
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
REMARKS CONCERN 1 NG COMPETENCYASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
'2
INTRODUCTION BEST COPY IMIABLE
The movement toward competency-based instruction has thrust rapidly into
educational practice in recent years. Performance-based teacher education has
been viewed as a vehicle through which: (1) The goals of individualized and
personalized instruction may be attained; (2) Generalities might be removed
from instructional development; (3) A viable method for evaluation/assessment
exists; and (4) The potentiality exists for program modification and improvement.
The United States Office of Education is vitally interested in this model
(or modifications thereof) as an instructional possibility. Competency-based
instruction is viewed by many educators as one of the most promising systems
in an "age of accountability" and possesses the elements to meet th& challenge
of changing educational communities.
If performance-based instruction is to succeed as an educational alternative,
it must be planned and organized as a system with long range goals and objectives.
Through olose scrutiny, assessment, and continual modification, the competency-
based approach can be adapted to the programmatic parameters of a given instruction-
al. situation.
Herein, is presented an initial attempt at the development of proposed student
competencies by the Division of Teacher Education's programs/projects for the 1972-
73 academic year. It is hoped that this endeavor will provide the impetus for
future refinement and development and will give adequate reflection of the status
attained by the DTE evaluation effort during the 1972-73 academic year.
BEST COPY AntABLE
COMPONENT PARTS CF COMPETENCYASSESSMENT PACKAGE
DIVISION OF.TEACHER EDUCATION
OBJEC T IV E S
LEVELS OF CONCERN
EVALUATIONTEAM
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
0
. LEVEL III: U:S.O.E. would like a set of student competencies from each,project/program:
(1) to serve as the basis for exportation and replication(potential use in other undergraduate teacher educationprograms)
(2) to meet needs for their own accountability purposes
LEVEL II: The Institutional Grant Policy Board and the Division Director'sOffice would like a set os student competencies for generalinformation and decision-making purposes. The CoordinationAssociates will make an attempt to disseminate these bothinternally and externally by way of newly created vehicles.
LEVEL I:
GENERALCONCERNS:
A set of student competencies might serve as the basis for:
(1) some type of project/program publication (technical report,journal article, monograph, etc.)
(2) project/program's own dissemination efforts foal- purposes of
student recruitment
(3) a list of expectancies or exit behaviors for studentscontemplating entrance into a given project/program
A List of student competencies is a brief, but just enough, wayof communicating to other educators as to what yolr project/program is "all about."
. DIVISION OFTEACHER EDUCATION
erriNairer
MI01,11
OPTIONS
EVALUATIONTEAK
BEST COPY AtIAIABLE
We accepted the competencies the evaluation team has "teased"from our original design submitted during the fall semester of.1972 (as stated in the correspondence of December 12. 1972).
OftlIIMININION111
We have made modifications.
We have not made modifications.
We did not accept the competencies the evaluation team "teased"from our original design submitted last fall.
111101111.
limmadmOmmilm.
task.
We havi used the "guides" developed by theevaluation team.
We have used our own means to accomplish this
We did not accept your statement of our project / program's competencies ordid'not make en attempt at some type of refinement.
Comment(s):
5
NOTE: The evaluation team will not give your set of competencies "astamp of approval or disapproval." We are not the experts withregard to your project/program's theoretical or operationalframeworks. The above options or any others are yours to choose.
Program/Project Director
Program/Project Evaluator
/11
--invismObrTEACHER EDUCATION
A POSSIBLE APPROACH FOR LOOKINGAT STUDENT. COMPETENCIES
..
EVALUATIONTEAM
BEST COPY LVAILABLE
The suggested format for this tool is columnar. The following approach,using four distinct headings, might be helpful. Imagine four columns on asheet of paper side by side with these four headings:
(1)
Student Cbmpetencies(ideas or concepts tobe learned and attitudesor skills to be developed)
(1)
(2)
How do we do it?
(3) (4)
What's supposeto happen tostudents?
How will weknow if it didhappen to students?
The student-cometeacies colu...n might contain 5 to 15 ideas, concepts,attitudes or skills that a project/program deems desirable and wishesto promote among its students. These statements might be statedspecifically or operationally. It might be best to avoid generalizationsor statements of a global nature.
(2) The how-do-we-do-it column is summary of the methods or procedures youmight use to ensure student progress or achievement in acquiring ordeveloping your stated "student-competencies." On the basis of certainevidence, either in their experience or because your project/programhas caused it to be introduced by way of your general design or strategy,students may behave in a manner which may be explained (presumably) bythat which is stated in the "student-competencies" column. Thesecompetencies will "present themselves," if you will, as a result of thenature and structuring of-your-learning experiences.
(3) The what's - suppose -to- happen column is a bit tricky. There are obviouslyclusters of very specific observable behaviors associated with thedevelopment or acquisition of your stated competencies in the firstcolumn. Hopefully, while or as a result of interacting in your program/project's environment, the student should become involved in using aswell as "possessing" competencies, along with extending his proficiencywith the "developing competency" by way of generalizing or extrapolatingto areas not specifically experienced during training. It might beparaphrat,ed as the co<Initive, psychomotor, caotivational, affective,social-interactive, and interpersonal processes the student mightpersonally experience in the environment created by your project /program.
(4) The how-well-T-fin ow column is a list of measurement indicies or "readablebarometers." IF a student understands, acquires, develops, etc. thatwhich is stated in the "student-competencies" column, THEN what mightyou observe him "doing," under condition your project/program specify?Stated another way, if a student "gets the r:!essa4e" from the "what's-suppose-to-happen" column, whet might you observe him doing? The Listof so-called "Helpful Hints" might be of particular value in completingthis colur..n.
NOTE: The most important criterion for effective use of this tool isconsistency across the columns.
VIP
DIVISION OFTEACHER EDUCATION
EVALUATIONTEAM
BEST CON ft.:AAREStatement of Competencies--Pelpful Mints
If a student un stands, the student might:- -attend to (particular aspect of a phenomenon)-- assign objects to particular classes--arrange items in a particular way- - prefer certain alternatives to others- -predict particular consequences- -discriminate among possible alternatives
A. The student who knows might:identifydescribegather
attend toaccumulatecount
B. The student who caamantal might:measureselect an instrumentcomputeread a scale
C. The student who can apply might:reorganize conclude
transformselectdiscriminateclassifyinterrelatestructureassigndefinequantifyassociateorder
gatherestimateequatesortpreferexperimentcontrolrearrangeplanorganizecompare
use an instrumentdemonstratebalanceweigh
decidearrangere-centerplayre-castdistinguishsegregateidentifyrejectutilizedissociategroup
D. The student who is creative Nic.ht:hypothesizegenerate ideasinterrelatere-centerinduce
deduceselect strateoiesspeculatectather datadesi-m t.'7oriments
planstructure
organizeformulate a hunchcompare
classifyreduceinventsuggest an alternate exn]anatiordoubtmaximizecontrol variablesutilize data
predictforecastcriticizeconcludetransformarrange
E. The student who can evaluate might:interrogateinterpretcriticizeaveragepool datalook for trendsrecognize errorstrive for masteryequatedistinguishcategorize
F. The student who can communicate might:expressdescribeinstructdemonstratetabulateuse referencesdebate
ACTION VERBS*
Action Verbs That Are Primarilx_co:nitive
identifiesconstructsdemonstratesdissectsreproducescontrastscompareseliminatessketchesmatchesexperir..ents
desimsexnloressurveysinsertssolves
interrogates
photd(!raphs
ranks
paraphrasespublishesrecallsdiscussesrelatesplansquotessuggestsdrawsassemblesreportsrecites
comnilesgraphsbuiHsinstructsmeasures
rearrange MaSUCCVANILMLEproposeestimategeneralizeextrapolateinterpolateexplain
insist on reproducibilityapply a generalizationinterpretestimatecollatedoubtverifytransliOse
tabulategraphchartplot
writereportcompareformulateteachinformexplainquestion
completesassistsanswersmentionsrequestscalculatesoutlinesoperatesinstigateswritestabulateslocatesusesclassifiestranslatesdescribesenumerates
records
0.
