assessment on the environmental effect of adding soybean ethylic biodiesel to fossil diesel for...

16
Assessment on the environmental effect of adding soybean ethylic biodiesel to fossil diesel for passengers transportation in urban center Alex R. Nogueira, Luiz Kulay and Gil Anderi da Silva

Upload: james-stewart

Post on 01-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Assessment on the environmental effect of adding

soybean ethylic biodiesel to fossil diesel for

passengers transportation in urban center

Alex R. Nogueira, Luiz Kulay and Gil Anderi da Silva

Passengers’ transportation in Brazil

Cities were designed for vehicles;

Lack of railroads or subway;

Road transportation prevails

large demand for infrastructure;

air pollution due to diesel consumption;

need for alternative fuels.

Biodiesel incorporation to the Brazilian energy matrix

National Program for Biodiesel Production and Consumption;

Federal law 11,097/2005: determined a gradual addition of biodiesel into fossil diesel blends:

at least 2% (B2) from 2008 to 2010;

at least 5% (B5) since 2010;

Mixtures are expressed in terms of biodiesel volumetric percentage.

Biodiesel as an alternative fuel

Biodiesel is traditionally proclaimed as more beneficial than fossil diesel:

better results in terms of Climate Change and energy efficiency; higher cetane number and oxigen content; lower sulfur content and safer storage.

On the other hand, there are some drawbacks associated with biodiesel consumption, such as:

impacts due to feedstock cultivation; poor cold flow properties and oxidation susceptibility;

Comprehensive analysis can be obtained from Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies.

well-to-wheel (WTW)

tank-to-wheel (TTW)well-to-tank (WTT)

LCA approaches for fuels

Goal

The study aims at evaluating the environmental effects of

different biodiesel + fossil diesel blends in passengers

locomotion by bus in the metropolitan region of São Paulo

(Brazil), considering the LCA well-to-wheel approach.

Blends considered:B0 (i.e. only diesel);B5B10B20B50

39 cities

20,7 million inhabitants

7,947.3 km2

20% of Brazilian GDP (approx.)

258 km of railroads

78 km of Metro

more than 20 thousand buses

6 million cars

São Paulo metropolitan region

Product system (foreground)

Bioethanol production

Soybean oil production

Transesterification Bus operation

Fossil diesel production in Brazil

Fossil diesel production in other

countries

Blending

T

T

T T

T

T

Scope

Methodological standardization: ISO 14044 (2006);

LCA approach: well-to-wheel;

Functional unit: passengers transportation in urban buses through 100 km;

This study is based on data adapted from Sugawara (2012), Nigro et al. (2008) and Leal (2008);

Geographical coverage: bus operation at São Paulo Metropolian region, and respective feedstock production in Brazil;

Technological coverage: Mercedes-Benz OM 904 LA engines (EURO III). Nevertheless, data can be considered as good proxy for buses operation in the region;

Allocation: economic criterion;

Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA): ReCiPe v. 1.08 – endpoint.

CO2

Engine performance

Engine performance

BLENDDENSITY 15oC

(kg/L)AUTONOMY

(km/L)

FUEL CONSUMPTION

AT BENCH(g-comb/kWh)

CONSUMO DE COMBUSTÍVEL

(L/100km)

Diesel 0,842 2,3767 219,7 42,0751

B5 0,845 2,3767 220,3 42,0751

B10 0,847 2,3624 221,0 42,3291

B20 0,850 2,3482 222,5 42,5862

B50 0,863 2,3315 229,3 42,8901

Engine operation parameters considered in this study.

LCA results

Impact category Bus operation – B 0

Bus operation - B05

Bus operation - B10

Bus operation - B20

Bus operation - B50

Climate change (human health) 7,05E+01 6,87E+01 6,69E+01 6,30E+01 4,68E+01

Climate change (ecosystems) 7,83E+00 7,63E+00 7,43E+00 6,99E+00 5,20E+00

Particulate matter formation 2,11E+01 2,32E+01 2,51E+01 2,95E+01 4,74E+01

Photochemical oxidant formation 1,34E-02 1,46E-02 1,56E-02 1,78E-02 2,65E-02

Terrestrial acidification 2,49E-02 2,75E-02 2,99E-02 3,55E-02 5,84E-02

Human toxicity 5,75E-02 6,09E-02 6,46E-02 7,30E-02 1,07E-01

Terrestrial ecotoxicity 6,04E-04 6,53E-04 7,08E-04 8,34E-04 1,38E-03

Freshwater ecotoxicity 2,73E-06 3,74E-06 4,89E-06 7,60E-06 2,06E-05

Freshwater eutrophication 1,71E-05 2,31E-05 2,99E-05 4,62E-05 1,24E-04

Agricultural land occupation 3,70E-05 6,85E-05 1,04E-04 1,89E-04 6,03E-04

Fossil depletion 4,48E-01 4,52E-01 4,57E-01 4,63E-01 4,37E-01

LCA results

Impact categories contribution to the single score indicator (Pt).

B5/B0 B10/B0 B20/B0 B50/B0

Climate change Human Health 0,917 0,844 0,701 0,350

Climate change Ecosystems 0,917 0,844 0,701 0,350

Particulate matter formation 1,033 1,055 1,095 1,182

Photochemical oxidant formation 1,024 1,033 1,046 1,045

Terrestrial acidification 1,040 1,068 1,119 1,235

Human toxicity 0,997 0,998 0,996 0,981

Terrestrial ecotoxicity 1,018 1,042 1,084 1,202

Freshwater ecotoxicity 1,290 1,589 2,184 3,974

Freshwater eutrophication 1,275 1,559 2,124 3,821

Agricultural land occupation 1,743 2,499 4,015 8,585

Fossil depletion 0,951 0,906 0,811 0,514

TOTAL (single score) 0,942 0,889 0,785 0,527

LCA results

Effect of biodiesel addition to fossil diesel on indicators results for the impact categories.

Conclusion

Increase in biodiesel concentration lead to better environmental results (single score);

However, impacts are dominated by Climate Change results;

Bus operation dominated the impact categories indicator for climate change, particulate matter formation, photochemical oxidant formation and terrestrial acidification;

Fossil fuel depletion seemed to be of little significance to the overall results.

Obrigado pela atenção!

 [email protected]