august 2016 parcc 2016 final results - washington, d.c. · 2016. 11. 21. · district of columbia...

PARCC Performance Level Overview

2016 PARCC Results | DCPS

Performance Levels

Level 5 Exceeded expectations

Level 4 Met expectations

Level 3 Approached expectations

Level 2 Partially met expectations

Level 1 Did not yet meet expectations

Level 4/5 = College‐and‐career readyDemonstrated the academic knowledge, skills and practices necessary to enter directly into and succeed in entry‐level, credit‐bearing courses in college or

technical courses requiring college‐level reading, writing, and math.

2

PARCC reports results according to five performance levels that delineate the knowledge, skills, and practices students are able to demonstrate.

Main Takeaways

DCPS improved in Mathematics (+ 3.0%) and held steady (+ 0.6%) in ELA Most grade levels improved Most subgroups improved 51 schools improved in both ELA and Math


3

Overall DCPS PARCC Performance (% Level 4/5+)


4

24.9% 25.5%20.9%

23.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 (n = 17,702) 2016 (n = 19,475) 2015 (n = 17,525) 2016 (n = 20,192)

Overall DCPS PARCC % L4 + L5ELA Math

+ 0.6% + 3.0%

Overall DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution


5

31.8% 31.4%23.6% 25.2%

23.1% 22.2%31.4% 29.2%

20.2% 20.9%24.1% 21.7%

19.7% 20.5%18.2% 20.3%

5.2% 4.9% 2.7% 3.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 (n = 17,702) 2016 (n = 19,475) 2015 (n = 17,525) 2016 (n = 20,192)

Overall DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

% L4 + L52015: 24.9%2016: 25.5%∆: +0.6%

ELA Math

% L4 + L52015: 20.9%2016: 23.9%∆: +3.0%

DCPS PARCC Performance, Grades 3‐8 & High School


6

24.6% 26.5% 27.0%

20.1% 22.6%26.9%

7.7%11.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 15508)

2016(n: 16446)

2015(n: 2194)

2016(n: 3029)

2015(n: 15520)

2016(n: 16422)

2015(n: 2005)

2016(n: 3770)

DCPS PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade Band

+ 1.8% ‐ 6.9% + 3.4%+ 4.3%

ELA Gr 3‐8 ELA HS (ELA II) Math Gr 3‐8 Math HS (Geo/Alg II)

DCPS PARCC Performance Level Distribution, 3‐8 & High School


7

30.7% 27.7%40.1%

51.7%

23.6% 24.5% 23.9% 27.9%

23.9%23.5%

17.4%

14.9%

29.5% 26.0%

46.5% 42.9%

20.9% 22.3% 15.5%

13.2%

24.4%22.6%

21.8% 18.1%19.9% 21.6% 18.3%

14.5% 19.6% 22.5%

7.3% 10.6%4.7% 4.8% 8.7% 5.6% 3.0% 4.3% 0.4% 0.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 15508)

2016(n: 16446)

2015(n: 2194)

2016(n: 3029)

2015(n: 15520)

2016(n: 16422)

2015(n: 2005)

2016(n: 3770)

DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade Band


ELA Gr 3‐8 ELA HS (ELA II) Math Gr 3‐8 Math HS (Geo/Alg II)

DCPS PARCC Performance by Grade (ELA)


8

23.9% 24.3%27.7% 29.1%

23.7%28.0%

22.9%25.6% 24.3% 24.6% 24.2% 26.5% 27.0%

20.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 3402)

2016(n: 3866)

2015(n: 3137)

2016(n: 3413)

2015(n: 2636)

2016(n: 2943)

2015(n: 2055)

2016(n: 1930)

2015(n: 2048)

2016(n: 2143)

2015(n: 2230)

2016(n: 2151)

2015(n: 2194)

2016(n: 3029)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade

Gr 3

+ 0.4%

Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 ELA II (HS)

+ 1.4% + 2.8% + 0.4% + 2.3% ‐ 6.9%+ 4.3%

DCPS PARCC Performance by Grade (Math)


9

29.7%36.1%

28.4% 30.6%

23.3%28.3%

19.6%22.9%

15.2%18.9%

12.2% 14.1%7.7%

11.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 3403)

2016(n: 3855)

2015(n: 3144)

