at&t: twenty years of change case analysis
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
AT&T: TWENTY YEARS OF CHANGE
CASE ANALYSISSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF
TECHNOLOGYNILE UNIVERSITY, MSC. MOT
MAY 2012
By: Al-Motaz Bellah Al-AgamawiMay 2012
AT&T: 135 Years of Operations187
5
1894
1984
1997
2000
AT&T: 135 Years of Operations187
5
1894
1984
1997
2000
For each Milestone we will conduct:• Porter 5 Forces Model Analysis• Technology Environment Analysis• Regulator Effect Analysis
• SWOT Analysis • Strategy Direction• Implementation and Control
AT&T: The Begging (1875-1893)
1875
Establishment
Rivalry•No
Competition Exist
•Monopoly
•Most telephone exchanges are under license from Bell Telephone.
Substitute• AT&T was incorporated in 1885 as
a wholly owned subsidiary of Bell with objective to build and operate long distance networks.
New Entrance• High Barrier to entry during the
patent life time.• Most of the licenses across US are
granted to Bell Telephoney
Supplier Power, •Bell
acquire Western Electric company as the first manufacturing firmBuyer Power, Low
Bargaining Power
AT&T: The Begging (1875-1893)
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
1875
1894Patent Expiry
Rivalry•In 1904,
6000 new telephone company we established.
•License to operate telephones have been opened to all companies
Substitute• No interconnection between
different companies
New Entrance• Patent expired in 1894, eliminating
the barrier of entry.
Supplier Power,
Buyer PowerIncreased from
285K to 3,317,000
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
New Strategic Direction in 1907 Formulation of the principal that Telephone and its technology would operate
most efficiently as a monopoly providing universal services.
Lead to an agreement known as Kingsbury commitment. In which AT&T provide competitors connection
to its network.
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
First Regulatory Act Through a lawsuit filed in 1949
Settlement reached in 1956 AT&T agreed to restrict its activities to the regulated
business of the national telephone system and government work.
The restriction did not influence the rapid development of systems and its steady progress towards its global universal services.
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
Second Regulatory Act FCC signaled its interest in more
competition allowed competitors to use some of Bell Labs technologies Therefore competition established in the
general long distance services
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
Technology Environment AT&T Bell Telephone Laboratories
Microwave Relay System Provide alternative to copper wires for long distance, in late 1949
First Comm. Satellite in 1962 Additional Alternative for international comm.
Transition to electronic components Allowed more powerful and less expensive customer and network
equipment.
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
Corporate Culture Profits as a way to support and extend monopoly Cost Control Customers taken for granted
Sales reps, received straight salaries Sales reps, were warned not to oversell
Managers were averse to risk
AT&T: Start of Competition (1894-1984)
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
1875
1894
1984First Divesture
Federal Communications Commission- FCC 1974 Anti-trust lawsuit
Monopoly for the local exchanges Lawsuit were settled in 1982
AT&T agreed to divest itself from the wholly owned Bell Operating Companies Creating Baby Bells The divest took place in 1984
AT&T retained $34 Billion of the $149 Billion in assets AT&T retained 373,000 of the 1,009,000 employees.
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
Strength• Advanced Technological Assets• Enormous positive cash flow• $34 Billion of Assets• Going out of Mature Competition segments• More Focus
Weaknesses• AT&T lost its ability to reach almost every consumer in the
US by its wires and bills• Significant change in corporate culture from Monopoly to
competitive based company• Manufacturing Operation challenges from monopoly to
competition
Opportunities• Emerging technologies as Fiber optic technologies• Based on the divestiture, AT&T business activities
were no longer restricted to regular business of national telephone system and government work.
Threats• Long distance telephone services become competitive
(market share fall from 90% to 50% from 84 to 96)• Telecommunication act of 1996, allowing baby bells and
other competitors to compete in long distance • Lose of market share
SWOT at the time of Divestiture
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
Change in the Strategic Direction Diversification strategy Acquisition of other companies through
horizontal integration approach
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
Early 90s Acquisition Wave 1991- Hostile Acquisition of the Computer maker NCR
For $7.4 Billion Targeting the convergence between communication and computers
1992- Acquisition of the US wireless business, McCaw For $11.5 Billion The deal position AT&T as a leading force in the fast growing
wireless communication Giving the company direct access to consumer for the first time in
decade.
