austin shines project - energy.gov · shines program review 2017 energy.gov/sunshot 1...
TRANSCRIPT
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 1
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot
SHINES Program Review 2017
Austin SHINES Project
Lisa Martin, Austin SHINES Project Manager Program Mgr, Smart Grid & System Operations, Austin Energy
Tess Williams, Austin SHINES Economic Modeling Lead Sr. Power Systems Engineer, Analytics, Doosan GridTech
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 2 2
Objectives/Agenda
• Austin SHINES project overview and status
• Budget Period 1 highlights
• Control platform conceptual design
• Economic modeling framework
• Communications and monitoring
• Next steps
• Remainder of Budget Period 1
• Budget Periods 2 and 3
• Austin SHINES impact
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 3 3 SHINES Program Review 2017 3
Austin SHINES Conceptual Overview
Illustrative
Utility Scale Energy Storage + PV
Commercial Energy Storage + PV
Residential Energy Storage + PV
DER Management Platform
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 4 4 SHINES Program Review 2017 4
Austin SHINES Project Org Chart
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 5 5
Project Structure and Timeline
Austin SHINES
39-month project with phases
Feb 1, 2016 Apr 30, 20192017 2018 2019
Apr - Apr
Demonstrate
Jul - Mar
Deploy
Feb - Jun
Contract/Design
Today
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 6 6
Key Benefits of the Austin SHINES Project
• Distributed Energy Resource (DER) management platform based on open standards to drive interoperability and lower costs
• Enables diverse strategies/business models for both utility and customer owned resources; to include direct utility control, third-party, and autonomous resource management of DERs
• Studies Distributed Energy Resource (DER) value for the utility and the customer
• Employs a modular approach allowing utilities across the country to adopt the scale and use-cases right for them
• Includes affordability targets and captures holistic benefits via System Levelized Cost of Energy metrics
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 7
Budget Period 1 Highlights
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 8 8
Budget Period 1 Highlights
DERO Conceptual Design
System LCOE to Serve Load
Communications & Monitoring
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 9 9
Budget Period 1 Highlights
DERO Conceptual Design
System LCOE to Serve Load
Communications & Monitoring
DERO Conceptual Design
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 10 10
DER Control System
Austin SHINES includes multiple levels of control to achieve DER optimization
DER Optimizer
Intelligent Controller
• Provides bulk power system (BPS) control
• Used to deploy DERs to meet overall goals for grid
• Connects directly into ADMS; inputs include market signals, forecasts, grid data
• Provides local control for a single energy storage site
• Applies to grid-scale energy storage systems
• Tries to make as many decisions as it can locally
10
Circuit Manager
• Provides control at the distribution circuit level
• Allocates commands from DERO across available circuit-connected assets
• Used in select applications such as voltage support
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 11 11
Utility-Scale ESS Sizing Analysis and Controls Design
Mueller ESS: 1.5MW / 2.5MWh
Use Case Optimal Range Use Case Priority
AS Revenue: Summer 2.5-3.5 MWh Medium
AS Revenue: Winter 2.0-2.5 MWh Medium
Energy Arbitrage Revenue: Summer 2.0 MWh Low
Energy Arbitrage Revenue: Winter 2.0-2.5 MWh Low
Kingsbery ESS: 1.5MW / 3.0MWh
0
200
400
600
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
ESS Power (MVA)
Voltage Fluctuations Summer
Winter
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
ESS Power (MVA)
Power Smoothing Effectiveness
Summer
Winter
Vo
ltag
e Fl
uct
uat
ion
Co
un
t
Smo
oth
ing
Effe
ctiv
enes
s
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 12 12 SHINES Program Review 2017 12
Conceptual Architecture
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 13 13
Potential Control System Applications
13
The Austin
SHINES team
considered 19
applications
during conceptual
design of the DER
Control System
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 14 14
Application List
14
1) Transmission Constraint Avoidance 2) Peak Loss Avoidance 3) VAR Support for Transmission
4) Congestion Management 5) Voltage Support 6) Power Factor Correction 7) Loss Avoidance 8) Harmonics
9) Back-up Power (Islanding) 10) Demand Charge Reduction 11) Time of Use
12) Peak Load Reduction 13) Energy Arbitrage 14) LMP Opportunities
15) Regulation Up/Down 16) Fast Frequency Response 17) Emergency Response Service
18) Solar Variance 19) Wind Variance
Tran
smis
sio
n
Dis
trib
uti
on
C
ust
om
er
SHINES Goals Team Feedback Value Variety Practicality P
rio
riti
zati
on
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 15 15
Budget Period 1 Highlights
DERO Conceptual Design
System LCOE to Serve Load
Communications & Monitoring
System LCOE to Serve Load
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 16 16
A Different Perspective on LCOE
16
LCOE
• Generation in isolation
• Quick and straight-forward calculation
System LCOE
• All system costs computed for investment / operational scenarios
• Requires calculation of complex interactions
LCOE = $capital + $O&M
kWhgenerated
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 17 17 SHINES Program Review 2017 17
System LCOE Boundary
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 18 18
System LCOE Equation
18
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 19 19
System LCOE Task Breakdown
19
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 20 20 SHINES Program Review 2017 20
Energy Arbitrage &
LMP Opportunities
Value Creation Mechanisms
Bulk /ISO /BA
Region
Feeder
Site
milli- second
second minute hour day year ...