2016(n: 3399)

2015(n: 2650)

2016(n: 2932)

2015(n: 2045)

2016(n: 1935)

2015(n: 2022)

2016(n: 2145)

2015(n: 2256)

2016(n: 2156)

2015(n: 2005)

2016(n: 3770)

DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Grade

Gr 3

+ 6.4%

Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8 Geo + Alg II (HS)

+ 2.2% + 3.4% + 3.7% + 1.9% + 3.4%+ 5.0%

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Grade (ELA)


10

36.9% 34.8%24.3% 23.6% 25.6% 20.0%

27.9% 23.7%34.7% 32.6% 35.1% 30.7%

40.1%51.7%

21.2% 21.1%

24.1% 22.7%27.9%

27.6%

27.0%25.4%

21.8% 23.5% 21.8%22.1%

17.4%

14.9%

18.0% 19.7%23.9% 24.6%

22.8%24.4%

22.2%25.2%

19.2% 19.3% 18.9%20.7% 15.5%

13.2%

22.0% 21.7%21.9% 22.2%

21.2% 24.9% 18.2% 21.0% 15.1% 17.4% 17.9% 20.8% 18.3%14.5%

1.9% 2.6% 5.8% 6.9% 2.5% 3.1% 4.6% 4.6% 9.2% 7.3% 6.3% 5.7% 8.7% 5.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 3402)

2016(n: 3866)

2015(n: 3137)

2016(n: 3413)

2015(n: 2636)

2016(n: 2943)

2015(n: 2055)

2016(n: 1930)

2015(n: 2048)

2016(n: 2143)

2015(n: 2230)

2016(n: 2151)

2015(n: 2194)

2016(n: 3029)

DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade


Gr 3 Gr 8Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 ELA II (HS)

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Grade (Math)


11

21.3% 21.7% 20.2% 23.1%17.3% 17.9%

25.3% 24.6% 25.0% 24.7%36.3% 40.7%

23.9% 27.9%

23.5% 20.5% 27.5% 24.7% 33.2% 28.2%

31.7% 29.5%34.7% 32.8%

30.2% 25.0%46.5% 42.9%

25.5%21.7%

23.9% 21.6%26.1%

25.6%

23.5%23.0%

25.1%23.6%

21.4% 20.2%21.8% 18.1%23.9%

27.7%25.0% 26.7%

19.8%23.4%

17.6% 19.3%14.6% 17.9%

11.7% 13.3%7.3% 10.6%

5.7% 8.4% 3.4% 3.9% 3.5% 5.0% 2.0% 3.6% 0.6% 1.0% 0.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 3403)

2016(n: 3855)

2015(n: 3144)

2016(n: 3399)

2015(n: 2650)

2016(n: 2932)

2015(n: 2045)

2016(n: 1935)

2015(n: 2022)

2016(n: 2145)

2015(n: 2256)

2016(n: 2156)

2015(n: 2005)

2016(n: 3770)

DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Grade


Gr 3 Gr 8Gr 4 Gr 5 Gr 6 Gr 7 Geo + Alg II (HS)

DCPS PARCC Performance by Race/Ethnicity (ELA)


12

13.9% 15.1%

21.7% 22.9%

78.8%74.0%

65.8%60.7%

52.6% 54.2%

33.3%

50.0%

22.7%26.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n:

11908)

2016(n:

12814)

2015(n: 2919)

2016(n: 3448)

2015(n: 2180)

2016(n: 2430)

2015(n: 319)

2016(n: 364)

2015(n: 342)

2016(n: 373)

2015(n: 12)

2016(n: 12)

2015(n: 22)

2016(n: 34)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Race/Ethnicity

Black

+ 1.2%

Hispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Am Ind Pac Isl

+ 1.2% ‐ 5.1% + 1.5% + 16.7% + 3.8%‐ 4.8%

DCPS PARCC Performance by Race/Ethnicity (Math)


13

10.7% 12.9%

20.3% 22.3%

67.6%71.5%

55.4% 55.3% 54.8% 57.2%

15.4%

23.1%19.0%

28.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n:

11773)

2016(n:

13098)

2015(n: 2928)

2016(n: 3634)

2015(n: 2133)

2016(n: 2628)

2015(n: 312)

2016(n: 387)