Action Verbs With Particular
selectschoosesparticipatesgathers (information)organizesvisitsargues (a position)objects (to an idea)adoptssubmitsperseveres .
praisesdefendsobeyskeeps (preserves)investigatesattempts
Value... or The Affect
challengesattemptsseeksspecifiesoffersproposesrejectsacceptsconsultsquestionsqueriesweights (judges)critici7.es
evaluatestestsdelays (response)qualifies
BEST PvP ;#persistsasksjoinsdesignssuggestssupportsrecommendsshares.disputessubscribespromotesspendsannotatesadvocatesvolunteerssleepsyawns
.1
*kiss, Albert F., Evaluation of Instructional Systems, New York:Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, 1970.
DIVISION OiTEACHER EDUCATION
PROPOSEDSTUDENT COMPETENCIES
EVALUATIONTEAM
BEST COPY ti'AILABLE
The attached might s'zrvo as a model for the task at hand. It. is an alternativeto the gui:lelines and suggestions of the evaluation team.
JOURNALISM PROGRAM
Coorjin-tcor: rj Jenkir.son
Lida
lho rpr;;;L.cf.d Nr-JicFicn 2,.n1L-:;z11j
10
Student Competencies
(Me student
..)
Propescd Competencies fer Students in the Journalism Program
impIomentation
Student Be:leviers
(The instructor
.(The student
.
Evaluation Eethods
(The instructor )
(1)
a)volors and evaluates his
ewa card his pupils' com-
7.:o.alcatioa s%1113
sp3alc-
anl
wading
2nd writ1:1;:.,
b..ith critically and crea-
tively.
(2)
Organizes a nine-wok in-
structionn3 unit in Jour-
nnlisra p':Lf:*-electives.
'Ito unit f%ould include
objcctiv4;:.:, cont:mt to be
ccver,-.J, activities, in-
st7ucticaal r_ateriall; and
ev.uipt, and cvaluation
:Lay
be prercd for the unit
or dezeriLA in &tail.
0)
Plana ,v4 t.rorsroz a PQrt""
folio of daily lesson
plans.
(4)
Writes ot,lef:tives in be,-
haviorti o.
partorrance
terms for specific learn7-
taeza iIl journelism,
Provides opportunities for
student
to practice com-
nualcatica skills in end out
of
colic;c clussrocri,
Provide3 exa=ploz of co:z--
Lanication offcrts of rupils
fcr ctudont to evuluate.
Pressats exa=ples of previoas
units for student to evaluate
and analyze;
Irzevid::s resource materials
fez studz:nt to use in pro-
Lait;
Prenunts samples of rhase-
elective dcscriptions for
student to critique.
Vot:3nztrates the desirability
of Navin.;; lesson plans of some
sort; Presents sample lesson
plans for analysis by student.
Presents examples of objectives
in behavioral and now-behavioral
tents; P:ovides practice in
writing oVjectives for a variety
of tasks; Discusses valueor
worthwhilonesz of objectives;
Provides practice in ordering or
sequencing objectives.
Easters communication
skills and/or improves
existing skill lcvals;
Evaluates skills and
perfor=ancos of pupils.
Critiques, analyses, and
evaluates existin.; units
'prepared by former stu-
donts or classroom teachers;
Plans, organizes, and pre-
pares his on unit.
Prepares daily lesson plans
for his own teaching situ-
ation to fit his own style;
Discovers how to Implement
segments of his nine-week
unit,
Discovers value of objectives
in performance terms;
Prepares objectives for
specific learning tasks.
Observes student's appli
cation of skills in col"
le ;e and public school
tettings; Analyzes studth
evaluation of pupils
co=unication skills.
Judges unit on its comm
pletetess, appropriatons
applicability, and
creativity.
0.4
cl
c2au
--c
Judges the prepared
port
afolio on the
crite
ria
a(2) above,
Judges the degree of
specificity present
ist:
objectives acrd the logics
sequence and orderim.
(3)
Dtscov3rz and cmp2oys a
v.trioty cf cv;:luatIon
cdf p.:1:11 per
forrinco in spccifiz
learning tas::n.
(C)
Compar,Js and contrasts
journall
offerings in
high scli3ols.
(7)
Acquires and establishes
a collection or source
file of notes, visual
aids, rc!:.::..reces; refer-
ences, ,s7t!ppl3 ers, etc.
for futu:.-e lane.
(!))
Dovelo;:, .::-..d'acquirs a
variJZy
t(..achinr.;
styles ara stzate[,,ies,
(0)
Conducts and partici
pates in larr,o and
sm.7.11 group
shone.
Presents, discusses, analyzes,
and values evaluation t,:.%chrs
aiecs.
Provides descriptions of cur-
riculum guides or phase-elective
programs in high school;
Guides discussion and °valuation
of t.:° offerinCS.
Provides student with names and
addzesses of suppliers and re-
sorces;
Discusses value of collection
or file;
Prc:,ents cza=plcs of collect
ions or files.
D::::-.sn,:tr:ittes teaching styles
and strategies;
Discus:;es appropriateness of
various strategies in assorted
situations.
De=enstrates and utilizes
large and small group
activities.
Discovers what techniques
are available to him and
tho advautLgez and distd!..
vanta^as of each;
'0.--ploys appropriate tech-
niquas in his tcaching.
Analyzes and values existing
programs in journalism with
the purpose of establishing
staadards for such programs.
Bogins to organize and
develop his own library of
materials and resources.
0serves and analyzes a
variety of teaching styles
and strategies;
Practices implemonting a
variety of strategies;
Discovers his own strengths
and *.z=katsses as he ex
plors various teaching
styles nud stratcgies.
Leads largo and scan
group activities;
DI:L.:over:7. the value of large
and small group activities
and their.appi,opriatenoss
with diffcront pupil groups
and objectives.
Observes and
toohniques c-7..:r::d tar
'their appr-:,-:--:tc.,zs to
tho specIft:: ;...s:Ing
task and U.c.- Tvpilb
involve3.
Criticues student's
ability to discover
streng:,hs end weaknossfs
in a journalism program.-
Observes student's
to discover r;o1.-e:e: and
his method cr.: c..1;LLizing
the file or collvction,
Obsorves
as he
practices t. .:1;_:1. anc !
strategies
ricro-
teaching atl student
teaching s::ttings.
