aura muntasell institut hospital del mar d’investigacions ... · pdf fileaura muntasell....

Download Aura Muntasell Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions ... · PDF fileAura Muntasell. Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques. Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: dohuong

Post on 06-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Respuesta inmune anti-tumoral

    Aura MuntasellInstitut Hospital del Mar dInvestigacions Mdiques

    Parc de Recerca Biomdica de Barcelona

  • Zitvogel et al Nat Rev Immunol (2006)

    CANCER IMMUNOEDITING

  • Evidences for cancer immunoediting in animal models of cancerSpontaneous tumor development in immunodeficient mice

    B cell

    A) RAG2-/- (Lacks B and T cells): Develop spontaneous adenocarcinomes of the intestine and lung

    B) RAG2-/- STAT1-/- (Lacks B and T cells, deficient in type I and II IFN signaling): Increased spontaneous tumor incidence with broad tumor spectrum: adenocarcinomes of the intestine and lung, breast, colon.

    C) Perforin -/- (lacking cytotoxic pathways):Spontenous development of late-onset B cell lymphomas (sensitive to CD8 T cells in wt mice)

    D) Perforin-/- and 2 microglobulin-/- (lack cytotoxic pathways and MHC class I): Spontenous development of early-onset B cell lymphomas (sensitive to NK and T cells in wt mice)

    Cytotoxicity IFN Abs: complement, phagocytosis, ADCC

  • A) Spontaneous tumor regression: Certain tumors regress spontaneously suggesting an immunological response (i.e. melanomas). Spontaneous regressing melanoma lessions are accompanied by clonal expansion of specific T cells

    B) Immunosuppressed patients: is associated with a higher risk of malignancyImmunosuppressed transplant recipients: 3-100 fold increase of developing lymphomas and a range of solid tumorsPrimary and acquired immunodeficiencies: increased incidence of lymphomas and tumors of viral etiology

    C) Tumor immune infiltrate: Tumors with severe mononuclear cell infiltatre (CD8, Th1) have a better prognosis than those lacking it (i.e. microsatellite unstable colorectal tumors, MSI)

    D) Paraneoplastic neurological disorders (PNDs) arise as a consequence of antibody and T cell responses against certain autologous tumors that ectopically express proteins whose expression is normally restricted to the nervous system

    E) Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors: clinical beneffit particularrly in immunogenic tumors (i.e. melanoma)

    Evidences for cancer immunoediting in humans

  • Anti-tumor immune effector cells and mechanisms

    Innate Immune response Adaptive Immune response

    Cell cytotoxicityIFN and TNF

    Phagocytic cellsROS and NOTNF, IL-6, IL-12Antigen presentation

    Phagocytic cellsMigrationAg presentationCostimulationType I IFN, IL-6, IL-12

    Cell cytotoxicityIFN and TNF

    Cytokine IFN and TNF

  • Antigen presentation to T cellsT cell and NK cell anti-tumor responses

    T regCTL and NK cell anergyPro-neoangiogenesisMatrix remodelling and metastasis

    Myeloid cells: from tumor-suppressing to tumor-promoting cells

    Non-immunogenic tumor cell deathRelease of tumor associated antigens

    Immunogenic tumor cell deathRelease of tumor-associated Ags

    + DAMPs

    AnthracyclinesOxaliplatinAnti-EGFR mAbCyclophosphamideIrradiationBortezomid

    Pro-inflammatory MDendritic cells (mature)

    Alt. Activated MTolerogenic DCTAMMDSC

    HLA and co-stimulatory molecules

    Anti-tumor

    Pro-tumor

  • Activation of NK cell effector functions

    ACTIVATING INHIBITORY

    KIR2DL (HLA-C)KIR3DL (HLA-B)CD94/NKG2A (HLA-E)ILT2 (LIR-1, CD85j) (HLA-G)IRP60LAIR

    CD16NKp30NKp44NKp46NKG2D2B4NTBA

    INDUCIBLE CO-RECEPTORS: CD137, PD-1, CEACAM-1

    Recognition of altered self by NK cells

    HLA Class I

    MICA, MICB, ULBP 1-6

  • Clinical evidences for NK-cell anti-tumor responses

    A) HSCT : Elimination of minimal residual disease (GvL)

    Allo-HCT

    Haploidentical allo-HCT

    Alloreactive donor NK-cell infusions

    B) Tumor Antigen specific mAb-based therapies (IgG1):

    Rituximab

    Alemtuzumab

    Trastuzumab

    Clynes RA, Nat Med., 2000

    BT47

    4

    Prob

    abili

    tyof

    rela

    pse

    Curti A, Clin Canc Res., 2016

  • T cell antigen recognition and activation

    Unique specificity determined by the TCR

    TCR: heterodimer ( or )

    Generated by somatic recombination of TCR gene fragments along T cell maturation

    Selection processes to ensure tolerance

    Nave T cell repertoire ~1015

    T cell Receptor Repertoire

    Chen L, Nat Rev Immunol, 2013

    Two signal model

    CD28B7

  • Phases of T cell response

    Cytokine environment

    HLA class II

    HLA class I

  • Polarization of T cell responses by soluble factors (cytokines)

    Anti-tumorPro-tumor

  • Viral associated antigens:Papilomavirus (E6,E7)Virus de Epstein Barr (EBNA )