2015(n: 345)

2016(n: 397)

2015(n: 13)

2016(n: 13)

2015(n: 21)

2016(n: 35)

DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Race/Ethnicity

Black

+ 2.2%

Hispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Am Indian Pac Isl

+ 2.0% ‐ 0.1% + 2.4% + 7.7% + 9.6%+ 3.9%

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Race/Eth (ELA)


14

38.8% 38.2%29.5% 30.3%

3.7% 4.1% 8.5% 9.6% 12.3% 9.7% 8.3%

25.0%18.2%

26.5%

26.8% 25.8%

23.7% 22.2%

5.0% 6.3%9.4% 11.8%

14.0%13.7%

33.3%

25.0%31.8%

23.5%

20.5% 21.0%

25.1% 24.5%

12.5%15.6%

16.3%17.9%

21.1% 22.5%

25.0%

27.3% 23.5%

12.7% 13.5%18.6% 19.9%

51.8%51.7%

44.2%42.9%

43.3%40.2%

33.3%

41.7%

18.2% 26.5%

1.2% 1.5% 3.2% 3.0%

27.0% 22.3% 21.6% 17.9%9.4% 13.9%

0.0%8.3% 4.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n:

11908)

2016(n:

12814)

2015(n: 2919)

2016(n: 3448)

2015(n: 2180)

2016(n: 2430)

2015(n: 319)

2016(n: 364)

2015(n: 342)

2016(n: 373)

2015(n: 12)

2016(n: 12)

2015(n: 22)

2016(n: 34)

DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Race/Ethnicity


Black Am IndianHispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Pac Isl

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Race/Eth (Math)


15

29.8% 31.8%18.3% 21.2%

2.6% 3.2% 6.7% 8.5% 4.1% 5.8%15.4%

7.7%

23.8%11.4%

36.4% 34.1%

32.7% 30.6%

8.0% 7.1%

14.7% 13.4%13.3% 14.9%

30.8%

23.1%

19.0%

28.6%

23.2% 21.2%

28.8% 25.9%

21.8% 18.2%

23.1% 22.7% 27.8% 22.2%

38.5%

46.2%

38.1%31.4%

10.2% 12.0%18.4% 20.1%

54.0%54.8%

43.6% 44.2% 44.9% 45.8%

15.4%23.1% 19.0%

25.7%

0.4% 1.0% 1.8% 2.2%13.6% 16.7% 11.9% 11.1% 9.9% 11.3%

0.0% 0.0% 2.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n:

11773)

2016(n:

13098)

2015(n: 2928)

2016(n: 3634)

2015(n: 2133)

2016(n: 2628)

2015(n: 312)

2016(n: 387)

2015(n: 345)

2016(n: 397)

2015(n: 13)

2016(n: 13)

2015(n: 21)

2016(n: 35)

DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Race/Ethnicity


Black Am IndianHispanic White Multi‐Racial Asian Pac Isl

DCPS Performance by Subgroup (ELA)


16

11.6% 13.9%

3.4% 4.5%

11.8%14.6%

29.7% 30.5%

20.3% 20.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 2000)

2016(n: 2495)

2015(n: 2802)

2016(n: 3170)

2015(n: 13306)

2016(n: 15045)

2015(n: 8684)

2016(n: 9549)

2015(n: 9018)

2016(n: 9926)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by Subgroup

ELL

+ 2.3%

SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male

+ 1.1% + 0.8% + 0.3%+ 2.8%

DCPS Performance by Subgroup (Math)


17

17.4%20.0%

2.8%5.6%

11.0% 13.5%

21.9%25.2%

19.8%22.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 2030)

2016(n: 2588)

2015(n: 2748)

2016(n: 3207)

2015(n: 13211)

2016(n: 15412)

2015(n: 8589)

2016(n: 9916)

2015(n: 8936)

2016(n: 10276)

DCPS Math PARCC % L4 + L5 by Subgroup

ELL

+ 2.6%

SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male

+ 2.8% +3.3% + 2.9%+ 2.5%

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Subgroup (ELA)