Observes awi. veil-14.4es
-
student's ;.i:.;;clilation
in largo
:,- :.:411 group
presentattz4 `.no studeat"
practice
lx-sding
::C)
Slporvises pupils in
Presents for discussion tho
Works with pupils in vari-
.04serves studant's abil-
proeucip
newspaper,
yearLoo:c, literary 1:w:;a-
min°, unC/or news bureau
rc1oase.
problems and responsibilizies
of tho publications advisor.
ous activities in producing
high school publications.
ity to supervise p4b31-'
cAtions pu;.ilt; and his
ai)i.iity to .1/4,1
or.;b1.?=
arise.
(11)
Reccgnil!,:s some of the
le;;a1 sf.p:Jats and respon-
sibilit.les of his role as
at:?f1Chyr.
(12)
Acquires a rrefessional
tc.;:ard teachirg
and relaticn-hips with
pu7Als aad school porsonr
nel.
(13)
Analyze:,
:13 pe,rsonal
stragt:.:; an
ad we%
.:
nessos
affect his
po:essiox-A behavior.
(14)
Analyze:, his values which
will aifict his profess-
ional ba-vior.
Discusses and preLents situ-
ations involving the legal
respnnsibilities of tho teacher
and publications adviser.
Presents situations for
student to explore in terms
of pupil/teacher or teacher/
administrator relationships.
Provides discussion or simu
lated classroom situations
which allow studont to analyze
his ability to teach;
Provides individual counseling
for student.
Provides opportunities for
student to state and review
his values or to reshape them.
Discovers the legal respon-
sibilities of his position;
Discovers how to protect
himself from law suits ro-
suiting from the exercise of
his duties.
Recognizes his and others'
attitudes toward teaching
.and pupils.
Discovers if he really
wants to be a teacher;
Identifies strengths and
weaknesses.
Discovers if his values
are suited to teaching at
the secondary level in the
public schools.
Obstasvod .12dent's abil-
ity to ara1yzo a poteatial
::.7:1)lem and make
appropril-to decisions.
Oln:e.-tes student's formal
end ini"or701 comments
about teachi;!z and his
dealings wit:. plplla and
school persenuel.
Infers from ;I:2:-Int's
verhal and ,,o...;rLal be-
haviors
student
has rccol;n:7cd
itis
s'Zrcugt'44
weaknesses.
Infers fro:.:
verbal a=
huviors
valubJ will
his succer
be-
student's
alp or hinder
as a teachor.
DIVISION OFTEACHER EDUCATION
CHECKLIST
EVALUATIONTEAM
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Consider a small, but deemed important, group of specific behaviorsstudents might acquire or develop while interacting in your program..
State these ideas/concepts, attitudes, and skills in as specific/operational/observable terms as possible in column one.
Avoid the use of global or general terms such as "understands," "appreciates,""develops" etc.
List the methods, procedures, activities, experiences etc. your project/program will use to insure student acquisition or development of thecompetency stated in column one. Multiple approaches might be used foreach competency; or a given experience may be utilized for the developmentof several of your listed competencies.
State the specific behaviors a student might exhibit as he/she acquires ordevelops the competency. This is perhaps the most difficult phase of thetask as this behavioral cluster usually represents a set of criterionmeasures for assessing student progress. This criterion set might includebehaviors that are cognitive (knowing something), affective (exhibitingfeeling about something), psychomotor (doing something), motivational(doing something extra), etc.
Specify in column 4 the measurement techniques utilized to assess the degreeof competency-proficiency the student has acquired or developed during his/her experience in your project/program. Examples might be scales, question-naires, written examinations, behavior checklists, term papers, reports, -written assignments, etc. In many instances, as a student progressesthrough a set of experiences, the need usually arises where the studentinteracts on an individual basis with the faculty member(s) responsible forthe implementation of the program. These sessions usually provide an oppor-tunity for mutual assessment of cognitive and affective development.
Submit to the evaluation team that which you have listed in columns one andfour. If you so desire, the evaluation team would be happy to review yourentire package.
14
DIVISION OFTEACHER EDUCATION
HELP! WE NEED FEEDBACK
EVALUATIONTEAM
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Your meeting with members of the evaluation team concerning the developmentof student competencies and means for assessing their presence was observed/perceived as:
1.' Inappropriate 1 2 3 4 5
2. Poorly organized 1 2 3' 4 5
3. No help at all 1 2 3 4 5
4. Generally poor 1 2 3 4 5
Very appropriate
Well organized
Very helpful
Generally excellent
In general, how effectively did the evaluation team members relate theobjectives of the task(s) of stating competencies and means for assessingtheir presence:
5. Objectives very 1 2 3 4 5 Objectives superblypoorly related related
In general, how effectively did your interactions with evaluation teammembers contribute to your completing the task:
6. Interactions were Interactions contributedill-chosen and 1 2 3 4 5 very effectivelyineffective
The general atmosphere (social-emotional climate) during the meeting withevaluation team members was felt to be:
7. Cold 1 2 3 4 5 Warm
8. Tense 1 2 3 4 5 Relaxed
9. Closed 1 2 3 4 5 Open
10. Unemotional 1 2 3 4 5 Emotional
11. Suspicious 1 2 3 4 5 Trusting
12. Pessimistic 1 2 3 4 5 Optimistic
13. Cooperative 1 2 3 4 5 Competitive
14. Dissatisfying 1 2 3 4 5 Satisfying
COMMENTS (optional):
RETURN TO:Bud Harty.309 - Education Building
16
BEST COPY Ai/RUBLE
PROJECT PROMOS
BEST COPY P7.1ILABLE
ALTERNAT I.VE SCHOOLS PROGRAM
evaluated by
Floyd Coppedge
Prof:reqt Objectives
_
1.
To preparepersonnkfor
variou9 roles in Altenkttivb
Public Schools through:
a.
Prc.-service Experiences
b.
Feld Experiences
c.
In- service .xoeriences
2.
ho provide for teacher conver-
sion -- To help conventional
teachers change their teaching
style and programs to be con-
sistent with alternative
schools.
3.
To encourage the development of
options in public schools.
ALTERN4fIVE SCHOOLS
_Competenci_ es
. _
_ .
(Roles for Which Personnel
Are Deing Prepared)
BOW Measured
1.
Teachers for conventional roles
1.
Employment of graduates
in Alternative Public Schools.
2.
Teachers for new roles in
Alternative Public Schools.
a.
Open Classroom Teacher
b.
Learning Facilitator
c.
Curriculum ueveloper
d.
Teacher-Advisor
3.
Personnel for Leadorship Roles
in Alternative
a.
School Organizer
b.
School-Comnflnity Liaison
2.
Employer Satisfaction
3.
Job Satisfaction
4.
Student Evaluation
5.
Judgement by Project Staff
6.
External Evaluation -- evalua-
tion by personnel in sites
where interns are placed.
NOTE:
Additional Information Available in:
1) Level It (Instrument 2) Report cf November 14, 1972, and
2)
Project Evaluation Design, Revised May, 1073.
. 19
BEST COPY AWULABLE
AMERICAN INDIAN PROJECT
evaluated by
Gary Anderson
Student/ Competencies
(The student
(1)
Plans and prepares a
daily lesson plaa
applicable to the
Indian Student
(2)
Develops and demonstrates
a variety of teaching
techniques unique to the
setting.
