astroparticles in the lhc era
DESCRIPTION
NO - VE 2008, Venice, April 15-18, 2008. ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA. Antonio Masiero Univ. of Padova and INFN, Padova. LHC and “LOW-ENERGY” NEW PHYSICS. LHC discovers NP : difficult, if not impossible, to “reconstruct” the fundamental theory lying behind those signals of NP; - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA
Antonio MasieroUniv. of Padova
andINFN, Padova
NO - VE 2008, Venice, April 15-18, 2008
![Page 2: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LHC and “LOW-ENERGY” NEW PHYSICS
• LHC discovers NP: difficult, if not impossible, to “reconstruct” the fundamental theory lying behind those signals of NP;
• LHC does not see any signal of NP: still a NP related to the stabilization of the elw. scale may be present, but with particles whose masses are in the multi-TeV range.
![Page 3: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
FCNC, CP ≠, (g-2), ()0 m n …
LINKED TO COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
Possible interplay with dynamical DE
NEWPHYSICS AT
THE ELW SCALE
DM - FLAVOR
for DISCOVERY
and/or FUND. TH.
RECONSTRUCTION
A MAJOR LEAP AHEAD IS NEEDED
LFV
NEUTRINO PHYSICSLEPTOGENESIS
TEVATRON I L C
![Page 4: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WHY TO GO BEYOND THE SM
“OBSERVATIONAL” REASONS
•HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
(but AFB……)
•FCNC, CPNO (but evidence >3σ for NP in b - s transitions,,,)
•HIGH PRECISION LOW-EN.
NO (but (g-2) …)
•NEUTRINO PHYSICS YE m 0, 0
•COSMO - PARTICLE PHYSICS
YE (DM, ∆B cosm, INFLAT., DE)
Z bbNO
NO
NO
YES
YES
THEORETICAL REASONS•INTRINSIC INCONSISTENCY OF SM AS QFT
(spont. broken gauge theory without anomalies)
•NO ANSWER TO QUESTIONS THAT “WE” CONSIDER “FUNDAMENTAL” QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED BY “FUNDAMENTAL” THEORY
(hierarchy, unification, flavor)
NO
YESStrong CP violation?
![Page 5: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ON THE COMPLEMENTARITY OFDM and LFV SEARCHES to DIRECT
LHC SEARCHES FOR NP
• Twofold meaning of such complementarity:
i) synergy in “reconstructing” the “fundamental theory” staying behind the signatures of NP;
ii) coverage of complementary areas of the NP parameter space ( ex.: multi-TeV SUSY physics)
![Page 7: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MICRO MACROPARTICLE PHYSICS COSMOLOGY
GWS STANDARD MODEL HOT BIG BANG STANDARD MODEL
HAPPY MARRIAGE Ex: NUCLEOSYNTHESIS
BUT ALSO POINTS OF FRICTION
-COSMIC MATTER-ANTIMATTER ASYMMETRY
-INFLATION
- DARK MATTER + DARK ENERGY
“OBSERVATIONAL” EVIDENCE FOR NEW PHYSICS BEYOND
THE (PARTICLE PHYSICS) STANDARD MODEL
![Page 8: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Present “Observational” Evidence for New Physics
• NEUTRINO MASSES
• DARK MATTER
• MATTER-ANTIMATTER ASYMMETRY
• INFLATION
![Page 9: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SM FAILS TO GIVE RISE TO A SUITABLE COSMIC MATTER-ANTIMATTER ASYMMETRY
• SM DOES NOT SATISFY AT LEAST TWO OF THE THREE SACHAROV’S NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR A DYNAMICAL BARYOGENESIS:
• NOT ENOUGH CP VIOLATION IN THE SM NEED FOR NEW SOURCES OF CPV IN ADDITION TO THE PHASE PRESENT IN THE CKM MIXING MATRIX
• FOR MHIGGS > 80 GeV THE ELW. PHASE TRANSITION OF THE SM IS A SMOOTH CROSSOVER
NEED NEW PHYSICS BEYOND SM. IN PARTICULAR, FASCINATING POSSIBILITY: THE ENTIRE MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE ORIGINATES FROM THE SAME MECHANISM RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXTREME SMALLNESS OF NEUTRINO MASSES
![Page 10: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MATTER-ANTIMATTER ASYMMETRY NEUTRINO MASSES CONNECTION: BARYOGENESIS THROUGH
LEPTOGENESIS
• Key-ingredient of the SEE-SAW mechanism for neutrino masses: large Majorana mass for the RIGHT-HANDED neutrino
• In the early Universe the heavy RH neutrino decays with Lepton Number violatiion; if these decays are accompanied by a new source of CP violation in the leptonic sector, then
it is possible to create a lepton-antilepton asymmetry at the moment RH neutrinos decay. Since SM interactions preserve Baryon and Lepton numbers at all orders in perturbation theory, but violate them at the quantum level, such LEPTON ASYMMETRY can be converted by these purely quantum effects into a BARYON-ANTIBARYON ASYMMETRY ( Fukugita-Yanagida mechanism for leptogenesis )
![Page 11: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1 2l R R R RL f h fL Me Lh
202
2 20
†1( o
8g3 ) lij jL i
G
m AM
f fM
m
Non-diagonality of the slepton mass matrix in the basis of diagonal lepton mass matrix depends on the unitary matrix U which diagonalizes (f+ f)
~
SUSY SEESAW: Flavor universal SUSY breaking and yet large lepton flavor violation
Borzumati, A. M. 1986 (after discussions with W. Marciano and A. Sanda)
see Isidori’s talk at this meeting
![Page 12: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
µ e+ in SUSYGUT: past and future
Calibbi, Faccia, A. M., Vempati
![Page 13: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
INFLATION
SEVERE COSMOGICAL PROBLEMS
COMMON SOLUTION FOR THESE PROBLEMSVERY FAST (EXPONENTIAL) EXPANSION IN THE UNIV.