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
2nd Divestiture (Voluntary) into 3 Companies
System and Equipment,… Named Lucent Technologies
Telecom network, switching and transmission equipment and Bell labs
Computer Company,… Named NCR Communication and Services Company,… Named
AT&T
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
Strategy Directions Behind 2nd Divestiture Lucent Technologies
New company had revenue of $20 Billion and 125,000 Employees Emergence of New Competitors (cable, RBOCs, mobile firms)
Had many options from where to buy equipments, by placing orders to AT&T, AT&T is
Having insight into competitors plans Could use profits from the equipment contract against them
NCR From 1993 to 1996, the computer unit lost $5.9 billion Forcing AT&T to inject $2.8 billion The spin-off valued NCR at $3.96 Billion which means that AT&T had lost
$10 Billion
AT&T: Baby Bells (1984-1997)
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
1875
1894
1984
1997Armstrong
Armstrong New Vision Transforming AT&T from a long distance
company to an “any distance” company. From a company that handles mostly voice call to a company that connect you to information in any form that is useful to you– voice, data and video. From a primarily domestic company to a truly global company.
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
New Strategy to Meet the New Vision Implementing a vision of a Global Company\
Integrating cables, wireless and long distance Implement refocused strategy
Cost-cutting measure to make AT&T the low-cost provider Cutting the workforce in its long distance business by 15000 to
18000 over two years Initiating series of Joint ventures and acquisition to broaden the
companies scope to areas data networking, digital voice encryption, broadband cable, video
telephone and increase AT&T global reach.
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Late 90s Acquisition Wave 1998- Acquisition of Teleport Communication Group
For $11.5 Billion Leading local Teleco. Service provider for Business Customers It is was attractive because it provide network that is an alternative to
regional bells., in which AT&T will save tens of millions of dollars 1999- Acquisition of Telecommunication Inc.
Second largest cable company in the US For $55 Billion
2000- Acquisition of MediaOne Large Cable company For $56 Billion
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Federal Communications Commission- FCC After MediaOne Acquisition, FCC gave AT&T 3
choices Divest 25% stake of MediaOne in Time Warner Sell Liberty Media Group, a minority stake in
Rainbow Media Holding and MediaOne’s Programming Networks
Sell 9.7 million cable subscribers, which was more than half of the company’s current subscribers.
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Assessment of the Armstrong Strategy Investment of $115 Billion in cable systems
By 2001 AT&T was only able to upgrade 65% of the cable lines, which matched only 1/5 of AT&T 60 million customer base
AT&T was spending $1200 to add a phone subscriber although new technologies lowered the cost to $700 in 2001.
AT&T did not succeed in striking a deal with other cable providers to lease their lines, which was necessary to broaden AT&T cable telephone customer base.
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Assessment of the Armstrong Strategy AT&T core long Distance Business
Was shrinking many analysts expects ten price to drop nearly zero
Long distance business made up 80% of the revenues in 1997 was projected to decrease to 35% by 2002
The Company had not succeeded with the competition with Baby Bell in the local phone service competition.
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Assessment of the Armstrong Strategy Acquisition of TCI and Media one
Left the company with $64 Billion in debt, making AT&T as the most indebted companies
WorldNet Failure Internet Service provider WorldNet in few month
attract 1 Million Customer and it was growing faster than AOL, when sales began to slow AT&T chose not to make investment. By 2000 WorldNet subscriber base was 2 Million compared to 21 million for AOL.
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Assessment of the Armstrong Strategy 2000 Revenue
Totaling $16.97 Billion, increase of 3.7% 3rd Quarter earning of 38 cents per share were
down 24% compared to same period a year ago
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
Assessment of the Armstrong Strategy Two areas of Growth were
AT&T wireless Expected to Grow by 30% in 2000
AT&T high speed services Sold under the brand Excite@Home, was gaining
customers
AT&T: Armstrong (1997-2000)
AT&T: 135 Years of Operations
1875
1894
1984
1997
2000Corrective
Actions
3rd Split in AT&T Life Time Plan to split the company in 4 parts
AT&T Broadband AT&T Wireless AT&T Business Services AT&T Consumer Services
AT&T: Corrective Actions (2000)
Objectives of the Split Individual companies have more flexibility
in raising money for repaying debt Boost company’s stock price by separating
various divisions into more easily understood stand-alone businesses
AT&T: Corrective Actions (2000)
THANK YOUFor More Information and Further DiscussionsAl-Motaz Bellah Alaa Al-AgamawiEmail: [email protected] ID: magamawiLinkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/motazalagamawiSlideShare Profile: http://www.slideshare.net/magamawi