(3)
Exhibits the ability to
"survive" a sixteen (16)
week student experience
in an isolated setting.
PROPoSiD COM'ETENCIEr FOR STUDENTS IN THE AMERICAN INDIAN PROJECT
Implemeatatlon
(The (:upervising
Teacher or Instructor)
Pre-plans with the
student teacher:
Confers in relation
to results.
Demonstrates teaching
styles and strategies:
Discuss varying techniques
in different settings
and with varying grade
levels or subject matter
areas.
Discusses techniques of
"self-entertainment" and
meaningful leisure time
activities.
Student Fehaviors
(The student
Demonstrates an
understanding of the
objectives of the
daily and continuing
plans and their
relationship to
overall content.
Self-evaluates in
relation to his own
teaching styles; which
were most effective or
least effective in
varying situations.
Maintains a balance
professionally and
socially with both
staff and students
during the experience.
(Also adults when
these types of contacts
are avaiiable)
.Fvaluation Nethods
(The Supervising
Teacher or
Instructor
Observation and
discussion of the goals
and 01,jectivesl-
related learning
concepts,
Observes and confers
with the student
teachez in relation to
student reaction
and understanding.
Completes the
sixteen (16) week
experience.
Exhibits composure
and activity during
the period.
O
(4)
Analyzes his/her ,.alues
and needs which will
affect his/her professional
and personal behavior
Exhibits an ability to
live within the cultural
setting in close
proximity to the students
and adults.
(6)
Exhibits the ability,
in general, to relate
to students of an
extremely different
clature in a classroom
setting.
(These students
will all use English as
a second language)
(7)
txhibits the ability
ask:el-L.1in and use
crfeetive questioning
techniplcs.
(This is
listed as a specific
competency because of
the unique group
relationship of Indian
siudents.)
Provides opportunities for
the student teacher to
analyze and reshape, if
necessary, his/her behavior
patterns.
Provides housing and
necessary co-curricular
assignments which will
be conducive to inter-
action outside of
classroom settings.
Provide a variety of
classroom settings in which
the student teacher may
interact with Indian
students.
Discuss the variety of
questioning techniques
acceptable to the Indian
culture.
Determines if his/her
values are consistent
with the values of the
Boarding School concept,
particularly, the
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Concept.
Through verbal and
non-verbal inference,
deternine if the
student teacher
is in accord with
the settim,..
Yorks with students in
Observe and discuss
social and school-coor-
"out -of- school"
dinated activities in
relationships with
various settings in addition
students.
to the "normal" classroom
setting.
Discovers his/her attitude
in relation to working
with and teaching a
minority group in a
Boarding School atmosphere
Discover which types of
questioning techniques
are most effective for
him/her.
Observes and discusses
interaction in
relation.to the
understanding and
interest of the
students involved.
&ID
Observe and discuss "es
the strength and
1:2
12
weakness of each
....c
technique as
perceived.
,.
JIB
CM
r-
ea
nv
22
BEST COPY /11"11,113LE
ASSOCIATE INSTRUCTOR PROGRi
evaluated by
PROJECT COMPETENCIES AS COMPILED FROM PROJECT =HanAND FILED COMMUNICATIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1D72
Crwtieti7ncf4s
23
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
~MIMI ONIfteW111.~10M111.111M.lion lisagurcd.........
Associate Instructor1) Develop teaching skills through teacher 1) Evaluation of communication
skills utilized in reachingtraining.
2) improved classroom effectiveness.
3) Confidence in teaching role
4) Micro teaching
session by students.
2) Evaluation of competency#1 by supervisor.
(Use space below for any revisions (additions, deletions or modifications)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
24
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
COMPETENCY 3ASEU SOCIALSTUDIES PROGRAM
PROJECT COMPETEICIES AS COMPILED FROM PROJECT DESIGNS
AND FILED COnYUNICATIONS AS OF NOVEMBF2 15, 1972
C071petencies
Competency Based Social Studies
How Measured
1.
Teaching historical and social-science concepts.
2.
Tezching for problem solving in social studies
problcm areas.
3.
Teaching for improved valuing and analysis of
value-laden problems.
4.
Skill in diagnosis and evaluation in teaching.
5.
Skill in describing and interpreting teaching-
learning siturtions.
1, 2, 3
Performance in preparing for and teaching
lessons in the teaching laboratory and school sites is
judged by faculty supervisPrs, peers, and students
against criteria, developed in class, for the particular
teaching tasks specified for that teaching assignment.
Feedback is given to the program student immediately
after the teaching sension, including videotape replay
of selected segments of the lesson, and prescriptions for
re:nedying cny problcms are developed, In the teaching
laboratory the student often reteachei an improved
version of the same lesson to a different group of stud-
ents, using the same criteria and procedures as before.
4Written and practical exercises involving individual
pupils or classes will be used to judge skills in this
area.
One idea being developed is to include a short quiz
as part of each laboratory teaching exercise; it is
administered to the junior high students after instruction
as a test of lesson objectives achievement, as well as
skill in devising tests.
5Written and oral class exercises are used to demon-
strate student skill in describing and interpreting
protocol material depicting various elements of teaching.
Also, peer observation and feedback in the teaching labor-
atory affords a practical application of these skills.
6.
Knowledge of a range of social studies curriculum
6Written assignments and planning instruction for the
materials and skill in adopting, adapting, and
teaching laboratory and in-school student teaching.
inventing such materials.
COrm CI
.4
to
iA
BEST COPY AVAIIABli
EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAM
evaluated by
Mary Lafollette
26
27.
COMPETENCIES FOR. STUT=TSIN 1'Al2.1' CHILDHOnD TEACHEREDUCAlION PROGRAM BEST GLei 1.iiitaLABLE
The student will:
1.
The instructor will:
be able to record observations 1. a) analyze students' techniques for re-of children's behavior ( :aces 3-Syrs) in various school settings.and diagnose f.:ctors relating tothe learning: situation from theobservation..
2. be able to select appropriatelearning gools for younc; childrenand use thLse as a bnsis forplanninc cu-- going learnirq,
experiences.
3. be able to identify a wide rangeof behaviors of chfldren(rues 3-6 years) Ann will he ebleto z.sive se%eral recom-men.'atiuns ond/or solutianc; toprebliftls wh!..ch are evident.
.cording observational data on children'sbehavior.
b) in seminar discussions judge astudent's ability to alalyze a child'sbehavior in a specific learning situationand the possible factors dctermining it.
2. a) critique student's instructir,.:.al plans
for appropriatenels of goals, irstruc-tional 7:atho..:.s and use of matarLds intheir written instructional plansb) observe and evaluate student's class-room performfmre
3. will judee citaent's nbil:.ty to id:ntifyan0 make adequate reco,:.!..eldatl-ni about
children's behaviorreactionf to selected Prot :, student's
daily accounts in Log aLa fromwritten observation report;:.