V()
TRUE VACUUM
VACUUM ENERGY
dominated by vacuum en.
NO WAY TO GET AN “INFLATIONARY SCALAR POTENTIAL” IN THE STANDARD MODEL
CAUSALITY(isotropy of CMBR)
FLATNESS( close to 1 today)
AGE OF THE UNIV. PRIMORDIAL MONOPOLES
![Page 14: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
NO ROOM IN THE PARTICLE
PHYSICS STANDARD MODEL FOR
INFLATION
V=2 2 + 4 no inflation
Need to extend the SM scalar potential
Ex: GUT’s, SUSY GUT’s,…
ENERGY SCALE OF “INFLATIONARY PHYSICS”:LIKELY TO BE » Mw
DIFFICULT BUT NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN ELECTROWEAK INFLATION IN SM EXTENSIONS
But for one solution requiring a non-trivial gymnastics
See Giudice’s talk at this meeting
![Page 15: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Energy Scale from the“Observational” New Physics
neutrino masses
dark matter
baryogenesis
inflation
NO NEED FOR THE NP SCALE TO BE CLOSE TO THE ELW. SCALE
The Energy Scale from the “Theoretical” New Physics
Stabilization of the electroweak symmetry breaking at MW calls for an ULTRAVIOLET COMPLETION of the SM already
at the TeV scale +
CORRECT GRAND UNIFICATION “CALLS” FOR NEW PARTICLES AT THE ELW. SCALE
![Page 16: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mandatory to look for P - DECAY
![Page 17: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
On the Energetic Budget of the Universe
Courtesy of H. Murayama
![Page 18: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
WMAP3 + small scale CMB exps (BOOMERang, ACBAR, CBI ans VSA)
+ Large-Scale Structures (SDSS,2dFCRS)
+ SuperNova ( HST/GOODS, SNLS)
CONSISTENT WITH BARYON DENSITY
DETERMINATION FROM BIG BANG NUCLEOSYNTHESIS
![Page 19: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
DM: the most impressive evidence at the “quantitative” and “qualitative” levels of
New Physics beyond SM
• QUANTITATIVE: Taking into account the latest WMAP data which in combination with LSS data provide stringent bounds on DM and B EVIDENCE FOR NON-BARYONIC DM AT MORE THAN 10 STANDARD DEVIATIONS!! THE SM DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY CANDIDATE FOR SUCH NON-BARYONIC DM
• QUALITATIVE: it is NOT enough to provide a mass to neutrinos to obtain a valid DM candidate; LSS formation requires DM to be COLD NEW PARTICLES NOT INCLUDED IN THE SPECTRUM OF THE FUNDAMENTAL BUILDING BLOCKS OF THE SM !
![Page 20: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
THE RISE AND FALL OF NEUTRINOS AS DARK MATTER
• Massive neutrinos: only candidates in the SM to account for DM. From here the “prejudice” of neutrinos of a few eV to correctly account for DM
• Neutrinos decouple at ~1 MeV ; being their mass<<decoupling temperature, neutrinos remain relativistic for a long time. Being very fast, they smooth out any possible growth of density fluctuation forbidding the formation of proto-structures.
