assignment 2 with peer editing

Upload: jayne-glanton

Post on 04-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 assignment 2 with peer editing

    1/5

    Controversy Over High-Tech Swim SuitsJayne Glanton

    October 16, 2013

  • 8/14/2019 assignment 2 with peer editing

    2/5

    Introduction:

    In the beginning of the sport competitive swimming, people didnt wear any kind

    of suit when competing. They found that any clothing worn would slow them down. But

    as the years went by and people became more conservative with their bodies, they started

    wearing dresses and full body suits so that nothing could be seen by anyone. They went

    so far as to put weights into the skirts of women so that they wouldnt float up in the

    water and reveal anything that wasnt to be seen. When the Olympics started in 1896,

    new suits and fabrics that made it easier to swim and didnt hinder the swimmer during

    the race (Deborah Durbin). They were trying to replicate the feeling of swimming naked

    while keeping the modesty of the swimmers intact. As years went by and technology

    evolved they kept coming up with new ways to get fabric to replicate the way that human

    skin repels water. After the suit that was created for the 1992 Olympics, Speedo has made

    a new suit with new technology for every single Olympics since then (Durbin).

    Most recently the swimming community has made huge advances in the

    development of high-tech suits or other wise known as competition suits. These suits are

    built to smooth over parts of your body that can cause drag and slow you down, cover

    large portions of your body and repel water. They come in all sorts of styles, from

    covering ankle to wrist or just knee to shoulders. Some people complained that these suits

    caused an unfair advantage in the sport.

    I have swam competitively for twelve year and have worn six different types of

    racing suits, the Fastskin LZR Racer, the LZR Pro, the Fastskin II Pro, the Fastskin, the

    Aquablade, and the Nike Performance suit. You may ask why I have so many of these

    really expensive suits and the answer is that they wear out easily so you can only wear

    Jayne Glanton 10/16/13 8:16 AMComment [1]: !"#$% ' ($)"* '+),$ $-%#./#0#/,'1 2")/,3$(4

    Jayne Glanton 10/16/13 8:19 AMComment [2]: 5"%'6 #.$) 7 /#88%"%.$(%.$%.3%(4

    Jayne Glanton 10/16/13 8:25 AMComment [3]: !-* () 9'.* /#88%"%.$(,#$(4

  • 8/14/2019 assignment 2 with peer editing

    3/5

    them to one maybe two meets. Usually you get a new race suit every season. I would get

    a new one for every short course season ending meet. In my personal experience, I prefer

    the Speedo brand suits because they are better fitting and they also have an advantage

    over every other company by being the one who gets the most research and money to

    make the best suits.

    I believe that high tech suits do give somewhat of an advantage to the swimmer

    but their main purpose. Just like track shoes with spikes give runners instead of just a

    plain running shoe. I believe the high-tech racing suits do need to have restrictions but

    they shouldnt be banned for a few tenths of a second difference in time. So my stance is

    that they should be allowed to be used because they are there to help the sport of

    swimming become more competitive and harder for the champions to be found, which

    makes people work harder. Sometimes, mentally the way they make you feel, gives you

    that extra confidence boost you need to push you through the race. But most of all, you

    wait all season to get it on and they cost several hundred dollars. The sport maybe rapidly

    becoming more and more competitive but sometimes things need to be pushed.

    Literature Review

    Jayne Glanton 10/16/13 8:23 AMComment [4]: :// ' 1)$ 9)"% /%$'#1 '+),$#$4

  • 8/14/2019 assignment 2 with peer editing

    4/5

    Worked Cited

    Barrow, John D. "Why Ban Full-Body Olympics Swimsuits? A Scientist ExplainsPolyurethane." The Daily Beast . Newsweek/Daily Beast, 25 July 2012. Web.01 Oct. 2013.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/25/why-ban-full-body-olympics-swimsuits-a-scientist-explains-polyurethane.html

    "The Effects of Technical Suits on Swimming Performance." LIVESTRONG.COM . N.p.,n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2013.

    http://www.livestrong.com/article/347469-the-effects-of-technical-suits-on-swimming- performance/

    "Michael Phelps, Polyurethane and the High-Tech Swimsuit Controversy | In TheHopper: SPI's Business Blog." Polyurethane and the High-Tech SwimsuitControversy | In The Hopper: SPI's Business Blog . N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Oct. 2013.

    http://www.inthehopper.org/industry-news/high-tech-swimsuit-controversy/

    "The Science of Sport: Swimsuit Controversy." The Science of Sport: SwimsuitControversy . N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Oct. 2013.

    http://www.sportsscientists.com/2008/11/swimsuit-controversy.html

    Barlowe, Barrett. "RULES & REGULATIONS OF OLYMPICSWIMMING." LIVESTRONG.COM . N.p., 21 Oct. 2013. Web..

    "Making No Waves." The Economist . The Economist Newspaper, 11 June 2008. Web. 24Oct. 2013. .

  • 8/14/2019 assignment 2 with peer editing

    5/5

    . N.p.. Web. 24 Oct 2013..

    Durbin, Deborah. "Getting Wet: Swimwear from Cavemen to theOlympics." Experimentation - . N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Oct. 2013..