4. be alile to recooi:te the .coe:ponents4. a) judge an ena:Anntion paper of theof a wholesome clim::rom! atT,es- student's ability to describe the charac-phcre and yin b z11:13 to ccnr.ri- teristics of a wholeso classroubute ideas and r.,.thods to pre:..ote pherea risitiv,f learnin environtcnt both b) observe and ju4e th effectivenessindoors and outdoors. of student's al-TlIcation of
methods and tec!..:!.,uus in settJ.ni, up
learning envirornts guidit* andevaluating lenrr,l.ni. .,oth indoors cal('
ouLdoorz, in the
5. able to pr,ni:!,. in:;tructic.n re-
lated to th.2
goals and :::.cscri::o exer'c.nces
which C.E.ve:.e.,' tint chi..!' potential
5. a)ohnerve an:.: rate the stu:icnt's skillsat applying various moLhods andchild devz.lor7e%t ::no1c!.!7e in individliali7is
:::11,trucsLion fielc situation.b) rcview Lnzi critfque .;tu,lent's p1an:5and ev70.1,Ation for learninp Activitiesas she plz:ns for, 1:-nle:.e:ita, and evaluLtcs
instrv.ctionthe field situation.
6. be able to apply knowledge from 6.
various child development theoriesin assessing planning and evalu-ating children's behavior in a
learning environment.
7. be able to discuss clearly andobjectively individual children,the curriculum, school policy,methods of handling behavior withparents, community groups, andother professionals interestedin children.
8. a) to begin formulatins! owntheory of child development andphilosophy of early childhood.educationb) to be able to write his philo-sophy of early childhood education.
28
BEST COPY AVAIIABIE
assess student's skills in. applying knowl-edge of various child developmenttheories in assessing, planning, andevaluating children's behavior througha continuous weekly Log Book and fromwritten observation reports assignedby course instructors.
7. observe students in role-playing episodesin real situations and/or viewing andlistening to tapes ef. student interviewswith parents and other professionalsto judge student's ability. to expresseffectively her views and ideas withsupporting facts and accurate knowledge.
8. a) listen to student's formal and informalcomments about their philosophies andchild development theories during con-ferences and seminar discussions.b) analyze student's written philosophyof early childhood education for clarityand factual information at the end of theearly childhood education program.
9. acquire a continually groing file 9.of notes, visual aids, resources,ideas, commercial and hand-madeinstructional materials forfuture use in teaching the youngchild
10. be able to effectively evaluate 10.
his own instruction in a class-room and reco;.nize his strencthsand weaknesses in his professionalgro,,th.
1913
review the student's collection of resourcesinstructional ra:terials, visu:11 aids,references, materials, noLcs and judr.ethe student's ability to solct and or-ganize appropriate materials.
judge the student's awirnness of his strentand weaknesses aad gro;a.as a classroomteacher through rorsnnvl e'll.iferences with
the students, written evalth. tion scales.viewing and discu'si.ng wi stucipents videotapes of classroom performance.
Program Director
. Program Evaluation
/ //(..!-12.:(7 Early Cildho0:1 Ecluc
(4- / L "44. 1,, tion FacA:ty :err.ers
BEST COPY AVAIIABIE
ENCORE PROGRAM
evaluated by
Vernon Droessler
29
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
THIS PAGE WAS MISSING FROM THE DOCUMENT THAT WASSUBMITTED TO ERIC DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION SERVICE;
30 Avd6
32
BEST COPY MAILABLE
FIELD BASED SOCIALSTUDIES PROGRAM
evaluated by
Meryl Englander
PROJECT COMPETENCIES AS COMPILED FROM PROJECT. DESIGNSAND FILED COMMUNICATIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 1972
BEST CM MUM
Colloatoacios.A.amaw, .
How MeasuredField Based ,,tudeis in Teacher Zd.
I) To develop the interest and capacity to work 1) An intention tocooperatively as a team member toward the im- measure studentprovement of instruction and curriculum. progress in in*
2) To develop the interest and necessary.abilitiesto engage in and make use of research in the im-provement of instruction and curriculum.
3) To develop the skills and teaching techniquesnecessary to foster and direct open inquiry .ndthe internalization of the processes therein in-cluded on the part of pupils.
4) To develop communication skills that facilitatethe personal growth of self and others.
5) To develop a broad range of evaluative skills in-cluding those for appraising the learning charac-teristics of individual pupils.
6) To become well - informed teachers, fully aware ofthe problems which con front the society and ac-tively involved as change agents in the society.
7) To become teachers who are committed to a demo-cratic perception of education especially withregard to equalizing educational opportunity,supporting a participatory democracy and apluralistic society.
8) To become teachers who can apply the conceptsand methodologies of the social sciences tosocial problems.
9) To possess a high degree of empathy for others,especially for those who are of differentethnic backgrounds.
dicated, but grati-fication procedsresare not specified.
11.
(Use space below for any revisions (additions, deletions or modifications)
33
* * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
BESTCOPYAVAILABILdr
JOURNAL I SM PROGRAM
evaluated by
Linda Gregory
Student Competencies
(The stto'cnt
..)
Proposed Competencies for Students in the JournalismProgram
Implementation
(The inlitructer
c,a .1nd
I.
Ltto.catic
and 1
,anti sari
both cri:
tiv('ly.
i)
.21d evaluates his
!!pupils' tort-
!f,.S1f llfi -- speak-
1:.tenirg, reading
and thinking --
and crea
t2;
CJI.:::aire,;
nine-we.ik in
el.rnet!i:JA unit in Jour-
1!",
ineDide
conicnt to be
ce :ed, activities, in-
naterials and
.!nd evalt:ation
itcL!..s way
ho
for the unit
or 49.?cr11..:d in dot 111.
(3)
P2t:As a!A ni-.tparos a port-
fll:, 12 (1:!ily lerLon
plaa3.
(4)
Writes ob.if_claves in be-
rerfor=nco
ter,n:1
1,rceific learn-
tashn 1,1 jourrall:m.
Provides opportunities for
student
to practice cor-
moalcation skills in and out
of tho college classroom;
Provid,...s examples of comr-
municltion efforts of pupils
for student to evaluate.
Student Behaviors
(The stadent
)
Evaluation Methods
(The instructor
.)
Presents exarplca of previous
units for student to evaluate
and analyze;
rrovide:q4 reseurco materials
for tItudent to use'in pre-
pi.ning unit;
PrLents sartples of phase-.
electtve descrtptions for
student to critique.
Le*orstrates the desirability
of having lesson plans 0Z
sem,
sort; Presents sample lose on
plans for analysis by t;:udent.
Presents examples of objectives
in behavioral and row-bobavioral
toms; Prov;des practice in
writing objectivos for a variety
of task; Dlecusses value or
worthwhiloness of objectives;
Provides practice in ordering or
sequeLcing objvctives.
Masters conzanication
skills and/or icproves
existinT skill levels;
Evaluates skills and
performances of pupils.
Critiques, analyzes, and
evaluates existing units
pr pared by former stu-
dents or classroom teachers:
Plana, organizoa and plse-
paros Ids own umAt.
Prepares daily lesson plans
for his own tet:ching situ-
ation to fit Leis own style;
Discovers how to irpleuent
segments of his nine -week
unit.
Discovers value of objectives
in perferranco trn.ms;
Prepares objectives for
specific louring tasks.
Observes student's appli-
cation of skills in col-
lege end pmblic :echool
settings; Analyzes students
evalnntion of mills"
eocritinieion skills.
5,11ges valt on Its come
pleteness, app ropristeness$
stpplicability, and
creativity.
Judges the pre/limed port..
fell° on the criteria. of
(2) :,gore.