• The “weight” of neutrinos in the DM budget is severely limited by the observations disfavoring scenarios where first superlarge structures arise and then galaxies originate from their fragmentation
![Page 21: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
![Page 22: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
WIMPS (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles)
#~# m
# exp(-m/T)# does not change any more
Tdecoupl. typically ~ m /20
depends on particle physics (annih.) and “cosmological” quantities (H, T0, …
h2_ ~ 10-3
<(annih.) V > TeV2
~ 2 / M2 From T0 MPlanck
h2 in the range 10-2 -10-1 to be cosmologically interesting (for DM)
m ~ 102 - 103 GeV (weak interaction) h2 ~ 10-2 -10-1 !!!
THERMAL RELICS (WIMP in thermodyn.equilibrium with the
plasma until Tdecoupl)
![Page 23: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
STABLE ELW. SCALE WIMPs from PARTICLE PHYSICS
1) ENLARGEMENT OF THE SM
SUSY EXTRA DIM. LITTLE HIGGS. (x, ) (x, ji) SM part + new part
Anticomm. New bosonic to cancel 2
Coord. Coord. at 1-Loop2) SELECTION RULE
DISCRETE SYMM.
STABLE NEW PART.
R-PARITY LSP KK-PARITY LKP T-PARITY LTP
Neutralino spin 1/2 spin1 spin0
3) FIND REGION (S) PARAM. SPACE WHERE THE “L” NEW PART. IS NEUTRAL + ΩL h2 OK
* But abandoning gaugino-masss unif. Possible to have mLSP down to 7 GeV
mLSP
~100 - 200
GeV *
mLKP
~600 - 800
GeV
mLTP
~400 - 800
GeV
Bottino, Donato, Fornengo, Scopel
![Page 24: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
D. kAZAKOV
![Page 25: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
FROM THE MSSM TO THE CMSSM ( constrained MSSM)
PROLIFERATION OF PARAMETRS IN THE SOFT BREAKING SECTOR OF THE MSSM:
OVERALL NUMBER OF PARAM. IN THE MSSM IS
1 2 4
CMSSM
![Page 26: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
WHICH SUSY
HIDDEN SECTOR SUSY BREAKING AT
SCALE F
OBSERVABLE SECTOR
SM + superpartnersMSSM : minimal content
of superfields
ME
SS
EN
GE
RSF = MW MPl
GRAVITY
Mgravitino ~ F/MPl ~
(102 -103) GeV
GAUGE INTERACTIONS
F = (105 - 106) GeV
Mgravitino ~ F/MPl ~
(102 - 103) eV
![Page 27: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
GRAVITINO LSP?
• GAUGE MEDIATED SUSY BREAKING
(GMSB) : LSP likely to be the GRAVITINO ( it can be so light that it is more a warm DM than a cold DM candidate )
Although we cannot directly detect thegravitino, there could be interesting signatures from the next to the LSP ( NLSP) : for instance the s-tau could decay into tau and gravitino,Possibly with a very long life time, even of the order of days or months
![Page 28: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
SWIMPS (Super Weakly Interacting Massive Particles)
• - LSP Gravitino in SUSY
• - First excitation of the graviton in UED …
They inherit the appropriate relic density through the decay of a more massive thermal species that has earlier decoupled from the thermal bath
DIFFERENT FROM THE THERMAL HISTORY OF WIMPS
![Page 29: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
ELLIS, OLIVE,SANTOSO,SPANOS
![Page 30: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
THE “WHY NOW” PROBLEM
![Page 32: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
DM DEDO THEY “KNOW” EACH OTHER?
DIRECT INTERACTION (quintessence) WITH DARK MATTER DANGER:
Very LIGHTm ~ H0
-1 ~ 10-33 eVThreat of violation of the equivalence principle, constancy of the fundamental “constants”, …CARROLL
INFLUENCE OF ON THE NATURE AND THE ABUNDANCE OF CDM
Modifications of the standard picture of WIMPs FREEZE - OUT
CDM CANDIDATES
CATENA, FORNENGO, A.M., PIETRONI, ROSATI, SCHELKE
SCALAR-TENSOR THEORIES OF GRAVITY, KINATION, RS II EXTRA DIM.
![Page 33: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
SCHELKE, CATENA, FORNENGO, A.M., PIETRONI
![Page 34: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
NEUTRALINO RELIC ABUNDANCE IN GR AND S-T THEORIES OF GRAVITY
![Page 35: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CONSTRAINTS ON THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE UNIV.EXPANSION RATE FROM THE LIMITS ON THE
ANTIPROTON ABUNDANCE
SCFMP
![Page 36: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
SEARCHING FOR WIMPs
WIMPS HYPOTHESIS
DM made of particles with mass 10Gev - 1Tev
ELW scale
With WEAK INTERACT.