18

40.7% 40.3%

72.0% 66.7%

40.0% 38.3%25.2% 24.9%

38.2% 37.8%

27.1% 24.7%

18.3%19.7%

27.5% 25.7%

22.9% 21.8%

23.2% 22.6%

20.7% 21.0%

6.3% 9.1%

20.7%21.4%

22.2% 22.9%

18.3% 19.0%

10.9% 12.9%2.9% 4.2%

11.1% 13.1%

23.0% 23.7%16.5% 17.5%

0.7% 1.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.7% 1.4% 6.7% 6.8% 3.8% 3.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 2000)

2016(n: 2495)

2015(n: 2802)

2016(n: 3170)

2015(n: 13306)

2016(n: 15045)

2015(n: 8684)

2016(n: 9549)

2015(n: 9018)

2016(n: 9926)

DCPS ELA PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Subgroup


ELL SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male

PARCC Performance Level Distribution by Subgroup (Math)


19

22.6% 26.4%

53.5% 52.6%

29.3% 31.0%20.4% 21.9% 26.7% 28.3%

34.5% 32.3%

35.2% 31.3%

36.5% 34.1%

31.5% 29.7%31.4% 28.6%

25.5% 21.3%

8.5%10.5%

23.2% 21.4%

26.1% 23.2%22.1% 20.3%

15.8% 18.0%

2.7% 5.0% 10.4% 12.5%19.4% 21.6%

17.1% 19.1%

1.6% 2.0% 0.1% 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 2.5% 3.7% 2.8% 3.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 2030)

2016(n: 2588)

2015(n: 2748)

2016(n: 3207)

2015(n: 13211)

2016(n: 15412)

2015(n: 8589)

2016(n: 9916)

2015(n: 8936)

2016(n: 10276)

DCPS Math PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and Subgroup


ELL SPED Eco Disadvantaged Female Male

PARCC Performance, 40/40 Schools


20

5.8% 7.2%

34.0% 34.3%

5.9% 7.7%

28.0%31.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 5721)

2016(n: 6324)

2015(n: 11981)

2016(n: 13151)

2015(n: 5641)

2016(n: 6346)

2015(n: 11884)

2016(n: 13846)

DCPS ELA PARCC % L4 + L5 by 40/40 Status

+ 1.4% + 0.3% + 3.4%+ 1.8%

ELA 40/40 ELA Non‐40/40 Math 40/40 Math Non‐40/40

PARCC Performance Level Distribution, 40/40 Schools


21

49.3% 49.6%

23.5% 22.7%

37.5% 39.7%

17.0% 18.5%

29.0% 27.0%

20.2% 19.9%

38.6% 35.9%

28.0% 26.1%

15.9% 16.1%

22.3% 23.2%

18.0% 16.8%

27.0% 24.0%

5.6% 6.8%

26.4% 27.1%

5.8% 7.2%

24.1% 26.3%

0.1% 0.4%7.7% 7.1%

0.2% 0.5% 3.8% 5.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015(n: 5721)

2016(n: 6324)

2015(n: 11981)

2016(n: 13151)

2015(n: 5641)

2016(n: 6346)

2015(n: 11884)

2016(n: 13846)

DCPS PARCC Performance by Achievement Level and 40/40 Status


ELA 40/40 ELA Non‐40/40 Math 40/40 Math Non‐40/40

PARCC Performance, by Ward


22

Ward

ELA Math2015 2016

Change2015 2016

Change# Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5Ward 1 1,753 19.9% 2,031 23.1% 3.2% 1,731 14.8% 2,147 19.0% 4.1%Ward 2 1,045 40.1% 1,072 44.8% 4.7% 1,007 33.3% 1,229 41.8% 8.6%Ward 3 3,183 64.6% 3,433 59.9% ‐4.7% 3,152 49.4% 3,719 52.4% 3.0%Ward 4 2,319 23.2% 2,834 23.4% 0.2% 2,322 24.1% 2,865 24.7% 0.6%Ward 5 1,561 12.2% 1,767 12.1% ‐0.2% 1,573 7.8% 1,841 7.9% 0.1%Ward 6 2,681 21.3% 2,880 24.0% 2.7% 2,697 19.1% 2,873 22.8% 3.6%Ward 7 2,116 6.6% 2,199 8.1% 1.5% 2,068 8.0% 2,226 9.8% 1.8%Ward 8 2,849 4.9% 3,098 6.7% 1.8% 2,782 5.0% 3,120 7.6% 2.7%

Achievement Gap


23

13.9% 15.1%

21.7% 22.9%

78.8%74.0%

65.8%

60.7%

52.6% 54.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016

ELA

White (‐4.8%)

Multi‐Racial (‐5.1%)

Asian (+1.5%)

Hispanic (+1.2%)

Black (+1.2%) 10.7%12.9%

20.3%22.3%

67.6%71.5%

55.4% 55.3%54.8%57.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016

Math

White (+3.9%)

Multi‐Racial (‐0.2%)

Asian (+2.4%)

Hispanic (+2.0%)

Black (+2.3%)

School‐Level Results

24

Schools Making Significant Gains in Both Subjects


25

Change in % L4 & L5School ELA MathAmidon‐Bowen ES +7.0% +6.8%Bancroft ES +8.2% +10.3%Barnard ES +7.1% +10.5%Beers ES +11.9% +9.5%Benjamin Banneker HS +24.1% +30%Brightwood EC +5.7% +4.8%Burroughs ES +11.1% +15.7%C.W. Harris ES +3.6% +7.1%Garrison ES +9.3% +8.3%H.D. Cooke ES +8.2% +17.2%Hardy MS +15.8% +9.3%Hearst ES +14.1% +12.3%Houston ES +4.7% +7.0%Hyde‐Addison ES +6.1% +24.1%

Change in % L4 & L5School ELA MathKetcham ES +5.0% +18.0%Key ES +6.8% +7.3%King, M.L. ES +3.3% +7.4%LaSalle‐Backus EC +2.3% +6.4%Leckie ES +4.2% +4.4%Marie Reed ES +17.0% +9.9%McKinley Tech HS +5.7% +4.0%Nalle ES +4.2% +5.7%Oyster‐Adams Bilingual +5.2% +4.9%Raymond EC +6.2% +2.5%School‐Within‐School +19.7% +6.9%Seaton ES +5.6% +12.2%Stanton ES +5.6% +9.9%Stoddert ES +8.5% +3.5%Thomson ES +8.2% +10.4%

DCPS 3‐8 Schools


26

ELA Math2015 2016

Change2015 2016

Change# Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5Aiton ES 75 4% 73 5% 1.5% 75 7% 73 14% 7.0%Amidon‐Bowen ES 131 2% 140 9% 7.0% 131 5% 140 12% 6.8%Bancroft ES 178 12% 190 20% 8.2% 178 20% 190 30% 10.3%Barnard ES 181 25% 213 32% 7.1% 189 23% 213 34% 10.5%Beers ES 148 5% 133 17% 11.9% 147 12% 133 21% 9.5%Brent ES 107 68% 128 61% ‐7.3% 107 57% 128 61% 3.9%Brightwood EC 281 6% 347 12% 5.7% 282 16% 353 20% 4.8%Brookland MS 281 15% 283 5%Browne EC 162 6% 146 7% 0.7% 163 6% 145 6% 0.1%Bruce‐Monroe ES 146 15% 171 14% ‐1.0% 148 18% 171 25% 6.9%Bunker Hill ES 58 17% 58 21%Burroughs ES 121 13% 78 24% 11.1% 122 16% 78 32% 15.7%Burrville ES 95 14% 90 10% ‐3.7% 95 13% 90 11% ‐1.5%C.W. Harris ES 88 1% 106 5% 3.6% 87 2% 106 9% 7.1%Capitol Hill Montessori 59 37% 94 35% ‐2.2% 59 20% 94 34% 13.7%Cleveland ES 96 31% 105 29% ‐2.7% 96 26% 105 33% 7.3%Deal MS 1,276 68% 1,307 63% ‐5.3% 1,276 44% 1,313 50% 6.5%Dorothy I Height ES 19% 149 23% 3.8% 20% 149 19% ‐0.5%Drew ES 54 13% 80 24% 10.8% 54 24% 79 19% ‐5.1%Eaton ES 207 71% 207 71% 0.5% 208 67% 202 71% 3.5%Eliot‐Hine MS 201 5% 173 9% 3.8% 200 1% 172 1% 0.2%Garfield ES 90 7% 116 16% 8.9% 90 11% 116 11% 0.1%Garrison ES 45 4% 58 14% 9.3% 47 11% 58 19% 8.3%H.D. Cooke ES 142 8% 138 16% 8.2% 142 17% 138 34% 17.2%Hardy MS 356 24% 335 40% 15.8% 356 22% 336 31% 9.3%Hart MS 388 1% 334 2% 1.1% 385 1% 334 1% 0.2%Hearst ES 116 41% 119 55% 14.1% 116 44% 119 56% 12.3%Hendley ES 194 2% 179 2% 0.2% 196 2% 179 2% 0.7%Houston ES 86 1% 86 6% 4.7% 86 5% 86 12% 7.0%