Judges the degree of
specificity present in tbo
objectives and the logical
sequence and ordering.
C.)
(5)
Discovor!! and employs a
variety of evaluation
teehnic....-1 of rupil per-
forrnt,c in bp.tcific
t.!nKs,
(6)
Compar... and contnlets
offurings in
high r.:lools,
(7)
Acquirt-: und establishes
collc ::tion or source
file of notes, visual
s.? cite,r,!,ourct:s mfr
44ncen, :k.pliers, etc.
for fu:-1,: una.
(8)
Ouvolo:
;:N1 acquires a
variety of ter.chirz
styles alit strategies.
(9)
Conduct.. ot7d
partici-
pa
In iprge and
prenent-
ntions.
Presents, discusses, analyzes,
and values evaluation tech-
niques.
Provides descriptions of cur-
riculum guides or phase-elective
programs in high school;
Guides discussion and evaluation
of the offerings.
Provides student with names and
addresses of suppliers and re-
sources;
Discusses value of collection
or file;
Presents examples of collect-
ions or files.
Demonstrates teaching styles
end strategies;
Discusses appropriateness of
varinus strategies in assorted
situations.
Demonstrates and Utilizes
large and small group
activities.
Discovers what techniques
are available to bin and
the advants::es and disad-
vantagos of each:
Employs appropriate tech.-
niqees in his teachim.
Analyzes and values existing
programs in jouraalisi with
the parpose of establishing
standards for such programs.
Begins to organize and
develop his own library of
materials and resources.
ObServes and analyzes a
variety of teaching styles
and strategies;
Practices implementing a
variety of strategies;
Discovers his own strengths
and weaknesses as ho ex-
plores various teaching
styles and strategies.
OD
rn
Leads large and snail
-4,3
-4
group activities;
.8
Discovers the value of large-a
and small group activities
and their appropriateness
with different pupil groups
and objectives.
co
Observes and analyzes
techniques em?loyed for
their appropriateness to
the specific learning
teak and the pupils
involvad.
Critiques students
ability to discolmr
strengths and weaknesses
in a journalise program.
Observes student's abilit
to discover sources and
his method of organizing
the file or collection.
Observes student as be
practices styles and
strategies in micro.-
tenching and student
teaching settings.
Observes and critiques
student's participation
in large and mall group
presentavon and student'
practice at loading both.
ar
(10)
Supervi!;,.%. pupils in
producir.-: a newspaper,
1.;:arboo::, literary maga.-
zino,
n:::'. /or news bureau
rolease. (i1)
!wcogn1;...-N somo of the
lcgal a..:..fcts and respon-
sibiliti,1 of his rolo as
a teacl.vr.
;12)
Acquire:, a professional
pttitudo tr.ward teaching
and rel.z_ionships with
a:..1 school person-.
T11.,
(!3)
Analyz<J!: his porsonal
stroile.V... And woaknesseS
w!lich wl?1 affect his
professicen1 behavior.
(14)
Analyze:: Ilia va]uJs which
sff_ct his profess-
Jenal 11(:1..tvlor.
Present's for discussion the
prot-lems and responsibilities
of the publications advisor.
Discusses and presents situ-
ations involving the legal
responsibilities of the teacher
and publications adviser.
Presents situations for
student to explore in terms
of pupil/teacher or teacher/
administrator relationships.
Provides discussion or sings-
lated classroom situations
which allow student to analyze
his ability to teach;
Provides individual counseling
for student.
Provides opportunities for
student to state and review
his values or to reshape theft.
Works with pupils in varies
ous activities in producing
high school publications.
Discovers the legal respons
sibilities of his position;
Discovers how to protect
himself from law suits re-
sulting from the exercise of
his duties.
Recognizes his and others*
attitudes toward teaching
and pupils.
Discovers if he really
wants to be a teacher;
.Identifies strengths and
reaknesses.
Discovers if his values
are suited to teaching at pg
the secondary level In the=4
public schools.
cos
IN 111
P2
Observes student's ail..
ity to supervise publki.
cations pupils ssd his
ability-to deal with
problens which erise.
Observes student's abil
ity to analyze a potentia
legal problem and cabs-.
appropriate decisions.
Observes student's formal
and informal comments.
about teaching and his
dealings with pupils and
school persoanel.
Infers from student's.
verbal and nonverbal be-
havlors whether student
.
has recognized his
strengths and weaknesses.
Infers "iron student's
verbal and nonverbal be..
haviors.whether student's
values wil.help. or hindez
his Success as a teacher.
LATINO PROJECT
evaluated by
Jim Mahan
BEST COPY MILAN
38
,
Item #4.
Student Competencies Statements and Assessments
Project /Program /Center /Team:
Latino Project
Date:
February 20, 1973
Anticipated competencies.
Nature of competency de-
(Be specific)
velopment - "evolving"
or relatively "firm"?
Hard data supporting the
development of compe-
tencies (within stu-
dents and within pro-
gram)
How was it measured?
Time required for students
to acquire specific com-
petencies and/or time
till program competencies
developed.
1.
3.T. will be familiar with
the sevnlices of at least 5
community ai:encies serving
Latinc, p:ople and will be
able
int2tc_KI
adults nnti!or pupils to an
4111
1.
evolving
4
1. survey used now to
document agencies in
which 3.T.'s work and
length of time of the
work.
Final interview by a
community agency direc-
tor would be good way
to measure competency.
1. 16 weeks at minimum
Hopefully this compe-
tency will be acquired
by May 15.
2.
3.T. will bt.
c.b1e to draw
tin I
t.ino history, art,
music, litt:rature, social
activiti:ts etc. when using
inlltruotional examples and
amt10*3, w.n.-!n decorating
the ollom, etc.
2. evolving-must con-
tinue through in-
service teaching
years.
2. survey items used now
to assess this--both
teacher rating and
S.T. rating.
However, interviews
with the teacher and
with selected students
are needed at end of
the semester.
3.
S.T. will function effec-
tively !t3 an assistant to
.n alult education instruc-
tor chglr&d with teaching
Engli!;!% to ip.nish speakers.
3. evolving
3. survey data indicating
that S.T.Is are invest-
ing time in this role.
However, interviews
with the adult educa-
tion instructors and
the edult students are
needed.
2. 16 week minimum
(obviously not long
enough time but a start.
can be made.)
-
g3. 16 weeks at minimum 4
au
25 te
4.
3.T. will be able to under-
stand and use "border Spanish"
as necessary and appropriate
in contrst to "Castillian
4anish"
4. evolving
5.
Iii
school S.T.Is will be
at)li!
to
d'.3cribe the curricular
cemp,,nts, instructional tech-
niqu:A, pupil populations, and
schc:c1
charac-
terkt1(7 ct' an clet:entary
schP(1--,,clally or a bi-
3ehc,01.
'
5. evolving
4. not being measured
now.
a survey or interview
form for school prin-
cipal and supervising
teacher could get at
this.
4. at least 16 weeks
5. S.T.Is work two hours
daily in an elementary
school (site agreement).
Data on end results
could be obtained by
survey or interview.
5. 16 weeks--should become
quite aware of elemen-
tary patterns and trends
kin general sense) over
a 16-week period.
6.
