astronomy with cm – mpc lenses phil marshall kipac – slac – stanford university
DESCRIPTION
Astronomy with cm – Mpc lenses Phil Marshall KIPAC – SLAC – Stanford University February 28 th 2004. The Human Eye has an aperture of 7mm or so when dark-adapted provides an image updated every eighth of a second - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Astronomy with cm – Mpc lenses
Phil Marshall
KIPAC – SLAC – Stanford University
February 28th 2004
The Human Eye
●has an aperture of 7mm or so when dark-adapted
●provides an image updated every eighth of a second
●has a logarithmic response to brightness, which has led astronomers to measure observed flux in magnitudes: m = -2.5 log10(flux) + constant
●gives an angular resolution of about 1arcmin
Faintest star visible by eye from a dark site has magnitude 6In Palo Alto one can sometimes see the Big Dipper – mag 2
Collecting photons
Use CCDs (charge coupled devices) to detect photons
Amount of charge built up in pixel ≈ no. of photons
Images manipulated as arrays of numbers
Astronomy with a digital camera
Exposure time = 16 secsAperture diameter = 30mm ⇒ see to magnitude 10.4?
Wide field! 48x36 degrees...
Zoom in (after the exposure!):
The pleiades star cluster:
Resolutionlimited by camera optics, ~3arcmin
Human eye does 3 times better!
Comparison with Palomar digitized sky survey (1949)
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/observatories/palomar/
Comparison with Palomar digitized sky survey
http://archive.stsci.edu/dss/
Magnitude limits:
Naked eye in Palo Alto: ~2
Camera image: ~5(predicted 10.4)
DSS: ~21
Telescopes:
Faintest star visible by eye from a dark site has magnitude 6
Ron got comparable results in Palo Alto by storing photons
An 8.4m lens would collect (8.4m/7mm)2 times more light than a dark-adapted eye ⇒ 15 magnitudes fainter (bit less for inefficency)
Integrate for an hour: ⇒ another 10 magnitudes (bit less for inefficency)
Resolution is (8.4m/7mm) times higher: 0.05 arcsec? ( = 1.22 /D when “diffraction-limited”)
Refracting
Reflecting
Parabolic mirrors
Making an 8.4m parabolic mirror:
Melt glass – rotate furnace – cool carefully – polish. Do not drop.
cf. Palomar 200inch
http://medusa.as.arizona.edu/mlab/mlab.html http://wood.phy.ulaval.ca/english/intro/what.htm
Example images – nearby galaxies
cf. Digicam
http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~frei/catalog.htm
+ =
Filters used to make separate red and blue images
Then combine to make colour picture
Spiral
Elliptical
Spectroscopy
Diffraction grating: d sin() = m
Best to use reflection grating:
A stellar spectrum:
Continuum with absorption lines – temperature and composition
No prizes for guessing which star...
Continuum is a 5700K black body
A typical galaxy spectrum:
http://www.sdss.org/
Absorption and emissionlines
Positions known fromatomic physics
Redshift:
Ned Wright's cosmology tutorial http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/
Galaxies appear to be receding from us: spectral lines are redshifted
Doppler shift is not quite right – the wavelengths are stretched by the expansion of the Universe
Redshift zUniverse scale size R = 1/(1+z)
Limits to image quality
Night sky is bright (even on Mountain tops!)
Scattered light from moon, cities
Airglow (chemiluminescence)
Faint objects are lost in noise
Atmosphere is turbulent
Twinkling of stars = blurring of images
(“seeing”)
Resolution ≤ 1 arcsec at good site
Solution – get above atmosphere!
http://hubblesite.org
Does this happen?
Hyperbolic orbit r(t)
Deflection angle:
Deflection of light by massive bodies
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/patricia/lclens.html http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-03/6-03.htm
Deflection of light by massive bodies
GR – light is deflected by, and travels slower in, a gravitational field (latter accounts for missing 2)
Refractive index is given by
Index is greater than 1, and gravity is an attractive force: massive bodies focus light, acting as “gravitational lenses”
Effect is greatest for rays passing close to point mass, or through regions of high density
Index varies over field of view: a highly aberrated system!
Lens geometry
On axis source S produces ring image when c
Off axis: partial ring, or “arcs”Magnification: image sizes increase roughly as 1/(1-c)
2
Demonstrating gravitational lensing
http://vela.astro.ulg.ac.be/themes/extragal/gravlens/bibdat/engl/DE/didac.html
Numbers
c = 1 g cm-2 (Dd / 700 Mpc)-1 (1 Mpc = 3 x 1022 m)c = 2x1025 g cm-2 (Dd / 0.5m)-1 (nuclear ~ 1015 g cm-
3)
700 Mpc is a cosmological distance (z=0.35)
1 g cm-2 = 1011 Mo / (0.3 kpc)2
Galaxies make good gravitational lenses!
Gravitational lensing by galaxies
Galaxy lens lying in front of small light source
Yellow ring marks “critical curve”, cross is optical axis
Lens demo by Jim Lovellhttp://www-ra.phys.utas.edu.au/~jlovell/simlens/
RXJ0911+0551
Many more lens images at http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/castles/
2 lens galaxies, 1 source quasar
Lens galaxies are different colour
4 images of quasar
RXJ0911+0551Refractive index is independent of wavelength
This is an X-ray image!
No visible lens galaxy – we are not seeing stars...
X-ray Astronomy
Ionising radiation, absorbed by most things – including the atmosphere
All X-ray telescopes are satellites
X-ray Telescopes
Particle behaviour makes focusing tricky: absorption not reflection
Refractive index is <1for most materials esp. metals
Total external reflection occurs at grazing incidence
X-ray telescopes are long!
http://www.chandra.harvard.eduhttp://xmm.vilspa.esa.es/
X-ray Detectors
Band gap in silicon is a few eV
One optical photon excites one electron in the CCD pixel No energy information
X-ray photons deposit all their energy: charge proportional to energy. Dependent on frequent readout
X-ray images are colour!
Reflection grating spectrometers can be used too: problem is always getting enough photons...
Cosmic telescope designWide field to catch chance alignments – try a few hundred times bigger angular size: expect strong lensing in dense central regions
Stay at cosmological distance: c = 1 g cm-2 = 1015 Mo / (30 kpc)2
Clusters of galaxies contain typically:
100 galaxies at 1011 Mo each 3 x 1014 Mo hot (transparent) plasma 7 x 1014 Mo cold (transparent) dark matter
Clusters make good gravitational lenses!
A wide field cosmic telescope: Abell 2218
Abell 2218:
Many muliply-imaged galaxies are visible
Mass distribution of lens can be precisely modelled
Lensing geometry is an important constraint on galaxy redshift, as well as (faint) spectrum
Galaxy appears to have magnitude 28 – but has been magnified 25x by the lens...
z=7 would make it the most distant galaxy known to date (last week). Universe was 1/8 its current scale and a very different place...
http://xxx.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0402319
21st Century Astronomy
Uses large telescopes with sensitive detectors at dark sites or in space
Involves collecting EM radiation over the whole spectrum,measuring its intensity, colour and polarisation; particles arrive from the sky as well
Has grown out of our frustration at being stuck on Earth combined with the usual thirst for more information
Makes extensive use of basic physics, and some cunning and guile!