DCPS 3‐8 Schools


27

ELA Math2015 2016

Change2015 2016

Change# Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5Hyde‐Addison ES 135 55% 128 61% 6.1% 136 49% 128 73% 24.1%J.O. Wilson ES 137 23% 163 24% 1.3% 136 34% 162 35% 0.7%Janney ES 258 81% 301 69% ‐11.2% 260 67% 299 77% 10.0%Jefferson MS Academy 255 16% 253 17% 0.1% 256 9% 253 16% 6.8%Johnson, John Hayden MS 212 3% 234 4% 0.5% 198 1% 245 2% 1.5%Kelly Miller MS 461 8% 401 8% ‐0.5% 459 7% 402 7% ‐0.4%Ketcham ES 85 8% 98 13% 5.0% 83 16% 98 34% 18.0%Key ES 145 65% 141 72% 6.8% 146 65% 141 72% 7.3%Kimball ES 131 4% 128 5% 0.9% 131 8% 128 13% 4.1%King, M.L. ES 135 5% 142 8% 3.3% 134 6% 142 13% 7.4%Kramer MS 272 2% 216 3% 0.6% 266 2% 217 0% ‐1.0%Lafayette ES 289 71% 287 67% ‐3.7% 291 73% 282 83% 9.8%Langdon ES 156 12% 107 11% ‐0.3% 156 12% 107 15% 3.4%Langley ES 69 19% 90 13% ‐5.5% 69 23% 86 20% ‐3.4%LaSalle‐Backus EC 177 8% 186 11% 2.3% 177 7% 182 13% 6.4%Leckie ES 138 24% 174 28% 4.2% 138 21% 173 25% 4.4%Ludlow‐Taylor ES 79 25% 96 42% 16.4% 79 41% 96 40% ‐0.9%Malcolm X ES 74 3% 78 5% 2.4% 74 4% 78 1% ‐2.8%Mann ES 97 80% 129 81% 1.0% 97 61% 129 77% 15.9%Marie Reed ES 123 18% 129 35% 17.0% 123 33% 132 42% 9.9%Maury ES 117 44% 126 44% 0.0% 117 44% 126 44% 0.1%McKinley MS 175 12% 204 9% ‐2.7% 174 6% 206 4% ‐2.4%Miner ES 118 10% 140 9% ‐0.9% 117 21% 137 24% 3.6%Moten ES 128 9% 148 3% ‐5.2% 128 2% 148 7% 4.4%Murch ES 251 66% 261 66% 0.1% 253 69% 262 70% 1.5%Nalle ES 113 5% 126 10% 4.2% 113 14% 126 20% 5.7%Noyes ES 140 8% 67 7% ‐0.4% 138 7% 65 14% 7.3%Orr ES 115 12% 142 14% 1.9% 115 8% 142 15% 7.7%Oyster‐Adams Bilingual 377 55% 388 60% 5.2% 376 49% 390 54% 4.9%

