associate professor richard brown [email protected] cost-benefit analysis what is it? why...
TRANSCRIPT
Associate Professor Richard Brown
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSISWhat is it? Why do it? How’s it done?
Cost-Benefit Analysis
What is CBA?
A method for evaluating projects, policies, programs
More precisely: A process of identifying, measuring and comparing the social benefits and costs of an investment project, program or policy intervention, from a public interest perspective
CBA is used for both prospective (appraisal) and retrospective (evaluation)
2Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis
What is CBA?
Used primarily but not exclusively in public sector decision-making
Some examples:
investment in public infrastructure – roads, schools, hospitals, dams, universities, R&D
public policies and regulations: health and safety, air and water quality, smoking, speed limits
3Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Why CBA? Why for public sector?
Why not leave all investment decisions to private sector, based on calculations of financial profitability?
Market failure!
The free market is not always capable of providing the correct price signals to guide private investment decisions in the ‘right direction’
Markets can be distorted for various reasons
4Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Price distortions inefficient outcomes
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Why CBA? Why for public sector?
Purely market-based decisions by private sector do not always deliver an outcome that is socially desirable – in the best interests of the public at large
Private sector unlikely to invest in roads, dams, schools, hospitals, defence, etc. if left completely to the free market
Why?
5Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Three main reasons for market failure:
uncompetititve market structures eg. monopolies, oligopolies, etc.
government interventions eg. taxes, subsidies, import duties, price controls, quotas
externalities i.e. costs and benefits arising from a decision (investment) not born/received by the private investor making the decision eg. air pollution (external cost), education (external benefit)
6Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Correcting for market failure and price distortions
Aim is to come up with interventions that would bring investment decision-making more in line with the socially desirable outcomes
Various means to steer private and public sector decisions towards more efficient, socially desirable outcomes:
regulations and penalties; eg. fines for speeding, smoking in public, noise, anti-competitive behaviour
taxes and subsidies to correct for externalities eg. ‘sin taxes’ on alcohol, tobacco, gambling
7Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Correcting for market failure and price distortions:
Tradeable permits - where markets do not exist ‘create’ a market eg. tradeable permits for carbon trading
Application of CBA - using a different set of prices
‘Shadow Prices’ used in calculation of profitability
‘Shadow Prices’ = ‘Opportunity Cost’
We have two types of shadow prices:‘adjusted’ market prices - to offset distortions‘non-market values’ – where prices non-existent
8Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis
9
What main economics principle underlies CBA methodology?
Standard CBA methodology requires the application of the core economics concept of opportunity cost
We have limited resources and unlimited wants or needs
The key economics question is how to make best use of our limited resources
By using them for the production of a given output will yield certain benefits. Using them for the production of some other good (or service) generates other benefits
Which produces the greater benefit to society?Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July
2015
Standard CBA Methodology: Opportunity Cost
Decision
Undertakethe Project
Do not Undertakethe Project
Scarce ResourcesAllocated to the Project
Scarce Resources Allocatedto Alternative Uses
Value of ProjectOutput
Value of Output fromResources in Alternative Uses
Project Benefit = $X Project OpportunityCost = $Y
If X>Y, recommend the project
Figure 1.1: The “With and Without” Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis
10Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Measure this – the difference
The ‘without’ project scenario
The ‘with’ project scenario
Project introduced
Time/years
$ net benefit
11
Comparing ‘with’ vs ‘without’ Scenarios
The ‘before’ project scenario
NOT THIS!
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
What do we mean by the public interest?
A private or public sector project has implications for:
• Government revenue – taxes, charges
• Government expenditure – provision of services
• Employment
• The Economy
• The Environment
These need to be assessed as part of a CBA before project or policy approval
12Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
13
Practical Examples: Comparing ‘with’ vs. ‘without’ scenarios
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
14
Practical Examples: Using Opp. Cost in Place of Market Price
Remember: OC = value in alternative use
Ask: (i) How would resource otherwise be used? and(ii) What is value in alternative use?
Example 1: A project generates 100 new jobs for otherwise unemployed youth, paid say $20
In Private Profitability calculation labour would be costed at 100 x $20 = $2000
In CBA we would first ask “What is value of labour’s output in alternative use?” Assume they have casual/informal work equivalent to $5 each
In CBA labour would be costed at 100 x $5 = $500Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July
2015
15
Practical Examples: Using Opp. Cost in Place of Market Price
So what? How would use of opportunity cost of labour in a CBA change anything?