Jhility to nuke
Latin:.) adults
out;id:
the school setting
(cr,.J,;-culturll interaction
of
int(m3ity.)
6. evolving
6. S.T.'s report "who"
'
they interact with and
who they feel they
know "as a person"
Follow-up survey to
verify could be
employed.
6. 16 weeks is minimal.
Students need to do this
continually after they
obtain employment in a
school district.
7.
Devlc.p.1 selected teaching
skill
as listed on super-
visinL: teacher report farm
(and colle supervisor
form).
7. evolving
I
7. observations by teacher 7. 16 weeks
and by college super-
'
visor plus critique
conferences
BEST COPY AVIIIIIIIii
PROFESSIONAL YEAR PROGROA
evaluated by
Jim Clark
C.)".PFTANCY
Devv1pent of
in the
p7-orelgioral
k"
(6 !,
s), coluulatiJn
(fl
it,-7!,0,c!ass-
r,-.
(7 i!(-:1), Emd
st
t"e
1att:it:F;
env'
(IA i!.11)
AS AII.:O A-1Z42
De\.,.1.,:_eaf- of pecnon.:!1 and
efft:ctivness,
abil!.. f
to 1
.!ot
-IV
A-0
-k5)
-2)
:p c
ifir`
':
Arts I S
by
1!_i-ifr
(;.5)
pr!-on
r;!aff
-petan-
p(:.-11r.finr or each
...11 A'
K2,11
of the various
CO- --4". f.,-,er and there
di
ard 1.1.1frec!. re-
laY,9 to Cie nr.}..n11 setting
PROG 'AM comPorENT
AssiAnrent to the class-
rcr=s - the student tea-
ching experience
Same as above
Student teaching, methods
instt-uction, s.T.-!rvisory
col'ences, and
st1
:e pcograra
11.1.10 VC
Sane Es9 above
F4C0 classes ar.
assign-
!rents and Indiarpolis
trips to scl.lcols and
BEHAVIORS
Indication that con.petancies
are developing or improving
as per opinion of assigned
cooperating teachers
Indication that co-petancies
.are developing or if:proving
as peropinion of supervisors
and methods instructors
S::udent expressions of con-
ard utility regard-
aets
EVALUATION **
Pi Progress Feedback Form
I Sera. - available.
II Sem. - incoi..plete
Quarterly rating sheets-
totals listed for entire
year
I & II Sem. -available
Mid-year PY evaluation
Results available
St.ujent expression of feelings
LOY evaluation (AT specific)
of ir.erescd knowledze, confl-
Results available
dente, ard prepar-ation in the
areas cone erred
Ctudrnr- oil! indicate 6
pecific conpetancies which
Ley feel hpve been acquired
t'lrouAh participction in the
PY prop,ra-,.
Inflication of inpnt of various
forces as per comrr.ent in dis-
cussion awl evaluation scales
EOY evaluation (AT specific)
Results not yet available
F400 evaluations
Results not yet
available
aAll ealIntion instruments previously forwarded to Evaluation Team with the exception of the EOY packets which
-lc
art' enclosed.
PRO:1:3;IONAL YEAR
PROFESSIONAL YEAR
PROFESSIONAL YEAR
to
BEST COri f"*IIABLE
LT t CULTUF,'A PF:0CfM1
evaluated by
Gerald Bracey
43
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana
PROPOSED
44
Division of Teacher Education .
Dr. Bud Harty
STUDENT COMPETENCIESBEST COP': !"!.11ABLE
T421: "Experiment in Multicultural Living"T422
Science Methods
(Ideas/concepts to belearned and attitudesor skills to be develop-ed)
Student Competencies
(The utudent...)
(1)
(How do I do it?) (What's suppose tohappen to students?)
Implementation
(The instructor...)
Student Behaviors
(The student...)
(How will I knowif it 'did happen
to students?)
Evaluation Modes
(The instructor...)
develops values, atti-tudes and skills foranalytical investigationand the teaching ofscience.
provides opportuni- identifies and des-
ties for the student cribes the centralto develop and refine theme of a given setdesirable values, atti- of observations fromLudes and skills by a teaching/learning.way of daily instructor/ situation.student interactions ina social-emotional clim. develops a criticalate commensurate for approach toward
such. evidence.
observes student'sattitude and skilldevelopment in thecampus-classroomsetting and in thepre-student teach-ing placement.
observes studentas he'practicesstyles and stratem--
selects srategies to gies in his daily
gather data along use- encounters.ful teaching/learningdimensions. observes and ana-
lyzes techniques
recognizes the in- employed for theirfluence of changing appropriateness toone variable in a the specific learn-teaching/learning ing task and tha
situation. pupils involved.
sorts out that whichis irrelevant and re-arranges the usefulaspects of informa-tion.
observes student'sability to dis-cover sources andhis methods of
organization.
BEST a""formulates fruit-ful hypotheses fromexisting data,
selects instrumentsand quantitativetreatments for test-ing hypotheses.
looks for new trendsand gathers newevidence.
reasons logicallyfrom establishedteaching/learningmodels.
suggests alternativeexplanations andconstructs modifiedor new models.
45
P
observes student .
as he practicesstyles and strate-gies in teaching/learning situat-ions.
observes student'sparticipation inlarge and smallgroup presentationsand student's prac-tice at leadingboth.
infers from stud-ent's verbal andnonverbal behavkorswhether he hasrecognized hisstrengths and weak-nesses, and whetherhis values willhelp or hinder hissuccess as *teach-er.
observes student'sability to interactwith pupils andhis ability todeal with problems
. which arise, andmake appropriatedecisions.
observes student'sfornalisnd infor-mal comments aboutteaching and hisdealings with pu-pils and profession-
al school personnel
critiques student'sability to discoverstrengths and weak-
nooses.
observes student's
applicatio of
developed values,attitudes, andskills when inter-acting in multi-cultural eduustion-al settings.
416
BEST COPY PIT URI
THIS PAGE WAS MISSING FROM THE DOCUMENT THAT WASSUBMITTED TO ERIC DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION SERVICE.
(5)
constructs or preparesa piece of scienceequipment or audio-visual aid which mightbo used when studentteaching or for usein future teaching(inservice).
(6)
writes a "paper" basedon his experiences duringthe pre-student teachingnlacement in a multicul-sral setting.
encourages student tomake or prepare scienceequipment and mAterialfor classroom use whenlocal funds are notavailable to purchaseexpensive commercialitems.
provides an opportu-nity for the studentto express his viewsin an expository mode.
allows for classroomdiscussion of what areality- oriented sci-ence program might belike.
distributes selecteddittoed handouts.
BEST COPY PVARABLE
demonstrates anability to relatescience concepts tothe construction ofa piece of hardware.
describes to hispeers how the objectwas made and thematerials needed tomake it.
explains to hispeers why, when andhow it is to be usedwhen teaching elemetrtary school science
identifies the manyconstraints placed onthe teaching of sci-ence in multiculturalsettings.
becomes skillfullyaware of operationalbarriers.
seeks out more infor-mation with regard tothe identified con-straints.
utilizes the gatheredinformation or dataas the bases for hispaper.