    Onco-fetal Antigens: CEA and AFPOverexpressed genes: HER-2Genes with restricted tissue expression: MAGEDiferentiation molecules: CD20, MART-1Post-translational modifications: MUC1

    Transformation-independent mutations (i.e. carcinogen- or UV-induced)Mutations in oncogens: p21ras, p53, translocations (bcr/abl)

    Cellular mechanisms for tumor elimination: T cellsTumor Associated Antigens (TAA)

    Tumor specific mutant Antigens (TSMA)

  • Modulation of T cell effectors by inducible co-receptors

    Co-stimulatory: TNF receptor subfamily

    Inhibitory co-receptors

    Chen L, Nat Rev Immunol, 2013

  • Zitvogel et al Nat Rev Immunol (2006)

    CANCER IMMUNOEDITING

    Elimination of tumor cells with strong mutant antigens Spare tumor cells with weaker antigens Promote epigenetic silencing of tumor-specific antigens/HLA-I Selection of tumor variants that scape from IS

  • CANCER IMMUNOEDITING by IMMUNE CELLS

    Aptsiauri N, SpringerBriefs in Cancer Research, 2013

  • Zitvogel et al Nat Rev Immunol (2006)

    Cancer Immunoediting

  • Tumor immune escape mechanisms

    Tumor variants.

    A) AVOID

    B) RESIST

    C) SUPPRESS

    .anti-tumor immune responses

    Immunological Ignorance: encapsulated tumors, fibroblasts, ECM, low antigen load, alterations in HLA expression/antigenpresentation

    Mutations in death-inducing receptors (i.e. Fas, TrailR)

    Overexpression of anti-apoptotic molecules (i.e. FLIP, BcL-X)

    Induction of tolerance to tumor antigens

    Suppression of cytotoxic lymphocyte infiltrate

    ACTIVE

  • Tumor immuno suppressor mechanisms

    TUMOR CELL

    IMMUNE CELLS

    Expression of T/NK-cell inhibitory molecules

    - B7-H1- HLA-G/HLA-E- PD1-L

    Secretion of immunosuppressiveSoluble factors:

    - TGF- VEGF- IL-10- sMICA- sFasL

    Differentiation to CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T reg

    Immunossuppresive myeloid cell populations

    Poor innate cell activation IDO+ DC

    CTL apoptosisInhibition of CTL proliferationLoss of signal transduction molecules (i.e. CD3)T cell functional exhaustion (PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG 3)

  • Gradual process

    Tumor microenvironment and T cell exhaustion

    The immunossupressive nature of tumor microenvironment (hypoxia, TGF, T regs) oftenrenders the infiltrated T cells dysfuntional (exhausted).

    Freeman, JEM, 2006

    PD-1

    TIM3CTLA4BTLACD160LAG32B4

    Gradual , dynamic and reversible process

  • Immune Dysregulation within the Tumor microenvironment

    Innate Immune response Adaptive Immune response

    Secretion of NOArginaseCys sequestration

    IL10, TGFVEGFMMPs

    IDO expressionTolerogenic SignalsDefective antigenpresentation

    Functional exhaustion

    IL-10, TGF(Sink for IL-2)Impaired CTL activation

    MDSC M2 macrophage Regulatory DC

  • Zitvogel et al Nat Rev Immunol (2006)

    Cancer Immunoediting

  • IDO inhibitors

    Switching to anti-tumor effectors with Immunotherapy

    Innate Immune response Adaptive Immune response

    MDSC M2 macrophage Regulatory DCCTL Regulatory T cell

    unlicensedNK cell

    IFNIL-12IL-15

    Anti-KIRAnti-PD1

    Anti-CSF-1R

    Anti-PD1Anti-CTL4

    Poly I:CBCGVaccines

    Anti-CTL4 (IgG1)

  • Final thoughts

    The natural history of the individual tumor and the oncogenic changes that it has acquired will condition suitable immunotherapeutic approaches

    Immune system has several effector cells with the potential for eliminating tumors. Those effector cells and mechanisms involved in tumor elimination differ among tumors depending on their:

    - nature- immunogeneicity- accessibility

    There is a need for identifying immune systemrelated biomarkers allowing to categorize patients - optimizing the selection of candidates with high response phenotypes. - facilitate decisions on the convenience of testing co-adjuvant/combination therapies in a personalized manner

    Immunotherapy will work best in combination, as tumor cells upregulate multiple immunocheckpoint pathways to evade the immune response

  • Thank you for your attention

    Nmero de diapositiva 1Nmero de diapositiva 2Nmero de diapositiva 3Nmero de diapositiva 4Anti-tumor immune effector cells and mechanismsNmero de diapositiva 6Nmero de diapositiva 7Nmero de diapositiva 8T cell antigen recognition and activationPhases of T cell responseNmero de diapositiva 11Nmero de diapositiva 12Nmero de diapositiva 13Nmero de diapositiva 14Nmero de diapositiva 15Nmero de diapositiva 16Nmero de diapositiva 17Nmero de diapositiva 18Nmero de diapositiva 19Immune Dysregulation within the Tumor microenvironmentNmero de diapositiva 21Nmero de diapositiva 22Nmero de diapositiva 23Nmero de diapositiva 24