assessment in distance education, web based learning and e-learning
DESCRIPTION
Assessment in distance education, web based learning and e-learning. Nicole Silver. Picture from Microsoft Word clipart. Findings. Discussion of Findings. Conclusion. Implications. Limitations. Limitations (concept maps) . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Assessment in distance education, web based learning
and e-learning
Nicole Silver
Picture from Microsoft Word clipart.
Study Country Participants# + type
Context Data collection
Data analysis
Costa, Mullan, Kothe & Butow (2009).
Australia 14 staff, 29 students
Undergraduate, graduate students and academic staff
Questionnaire and qualitative feedback.
Simple statistical analysis.
Barbera (2009).
Catalonia, Spain
31 PHd students
PhD level students.
Questionnaires UCINET system.
Heinrich, Milne & Moore (2009).
New Zealand
90 lecturers Post-secondary educators.
Interviews with lectures.
Coding for themes.
Dermo (2009)
Branford 130 undergrad students
Undergraduate level students.
Online surveys.
Likert Scale
Heinze & Heinze (2009).
Salford, UK
85 students 15 supervisors.
University level learning.
Focus groups and student questionnaire
Johnson-Glenberg (2010).
United States
172 adult tutors.
Adult learners. Pre and post tests.
Two-tailed analysis and t-test
Study Country Participants# + type
Context Data collection
Data analysis
Martens & Hermans (1999).
Netherlands
151 pre university students.
University level students.
Online questionnaire.
Unknown
Pachler, Daly, Mor & Mellar (2009).
United Kingdom
Education practitioners.
Education practitioners.
Case stories created by students.
Unknown
Peat & Franklin (2003)
Australia A large cohort of first year biology students
First year undergraduate students.
Surveys and open ending questions.
Perception scale and qualitative data.
Peat & Franklin (2003)
Australia 1200 – 1600 first year bio students.
First year university students.
Surveys and focus groups.
Likert survey
Gog, Sluijsmans, Brinke & Prins (2010).
Netherlands
Groups of 5–10 various professional individuals.
Professionals in demanding jobs.
Online learning modules and focus groups.
Descriptive statistical analysis.
Soler, Boada, Prados, Poch & Fabregat (2010).
Gerona, Spain
Two groups of 24 students.
University level students.
Completed student exercises and a final exam.
UML data analysis
Study Country Participants# + type
Context Data collection
Data analysis
Byrnes & Ellis (2006)
Australia 391 associate lecturers, lecturers and senior lecturers
University lecturers
Mailed out survey completion.
Basic statistical analysis.
Walker, Topping & Rodrigues (2008).
United Kingdom
15 university students in sciences programs.
University students.
Individual semi-structured interviews.
Interpretative phenomenological analysis
Cooner (2010).
Edgbaston, England
81 students in a 3-year social work program.
Postgraduate university students.
Student survey and discussion group.
Coding surveys and qualitative feedback
Findings
Discussion of Findings
Conclusion
•
Implications
•
Limitations
• Limitations (concept maps)