atlanta 1101
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
1/12
Unitary Agent Models at
Multiple Levels: The Consistency
Problem
Paper presented by John Quiggin*CEAR Seminar on Risk and Agency, 22-23 January 2011, Atlanta
* Australian Research Council Federation Fellow* Risk and Sustainable Management Group, Schools of Economics
and Political Science,University of Queensland
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
2/12
Websites
Web site http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/
johnquiggin
WebLog http://johnquiggin.com
2
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquigginhttp://johnquiggin.com/http://johnquiggin.com/http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquigginhttp://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquigginhttp://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquigginhttp://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquiggin -
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
3/12
Unitary agent models
Outcomes reflect decisions of individual
agents
Agents undertake constrained maximization
of (expected values of) well-defined
objective functions
Outcome is a Bayes-Nash equilibrium
In limiting case, behavior is competitive
3
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
4/12
Levels of agency
Gene - Evolutionary psychology
Individual/household - consumer theory
Firm - Production theory
Class-For-itself - Marxism
Interest group - Public choice theory
Nation-state - International realism
Planetary ecosystem - Gaia
4
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
5/12
Stylistic consistency
With some exceptions, same people tend to
like/dislike these models
Becker on Evolutionary psychology, new
household economics, Public choice
Similar style of explanation, hence similaraesthetic appeal
5
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
6/12
One level to rule them all
lower levels disregarded
Higher levels are aggregate outcomes of
decisions at master level
Compare micro foundations of macro
Logical inconsistency
6
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
7/12
Resolution:Co-operation
Co-operation between agents at the same
level
Genes - group selection
Individuals - altruism
Interest groups - democratic pluralism
Nations - idealism in international relations
Aggregate outcomes maximize some welfare
function7
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
8/12
Resolution: Multi-
level Agency models
Freudian psychology - Id, Ego, superego
Olson on internal structure of interest
groups
International relations models with non-state actors
8
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
9/12
Risk and unitary agent
models
How do the objectives of the decision agent
affect outcomes at level of interest
Example: If behavior is driven by Genes, how doevolutionary imperatives affect individual
Behavior under risk
Example: What does international realism
imply about risky behavior by states?
Individuals?
Example: How do firm decisions reflect risk
preferences of shareholders (Modigliani-Miller)
9
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
10/12
Risk and co-operation
Collective choices under uncertainty
Informal institutions for risk management
Large literature on both of these topics
10
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
11/12
Risk and multi-level
AgencyHeuristics and Biases
Ideal of rational Individual choice
compromised by (genetically determined)
biases
Risk for firms and factor suppliers with
incomplete markets
Risk aversion for Nation-States or for
Citizens - Implications for War and Peace
11
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
-
7/30/2019 Atlanta 1101
12/12
Unitary Agent Models at
Multiple Levels: The Consistency
Problem
Paper presented by John Quiggin*CEAR Seminar on Risk and Agency, 22-23 January 2011, Atlanta
* Australian Research Council Federation Fellow* Risk and Sustainable Management Group, Schools of Economics
and Political Science,University of Queensland
Tuesday 18 January 2011