47
judges the worthof object on thecriteria listedin the thirdcolumn.
infers as to theamount of workinvolved and thestudent's attitudeduring its devel-opment /construction
assesses the valueof the student'seffort based onthe criteria imrplicitly found inthe narrative ofhis paper.
interacts with thestudent by way oftwo supervisoryvisits to the field!,based sites (thesesessiorrs will pro-vide nn opportunityfor mutual assess-ment of cognitiveand affectivedevelopment).
t
..,
RELATE PROGRAM
evaluated by
Richard Stowe
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
IP.
48
49
PROJECT CCIPETENCIES AS CMPILED FROU PROJECT DESIGNSAND FILED COMMUNICATIONS AS, OF NOVEMBER 15, 197
-2 BEST COPY PV4IIABLE
. Competencies now L:easured
Relate1) Diagnosing Learner Characteristics
a) Diagnosing learners1) Enablers
a) learners & instructional objectivesb) categories of learner characteristicsc) sources of learner datad) 'classification of learner datae) interpretation of learner data
2) Settinfr Objectivesa)
b)
c)
d)
Instructional goalsPerformance objectivesTask analysisInstructional sequencing'1) EL ers
a) content1) children's 116erature2) listening3) speaking (oral communication)4) reading skills (oral reading)5) reading skills (general)6) reading skills (work attack)7) reading skills (comprehension)8) writing
3) Planning learner assessmenta) Indicators of achievementb) Instruments for data collectionc) Plan for learner management
1) Enablersa) procedures for information collectionb) use of instruments
4, Planning Strategiesa) Selection of instructional strategies
1) Enablersa) varieties of instructional strategiesb) criteria for instructional strate;ims
5) Plannin: Strate;:iesa) Selection cf orT:anizational patterns
1) Enablersa) varieties of or;;anizational patternsb) criteria for orjanizational patterns
1) Informal observation2) Field test3) Pilot test4) Student management
data system
50
Relate, cont'd.6. Planning use of resources
a) Selection of potential resources1) Enablers
a) varieties: of peten:ial resourcesb) criteria fur potent:Lai resources
7) Integrating the learning environmenta) /ntei;ratinn of instruetipnb) Evaluation Plan
S) implementinga) Instruction with a pupilb) Instruction with .a group
1) . Enablersa) plan for implementationb) instruction with a peer
9) Evaluating
10) Revisinga) Instructional changesb) Assessment
BEg rY PMLABLE
(Use space below for any revisions (additions, deletions, or modifications)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
ct
SHAh'NEE GRADU/TE PROGRAM
evaluated by
William Pilder
51
PROJECT COVPETENCIES AS COMPILED FROM PROJECT DESIGNSAND FILED COMIUNICATICNS OP A NOVEMBER 15, 1972
52
BEST COPY 1..11EABLE
ComulaciesHow Measured
Shawnee Graduate1) Translating what is learned into affecting 1) Staff evaluations
children and the community.2) Staff records as resource
people.2) Skills in doing action research. 3) Records kept of media use.4) Record of model and3) Skills in criticism of educational policies. community experience.5) Records of characteristics4) Skills in assessment of one's value. of participants:
a) Application formsb) Attitudinal Questionnairesc) Themes of participants
(Use space below for any revisions (additions, deletions or modifications)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
53
i ..ISLEIABLE
SHAWrEE Ut'DEFI'Gf;ADUATE PROCriC.1
evaluated by
Thomas Glass
COM1i.T1%^Y
I. ubtaia information concerning
community and social agencies
.and
th.3 social order of the ur-
ban ccr.manity
II. Develop skills in A'd's in
order to become ftnkltional
in urban area 3chool systems
III. Daelcnment of r. d'.sire
of partietlpflats to nue% ._-,la-
pivn..e!at in an innor city
F..chool system
PAgiiikM COratNiAT
Three week communitybaccial
agency work experiences and
related seminars (F400)
Student teaching assign-
ment in inner city schools
Formal instruction (S485)
On-site conferences
The whole program:
Student teaching
Community work (F400)
5485
YPAWNF% UNDERq=UATr
nr.:AvIoRs
Via work in an agnecy-
A.Contact with city
fsnilie?s
B.Expo-nire to problems of
and fr-t:;tri.tions to city
C,i'otp,slire to relationships
betvc,::n nenciffs, schools,
and counityand formal
trejning nessions with
ai:enr7y -karkers
EVALUAT P
Pri,gram (Jhjectives
I :ran attached -complete
II Sem attached - INC.
F400 evaluations (pre and pest
Incorlplrste
Overall Prcpram Evalueition
I Sem- complete 6 pttached
Ii Semi -attached INC.
A. Ir!soens ayproprit,te-to
atuleilte. in level, content,
and lanFus;e
13.4e.cial considerations
for sit:lents in co=yensatory
(potential dropout) programs
C.3hailn!; of concerns and
ideas with to4chers, admin-
instrators, suly:rvisor.3, and
frqlow atuaenta
D.Vcdification of beh,Avior
to rork?ct role of inner
city teacher
Indication of little, or
no, hositnncy to seek a
position in a city system
Actual application for pos-
ition 5n Louisville or
other city school system
Program obiletives
(see above)
Overall Program Evaluation
(see above)
Supertrisors - 3 way
conference forna -not yet
tabulated
Instructor and course
evaluation (S485) attached
Program objectives
(see above)
Overall Program Evaluation
(see above)
r
Clt
COM11.-e;,NCY
I. Ulain Information concerning
cot:mu:114.7 and social agencies
and
social order of the ur-
ban eot.r.'mr.ity
1I. D.velop skills in ATs in
order to become functional
in urban area school systems
III. Development of a desire
of participants to seek em-
ployment in an inner city
school system
FRuCRAM COM;.ONENT
Three week community/social
agency work experiences and
related seminars (F400)
Student teaching assign-
ment in inner city schools
Formal instruction (S485)
,
On-site conferences
The whole program:
Student teaching
Community work (F400)
S485
III
SHAWNEE Utiinz:RGRADVATE fROGRAM
BAYTuR3
Vin 'Jerk in an agnecy-
A.Contact with city
fAmilies
B.Exposure to problems of
and fraItrations to city
citizfxs
C.Exp0.7ure to relationships
ketw(Aln agencies, schools,
and community
D.Discnssion and formal
training see .ions with
age.icy workers
EVALUATION
ProrTam Objectives
I Sem attii.chd
- complete
II Jem attsched - :NC.
F400 evaluntiuns (pre and post
Incomplete
Overall Program Elahmtion
I Jem- complete & attached
II Sem -attached INC.
A. Lessons a!propriate to
sturlents in level, content,
and lanErolo
B. Special considerations
for stl:dents in compensatory
Gotential dropout) programs
C.S:Inring of concerns and
ideas with teachers, admin-
instratorn, supervisors, and
fellow students
D.Wification of behavior
to reflect role of inner
city tr:acher
Indication of little, or
no, hesitancy to seek a
position in a city system
Actual application for pos-
ition in Louisville or
other city school system
pig
CD -v .1
1..1
1.11
vo
Program objectives
(see above)
Overall Program Evaluation
(see above)
Supervisors - 3 way
conference forms -not yet
tabulated
Instructor and course
evaluation (S485)
attached/4
Frogram objectives
4see above)
3verall Program Evaluation
(see above)
or. 11 S Eir4
SE, I
P kw
4elo
teep