assessment of the annual variation of malaria and the climate effect based on kahnooj data between...

1
ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL VARIATION OF ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL VARIATION OF MALARIA AND THE CLIMATE EFFECT BASED ON KAHNOOJ MALARIA AND THE CLIMATE EFFECT BASED ON KAHNOOJ DATA BETWEEN 1994 AND 2001 DATA BETWEEN 1994 AND 2001 Conclusions 1. One month lag between predictors and malaria risk maximised the accuracies 2. Seasonality, time trend and autocorrelations between temporal risks explained a considerable part of temporal 3. Ground climate data increased the model accuracies significantly 4. Remote sensing data (NDVI and land surface temperature, improved the spatial and temporal predictions 5. GIS is powerful tool to illustration and analysis the temporal and spatial distributions Dr. Ali-Akbar Haghdoost Dr. Ali-Akbar Haghdoost Dr. Neal Alexander Dr. Neal Alexander Dr Jonathan Cox Dr Jonathan Cox Malaria, as a complex multi-factorial disease, is sensitive to climate, particularly temperature and precipitation. However, it depends on a range of factors such as the quality, and quantity of vector control programmes and case detection/treatment strategy. The surveillance data of malaria cases in an endemic area of Iran, Kahnooj, was linked to the ground and remote sensing climate data. Objective : To check the feasibility of malaria predicting models based on climate, in strongly seasonally transmitted regions Using Poisson regression models, the numbers of expected cases were predicted based on temperature (ground and remote sensing), humidity and rainfall and vegetation index (NDVI), seasonality, time trend and autocorrelation between temporal risks. 1 1.07(1.03- 1.11) 0.99(0.95- 1.04) 0.56(0.53- 0.59) 10.4 11.2 10.3 5.6 28571 66316 48498 50962 2972 7436 5001 2842 Age <5 5-14 15-29 >=30 1 0.52(0.48- 0.56) 9.8 4.8 179936 12950 17628 626 Nationality Iran Afghanistan 1 0.91 (0.83- 1.0) 9.1 8.2 191400 4880 17471 401 Accommodatio n Permanent Temporary 1 0.86 (0.83- 0.88) 10.2 8.7 976635 957135 9932 8326 Sex Male Female Risk ratio (95% CI) Disease risk between 1994- 2002 (per 100) Populatio n Malaria case Risk factors Malaria Risk factors P.falciparum risk P.vivax risk Alls species risk Observed annual risk of malaria per 100,000 population between 1994-2001 56 - 162 163 - 297 298 - 659 660 - 1957 1958 - 2924 64 - 286 287 - 537 538 - 839 840 - 3129 3130 - 5019 9-76 77-197 198-348 349-676 677-2343 0 100 200 300 Jun 00 Jun 98 Jun 96 Jun 94 date fitted value ppv 0 100 200 300 Jun 00 Jun 98 Jun 96 Jun 94 date fitted value ppf 0 500 Jun 00 Jun 98 Jun 96 Jun 94 date fitted value all species num berofcases The fitted values of models based on seasonality, time trend, autocorrelations between risks and meteorological variables classified by species, the observed numbers (dotes) and model estimated number (solid line) Vegetation index (NDVI) Altitude These maps show the distributions of villages, cities and roads, and NDVI and altitude The data were randomly were divided in modelling (75%) and checking (25%). The parameters were estimated based on the modelling part of data. The accuracy of models were checked by comparing the fitted and observed values in checking part of data 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Sensitivity 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1 -Specificity A rea underRO C curve = 0.8626 P.vivax 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Sensitivity 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1 -Specificity A rea underRO C curve = 0.8462 P.falciparum 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Sensitivity 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1 -Specificity A rea underRO C curve = 0.8452 all species species specified ROCs, they assess the relationship between sensitivity and specificity of the full models (seasonality, time trend, history of disease in previous 8-18 month within the village, population NDVI and LST) in predicting local transmissions in all data The local transmission in each village was defined as the present of at least two species specific malaria cases in a month, or in two consecutive months Over and under estimation of final model classified by transmission period, based on seasonality, time trend, ground climate data (temperature, humidity and rainfall, and autocorrelations between temporal risks 881(16.7) 870(16.5) 2326(14.4) 2326(14.4) All species 565(17.1) 608(18.4) 1454(14.4) 1454(14.4) P. vivax 396(20.1) 321(16.3) 1113(18.4) 1113(18.4) P. falcipar um Under estimation (% 3 ) Over estimation (% 3 ) Under estimation (% 3 ) Over estimation (%3) Checking part 2 Modelling part1 species 1: the model was built based on three-quarters of data 2: the fitted value was computed based on the estimated parameters in modelling part of data 3: total numbers of over or underestimation divided by total number of cases 4: the average of monthly number of over or underestimations References:

