audience feedback – moving foreword

26
Emma Riddiough

Upload: belladog55

Post on 05-Jul-2015

290 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A2 coursework

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Emma Riddiough

Page 2: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

2

4

6

8

Male Female

Gender Results

The results show that out of all the peoplewe asked, all where female.

Page 3: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

16-18 19-21 22-25 26-29 30+

Age Results

When looking at the results, I noticed that it was those between the ages of 16 – 21 that

answered the questionnaire that they filled out.

Page 4: Audience feedback – moving foreword
Page 5: Audience feedback – moving foreword

1 2 3 4 5

Interviews - - 3 2 1

Archive Footage - - 1 3 2

Voiceover - - - 3 3

Music 1 - 2 3 -

Cutaways - - 1 5 -

Opening Sequence - - - 2 4

The table above shows the ratings that all the people gave us on the various aspects of our

fully completed documentary.

Page 6: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

yes no

Title Results

The graph shows that out of all the people we asked, only one believed that

the title didn’t suit the documentary.

Page 7: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Yes:“lots of books in background”

“very well done”

“creative”

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Yes No

Interview Relevance?

This slide shows what the people thought about the mise-en-scene of the interviews.

Page 8: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Yes:“Interesting , wanted to find out more”

“I found it interesting”

“It was interesting”

“very interesting”

No:“focuses to much on interviews”

“not interested in topic”

0

1

2

3

4

5

yes no

The slide shows both the graph and reasons in relation to whether they

would watch it, (4/6 said they would).

Page 9: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

yes no

Graph shows that 5 out of the 6 people thought that the documentary related to

our chosen target audience.

Page 10: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Yes:“full of information”

“through interviews, voiceover

and archive footage”

No:“could do with more but the five

minutes did provide information”

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

yes no

Following slide shows the reasons and the graphed results for the following question.

Page 11: Audience feedback – moving foreword

The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about the

documentary we created.

Name three good things about the documentary:

Voiceovers

Cutaways

Interviews

Archive Footage

Storyline

Title Sequence

Creative

Clear Graphics

Creatively Clever

Relevant

Interesting

Page 12: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Diagram shows the various improvements that the people thought where necessary to our documentary.

Name three improvements:

Music (random)

Clear graphics

Less archive

More cutaways

Cuts early

Wide range of interviews

More Music

Shorter Interviews

Interviewee looking at

camera

Page 13: Audience feedback – moving foreword
Page 14: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

yes no

The graph shows that all six thought that the radio trailer was relevant to our documentary.

Page 15: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

yes no

Results show that 4/6 people said they would watch the documentary if

they heard the radio trailer.

Page 16: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

yes no

5/6 people said that the advert suited our target audience.

Page 17: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

yes no

Looking at the results, I can see that the people thought that the music suited the trailer.

Page 18: Audience feedback – moving foreword

The following diagrams show the areas in which the people thought where good in

relation to our radio trailer.

Name three things good about the radio

trailer:

Vox pops

Music

Voiceover

Information

Sound effects

Clarity of voiceover

Page 19: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Name three improvements:

Unsuitable for audience

Too much interview

Music

Better sound effects

More exciting

More upbeat music

The following diagram shows what the people thought could be improved

with the radio trailer.

Page 20: Audience feedback – moving foreword
Page 21: Audience feedback – moving foreword

The table shows the results as to how people have rated the following things.

1 2 3 4 5

Imagery - - - 2 4

Information Provided - - - 2 4

Documentary Title - - 1 3 2

Logo - - - 3 3

Slogan - - - 2 4

Background Colour - - - 1 5

Page 22: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

yes no

Graph shows the results people gave in relation to whether they thought the

advertisement was eye-catching or not.

Page 23: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

yes no

Results show that all of them thought that the newspaper advertisement

suited our target audience.

Page 24: Audience feedback – moving foreword

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

yes no

The graph shows that all of them said that they would be encouraged to watch the documentary if they saw the newspaper

advertisement in a newspaper or magazine.

Page 25: Audience feedback – moving foreword

Name three good things about the newspaper

advertisement:

Pictures

Clear

Information

Graphics

Slogan

Title

Creative

Unique

Bold

Effective

Colours

The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about our

newspaper advertisement.

Page 26: Audience feedback – moving foreword

This is the only improvement that the people pointed out when it came to the

newspaper advertisement.

Name three improvements:

More book references in images