assignment 8 v2

Upload: neptuna

Post on 04-Jun-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Assignment 8 v2

    1/5

    Atn zgrAhmet Uur Birinci 12.12.2013

    ME 482 ASSIGNMENT 8

    INTRODUCTION

    The main aim of the assignment is to investigate a uniformly loaded and simply

    supported beam. The beam is made of steel, it is 0.5m in length and the cross section is 50

    mm deep by 10 mm wide. The uniform load is a pressure of 2 N/mm2.

    The main objectives are; to find out the effects of type of supports, namely pin-pin,

    pin-roller, to study the effect of placement of supports, namely neutral axis, bottom fibers and

    to compare structural and continuum elements.

    ANALYSIS OF THE MODEL

    Preliminary Analysis (Beam Theory):

  • 8/13/2019 Assignment 8 v2

    2/5

    Finite Element Analysis

    The material is steel with 210 MPa Youngs modulus and 0.3 Poissons ratio.For the pin supports, pinned boundary condition is applied; for the roller supports,

    displacement boundary condition in y-direction is applied.

    For continuum elements, 75 elements gave out 0.733 mm deflection, 250 elements

    gave out 0.776 mm deflection. The mesh was considered to be converged at 250 elements.

    For beam elements, 25 elements gave out 0.743 mm deflection, 50 elements gave out

    0.744 mm deflection. The mesh was considered to be converged at 50 elements.

    Maximum bending stress, maximum deflection and the reaction at supports were

    investigated for CPS8R, B23 and B22 elements. The cases where pin-roller and pin-pin

    supports are applied at neutral axis and at the bottom were considered. The reaction force was

    scaled by multiplying by 10 to account for the 2D modeling of the beam. The results were

    compared with beam theory solutions.

    Deflection for 75 elements

    Deflection for 250 elements

  • 8/13/2019 Assignment 8 v2

    3/5

    Stress for CPS8R pin-pin supports at neutral axis

    Stress for B23 pin-pin supports at the bottom

    Stress for B23 pin-roller supports at the bottom

  • 8/13/2019 Assignment 8 v2

    4/5

    Table.1 Maximum Stress, Maximum Deflection and Reaction Force Values

    RF (N)

    Beam Theory 150 0.744 5000

    Pin-Roller

    CPS8R

    n.a 150 0,763 5000B23n.a 150 0,744 5000

    B22n.a 150 0,763 5000

    CPS8RBottom 150 0,776 5000

    B23Bottom 150 0,744 5000

    B22Bottom 150 0,763 5000

    Pin-Pin

    CPS8Rn.a 150 0,763 5000

    B23n.a 150 0,744 5000

    B22n.a 150 0,763 5000

    CPS8R

    Bottom 99 0,372 5000, 10750*B23Bottom 50 0,298 5000, 12500*

    B22Bottom 50 0,316 5000, 12500*

    * The reaction forces in x and y-direction respectively.

    Table.2 Shear Stress Effect

    Pin-RollerNeutral Axis

    CPS8R 10 1 1,02

    5 1,008 1,132 0,94 5,45

    1 0,92 47,1

    B23 10 1 1

    5 1 1

    2 1 1,2

    1 1 1

    B22 10 1 1,02

    5 1 1,11

    2 1 1,94

    1 1 3,55

  • 8/13/2019 Assignment 8 v2

    5/5

    CONCLUSIONS

    Pin-pin supporting can give the same results as pin-roller supporting if the pins are

    applied at the neutral axis. If the pins are applied at the bottom, stress concentration occurs at

    the pins, this results in less stress at the outer fibers.All the cases except for the pin-pin support at the bottom give out the same maximum

    bending stress with the beam theory. Maximum deflections are also accurate considering the

    beam theory solution to be true.

    For L/h = 10 and L/h = 5, all three elements give results consistent with the beam

    theory. For L/h < 5, beam theory fails to function. Beam elements give close results to the

    beam theory but the continuum elements give very different results for the maximum

    deflection. It is better to use continuum elements for L/h < 5.