Upload: derek-blankenship

Post on 18-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL VARIATION OF MALARIA AND THE CLIMATE EFFECT BASED ON KAHNOOJ DATA BETWEEN 1994 AND 2001 Conclusions 1. One month lag between predictors

ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL VARIATION OF ASSESSMENT OF THE ANNUAL VARIATION OF MALARIA AND THE CLIMATE EFFECT BASED ON KAHNOOJ MALARIA AND THE CLIMATE EFFECT BASED ON KAHNOOJ

DATA BETWEEN 1994 AND 2001DATA BETWEEN 1994 AND 2001

Conclusions

1. One month lag between predictors and malaria risk maximised the accuracies

2. Seasonality, time trend and autocorrelations between temporal risks explained a considerable part of temporal

3. Ground climate data increased the model accuracies significantly

4. Remote sensing data (NDVI and land surface temperature, improved the spatial and temporal predictions

5. GIS is powerful tool to illustration and analysis the temporal and spatial distributions  

Dr. Ali-Akbar HaghdoostDr. Ali-Akbar HaghdoostDr. Neal AlexanderDr. Neal AlexanderDr Jonathan CoxDr Jonathan Cox

Malaria, as a complex multi-factorial disease, is sensitive to climate, particularly temperature and precipitation. However, it depends on a range of factors such as the quality, and quantity of vector control programmes and case detection/treatment

strategy.

The surveillance data of malaria cases in an endemic area of Iran, Kahnooj, was linked to the ground and remote sensing climate data.

Objective: To check the feasibility of malaria predicting models based on climate, in strongly seasonally transmitted regions

Using Poisson regression models, the numbers of expected cases were predicted based on temperature (ground and remote sensing), humidity and rainfall and vegetation index (NDVI), seasonality, time trend and autocorrelation between temporal risks.

11.07(1.03-1.11)0.99(0.95-1.04)0.56(0.53-0.59)

10.411.210.35.6

28571663164849850962

2972743650012842

Age<55-1415-29>=30

10.52(0.48-0.56)

9.84.8

17993612950

17628626

NationalityIranAfghanistan

10.91 (0.83-1.0)

9.18.2

1914004880

17471401

AccommodationPermanentTemporary

10.86 (0.83-0.88)

10.28.7

976635957135

99328326

SexMaleFemale

Risk ratio(95% CI)

Disease risk between 1994-2002 (per 100)PopulationMalaria caseRisk factors

Malaria Risk factors

P.falciparum riskP.vivax riskAlls species riskObserved annual risk of malaria per 100,000 population between 1994-2001

56 - 162163 - 297298 - 659660 - 19571958 - 2924

64 - 286287 - 537538 - 839840 - 31293130 - 5019

9 - 7677 - 197198 - 348349 - 676677 - 2343

010

020

030

0

Jun 00Jun 98Jun 96Jun 94date

fitted value ppv

010

020

030

0

Jun 00Jun 98Jun 96Jun 94date

fitted value ppf

050

0

Jun 00Jun 98Jun 96Jun 94date

fitted value all species

num

ber o

f cas

es

The fitted values of models based on seasonality, time trend, autocorrelations between risks and meteorological variables classified by species, the observed numbers (dotes) and model estimated number (solid line)

Vegetation index (NDVI)

Altitude

These maps show the distributions of villages, cities and roads, and NDVI and altitude

The data were randomly were divided in modelling (75%) and checking (25%). The parameters were estimated based on the modelling part of data. The accuracy of models were checked by comparing the fitted and observed values in checking part of data

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

Sens

itivi

ty

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.001 - Specificity

Area under ROC curve = 0.8626

P.vivax

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

Sens

itivi

ty

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.001 - Specificity

Area under ROC curve = 0.8462

P.falciparum

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

Sens

itivi

ty

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.001 - Specificity

Area under ROC curve = 0.8452

all speciesspecies specified ROCs, they assess the relationship between sensitivity and specificity of the full models (seasonality, time trend, history of disease in previous 8-18 month

within the village, population NDVI and LST) in predicting local transmissions in all data

The local transmission in each village was defined as the present of at least two species specific malaria cases in a month, or in two consecutive months

Over and under estimation of final model classified by transmission

period, based on seasonality, time trend, ground climate data (temperature, humidity and rainfall, and autocorrelations between temporal risks

881(16.7)870(16.5)2326(14.4)2326(14.4)All species

565(17.1)608(18.4)1454(14.4)1454(14.4)P. vivax

396(20.1)321(16.3)1113(18.4)1113(18.4)P. falciparum

Under estimation(%3)

Over estimation(%3)

Under estimation(%3)

Over estimation(%3)

Checking part2Modelling part1

species

1: the model was built based on three-quarters of data2: the fitted value was computed based on the estimated parameters in modelling part of data3: total numbers of over or underestimation divided by total number of cases4: the average of monthly number of over or underestimations

References: