association predicting one variable from another

22
Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Post on 19-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Association

Predicting One Variable from Another

Page 2: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Correlation

• Usually refers to Pearson’s r computed on two interval/ratio scale variables.

• It measures the degree to which variance in one variable is “explained” by a second variable

• It measures the strength of a linear relationship between the variables

Page 3: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Definition of r

𝑟= σሺ𝑥𝑖 − 𝑥ҧሻ(𝑦𝑖 − 𝑦ത)σሺ𝑥𝑖 − 𝑥ҧሻ2 σ(𝑦𝑖 − 𝑦ത)2

Page 4: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Properties of r

• r is symmetrical and varies from -1 to +1

• 0 indicates no correlation or relationship

• ±1 indicates a perfect correlation (knowledge of one variable makes it possible to predict the second one without any error).

Page 5: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Properties of r2

• r2 is symmetrical and varies from 0 to 1

• r2 is the proportion of the variability in one variable that is “explained by” the other variable

• cor.test(x, y, method=“pearson”)• cor(x, y, method=“pearson”)

Page 6: Association Predicting One Variable from Another
Page 7: Association Predicting One Variable from Another
Page 8: Association Predicting One Variable from Another
Page 9: Association Predicting One Variable from Another
Page 10: Association Predicting One Variable from Another
Page 11: Association Predicting One Variable from Another
Page 12: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Spearman’s rho• For rank/ordinal data. • Pearson correlation computed on

ranks• If Spearman coefficient is larger

than Pearson, it may indicate a non-linear relationship

• Ties make it difficult to compute p values

Page 13: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Kendall’s tau

• For rank/ordinal data• Evaluate pairs of observations (xi,

yi) and (xj, yj)

• Concordant – (xi > xj) and (yi > yj) OR (xi < xj) and (yi < yj)

• Discordant – (xi > xj) and (yi < yj) OR (xi < xj) and (yi > yj)

Page 14: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Kendall’s tau-a

𝜏𝑎 = ሺ𝑁𝑜.𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡ሻ− (𝑁𝑜.𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡)12𝑛(𝑛− 1)

Page 15: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Kendall’s tau b

• Divide by total number of pairs adjusted for all ties

𝜏𝑏 = ሺ𝑁𝑜.𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡ሻ− (𝑁𝑜.𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡)ට൬𝑛(𝑛− 1)2 − σ𝑡𝑖(𝑡𝑖 − 1)2 ൰൬𝑛(𝑛− 1)2 − σ𝑢𝑖(𝑢𝑖 − 1)2 ൰

Page 16: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Kendall’s tau c

• For grouped (tabled data) where the table is not square (rows ≠ columns)

𝜏𝑐 = ሺ𝑁𝑜.𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡ሻ− (𝑁𝑜.𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡)𝑁22 minሺ𝑟,𝑐ሻ− 1min(𝑟,𝑐) ൨

Page 17: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Nominal Measures

• Measures based on Chi-Square:– Phi coefficient– Cramer’s V– Contingency coefficient– Odds ratio

Page 18: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Phi and Cramer’s V

• Phi ranges from 0 to 1 in a 2x2 table but can exceed 1 in larger tables. Cramer’s V adds a correction to keep the maximum value at 1 or less:

𝜙 = ඨ𝜒2𝑁 𝑉= ඨ 𝜒2𝑁 × Min(𝑟− 1,𝑐− 1)

Page 19: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Contingency Coefficient• Ranges from 0 to <1 depending on

the number of rows and columns with 1 indicating a high relationship and 0 indicating no relationship

𝐶= ඨ 𝜒2(𝜒2 + 𝑁)

Page 20: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

Odds Ratio

• For 2 x 2 tables it shows the relative odds between the two variables

a b

c d𝛼= 𝑎/𝑐𝑏/𝑑= 𝑎𝑑𝑏𝑐

Page 21: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

> Table <- xtabs(~Sex+Goods, data=EWG2)> Table GoodsSex Absent Present Female 38 28 Male 16 30> ChiSq <- chisq.test(Table)> ChiSq

Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction

data: Table X-squared = 4.7644, df = 1, p-value = 0.02905

Page 22: Association Predicting One Variable from Another

library(vcd)> assocstats(Table) X^2 df P(> X^2)Likelihood Ratio 5.7073 1 0.016894Pearson 5.6404 1 0.017552

Phi-Coefficient : 0.224 Contingency Coeff.: 0.219 Cramer's V : 0.224 > cor(as.numeric(EWG2$Sex), as.numeric(EWG2$Goods), use="complete.obs")[1] 0.2244111> oddsratio(Table, log=FALSE)[1] 2.544643