DCPS 3‐8 Schools


28

ELA Math2015 2016

Change2015 2016

Change# Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5Patterson ES 118 8% 137 6% ‐2.6% 119 9% 135 7% ‐1.8%Payne ES 83 7% 107 8% 1.2% 85 14% 103 22% 8.2%Plummer ES 133 5% 151 5% 0.1% 136 4% 151 7% 2.2%Powell ES 138 15% 178 10% ‐5.7% 139 35% 178 28% ‐6.4%Randle Highlands ES 107 8% 126 7% ‐1.3% 105 14% 127 17% 2.2%Raymond EC 250 16% 266 22% 6.2% 253 13% 263 16% 2.5%Ross ES 51 71% 51 71% 0.0% 51 75% 51 75% 0.0%Savoy ES 140 4% 127 6% 1.2% 141 4% 127 9% 4.4%School‐Within‐School 39 46% 79 66% 19.7% 39 56% 79 63% 6.9%Seaton ES 77 18% 80 24% 5.6% 77 29% 81 41% 12.2%Shepherd ES 135 47% 137 46% ‐1.4% 135 39% 138 48% 8.6%Simon ES 110 7% 125 6% ‐1.7% 110 10% 125 14% 4.4%Smothers ES 84 8% 86 6% ‐2.5% 83 8% 86 8% ‐0.3%Sousa MS 247 6% 231 8% 1.7% 246 4% 230 3% ‐1.5%Stanton ES 222 4% 206 9% 5.6% 222 9% 206 19% 9.9%Stoddert ES 133 63% 166 72% 8.5% 134 72% 166 76% 3.5%Stuart‐Hobson MS 405 24% 405 24% 0.5% 401 10% 405 11% 0.6%SWW @ Francis‐Stevens 216 29% 240 26% ‐2.5% 216 18% 240 25% 6.9%Takoma EC 197 18% 227 17% ‐0.6% 197 12% 227 11% ‐0.7%Thomas ES 130 15% 136 11% ‐3.6% 130 8% 136 13% 4.0%Thomson ES 95 21% 99 29% 8.2% 97 33% 99 43% 10.4%Truesdell EC 220 13% 252 18% 4.7% 222 19% 254 16% ‐3.2%Tubman ES 164 15% 203 11% ‐3.3% 164 18% 203 18% 0.5%Turner ES 126 2% 156 5% 2.7% 125 1% 155 1% ‐0.2%Tyler ES 130 18% 162 23% 5.0% 130 27% 162 19% ‐8.4%Walker‐Jones EC 191 9% 174 8% ‐1.4% 194 6% 169 5% ‐0.9%Watkins ES 298 34% 280 30% ‐3.9% 299 35% 280 39% 4.1%West EC 116 28% 134 26% ‐2.3% 116 21% 134 25% 3.9%Wheatley EC 219 5% 183 4% ‐0.7% 217 6% 181 6% ‐0.5%Whittier EC 176 15% 164 15% ‐0.1% 172 12% 156 11% ‐1.3%

DCPS High Schools


29

ELA Math2015 2016

Change2015 2016

Change# Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5 # Takers % L4 + L5

Anacostia HS 97 2% 149 3% 0.6% 96 0% 152 0% 0.0%Ballou HS 122 0% 245 3% 2.9% 87 0% 251 0% 0.4%Ballou STAY 4 14 0% 2 15 0%Benjamin Banneker HS 109 74% 125 98% 24.1% 111 32% 130 62% 30.0%Cardozo EC 142 5% 236 7% 1.9% 186 2% 183 2% 0.6%Columbia Heights EC 507 13% 541 19% 5.5% 463 8% 696 5% ‐2.2%Coolidge HS 71 8% 90 11% 2.7% 53 0% 128 0% 0.0%Dunbar HS 97 8% 231 5% ‐3.5% 89 0% 237 1% 0.8%Eastern HS 233 11% 251 18% 6.8% 248 2% 261 1% ‐0.5%Ellington School of the Arts 125 50% 124 39% ‐10.9% 100 3% 125 9% 5.8%Luke Moore Alternative HS 24 4% 52 0% ‐4.2% 31 0% 46 0% 0.0%McKinley Tech HS 135 30% 147 36% 5.7% 157 6% 212 10% 4.0%Phelps ACE HS 118 17% 75 13% ‐3.6% 109 3% 91 1% ‐1.7%Roosevelt HS 65 0% 155 7% 7.1% 74 0% 159 1% 0.6%Roosevelt STAY 2 15 0% 1 14 0%School Without Walls HS 143 97% 157 84% ‐12.4% 100 76% 313 52% ‐23.9%Washington Metropolitan HS 9 11% 44 0% ‐11.1% 9 51 0% 0.0%Wilson HS 317 50% 411 21% ‐28.9% 279 8% 695 18% 10.5%Woodson, H.D. HS 118 0% 192 4% 3.6% 75 0% 215 1% 0.9%

august 2016 parcc 2016 final results - washington, d.c. · 2016. 11. 21. · district of columbia...

Documents