LHC, ILC may PRODUCE WIMPS
WIMPS escape the detector MISSING ENERGY
SIGNATURE
FROM “KNOWN” COSM. ABUNDANCE OF WIMPs PREDICTION FOR WIMP PRODUCTION AT COLLIDERS WITHOUT SPECYFING THE PART. PHYSICS MODEL OF WIMPs
BIRKEDAL, MATCHEV, PERELSTEIN , FENG,SU, TAKAYAMA
![Page 37: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Model Independent Annual Modulation ResultModel Independent Annual Modulation Result
experimental single-hit residuals rate vs time and energy DAMA/NaI (7 years) + DAMA/LIBRA (4 years) Total exposure: 300555 kgday = 0.82 tonyr
2-5 keV
2-6 keV
A=(0.0215±0.0026) cpd/kg/keV
2/dof = 51.9/66 8.3 C.L.
2-4 keV
The data favor the presence of a modulated behavior with proper features at The data favor the presence of a modulated behavior with proper features at 8.28.2 C.L. C.L.
A=(0.0176±0.0020) cpd/kg/keV
2/dof = 39.6/66 8.8 C.L.
A=(0.0129±0.0016) cpd/kg/keV
2/dof = 54.3/66 8.2 C.L.
Absence of modulation? No
2/dof=117.7/67 P(A=0) = 1.310-4
Absence of modulation? No
2/dof=116.1/67 P(A=0) = 1.910-4
Absence of modulation? No
2/dof=116.4/67 P(A=0) = 1.810-4
ROM2F/2008/07
Acos[(t-t0)] ; continuous lines: t0 = 152.5 d, T = 1.00 y
![Page 39: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
ELLIS, OLIVE, SAVAGE
Neutralino-nucleon scattering cross sections along the WMAP-allowed coannihilation strip for tanbeta=10 and coannihilation/funnel strip for tanbeta=50 using the hadronic parameters
Ellis, Olive, Sandick
LHC Sensitivity
![Page 40: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
SPIN - INDEPENDENT NEUTRALINO - PROTON CROSS SECTION FOR ONE OF THE SUSY PARAM. FIXED AT 10 TEV
PROFUMO, A.M., ULLIO
![Page 41: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
LFV - DM CONSTRAINTS IN MINIMAL SUPERGRAVITY
A.M., Profumo, Vempati, Yaguna
![Page 43: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
INDIRECT SEARCHES OF DM• WIMPs collected inside celestial bodies ( Earth, Sun):
their annihilations produce energetic neutrinos • WIMPs in the DM halo: WIMP annihilations can take place
( in particular, their rate can be enhanced with there exists a CLUMPY distribution of DM as computer simulations of the DM distribution in the galaxies seem to suggest. From the WIMP annihilation:
-- energetic neutrinos ( under-ice, under-water exps Amanda, Antares, Nemo, Antares, …)
--photons in tens of GeV range ( gamma astronomy on ground Magic, Hess, … or in space Glast…)
--antimatter: look for an excess of antimatter w.r.t. what is expected in cosmic rays ( space exps. Pamela, AMS, …)
![Page 44: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Roszkowski, Ruiz,
Silk, Trotta
![Page 47: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
CIRELLI, STRUMIA,
TAMBURINI 2008
![Page 48: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
A.M., PROFUMO, ULLIO
![Page 49: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
A.M., PROFUMO,ULLIO
![Page 50: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
![Page 51: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
S. Katsanevas ASPERA
![Page 52: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
2013201120092007 2008 20182016201420122010 20172015
30 M€ (from 85)
KM3NeT
Megaton
Auger North
CTA
Grav Wave 3rd generation
> 2/3 from 100 + 50 M€
250 M€
400-800 M€
300 M€
60-100 M€
60-100 M€
Double Beta 1 ton
DM search 1 ton
50-200 M€
50-200 M€
C. SPIERING, APPEC - ASPERA ROADMAP
![Page 53: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
2013201120092007 2008 20182016201420122010 20172015
30 M€ (from 85)
KM3NeT
Megaton
Auger North
CTA
Grav Wave 3rd generation
> 2/3 from 100 + 50 M€
250 M€
400-800 M€
300 M€
60-100 M€
60-100 M€
Double Beta 1 ton
DM search 1 ton
50-200 M€
50-200 M€30+100+250+200+100+100+50+100 ~ 950 M€
add 300 M€ for runningexperiments, upgrades,new methods
![Page 54: ASTROPARTICLES IN THE LHC ERA](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051821/56815747550346895dc4e8fc/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
FCNC, CP ≠, (g-2), ()0 m n …
LINKED TO COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
Possible interplay with dynamical DE
NEWPHYSICS AT
THE ELW SCALE
DM - FLAVOR
for DISCOVERY
and/or FUND. TH.
RECONSTRUCTION
A MAJOR LEAP AHEAD IS NEEDED
LFV
NEUTRINO PHYSICSLEPTOGENESIS
TEVATRON I L C