Fast Frequency Response
Ancillary Services
Congestion Management
Peak Reduction
Islanding
Demand Charge
Reduction
Voltage Support
Capacity Upgrade Deferrals
Time Of Use
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 21 21 SHINES Program Review 2017 21
solar PV generation
forecasting
Timescales for Austin SHINES Controls
fastest PV/ESS
PCS response
VVO control
loop
SH
INE
S a
pp
lica
tions
Syste
m c
ha
racte
ristics
seasonal changes in
solar PV generation
cloud-induced
volatility in solar
PV generation
diurnal variation in
solar PV production
• Congestion management: minutes to hours
• Demand charge reduction: 15 minutes to hours
• Peak load reduction: 15 minutes to hours
Voltage support: seconds to minutes Energy arbitrage: day(s)
LMP variance: 5-15 minutes
ADMS power
flow calculation metering
scan rate: 2s
ERCOT forecast
/ schedule: 5min
ERCOT
settlements:
15min
transformer, LTC,
VREG, wires,
poles lifetime
ESS lifetime
solar PV lifetime
diurnal variation
in demand
seasonal variation
in demand
fluctuations
in demand
ESS duration
millisecond second minute hour day month season year decade
demand forecasting
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 22 22
22
System LCOE Modeling Requirements
• Time dependency need a time-series modeling tool
• Coordinated voltage control and congestion management need a power flow solver
• The solution: GridLAB-DTM, a power system simulation and analysis tool – Developed by the DOE at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
(PNNL) with support from Office of Electricity
– Strongest at the nexus of electrical and economic interactions
– Flexible environment enables detailed study of controls design and configuration
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 23 23
Modeling and Simulation Process
Baseline model
Baseline System LCOE
calculation
Add new SHINES assets
Develop new
SHINES controls
Simulate, calculate System LCOE
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 24 24
Budget Period 1 Highlights
DERO Conceptual Design
System LCOE to Serve Load
Communications & Monitoring
Communications & Monitoring
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 25 25
25
Utility-Scale Components
DERO
ERCOT Simulated Market Signals
DG-IC DG-IC
Kingsbery ESS
1.5 MW / 3 MWh Single 46’ battery container,
separate PCS
Kingsbery
Community Solar
2 MW
Rooftop
Solar
@Mueller
Mueller ESS
1.5 MW / 2.5 MWh
Modular container design
Electricity Information Value
Legend
Illustrative
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 26 26
26
Commercial Components
3rd Party Aggregator Sites 4x – 30kW
1x – 125kW
Dispatch Priority: Customer value propositions
Direct Utility Control Sites 1x – 30kW
1x – 125kW
Dispatch Priority: Utility reliability needs
DERO Stem (Aggregator)
ERCOT Simulated Market Signals
Electricity Information Value
Legend
Illustrative
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 27 27
Residential Components
Illustrative
DERO Pecan Street
(Aggregator)
Third-Party Aggregator
Sites x6
PV and ESS
Direct Utility Control
Sites x12
PV only
ERCOT Simulated Market Signals
Autonomous Sites x6
PV only
Auto Auto
Electricity Information Value
Legend
Illustrative
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 28 28 SHINES Program Review 2017 28
Communications Connectivity
Illustrative
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 29
Next Steps & Austin SHINES Impact
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 30 30
Next Steps
Remainder of BP1
• Detailed design documentation
• Commercial & Residential participant selection
• Lab testing
• Permitting
• Econ modeling • Calcs for System LCOE “as
designed”
BP2
• Deploy all SHINES assets
• Site acceptance testing
• Econ modeling • Calcs for System LCOE “as
deployed”
BP3
• Demonstration year
• Performance analysis
• Econ modeling • Calcs for System LCOE “as
demonstrated”
• Final deliverables
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 31 31 SHINES Program Review 2017 31
Austin SHINES Impact
Multiple use-cases
Maintain grid
reliability
Minimize cost
Open standards
Customer value
Utility value
Modular approach
Holistic DER coordination
High PV penetration
Grid Integration Interoperability
Diverse perspectives
DER control methodologies
Collaborative work
Emerging technologies
energy.gov/sunshot energy.gov/sunshot SHINES Program Review 2017 32 32 SHINES Program Review 2017 32
Questions?
32
Lisa Martin Austin SHINES
Project Manager
www.austinenergy.com/go/shines
Tess Williams Austin SHINES
Economic Modeling Lead