austroads bridge conference 2004 hobart may 2004 bridge deck behaviour revisited doug jenkins...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Austroads Bridge ConferenceAustroads Bridge Conference 200 20044HobartHobart MayMay 200 20044
Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited
Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
![Page 2: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OverviewOverview:: Changes in computing technology Illustration – dynamic analysis animation Features of alternative analysis methods Hambly’s comments on FE analysis Summary of findings in paper Examples of advanced analysis techniques Conclusions
Copy of presenation: www.interactiveds.com.au
![Page 3: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Changes in Computing TechnologyChanges in Computing Technology
1976 Text based punched
card input 200 nodes; grillage
Linear static analysis
Printed text output
2004 Interactive graphical
input 100,000 nodes; 3D
brick elements Non-linear and dynamic
analysis Interactive, animated
graphical output
![Page 4: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ftp://download.intel.com/research/silicon/moorespaper.pdf
![Page 5: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Speed of Computer SystemsSpeed of Computer Systems Prof. E.L. Wilson Prof. E.L. Wilson
http://www.csiberkeley.com/support_technical_papers.htmlhttp://www.csiberkeley.com/support_technical_papers.html
![Page 6: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Year
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Rel
ativ
e P
erfo
rman
ce
Main Frame Desktop Trend
Computer Performance1963 - 2003
![Page 7: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
AnimationAnimation
![Page 8: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Hambly commentsHambly comments Powerful and versatile analytical ... with a sufficiently
large computer,
Often requested by clients, or proposed to a client,
Cumbersome to use and is usually expensive.
Choice of element type can be extremely critical
Full time occupation which cannot be carried out ... by the senior engineer responsible for the design.
Unlikely to have time to understand or verify ... data.
Difficult to place his confidence in the results
![Page 9: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Features of AnalysesFeatures of Analyses Downstand
Grillage Plates with downstand
beams
3D Brick models
Transverse variation in the level of the neutral axis.
Transverse and longitudinal in-plane forces
Distortion of beam members
Torsional and distortional warping effects
Local bending effects Model skew decks exactly
![Page 10: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Grillage 1aGrillage 1a
![Page 11: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Grillage 1bGrillage 1b
![Page 12: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Grillage 1cGrillage 1c
![Page 13: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Grillage 2Grillage 2
![Page 14: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Grillage 2 - detailGrillage 2 - detail
![Page 15: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Plate Slab with Downstand BeamsPlate Slab with Downstand Beams
![Page 16: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Brick ElementsBrick Elements
![Page 17: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Brick Elements - detailBrick Elements - detail
![Page 18: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Deflections at mid-span
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Position, m
De
fle
cti
on
, mm
Grillage 1a Grillage 1b Grillage 1c Grillage 2 Plate slab Brick
![Page 19: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Top Face Stress
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00
Position, m
Str
es
s, k
Pa
Grillage 1a Grillage 1b Grillage 1c Grillage 2 Plate slab Brick
![Page 20: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Bottom Face Stress
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00
Position, m
Str
es
s, k
Pa
Grillage 1a Grillage 1b Grillage 1c Grillage 2 Plate slab Brick
![Page 21: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Beam and Plate Analysis – Deflected ShapeBeam and Plate Analysis – Deflected Shape
![Page 22: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Beam and Plate Analysis – Long. StressBeam and Plate Analysis – Long. Stress
![Page 23: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Brick Elements – Long. StressBrick Elements – Long. Stress
![Page 24: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Brick Elements – Cutting PlaneBrick Elements – Cutting Plane
![Page 25: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Brick Elements – Cutting Plane, Selected ElementBrick Elements – Cutting Plane, Selected Element
![Page 26: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Link SlabLink Slab
![Page 27: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Deflections at mid-span
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Position, m
De
fle
cti
on
, mm
Grillage 1c Grillage + Link Plate Plate + Link
Brick Brick + Link No hinges
![Page 28: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
AnimationAnimation
![Page 29: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Dynamic AnalysisDynamic AnalysisDeflection at mid Span, Outer Beam
-0.012
-0.010
-0.008
-0.006
-0.004
-0.002
0.000
0.002
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
Time, S
Def
lect
ion
, m
Plate dynamic Brick Dynamic Plate static Brick Static
![Page 30: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
AnimationAnimation
![Page 31: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Summary of findings in paperSummary of findings in paperAdvantagesAdvantages
Transverse distribution of live loads - significantly reduce maximum design stresses in longitudinal members.
Distribution of wheel loads - more accurate estimate top slab bending moments, without the need for introducing separate local analyses.
Analysis of secondary effects such as differential temperature and shrinkage
Ends of skew decks and link slabs modelled more exactly, including three dimensional effects.
![Page 32: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary of findings in paperSummary of findings in paperNo Longer a ProblemNo Longer a Problem
Finite element models may now be produced and analysed using standard computing equipment in a shorter time than a grillage analysis would have taken in the recent past.
The accuracy of complex models may be checked against grillage analysis, or individual elements may be checked against simple analysis methods.
Three dimensional contour plots of stresses or plots of the deformed shape of structures are easily produced, allowing engineers not directly involved in the analysis to review the results, and check the validity of the model.
![Page 33: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Summary of findings in paperSummary of findings in paperDisadvantagesDisadvantages
More difficult to extract member actions, particularly for large elements such as bridge beams.
Design engineers must be trained in the use of complex software to use it efficiently.
Verification process may be more difficult, particularly if detailed analysis has resulted in lower design actions than a simpler analysis.
![Page 34: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Review Review Hambly commentsHambly comments Powerful and versatile analytical ... with a sufficiently
large computer,
Often requested by clients, or proposed to a client,
Cumbersome to use and is usually expensive.
Choice of element type can be extremely critical
Full time occupation which cannot be carried out ... by the senior engineer responsible for the design.
Unlikely to have time to understand or verify ... data.
Difficult to place his confidence in the results
![Page 35: Austroads Bridge Conference 2004 Hobart May 2004 Bridge Deck Behaviour Revisited Doug Jenkins Interactive Design Services](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051215/5697bfae1a28abf838c9ca3e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
RecommendationsRecommendations
Standard analysis procedure:- Plate slab model with longitudinal beam members
Use pre and post-processor software, specifically designed for bridge decks.
Use brick models to further refine the design, or to investigate the behaviour of non-standard features.
Consider the use of non-linear analysis and slab membrane action - potential for significant refinement of deck slab design.