By costing labour at lower opportunity cost, projects that generate relatively more jobs would be ranked higher - prefered
Example 2:
A project requires 100Mwh of electricity per day. The power company charges $5 per Mwh
In private profitability calculation electricity costed at $500/day
In CBA we need to ask first, where would that additional power supply come from, and, at what opportunity cost?
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
16
Practical Examples: Using Opp. Cost in Place of Market Price
Example 2 (cont.):
Case A: If the power supply system is already operating at full capacity, we would have to divert it from other users
The opportunity cost would be the loss of output to them
Assume lost output = $8, then opportunity cost = $800
Case B: If there is spare capacity, we would price it at the marginal cost of producing more output
Assume marginal cost = $3, then opportunity cost = $300
CBA shows higher net benefit when there is spare capacity
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
17
Practical Examples: Using Opp. Cost Where No Market Price
Example 3:A proposed coal-fired power project generating additional electricity is expected to make a profit of $1250
But, the production of power also produces 50 tonnes of carbon pollution for which the producer is not charged
In CBA we include the cost to society of the carbon pollution
If the economists value this at, say, $30 per tonne the CBA would recalculate the ‘economic profitability’ at $1250-1500 ($30x50) = -$250 (ie. from an economic point of view there would be a loss)
The implication is that a less financially profitable project which produces less or no carbon would appear more profitable in the CBA and thus preferred from a public interest perspective
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
18
Practical Examples: Using Opp. Cost Where No Market Price
Example 4:A proposed health sector project is expected to reduce human fatalities by 10 persons per annum
As there is no ‘market price’ for an avoided fatality (a saved human life) a financial profitability calculation would show no $ benefits for this
In CBA we include the value to society of each human life saved
Moral and ethical issues/objections?
A thought experiment using universal speed limit of 10km/hour which eliminates all road fatalities. For or against?
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
• The underlying principle of CBA is that net benefits should be positive for a project to be considered worthwhile– Total Benefits – Total Costs > $0
• BUT… this does not necessarily mean that all stakeholders gain – some will but others will no doubt lose
• We need to look at the distribution of net benefits among stakeholders - who gains and who loses, and how much?
• In some instances the project will not succeed if the costs and benefits are unevenly distributed – complementary policies might be recommended to compensate the losers
Comparing Costs & Benefits Among Stakeholders
19Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
• We cannot compare dollar values that accrue at different points in time
• To compare costs and benefits over time we apply the concept of “discounting”
• The reason is that $1 today is worth more than $1 tomorrow
WHY?
Comparing Costs and Benefits Over Time
20Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
• Inflation – purchasing power of $ declines in real terms as prices rise
• ‘Opportunity cost’ – you could have earned some income (eg. interest)
• Risk – some unforeseen event in the future
Comparing Costs and Benefits Over Time
21
• ‘Pure time preference’ – more distant objects appear smaller
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Comparing Costs and Benefits Over Time
Year 0 1 2 3
Project A -100 +50 +40 +30
Project B -100 +30 +45 +50
WHICH PROJECT OPTION: A or B ?
22
Cannot say until we convert all future values into present day equivalent values – discounting using ‘discount factors’
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Further Thoughts
Decision-support vs. decision-making?
CBA cannot remove from the decision-maker ultimate responsibility for a decision
In this sense I prefer to think of CBA as a decision-support rather than a decision-making process: its ultimate purpose is to better inform the decision-making process rather than replacing it
In many respects it is also the process of applying the principles of CBA, using a coherent framework and ‘thinking like an economist’ that is more important than the numbers generated by a CBA
23Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Further Thoughts
I’ve been teaching and practicing CBA for almost 40 years!
“What’s different today, I am often asked?”
Two major innovations in recent decades affecting the practice of CBA - one technological and one methodological
invention of the PC and electronic spreadsheet (Excel), and,
development of non-market valuation methods and techniques for valuation of environmental and other non-market, ‘intangible’ costs and benefits
24Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Do a CBA of a CBA!
25Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Further Thoughts
26
CBA can be applied to any decision/situation, but beware ... it could get you into trouble if taken too far!
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Further Thoughts
27
Benefit-Cost Analysis: financial and economic appraisal using spreadsheets
H.F. Campbell and R.P.C. Brown Cambridge University Press, 2003
(2ND Edition Routledge, 2015, in press)
Companion website has a number of worked case studies:
www.uq.edu.au/economics/bca
Login to “Other Users” username=user; password=abc2004
My contact: [email protected]
PRIMARY REFERENCE
Richard Brown: UQ Economics Schools' Day, July 2015
Questions and CommentsThank you