australia `should lead' in solar energy push_ siemens _ the australian

Upload: carlsmith2166

Post on 10-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Australia `Should Lead' in Solar Energy Push_ Siemens _ the Australian

    1/2

    The Australian

    Australia `should lead' in solar energy push: SiemensGiles Parkinson

    From: The Australian

    April 05, 2010 12:00AM

    THE German industrial giant Siemens is urging Australia to build a massive renewable energy network t

    rival that of the Desertec project that will harness solar energy in northern Africa and deliver it to

    consumers in Europe.

    Siemens -- along with Deutsche Bank, Munich Re, ABB, and utility groups E.ON and RWE, among others -- has

    been one of the driving forces behind the $700 billion Desertec concept and the creation of energy "super-highways"

    Siemens is active in Australia and has made four separate applications under the Australian government's Solar

    Flagships program, which aims to build two large-scale solar energy facilities by 2015. But chief financial officer JoeKaeser believes Australia should be much more ambitious and consider its own "Austral-tec" project.

    "Australia has everything it needs," Kaeser says, adding that Siemens has already held some preliminary discussions

    with the government and other corporates. "Australia should be in the lead (in solar energy) and showing the world

    how it works. If you source solar energy for nothing, and sell natural resources to other countries, it makes for a

    powerful business case."

    Siemens is Europe's largest engineering group and is leading the push into green technology, from where it now

    sources some $25bn of annual revenues -- nearly one quarter of its global revenues. Kaeser says Siemens' push into

    green technology came in 2005 after the board analysed the global "mega-trends" and how the company might beplaced in 50 years. "The push to sustainability is real. It is not a fashion."

    Kaeser says Siemens' hunger for innovation is borne from need. Europe does not enjoy the rate of economic growth

    of China, or the natural resources of Australia. "Our natural resource is know-how." It spends $1bn on green-tech

    R&D each year.

    But Kaeser says the massive redistribution of wealth from new technologies, and the transformation of desolate solar

    rich areas such as the Sahara into "economic treasures", will be fiercely resisted and the transition will not be easy.

    "There is a lot of economic power behind the current technologies, behind coal-fired power plants, and the factories

    that produce CO2," he says. "These markets are threatened by a paradigm shift, and that can cause social problems.That is why the government needs to lead the way."

    He points to the experience of Denmark, which was burned by the oil crisis in the 1970s and supported massive

    investment in wind technology, where it now leads the world. He also points to Singapore, which with few natural

    resources in now turning itself into a "Smart City".

    Carbon capture a `diversion'

    ANOTHER to support a more vigorous push into renewables is professor Stefaan Simons, one of the world's leading

    experts in low-carbon technologies. Professor Simons addressed a Santos-sponsored event in Adelaide last week. Hi

    10/4/2010 Australia should lead' in solar energy

    theaustralian.com.au//story-fn2pxvk0 1

  • 8/8/2019 Australia `Should Lead' in Solar Energy Push_ Siemens _ the Australian

    2/2

    message is that the focus on carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a "dangerous diversion" that is stalling the transition

    to renewable energy sources and a highly efficient, low-carbon energy system.

    Professor Simons is a specialist in the chemical engineering at the University College London and director of its

    Centre for CO2 Technology. He is currently on a global research fellowship with the Royal Academy of Engineering

    that includes time at Australia's Co-operative Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, which is leading research int

    CCS.

    However, he says CCS research (which accounts for more than half of the funds promised by the Australiangovernment for clean energy technologies) is soaking up time, resources and funding that could be better applied in

    securing a low carbon future. He says CO2 capture is not fit for post-combustion at a large scale -- and therefore

    most existing fossil fuel plants -- but the real problem lies in technical and legal issues around storage. There will be a

    role for CCS, he says, but not as broad as its supporters make out.

    "I challenge our energy policymakers to reassess whether large-scale deployment of CCS makes sense and whether

    we should continue to use fossil fuels as our primary energy source, or use these fossil resources to produce higher

    value forms of energy and chemicals.

    "We could then replace fossil-fuel electricity production with that from renewable sources, at the same time reducing

    the need for CCS. We also need to mature our thinking, our innovation and our chemical industry so that CO2

    becomes a valuable resource, rather than a waste product in need of disposal."

    This, Professor Simons says, could provide an opportunity for Australia to use its expertise in coal and gas to lead in

    the development of to new and existing chemicals from CO2 so that CO2 becomes a valuable feedstock rather than a

    waste product. "It needs new business models, and policy and market support. If the coal and gas industries do not

    change, where will they fit into a renewable energy-driven society?"

    Copyright 2010 News Limited. All times AEDT (GMT +11).

    All times are EST. MarketWatch, Inc. 2008. All rights reserved. Subject to the Terms of Use . Designed and

    powered by Dow Jones Client Solutions. MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, BigCharts and the BigCharts logo

    are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc. Dow Jones is the registered trademark of Dow Jones & Company,

    Inc. Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes. "Intraday data is provided by Interactive Data Real Time Services

    and subject to the Term of Use ." FXQuoteTM provided by GTIS, an Interactive Data Company "Historical and

    current end-of-day data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data". FTSE (Footsie) is a trade

    mark of the London Stock Exchange and the Financial Times and is used by FTSE International under license.

    10/4/2010 Australia should lead' in solar energy

    theaustralian.com.au//story-fn2pxvk0 2